Search (113 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Oxbrow, N.: Information literacy : the final key to an information society (1998) 0.10
    0.1019371 = product of:
      0.2038742 = sum of:
        0.2038742 = sum of:
          0.14906852 = weight(_text_:light in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14906852 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050563898 = queryNorm
              0.51047 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
          0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054805685 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050563898 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The terms: information society, the information age, the knowledge based society and the knowledge driven economy are all now familiar terms. Governments have been promoting them, the media has been reporting on them and leaders use them to indicate progress and advancement. In light of all this exposure, considers just how far along the road are these societies from the industrial age towards the information age
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:55:13
  2. Albright, K.: Multidisciplinarity in information behavior : expanding boundaries or fragmentation of the field? (2010) 0.10
    0.09781248 = product of:
      0.19562496 = sum of:
        0.19562496 = sum of:
          0.16137141 = weight(_text_:light in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16137141 = score(doc=5077,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050563898 = queryNorm
              0.55259997 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
          0.034253553 = weight(_text_:22 in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034253553 = score(doc=5077,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050563898 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    How does information lead to changes in human behavior? Why have current information theories been inadequate to shed light on this and related questions? Library and Information Science (LIS) has arrived at a crucial juncture in its relatively brief theoretical history. In addition to the cognitive and physical perspectives in our study of information, a new paradigm has been suggested; the affective paradigm. This new perspective offers keys to unlocking questions about the nature of the interaction of human and information. In recent years we have developed deeper knowledge and deeper specializations, drawing together and combining knowledge from multiple fields in order to advance our own knowledge. The relationship between information needs and information seeking has been well studied. The ways in which people use information is not as well understood because of the complex nature of human behavior. Drawing from other fields that study human behavior, however, muddies the traditional boundaries of LIS, creating some possible discomfort as we trespass into lesser known intellectual territory. Pushing our boundaries also forces questions of our self-identity as a discipline. What constitutes Library and Information Science, either in whole or in part, becomes more difficult to define and can lead to greater fragmentation. Alternatively, the incorporation of multiple perspectives may be the defining core of what constitutes LIS. The focus of this talk is to look at LIS from the outside in, from a multidisciplinary perspective, in order to shed light on questions of how information can lead to changes in human behavior. Drawing from other fields of study, the impact of information on human behavior will be explored in light of what other fields may have to offer.
    Date
    16. 3.2019 17:32:22
  3. Huvila, I.: Situational appropriation of information (2015) 0.05
    0.05096855 = product of:
      0.1019371 = sum of:
        0.1019371 = sum of:
          0.07453426 = weight(_text_:light in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07453426 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050563898 = queryNorm
              0.255235 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
          0.027402842 = weight(_text_:22 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027402842 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050563898 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In contrast to the interest of describing and managing the social processes of knowing, information science and information and knowledge management research have put less emphasis on discussing how particular information becomes usable and how it is used in different contexts and situations. The purpose of this paper is to address this major gap, and introduce and discuss the applicability of the notion of situational appropriation of information for shedding light on this particular process in the context of daily information work practices of professionals. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on the analysis of 25 qualitative interviews of archives, library and museum professionals conducted in two Nordic countries. Findings The study presents examples of how individuals appropriate different tangible and intangible assets as information on the basis of the situation in hand. Research limitations/implications The study proposes a new conceptual tool for articulating and conducting research on the process how information becomes useful in the situation in hand. Practical implications The situational appropriation of information perspective redefines the role of information management to incorporate a comprehensive awareness of the situations when information is useful and is being used. A better understanding how information becomes useful in diverse situations helps to discern the active role of contextual and situational effects and to exploit and take them into account as a part of the management of information and knowledge processes. Originality/value In contrast to orthodoxies of information science and information and knowledge management research, the notion of situational appropriation of information represents an alternative approach to the conceptualisation of information utilisation. It helps to frame particular types of instances of information use that are not necessarily addressed within the objectivistic, information seeker or learning oriented paradigms of information and knowledge management.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  4. Yu, L.; Fan, Z.; Li, A.: ¬A hierarchical typology of scholarly information units : based on a deduction-verification study (2020) 0.05
    0.05096855 = product of:
      0.1019371 = sum of:
        0.1019371 = sum of:
          0.07453426 = weight(_text_:light in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07453426 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050563898 = queryNorm
              0.255235 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
          0.027402842 = weight(_text_:22 in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027402842 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050563898 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to lay a theoretical foundation for identifying operational information units for library and information professional activities in the context of scholarly communication. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a deduction-verification approach to formulate a typology of units for scholarly information. It first deduces possible units from an existing conceptualization of information, which defines information as the combined product of data and meaning, and then tests the usefulness of these units via two empirical investigations, one with a group of scholarly papers and the other with a sample of scholarly information users. Findings The results show that, on defining an information unit as a piece of information that is complete in both data and meaning, to such an extent that it remains meaningful to its target audience when retrieved and displayed independently in a database, it is then possible to formulate a hierarchical typology of units for scholarly information. The typology proposed in this study consists of three levels, which in turn, consists of 1, 5 and 44 units, respectively. Research limitations/implications The result of this study has theoretical implications on both the philosophical and conceptual levels: on the philosophical level, it hinges on, and reinforces the objective view of information; on the conceptual level, it challenges the conceptualization of work by IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and Library Reference Model but endorses that by Library of Congress's BIBFRAME 2.0 model. Practical implications It calls for reconsideration of existing operational units in a variety of library and information activities. Originality/value The study strengthens the conceptual foundation of operational information units and brings to light the primacy of "one work" as an information unit and the possibility for it to be supplemented by smaller units.
    Date
    14. 1.2020 11:15:22
  5. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.05
    0.046846848 = product of:
      0.093693696 = sum of:
        0.093693696 = product of:
          0.28108108 = sum of:
            0.28108108 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28108108 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42868128 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  6. fwt: Wie das Gehirn Bilder 'liest' (1999) 0.04
    0.038753472 = product of:
      0.077506945 = sum of:
        0.077506945 = product of:
          0.15501389 = sum of:
            0.15501389 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15501389 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:01:22
  7. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.03
    0.033462033 = product of:
      0.066924065 = sum of:
        0.066924065 = product of:
          0.20077218 = sum of:
            0.20077218 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20077218 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42868128 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  8. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.03
    0.033462033 = product of:
      0.066924065 = sum of:
        0.066924065 = product of:
          0.20077218 = sum of:
            0.20077218 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20077218 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42868128 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  9. dpa: Struktur des Denkorgans wird bald entschlüsselt sein (2000) 0.03
    0.029065104 = product of:
      0.05813021 = sum of:
        0.05813021 = product of:
          0.11626042 = sum of:
            0.11626042 = weight(_text_:22 in 3952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11626042 = score(doc=3952,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3952, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3952)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
    22. 7.2000 19:05:41
  10. Zaring, P.A.: From signals to knowledge : pragmatic views on the information concept (1996) 0.03
    0.027950348 = product of:
      0.055900697 = sum of:
        0.055900697 = product of:
          0.11180139 = sum of:
            0.11180139 = weight(_text_:light in 818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11180139 = score(doc=818,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.3828525 = fieldWeight in 818, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=818)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the characteristics of the information era: a complex environment with which business attempts, mostly unsuccessfully, to cope using management information and decision support systems. The failures may be due to the fact that the decision maker does notknow what information to look for and where. The impact of the principle of incomplete knowledge upon current business information acquisition problems motivates this paper, which looks at the concepts of data, information, and knowledge in the light of cybernetic research concerning the role of signals, artificial intelligence regarding the nature of knowledge, and Borje Langefor's infological research. The latter bridges the gap between signal and knowledge by introducing the infological equation with information as a key concept. All recognise a communication process. Focuses on the semantic, pragmatic, and social aspects of communication. Concludes that Langefor's e-message concept should be further investigated
  11. Brier, S.: ¬The usefulness of cybersemiotics in dealing with problems of knowledge organization and document mediating systems (1996) 0.03
    0.027950348 = product of:
      0.055900697 = sum of:
        0.055900697 = product of:
          0.11180139 = sum of:
            0.11180139 = weight(_text_:light in 98) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11180139 = score(doc=98,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.3828525 = fieldWeight in 98, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=98)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article develops a non-reductionistic and interdisciplinary view of information and human knowing in the light of second-order cybernetics, where information is seen as 'a difference which makes a difference' for a living autopoietic (self-organizing, self-creating) system. Another key idea comes from the semiotics of Peirce: the understanding of signs as a triatic relation between an object, a representation, and an interpretant. Information is the interpretation of signs by living, feeling, aelf-organizing, biological and social systems. As a concrete example we attempt to describe Library and Information Science (LIS) - especially Information Retrieval (IR) - in a way that goes beyond the cognitivist 'information processing paradigm'. The mn problem of this paradigm is that its concept of information and language does not deal in a systematic way with how social and cultural dynamics set the contexts that determine the meaning of those signs and words that are the basic tools for LIS to organize and retrieve documents. The paradigm does not distinguish clearly enough between how the computer manipulate signs and how meaning is generated in autopoietic systems, and thereby the difference between physical and intellectual access
  12. Mai, J.-E.: ¬The quality and qualities of information (2013) 0.03
    0.027950348 = product of:
      0.055900697 = sum of:
        0.055900697 = product of:
          0.11180139 = sum of:
            0.11180139 = weight(_text_:light in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11180139 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.3828525 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper discusses and analyzes the notion of information quality in terms of a pragmatic philosophy of language. It is argued that the notion of information quality is of great importance, and needs to be situated better within a sound philosophy of information to help frame information quality in a broader conceptual light. It is found that much research on information quality conceptualizes information quality as either an inherent property of the information itself, or as an individual mental construct of the users. The notion of information quality is often not situated within a philosophy of information. This paper outlines a conceptual framework in which information is regarded as a semiotic sign, and extends that notion with Paul Grice's pragmatic philosophy of language to provide a conversational notion of information quality that is contextual and tied to the notion of meaning.
  13. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980) 0.03
    0.027402842 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = product of:
          0.10961137 = sum of:
            0.10961137 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10961137 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
  14. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.03
    0.027402842 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = product of:
          0.10961137 = sum of:
            0.10961137 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10961137 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
  15. Arning, M.: Wenn Philosophen die Welt von den Füßen auf den Kopf stellen : bei den 22. Römerberggesprächen sorgt Hermann Lübbe für eine erstaunliche Provokation (1995) 0.02
    0.02422092 = product of:
      0.04844184 = sum of:
        0.04844184 = product of:
          0.09688368 = sum of:
            0.09688368 = weight(_text_:22 in 1408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09688368 = score(doc=1408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Der Sozialphilosoph Hermann Lübbe ist überzeugt davon, daß die Massenmedien nicht 'vermassend', sondern vielmehr 'pluralistisch' wirken. - Bericht zu den 22. Frankfurter Römerberggesprächen zum Thema: Kommt eine neue Kultur? Auf der Suche nach Wirklichkeit im Medienzeitalter
  16. Schöne neue Welt? : Fragen und Antworten: Wie Facebook menschliche Gedanken auslesen will (2017) 0.02
    0.02422092 = product of:
      0.04844184 = sum of:
        0.04844184 = product of:
          0.09688368 = sum of:
            0.09688368 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09688368 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:42:33
    22. 4.2017 11:58:05
  17. Flohr, H.: Denken und Bewußtsein (1994) 0.02
    0.023977486 = product of:
      0.047954973 = sum of:
        0.047954973 = product of:
          0.095909946 = sum of:
            0.095909946 = weight(_text_:22 in 1823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095909946 = score(doc=1823,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1823, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:23:03
  18. Repo, A.J.: ¬The dual approach to the value of information : an appraisal of use and exchange values (1989) 0.02
    0.023977486 = product of:
      0.047954973 = sum of:
        0.047954973 = product of:
          0.095909946 = sum of:
            0.095909946 = weight(_text_:22 in 5772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095909946 = score(doc=5772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.5, S.373-383
  19. afp: Gehirn von Taxifahrern passt sich an : Größerer Hippocampus (2000) 0.02
    0.023977486 = product of:
      0.047954973 = sum of:
        0.047954973 = product of:
          0.095909946 = sum of:
            0.095909946 = weight(_text_:22 in 4496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095909946 = score(doc=4496,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4496, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4496)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:05:18
  20. Houston, R.D.; Harmon, E.G.: Re-envisioning the information concept : systematic definitions (2002) 0.02
    0.023731558 = product of:
      0.047463115 = sum of:
        0.047463115 = product of:
          0.09492623 = sum of:
            0.09492623 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09492623 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050563898 = queryNorm
                0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    22. 2.2007 19:22:13

Years

Languages

  • e 56
  • d 55
  • de 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 90
  • m 21
  • s 3
  • el 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…