Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Kataloge"
  1. Panizzi, A.K.C.B.: Passages in my official life (1871) 0.03 
    0.034915853 = product of:
  0.06983171 = sum of:
    0.06983171 = product of:
      0.13966341 = sum of:
        0.13966341 = weight(_text_:22 in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13966341 = score(doc=935,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2007 12:05:26
    22. 7.2007 12:08:24
  2. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.03 
    0.027564256 = product of:
  0.05512851 = sum of:
    0.05512851 = product of:
      0.16538553 = sum of:
        0.16538553 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16538553 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44140628 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
  3. Creider, L.S.: ¬A comparison of the Paris Principles and the International Cataloguing Principles (2009) 0.02 
    0.02217487 = product of:
  0.04434974 = sum of:
    0.04434974 = product of:
      0.08869948 = sum of:
        0.08869948 = weight(_text_:international in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08869948 = score(doc=2985,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.5107003 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2985)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    After more than forty-five years of cataloging experience with the Paris Principles and their impact on the international sharing of bibliographic data, the process of replacing them with a wider and deeper set of International Cataloguing Principles is nearing completion. This paper compares the scope, technological context, process of decision-making, conceptual framework, and amount of change involved in the adoption of the two different statements.
  4. Genetasio, G.: ¬The International Cataloguing Principles and their future", in: JLIS.it 3/1 (2012) (2012) 0.02 
    0.021470724 = product of:
  0.042941447 = sum of:
    0.042941447 = product of:
      0.085882895 = sum of:
        0.085882895 = weight(_text_:international in 2625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085882895 = score(doc=2625,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.49448338 = fieldWeight in 2625, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2625)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The article aims to provide an update on the 2009 Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) and on the status of work on the Statement by the IFLA Cataloguing Section. The article begins with a summary of the drafting process of the ICP by the IME ICC, International Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code, focusing in particular on the first meeting (IME ICC1) and on the earlier drafts of the 2009 Statement. It then analyzes both the major innovations and the unsatisfactory aspects of the ICP. Finally, it explains and comments on the recent documents by the IFLA Cataloguing Section relating to the ICP, which express their intention to revise the Statement and to verify the convenience of drawing up an international cataloguing code. The latter intention is considered in detail and criticized by the author in the light of the recent publication of the RDA, Resource Description and Access. The article is complemented by an updated bibliography on the ICP.
  5. Buizza, P.: Bibliographic control and authority control from Paris principles to the present (2004) 0.02 
    0.019203998 = product of:
  0.038407996 = sum of:
    0.038407996 = product of:
      0.07681599 = sum of:
        0.07681599 = weight(_text_:international in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07681599 = score(doc=5667,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.44227937 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Forty years ago the ICCP in Paris laid the foundations of international co-operation in descriptive cataloging without explicitly speaking of authority control. Some of the factors in the evolution of authority control are the development of catalogs (from card catalog to local automation, to today's OPAC on the Web) and services provided by libraries (from individual service to local users to system networks, to the World Wide Web), as well as international agreements on cataloging (from Paris Principles to the UBC programme, to the report on Mandatory data elements for internationally shared resource authority records). This evolution progressed from the principle of uniform heading to the definition of authority entries and records, and from the responsibility of national bibliographic agencies for the form of the names of their own authors to be shared internationally to the concept of authorized equivalent heading. Some issues of the present state are the persisting differences among national rules and the aim of respecting both local culture and language and international readability.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Authority control: definition and international experience. Part I"
  6. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003) 0.02 
    0.017635169 = product of:
  0.035270337 = sum of:
    0.035270337 = product of:
      0.070540674 = sum of:
        0.070540674 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070540674 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.3-22
  7. Steinhagen, E.N.: Historical perspective of a union catalog in Chile : authorities and periodicals (2003) 0.02 
    0.017635169 = product of:
  0.035270337 = sum of:
    0.035270337 = product of:
      0.070540674 = sum of:
        0.070540674 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070540674 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 7.2006 20:06:22
  8. Laaff, M.: Googles genialer Urahn (2011) 0.02 
    0.01681925 = product of:
  0.0336385 = sum of:
    0.0336385 = sum of:
      0.016003333 = weight(_text_:international in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016003333 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05206484 = queryNorm
          0.09214154 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
      0.017635169 = weight(_text_:22 in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017635169 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05206484 = queryNorm
          0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Praktischere Medien sollen Bücher ersetzen Dabei was das Mundaneum im frühen 20. Jahrhundert zunächst eine schillernde Erfolgsgeschichte. An dem Projekt hatten Otlet und sein Mitstreiter, der spätere Friedensnobelpreisträger Henri La Fontaine, schon seit 1895 gearbeitet. 1920 öffnete das Mundaneum in einem Prunkbau im Herzen von Brüssel seine Türen - eine Mischung aus Besuchermuseum und Gelehrtentreff, mit einem gigantischen Wissenskatalog und Archiv. Darin wurden nicht nur Bücher erfasst, sondern auch zahllose Zeitungen, Poster, über 200.000 Postkarten sowie Ausstellungsstücke, von Flugzeugen bis zu Telefonen. Riesige Materialmengen, an denen sich das Projekt schon bald zu verschlucken drohte. Doch Otlet und seine Mitstreiter hatten eine Mission: Sie waren davon überzeugt, dass die globale Verbreitung von Wissen den Frieden fördern könne. Auch darum gab es einen engen Austausch mit anderen Forschungseinrichtungen im Ausland. Parallel zu dieser Sammelwut arbeitete Otlet an neuen Ideen für das papierlose Verbreiten von Wissen. Bücher waren für ihn nicht mehr als "Container für Ideen", die durch praktischere Medien ersetzt werden könnten. Durch Grafiken und Schaubilder zum Beispiel, von denen er selbst zahllose anfertigte. Platzsparend, weil man sie auf Mikrofilm bannen konnte. International verständlich. Mit Ton und Film wollte er Informationen schneller, einfacher und weiter transportieren.
    Date
    24.10.2008 14:19:22
  9. Walravens, H.: Serials cataloging in Germany : the historical development (2003) 0.02 
    0.015842492 = product of:
  0.031684984 = sum of:
    0.031684984 = product of:
      0.06336997 = sum of:
        0.06336997 = weight(_text_:international in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06336997 = score(doc=5651,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.36486188 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the development of serials cataloguing in Germany, which started with entries usually in systematic catalogues. Cataloguing codes were developed first by individual major libraries; the establishment of a Prussian union catalogue called for generally recognized rules, but these focused mainly on sorting and filing. When, in the 1960s, the Prussian Instructions were given up in favor of RAK (Regeln für Alphabetische Katalogisierung), ISBD was adopted for the descriptive part. As to modern international cooperation, this paper explains that the main obstacles are not so much different cataloguing codes but the lack of consensus on the definition of a serial title. Recent revision efforts missed the opportunity of accepting an International Standard Serials Title.
  10. Gorman, M.: ¬The origins and making of the ISBD : a personal history, 1966-1978 (2014) 0.02 
    0.015842492 = product of:
  0.031684984 = sum of:
    0.031684984 = product of:
      0.06336997 = sum of:
        0.06336997 = weight(_text_:international in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06336997 = score(doc=1995,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.36486188 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    What follows are my memories of the events, starting almost five decades ago, that led to the International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD)-still the most successful and widely used international cataloging standard in history. Many of the documents of the time were little more than ephemera (working papers and the like) and some are not now available to me. I have checked my recollections in all the documents to which I have access and apologize in advance for any errors of time or place. I also apologize for the, alas, unavoidable, given the nature of the essay, many repetitions of the words "I" and "me."
  11. Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975) 0.01 
    0.014108134 = product of:
  0.028216269 = sum of:
    0.028216269 = product of:
      0.056432538 = sum of:
        0.056432538 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056432538 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
  12. Walravens, H.: Serials cataloging in Germany : the historical development (2003) 0.01 
    0.013579277 = product of:
  0.027158555 = sum of:
    0.027158555 = product of:
      0.05431711 = sum of:
        0.05431711 = weight(_text_:international in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05431711 = score(doc=5650,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.31273875 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the development of serials cataloguing in Germany, which started with entries usually in systematic catalogues. Cataloguing codes were developed first by individual major libraries; the establishment of a Prussian union catalogue called for generally recognized rules, but these focused mainly on sorting and filing. When, in the 1960s, the Prussian Instructions were given up in favor of RAK (Regeln für Alphabetische Katalogisierung), ISBD was adopted for the descriptive part. As to modern international cooperation, this paper explains that the main obstacles are not so much different cataloguing codes but the lack of consensus on the definition of a serial title. Recent revision efforts missed the opportunity of accepting an International Standard Serials Title.
  13. Mutula, S.M.; Tsvakai, M.: Historical perspectives of cataloguing and classification in Africa (2002) 0.01 
    0.012802666 = product of:
  0.025605332 = sum of:
    0.025605332 = product of:
      0.051210664 = sum of:
        0.051210664 = weight(_text_:international in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051210664 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the historical perspectives of cataloguing and classification practices in Africa and looks at international cataloguing practices and their implications for African librarianship. The challenges facing libraries on the continent in the cataloguing and classification of Africana materials are discussed and some suggestions offered on how the situation may be improved. Efforts towards developments of bibliographic control in Africa are highlighted.
  14. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002) 0.01 
    0.012344617 = product of:
  0.024689235 = sum of:
    0.024689235 = product of:
      0.04937847 = sum of:
        0.04937847 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04937847 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
  15. Popst, H.; Croissant, C.R.: ¬The development of descriptive cataloging in Germany (2002) 0.01 
    0.011316065 = product of:
  0.02263213 = sum of:
    0.02263213 = product of:
      0.04526426 = sum of:
        0.04526426 = weight(_text_:international in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04526426 = score(doc=5487,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.26061562 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article discusses the development of descriptive cataloging in Germany and the evolution of cataloging principles. The Instruktionen für die alphabetischen Kataloge der preußischen Bibliotheken (Instructions for the Alphabetic Catalogs of the Prussian Libraries, known as the Prussian Instructions, or PI, for short) were published in 1899. The so-called Berliner Anweisungen ("Berlin Instructions," Instructions for the Alphabetic Catalog in Public Libraries) appeared in 1938. Discussion for reform of cataloging rules began in the 1950s and received impetus from the International Conference on Cataloging Principles in Paris in 1961 and from the International Meeting of Cataloging Experts in Copenhagen in 1969. Preliminary drafts of the new Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung, RAK (Rules for Descriptive Cataloging) were issued between 1969 and 1976; the complete edition of the RAK was published in the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) in 1976 and in a slightly different version in 1977 for the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany). A version for academic libraries appeared in 1983, followed by a version for public libraries in 1986. Between 1987 and 1997, supplementary rules for special categories of materials were published.
  16. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: From bibliographic models to cataloguing rules : remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the relationships between them (2009) 0.01 
    0.011202332 = product of:
  0.022404663 = sum of:
    0.022404663 = product of:
      0.044809327 = sum of:
        0.044809327 = weight(_text_:international in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044809327 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article discusses the changes that are occurring in the world of cataloguing. It argues that these changes need to be coordinated. It also discusses the feature of current OPACs, FRBR, the Paris Principles and its proposed replacement (ICP), AACR2 and its proposed replacement (RDA), ISBD, and the relationships between and among these standards. It argues that the syntax of ISBD is an essential component of RDA and all future international and national cataloguing codes.
  17. Umstätter, W.: Bibliographie, Kataloge, Suchmaschinen : Das Ende der Dokumentation als modernes Bibliothekswesen (2005) 0.01 
    0.009601999 = product of:
  0.019203998 = sum of:
    0.019203998 = product of:
      0.038407996 = sum of:
        0.038407996 = weight(_text_:international in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038407996 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Als Otlet und La Fontaine um 1900 den Begriff Bibliographie durch den moderneren Begriff Dokumentation ersetzten und im Sinne einer Dokumentationswissenschaft von Dokumentologie sprachen, um damit auch den Weg zu öffnen, immer mehr "Neue Medien", wie Lochkartensysteme, Filme, Mikrofiches, Schallplatten, Magnetbandaufzeichnungen, etc. in die bibliothekarische Wissensbewahrung zu integrieren, da geriet das Bibliothekswesen in eine Zerreißprobe, die für Deutschland besonders nachhaltig war. Eigentlich war es nur ein Zeichen dafür, dass die Bibliothekswissenschaft plötzlich eine so große Dynamik bekam, dass ein Teil ihrer Vertreter sich immer stärker an den rasanten Entwicklungen dieser "Neuen Medien", dann an den informationsverarbeitenden Maschinen und an der Digitalisierung orientierten, während sich andere um so mehr darum bemühten, alte Erfahrungen und das bereits etablierte Wissen nicht dem Untergang preis zu geben. Diese Zerreißprobe hat zunächst auch international eine tiefe Spaltung zwischen Dokumentation und Bibliothekswesen hervorgebracht. Die "alte" Bibliothek erschien zunehmend "verstaubt" gegenüber der modernen Dokumentation, die ihrerseits allerdings einen Namen trug, der sich als Berufsbild in der breiten Bevölkerung nie so recht durchsetzen konnte. Heute hat die Digitale Bibliothek beide wieder vereinigt und damit das Berufsbild Dokumentar auf einen speziellen Bereich, der Erschließung nicht publizierter Dokumente, neben dem Archivar fokussiert.
  18. Liu, S.; Shen, Z.: ¬The development of cataloging in China (2002) 0.01 
    0.009601999 = product of:
  0.019203998 = sum of:
    0.019203998 = product of:
      0.038407996 = sum of:
        0.038407996 = weight(_text_:international in 5486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038407996 = score(doc=5486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 5486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5486)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    With a long history, cataloging has evolved with changes in society, economy, and technology in China. This paper presents Chinese cataloging history in four parts, with emphasis on the last two parts: the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949 and the development of cataloging after 1979 when China opened its doors to the world. Particularly important has been the rapid growth of online cataloging in recent years. The China Academic Library and Information System (CALIS), as a successful online cataloging model, is emphasized. Through investigation of the entire history of Chinese cataloging, three distinct features can be stated: (1) Standardization- switching from the Chinese traditional way to aligning with international standards, (2) Cooperation-from decentralized and self-supporting systems to sharing systems, (3) Computerization and networking-from manual operation to computer-based online operation. At the end of this paper, a set of means by which to enhance online cataloging and resource sharing is suggested.
  19. Takawashi, T.: Cataloging in Japan : relationship between Japanese and Western cataloging rules (2002) 0.01 
    0.009601999 = product of:
  0.019203998 = sum of:
    0.019203998 = product of:
      0.038407996 = sum of:
        0.038407996 = weight(_text_:international in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038407996 = score(doc=5490,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In 1943 the Japanese League of Young Librarians published Nippon Catalog Rules (NCR1942) based on ALA 1908, and adopted the author main-entry system for Japanese and Western materials. After World War II, the Japan Library Association (JLA) compiled and published NCR1952, based on ALA 1949 and LC 1949 but maintained the author main-entry system. The main-entry system was then replaced by an alternative heading method, which came to be known as the Description-Independent-System (DIS). NCR1965 adopted the main entry principle, which was based on the Paris Principles of 1961. NCR1977 was compiled and published by the JLA Cataloging Committee and based upon a "no-main-entry principle." Then in 1987, the Committee published the standard edition of the rules, which was completely compatible with the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD). NCR1987R was published in 1994 and NCR1987R01 in 2001, which included revised "Chapter 9: Computer Files," devised according to ISBD(ER).
  20. Kasprzik, A.: Vorläufer der Internationalen Katalogisierungsprinzipien (2014) 0.01 
    0.009601999 = product of:
  0.019203998 = sum of:
    0.019203998 = product of:
      0.038407996 = sum of:
        0.038407996 = weight(_text_:international in 1619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038407996 = score(doc=1619,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 1619, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1619)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Für eine korrekte und zielführende Formalerschließung lassen sich drei Ebenen von Leitlinien definieren: Zielsetzungen, Prinzipien und Regeln der Katalogisierung. Der vorliegende Artikel befasst sich hauptsächlich mit den (möglichen) Zielsetzungen und Prinzipien der Katalogisierung. In der Einleitung der im Jahr 2009 herausgegebenen "Erklärung zu den Internationalen Katalogisierungsprinzipien" (ICP) ist vermerkt, dass die dort vorgelegte Prinzipiensammlung aufbaut auf "den großen Katalogtraditionen der Welt". Diese Traditionen werden dann mit drei Referenzen aus der frühen Fachliteratur belegt: Den Schriften von Charles A. Cutter (1904), Shiyali R. Ranganathan (1955) und Seymour Lubetzky (1969). In diesem Artikel werden nach einem kurzen chronologischen Überblick die drei genannten Publikationen und insbesondere die darin enthaltenen Feststellungen zu Sinn und Zweck von international einheitlichen Prinzipien für die bibliothekarische Formalerschließung in ihren geschichtlichen Kontext eingeordnet und ihr jeweiliger Einfluss auf die diversen existierenden Formulierungen von Zielen und Prinzipien näher beleuchtet. Außerdem werden einige bemerkenswert moderne Gedankengänge in den betreffenden Schriften aufgezeigt. Ein abschließendes Fazit fasst die wichtigsten Zielsetzungen und Prinzipien der Katalogisierung noch einmal mit Bezug auf die verwendete Literatur zur Theorie der Informationsorganisation zusammen.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 18
  • d 5

Types

  • a 21
  • el 2
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes