-
Hjoerland, B.; Albrechtsen, H.: ¬An analysis of some trends in classification research (1999)
0.02
0.020484962 = product of:
0.040969923 = sum of:
0.040969923 = product of:
0.08193985 = sum of:
0.08193985 = weight(_text_:ii in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08193985 = score(doc=6391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.29840025 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper takes a second look at three prevailing main themes in knowledge organization: i) the academic disciplines as the main structural principle; ii) the fiction/non-fiction distinction; and iii) the appropriate unit of analysis in online retrieval systems. The history and origin of bibliographic classification [Dewey, Bliss, Mills, Beghtol] are discussed from the perspective of pragmatist philosophy and social studies of science [Kuhn, Merton, Reich]. Choices of structural principles in different schemes are found to rely on more or less implicit philosophical foundations, ranging from rationalism to pragmatism. It is further shown how the increasing application of faceted structures as basic structural principles in universal classification schemes [DDC, UDC] impose rationalistic principles and structures for knowledge organization which are not in alignment with the development of knowledge in the covered disciplines. Further evidence of rationalism in knowledge organization is the fiction/non-fiction distinction, excluding the important role of artistic resources for, in particular, humanistic research. Finally, for the analysis of appropriate bibliographic unit, it is argued that there is a need to shift towards a semiotic approach, founded on an understanding of intertextuality, rather than applying standard principles of hierarchical decomposition of documents. It is concluded that a change in classification research is needed, founded on a more historical and social understanding of knowledge
-
Capurro, R.; Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of information (2002)
0.01
0.012290977 = product of:
0.024581954 = sum of:
0.024581954 = product of:
0.049163908 = sum of:
0.049163908 = weight(_text_:ii in 5079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049163908 = score(doc=5079,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.17904015 = fieldWeight in 5079, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5079)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The concept of information as we use it in everyday English, in the sense of knowledge communicated, plays a central role in contemporary society. The development and widespread use of computer networks since the end of World War II, and the emergence of information science as a discipline in the 1950s, are evidence of this focus. Although knowledge and its communication are basic phenomena of every human society, it is the rise of information technology and its global impacts that characterize ours as an information society. It is commonplace to consider information as a basic condition for economic development together with capital, labor, and raw material; but what makes information especially significant at present is its digital nature. The impact of information technology an the natural and social sciences in particular has made this everyday notion a highly controversial concept. Claude Shannon's (1948) "A Mathematical Theory of Communication" is a landmark work, referring to the common use of information with its semantic and pragmatic dimensions, while at the same time redefining the concept within an engineering framework. The fact that the concept of knowledge communication has been designated by the word information seems, prima facie, a linguistic happenstance. For a science like information science (IS), it is of course important how fundamental terms are defined; and in IS, as in other fields, the question of how to define information is often raised. This chapter is an attempt to review the status of the concept of information in IS, with reference also to interdisciplinary trends. In scientific discourse, theoretical concepts are not true or false elements or glimpses of some element of reality; rather, they are constructions designed to do a job in the best possible way. Different conceptions of fundamental terms like information are thus more or less fruitful, depending an the theories (and in the end, the practical actions) they are expected to support. In the opening section, we discuss the problem of defining terms from the perspective of the philosophy of science. The history of a word provides us with anecdotes that are tangential to the concept itself. But in our case, the use of the word information points to a specific perspective from which the concept of knowledge communication has been defined. This perspective includes such characteristics as novelty and relevante; i.e., it refers to the process of knowledge transformation, and particularly to selection and interpretation within a specific context. The discussion leads to the questions of why and when this meaning was designated with the word information. We will explore this history, and we believe that our results may help readers better understand the complexity of the concept with regard to its scientific definitions.
-
Hjoerland, B.; Christensen, F.S.: Work tasks and socio-cognitive relevance : a specific example (2002)
0.01
0.012053271 = product of:
0.024106542 = sum of:
0.024106542 = product of:
0.048213083 = sum of:
0.048213083 = weight(_text_:22 in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048213083 = score(doc=5237,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 7.2006 14:11:22
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.01
0.012053271 = product of:
0.024106542 = sum of:
0.024106542 = product of:
0.048213083 = sum of:
0.048213083 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048213083 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-36
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011)
0.01
0.010331375 = product of:
0.02066275 = sum of:
0.02066275 = product of:
0.0413255 = sum of:
0.0413255 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0413255 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 3.2011 19:22:55
-
Hjoerland, B.: User-based and cognitive approaches to knowledge organization : a theoretical analysis of the research literature (2013)
0.01
0.008609479 = product of:
0.017218959 = sum of:
0.017218959 = product of:
0.034437917 = sum of:
0.034437917 = weight(_text_:22 in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034437917 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:49:13
-
Hjoerland, B.: Classical databases and knowledge organisation : a case for Boolean retrieval and human decision-making during search (2014)
0.01
0.008609479 = product of:
0.017218959 = sum of:
0.017218959 = product of:
0.034437917 = sum of:
0.034437917 = weight(_text_:22 in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034437917 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022)
0.01
0.008609479 = product of:
0.017218959 = sum of:
0.017218959 = product of:
0.034437917 = sum of:
0.034437917 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034437917 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18.11.2023 13:47:22
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009)
0.00
0.0043047396 = product of:
0.008609479 = sum of:
0.008609479 = product of:
0.017218959 = sum of:
0.017218959 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017218959 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:13:27
