-
Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007)
0.04
0.036702197 = product of:
0.11010659 = sum of:
0.11010659 = sum of:
0.0787952 = weight(_text_:project in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0787952 = score(doc=1291,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.40387696 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009)
0.03
0.030721527 = product of:
0.092164576 = sum of:
0.092164576 = sum of:
0.054590914 = weight(_text_:project in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054590914 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.03757366 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03757366 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This study is an examination of the overlap between author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) for a set of electronic theses and dissertations in Ohio State University's online catalog. The project is intended to contribute to the literature on the issue of keywords versus controlled vocabularies in the use of online catalogs and databases. Findings support previous studies' conclusions that both keywords and controlled vocabularies complement one another. Further, even in the presence of bibliographic record enhancements, such as abstracts or summaries, keywords and subject headings provided a significant number of unique terms that could affect the success of keyword searches. Implications for the maintenance of controlled vocabularies such as LCSH also are discussed in light of the patterns of matches and nonmatches found between the keywords and their corresponding subject headings.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.03
0.029924473 = product of:
0.08977342 = sum of:
0.08977342 = sum of:
0.045492426 = weight(_text_:project in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045492426 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.23317845 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.044280987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044280987 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Folksonomy is the result of describing Web resources with tags created by Web users. Although it has become a popular application for the description of resources, in general terms Folksonomies are not being conveniently integrated in metadata. However, if the appropriate metadata elements are identified, then further work may be conducted to automatically assign tags to these elements (RDF properties) and use them in Semantic Web applications. This article presents research carried out to continue the project Kinds of Tags, which intends to identify elements required for metadata originating from folksonomies and to propose an application profile for DC Social Tagging. The work provides information that may be used by software applications to assign tags to metadata elements and, therefore, means for tags to be conveniently gathered by metadata interoperability tools. Despite the unquestionably high value of DC and the significance of the already existing properties in DC Terms, the pilot study show revealed a significant number of tags for which no corresponding properties yet existed. A need for new properties, such as Action, Depth, Rate, and Utility was determined. Those potential new properties will have to be validated in a later stage by the DC Social Tagging Community.
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Hidderley, R.; Rafferty, P.: Flickr and democratic indexing : disciplining desire lines (2006)
0.01
0.0106149 = product of:
0.031844698 = sum of:
0.031844698 = product of:
0.063689396 = sum of:
0.063689396 = weight(_text_:project in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063689396 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this paper, we consider three models of subject indexing, and compare and contrast two indexing approaches, the theoretically based democratic indexing project, and Flickr, a working system for describing photographs. We argue that, despite Shirky's (2005) claim of philosophical paradigm shifting for social tagging, there is a residing doubt amongst information professionals that self-organising systems can work without there being some element of control and some form of 'representative authority'.
-
Rafferty, P.; Hidderley, R.: Flickr and democratic Indexing : dialogic approaches to indexing (2007)
0.01
0.009098486 = product of:
0.027295457 = sum of:
0.027295457 = product of:
0.054590914 = sum of:
0.054590914 = weight(_text_:project in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054590914 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is two-fold: to examine three models of subject indexing (i.e. expert-led indexing, author-generated indexing, and user-orientated indexing); and to compare and contrast two user-orientated indexing approaches (i.e. the theoretically-based Democratic Indexing project, and Flickr, a working system for describing photographs). Design/methodology/approach - The approach to examining Flickr and Democratic Indexing is evaluative. The limitations of Flickr are described and examples are provided. The Democratic Indexing approach, which the authors believe offers a method of marshalling a "free" user-indexed archive to provide useful retrieval functions, is described. Findings - The examination of both Flickr and the Democratic Indexing approach suggests that, despite Shirky's claim of philosophical paradigm shifting for social tagging, there is a residing doubt amongst information professionals that self-organising systems can work without there being some element of control and some form of "representative authority". Originality/value - This paper contributes to the literature of user-based indexing and social tagging.
-
Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008)
0.01
0.008349704 = product of:
0.025049109 = sum of:
0.025049109 = product of:
0.050098218 = sum of:
0.050098218 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050098218 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
Knautz, K.; Stock, W.G.: Collective indexing of emotions in videos (2011)
0.01
0.0075820712 = product of:
0.022746213 = sum of:
0.022746213 = product of:
0.045492426 = sum of:
0.045492426 = weight(_text_:project in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045492426 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.23317845 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The object of this empirical research study is emotion, as depicted and aroused in videos. This paper seeks to answer the questions: Are users able to index such emotions consistently? Are the users' votes usable for emotional video retrieval? Design/methodology/approach - The authors worked with a controlled vocabulary for nine basic emotions (love, happiness, fun, surprise, desire, sadness, anger, disgust and fear), a slide control for adjusting the emotions' intensity, and the approach of broad folksonomies. Different users tagged the same videos. The test persons had the task of indexing the emotions of 20 videos (reprocessed clips from YouTube). The authors distinguished between emotions which were depicted in the video and those that were evoked in the user. Data were received from 776 participants and a total of 279,360 slide control values were analyzed. Findings - The consistency of the users' votes is very high; the tag distributions for the particular videos' emotions are stable. The final shape of the distributions will be reached by the tagging activities of only very few users (less than 100). By applying the approach of power tags it is possible to separate the pivotal emotions of every document - if indeed there is any feeling at all. Originality/value - This paper is one of the first steps in the new research area of emotional information retrieval (EmIR). To the authors' knowledge, it is the first research project into the collective indexing of emotions in videos.
-
Rafferty, P.; Murphy, H.: Is there nothing outside the tags? : towards a poststructuralist analysis of social tagging (2015)
0.01
0.0075820712 = product of:
0.022746213 = sum of:
0.022746213 = product of:
0.045492426 = sum of:
0.045492426 = weight(_text_:project in 1792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045492426 = score(doc=1792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.23317845 = fieldWeight in 1792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of the research is to explore relationships between social tagging and key poststructuralist principles; to devise and construct an analytical framework through which key poststructuralist principles are converted into workable research questions and applied to analyse Librarything tags, and to assess the validity of performing such an analysis. The research hypothesis is that tagging represents an imperfect analogy for the poststructuralist project Design/methodology/approach Tags from LibraryThing and from a library OPAC were compared and constrasted with Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and publishers' descriptions. Research questions derived from poststructuralism, asked whether tags destabilise meaning, whether and how far the death of the author is expressed in tags, and whether tags deconstruct LCSH. Findings Tags can temporarily destabilise meaning by obfuscating the structure of a word. Meaning is destabilised, perhaps only momentarily, and then it is recreated; it might resemble the original meaning, or it may not, however any attempt to make tags useful or functional necessarily imposes some form of structure. The analysis indicates that in tagging, the author, if not dead, is ignored. Authoritative interpretations are not pervasively mimicked in the tags. In relation to LCSH, tagging decentres the dominant view, but neither exposes nor judges it. Nor does tagging achieve the final stage of the deconstructive process, showing the dominant view to be a constructed reality. Originality/value This is one of very few studies to have attempted a critical theoretical approach to social tagging. It offers a novel methodological approach to undertaking analysis based on poststructuralist theory.
-
Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008)
0.01
0.0073059904 = product of:
0.02191797 = sum of:
0.02191797 = product of:
0.04383594 = sum of:
0.04383594 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04383594 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 21. 6.2009 12:22:44
-
Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009)
0.01
0.0062622773 = product of:
0.01878683 = sum of:
0.01878683 = product of:
0.03757366 = sum of:
0.03757366 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03757366 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.2010 12:35:22
-
Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009)
0.01
0.0062622773 = product of:
0.01878683 = sum of:
0.01878683 = product of:
0.03757366 = sum of:
0.03757366 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03757366 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011)
0.01
0.0062622773 = product of:
0.01878683 = sum of:
0.01878683 = product of:
0.03757366 = sum of:
0.03757366 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03757366 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
-
Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008)
0.01
0.005218565 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = product of:
0.03131139 = sum of:
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008)
0.01
0.005218565 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = product of:
0.03131139 = sum of:
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012)
0.01
0.005218565 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = product of:
0.03131139 = sum of:
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 25.12.2012 15:22:37
-
Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016)
0.01
0.005218565 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = product of:
0.03131139 = sum of:
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 21. 4.2016 11:23:22
-
Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019)
0.01
0.005218565 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = product of:
0.03131139 = sum of:
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008)
0.00
0.004174852 = product of:
0.0125245545 = sum of:
0.0125245545 = product of:
0.025049109 = sum of:
0.025049109 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025049109 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008)
0.00
0.004174852 = product of:
0.0125245545 = sum of:
0.0125245545 = product of:
0.025049109 = sum of:
0.025049109 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025049109 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Vander Wal, T.: Welcome to the Matrix! (2008)
0.00
0.004174852 = product of:
0.0125245545 = sum of:
0.0125245545 = product of:
0.025049109 = sum of:
0.025049109 = weight(_text_:22 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025049109 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2009 9:15:45
