-
Joint, N.: URLs in the OPAC : comparative reflections on US vs UK practice (2007)
0.03
0.027950348 = product of:
0.055900697 = sum of:
0.055900697 = product of:
0.11180139 = sum of:
0.11180139 = weight(_text_:light in 857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11180139 = score(doc=857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.3828525 = fieldWeight in 857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=857)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - To examine whether placing URLs into library OPACs has been an effective way of enhancing the role of the catalogue for the contemporary library user. Design/methodology/approach - A brief review of the literature combined with an analysis of publicly available statistics for library use in the USA and the UK. Findings - That certain ways of placing URLs into the OPAC are loosely associated with a successful library environment, i.e. with constant or increasing levels of stock circulation and OPAC use, while other forms of hyper-linking OPAC records are loosely associated with declining levels of library use. Research limitations/implications - The loose association between different OPAC management practices and apparent statistical trends of library use could be investigated in greater depth by further subsequent research, but along the lines and methodology suggested herein. Practical implications - Firm suggestions on how to place and manage URLs in the online catalogue are made. Originality/value - This paper takes certain catalogue enhancement practices which are identified with the US library environment and investigates them in a UK, and specifically Scottish context, to shed light on the original US ideas behind these practices.
-
Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979)
0.03
0.027402842 = product of:
0.054805685 = sum of:
0.054805685 = product of:
0.10961137 = sum of:
0.10961137 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10961137 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3.10.2000 20:48:22
-
Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998)
0.03
0.027402842 = product of:
0.054805685 = sum of:
0.054805685 = product of:
0.10961137 = sum of:
0.10961137 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10961137 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
-
Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982)
0.02
0.02055213 = product of:
0.04110426 = sum of:
0.04110426 = product of:
0.08220852 = sum of:
0.08220852 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08220852 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 14:49:22
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.02
0.02055213 = product of:
0.04110426 = sum of:
0.04110426 = product of:
0.08220852 = sum of:
0.08220852 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08220852 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004)
0.02
0.018633565 = product of:
0.03726713 = sum of:
0.03726713 = product of:
0.07453426 = sum of:
0.07453426 = weight(_text_:light in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07453426 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.255235 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- 1. Introduction In this paper we address two questions: 1. What is the position of subject indexing in the thinking of the library world after the publication of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998)? 2. Is this position in accordance with the requirements of the users searching for documents about a given subject? Research Shows that searching an a topic (i.e. subject access) is an important, even predominant type of end-user searching of library catalogues and even more so of other bibliographic databases. Between one third and two thirds of all OPAC searches are probably subject searches (Large & Beheshti, 199%). Taking into account different ways in which searching an a topic is implemented in library catalogues (subject headings, classification, keywords only) the percentage may be even higher. For example title word searching may be a substitute for subject searching if no better tools are available. In the light of this it is not surprising that the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (1998) pays attention to subject searching, as well as the Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) (2003). Also the Statement of International Cataloguing Principles: Final draft of 19 December 2003, which is the result of the first First IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code mentiong subject access as a function of cataloguing (Statement, 2003). In this paper we discuss the ways these three documents deal with subjects.
-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.02
0.017126776 = product of:
0.034253553 = sum of:
0.034253553 = product of:
0.068507105 = sum of:
0.068507105 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068507105 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.01
0.014532552 = product of:
0.029065104 = sum of:
0.029065104 = product of:
0.05813021 = sum of:
0.05813021 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05813021 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.01
0.013701421 = product of:
0.027402842 = sum of:
0.027402842 = product of:
0.054805685 = sum of:
0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054805685 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.01
0.013701421 = product of:
0.027402842 = sum of:
0.027402842 = product of:
0.054805685 = sum of:
0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054805685 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007)
0.01
0.013701421 = product of:
0.027402842 = sum of:
0.027402842 = product of:
0.054805685 = sum of:
0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054805685 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.01
0.013701421 = product of:
0.027402842 = sum of:
0.027402842 = product of:
0.054805685 = sum of:
0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054805685 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hillmann, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.01
0.011988743 = product of:
0.023977486 = sum of:
0.023977486 = product of:
0.047954973 = sum of:
0.047954973 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047954973 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000)
0.01
0.011988743 = product of:
0.023977486 = sum of:
0.023977486 = product of:
0.047954973 = sum of:
0.047954973 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047954973 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
-
Randall, N.B.: Spelling errors in the database : shadow or substance? (1999)
0.01
0.011988743 = product of:
0.023977486 = sum of:
0.023977486 = product of:
0.047954973 = sum of:
0.047954973 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047954973 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006)
0.01
0.011988743 = product of:
0.023977486 = sum of:
0.023977486 = product of:
0.047954973 = sum of:
0.047954973 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047954973 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Morgan, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloging services (1996)
0.01
0.011988743 = product of:
0.023977486 = sum of:
0.023977486 = product of:
0.047954973 = sum of:
0.047954973 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047954973 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170
-
McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996)
0.01
0.011988743 = product of:
0.023977486 = sum of:
0.023977486 = product of:
0.047954973 = sum of:
0.047954973 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047954973 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125
-
Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012)
0.01
0.011988743 = product of:
0.023977486 = sum of:
0.023977486 = product of:
0.047954973 = sum of:
0.047954973 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047954973 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 11:08:22
-
Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002)
0.01
0.010276065 = product of:
0.02055213 = sum of:
0.02055213 = product of:
0.04110426 = sum of:
0.04110426 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04110426 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
