-
Söhler, M.: Schluss mit Schema F (2011)
0.02
0.018633565 = product of:
0.03726713 = sum of:
0.03726713 = product of:
0.07453426 = sum of:
0.07453426 = weight(_text_:light in 4439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07453426 = score(doc=4439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.255235 = fieldWeight in 4439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4439)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Indem Schlagworte, sogenannte Tags, in den für Normal-User nicht sichtbaren Teil des Codes von Websites eingebettet werden, sind Suchmachinen nicht mehr so sehr auf die Analyse der natürlichen Sprache angewiesen, um Texte inhaltlich zu erfassen. Im Blog ZBW Mediatalk wird dies als "Semantic Web light" bezeichnet - ein semantisches Web auf niedrigster Ebene. Aber selbst das werde "schon viel bewirken", meint Bahls. "Das semantische Web wird sich über die nächsten Jahrzehnte evolutionär weiterentwickeln." Einen "Abschluss" werde es nie geben, "da eine einheitliche Formalisierung von Begrifflichkeiten auf feiner Stufe kaum möglich ist". Die Ergebnisse aus Schema.org würden "zeitnah" in die Suchmaschine integriert, "denn einen Zeitplan" gebe es nicht, so Stefan Keuchel, Pressesprecher von Google Deutschland. Bis das so weit ist, hilft der Verweis von Daniel Bahns auf die bereits existierende semantische Suchmaschine Sig.ma. Geschwindigkeit und Menge der Ergebnisse nach einer Suchanfrage spielen hier keine Rolle. Sig.ma sammelt seine Informationen allein im Bereich des semantischen Webs und listet nach einer Anfrage alles Bekannte strukturiert auf.
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.02
0.017126776 = product of:
0.034253553 = sum of:
0.034253553 = product of:
0.068507105 = sum of:
0.068507105 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068507105 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.02
0.017126776 = product of:
0.034253553 = sum of:
0.034253553 = product of:
0.068507105 = sum of:
0.068507105 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068507105 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.02
0.017126776 = product of:
0.034253553 = sum of:
0.034253553 = product of:
0.068507105 = sum of:
0.068507105 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068507105 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Söhler, M.: "Dumm wie Google" war gestern : semantische Suche im Netz (2011)
0.02
0.01630437 = product of:
0.03260874 = sum of:
0.03260874 = product of:
0.06521748 = sum of:
0.06521748 = weight(_text_:light in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06521748 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.22333062 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- - Neue Standards Doch was hier entstehen könnte, hat das Zeug dazu, Teile des Netzes und speziell die Funktionen von Suchmaschinen mittel- oder langfristig zu verändern. "Große Player sind dabei, sich auf Standards zu einigen", sagt Daniel Bahls, Spezialist für Semantische Technologien beim ZBW Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft in Hamburg. "Die semantischen Technologien stehen schon seit Jahren im Raum und wurden bisher nur im kleineren Kontext verwendet." Denn Schema.org lädt Entwickler, Forscher, die Semantic-Web-Community und am Ende auch alle Betreiber von Websites dazu ein, an der Umgestaltung der Suche im Netz mitzuwirken. "Damit wollen Google, Bing und Yahoo! dem Info-Chaos im WWW den Garaus machen", schreibt André Vatter im Blog ZBW Mediatalk. Inhalte von Websites sollen mit einem speziellen, aber einheitlichen Vokabular für die Crawler der Suchmaschinen gekennzeichnet und aufbereitet werden. Indem Schlagworte, so genannte Tags, in den Code von Websites eingebettet werden, sind Suchmachinen nicht mehr so sehr auf die Analyse der natürlichen Sprache angewiesen, um Texte inhaltlich zu erfassen. Im Blog wird dies als "Semantic Web light" bezeichnet - ein semantisches Web auf niedrigster Ebene. Aber selbst das werde "schon viel bewirken", meint Bahls. "Das semantische Web wird sich über die nächsten Jahrzehnte evolutionär weiterentwickeln." Einen "Abschluss" werde es nie geben, "da eine einheitliche Formalisierung von Begrifflichkeiten auf feiner Stufe kaum möglich ist."
-
White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013)
0.01
0.013701421 = product of:
0.027402842 = sum of:
0.027402842 = product of:
0.054805685 = sum of:
0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054805685 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:09:22
-
Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018)
0.01
0.013701421 = product of:
0.027402842 = sum of:
0.027402842 = product of:
0.054805685 = sum of:
0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054805685 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 1.2019 19:13:22
-
Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014)
0.01
0.011988743 = product of:
0.023977486 = sum of:
0.023977486 = product of:
0.047954973 = sum of:
0.047954973 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047954973 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016)
0.01
0.011988743 = product of:
0.023977486 = sum of:
0.023977486 = product of:
0.047954973 = sum of:
0.047954973 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047954973 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Pfister, E.; Wittwer, B.; Wolff, M.: Metadaten - Manuelle Datenpflege vs. Automatisieren : ein Praxisbericht zu Metadatenmanagement an der ETH-Bibliothek (2017)
0.01
0.011988743 = product of:
0.023977486 = sum of:
0.023977486 = product of:
0.047954973 = sum of:
0.047954973 = weight(_text_:22 in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047954973 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 20(2017) H.1, S.22-25
-
Baker, T.: Dublin Core Application Profiles : current approaches (2010)
0.01
0.010276065 = product of:
0.02055213 = sum of:
0.02055213 = product of:
0.04110426 = sum of:
0.04110426 = weight(_text_:22 in 3737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04110426 = score(doc=3737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3737)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, C.: Exploring user-contributed metadata's potential to enhance access to literary works (2011)
0.01
0.010276065 = product of:
0.02055213 = sum of:
0.02055213 = product of:
0.04110426 = sum of:
0.04110426 = weight(_text_:22 in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04110426 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Wartburg, K. von; Sibille, C.; Aliverti, C.: Metadata collaboration between the Swiss National Library and research institutions in the field of Swiss historiography (2019)
0.01
0.010276065 = product of:
0.02055213 = sum of:
0.02055213 = product of:
0.04110426 = sum of:
0.04110426 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04110426 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 5.2019 19:22:49
-
Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017)
0.01
0.008563388 = product of:
0.017126776 = sum of:
0.017126776 = product of:
0.034253553 = sum of:
0.034253553 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034253553 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2017 13:30:22
-
Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018)
0.01
0.008563388 = product of:
0.017126776 = sum of:
0.017126776 = product of:
0.034253553 = sum of:
0.034253553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034253553 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
-
Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018)
0.01
0.008563388 = product of:
0.017126776 = sum of:
0.017126776 = product of:
0.034253553 = sum of:
0.034253553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034253553 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10.11.2018 16:27:22
-
Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012)
0.01
0.0068507106 = product of:
0.013701421 = sum of:
0.013701421 = product of:
0.027402842 = sum of:
0.027402842 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027402842 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
