-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.06
0.062227696 = product of:
0.093341544 = sum of:
0.072989546 = weight(_text_:citation in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072989546 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.31085873 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.020351999 = product of:
0.040703997 = sum of:
0.040703997 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040703997 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
-
Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998)
0.04
0.04344636 = product of:
0.13033907 = sum of:
0.13033907 = sum of:
0.089635074 = weight(_text_:index in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089635074 = score(doc=4190,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.040703997 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040703997 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Creates an open, metadata aware system for distributed, collaborative WWW indexing. The system has 3 main components: a harvester (for collecting information), a database (for making the collection searchable), and a user interface (for making the information available). all components can be distributed across networked computers, thus supporting scalability. The system is metadata aware and thus allows searches on several fields including title, document author and URL. Nordic Web Index (NWI) is an application using this system to create a regional Nordic Web-indexing service. NWI is built using 5 collaborating service points within the Nordic countries. The NWI databases can be used to build additional services
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Object
- Nordic Web Index
-
Heiser, W.J.: Zoeken in de bibliografische ruimte : de bijzondere rol van de hierarchische classificaties bij geautomatiseerde onderwerpsontsluiting (1993)
0.03
0.028384823 = product of:
0.08515447 = sum of:
0.08515447 = weight(_text_:citation in 3121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08515447 = score(doc=3121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.3626685 = fieldWeight in 3121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3121)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The universal classification schemes developed in the 19th century are a direct response to the social changes of that era. However, the increasing use of automation in libraries has highlighted the need fir greater precision in hierarchical structures. A thesaurus of used and related headings can be employed to show the spatial relationship of semantic terms. The resulting search profile can be further enhanced by the addition of citation weighting. To assist users to define searches more accurately libraries using large general classification schemes should consider adding supplementary classification data to records
-
Gödert, W.: Facettenklassifikation im Online-Retrieval (1992)
0.03
0.028384823 = product of:
0.08515447 = sum of:
0.08515447 = weight(_text_:citation in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08515447 = score(doc=4574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.3626685 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Facettenklassifikationen wurden bislang vorwiegend im Hinblick auf ihre Verwendungsmöglichkeiten in präkombinierten systematischen Katalogen bzw. Bibliographien betrachtet, nicht so sehr unter dem Aspekt eines möglichen Einsatzes in postkoordinierenden Retrievalsystemen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag soll nachgewiesen werden, daß Facettenklassifikationen anderen Techniken des Online Retrievals überlegen sein können. Hierzu sollten Begriffs- und Facettenanalyse mit einem strukturabbildenden Notationssystem kombiniert werden, um mit Hilfe Boolescher Operatoren (zur Verknüpfung von Facetten unabhängig von einer definierten Citation order) und Truncierung hierarchisch differenzierte Dokumentenmengen für komplexe Fragestellungen zu erhalten. Die Methode wird an zwei Beispielen illustriert: das erste nutzt eine kleine, von B. Buchanan entwickelte Klassifikation, das zweite das für Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) verwendete Klassifikationssystem. Weiter wird am Beispiel PRECIS diskutiert, welche Möglichkeiten des syntaktischen Retrievals Rollenoperatoren bieten können.
-
Sandner, M.; Jahns, Y.: Kurzbericht zum DDC-Übersetzer- und Anwendertreffen bei der IFLA-Konferenz 2005 in Oslo, Norwegen (2005)
0.03
0.026032798 = product of:
0.078098394 = sum of:
0.078098394 = sum of:
0.036972582 = weight(_text_:index in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036972582 = score(doc=4406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.16897833 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
0.04112581 = weight(_text_:22 in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04112581 = score(doc=4406,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.23454636 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- "Am 16. August 2005 fand in Oslo im Rahmen der heurigen IFLA-Konferenz das alljährliche Treffen der DDC-Übersetzer und der weltweiten DeweyAnwender-Institutionen (Nationalbibliotheken, Ersteller von Nationalbibliografien) statt. Die im Sommer 2005 bereits abgeschlossene deutsche Übersetzung wird in der Druckfassung Ende des Jahres in 4 Bänden vorliegen, beim K. G. Saur Verlag in München erscheinen (ISBN 3-598-11651-9) und 2006 vom ebenfalls erstmals ins Deutsche übersetzten DDC-Lehrbuch (ISBN 3-598-11748-5) begleitet. Pläne für neu startende Übersetzungen der DDC 22 gibt es für folgende Sprachen: Arabisch (mit der wachsenden Notwendigkeit, Klasse 200 Religion zu revidieren), Französisch (es erschien zuletzt eine neue Kurzausgabe 14, nun werden eine vierbändige Druckausgabe und eine frz. Webversion anvisiert), Schwedisch, Vietnamesisch (hierfür wird eine an die Sprache und Schrift angepasste Version des deutschen Übersetzungstools zum Einsatz kommen).
Allgemein DDC 22 ist im Gegensatz zu den früheren Neuauflagen der Standard Edition eine Ausgabe ohne generelle Überarbeitung einer gesamten Klasse. Sie enthält jedoch zahlreiche Änderungen und Expansionen in fast allen Disziplinen und in vielen Hilfstafeln. Es erschien auch eine Sonderausgabe der Klasse 200, Religion. In der aktuellen Kurzausgabe der DDC 22 (14, aus 2004) sind all diese Neuerungen berücksichtigt. Auch die elektronische Version exisitiert in einer vollständigen (WebDewey) und in einer KurzVariante (Abridged WebDewey) und ist immer auf dem jüngsten Stand der Klassifikation. Ein Tutorial für die Nutzung von WebDewey steht unter www.oclc.org /dewey/ resourcesitutorial zur Verfügung. Der Index enthält in dieser elektronischen Fassung weit mehr zusammengesetzte Notationen und verbale Sucheinstiege (resultierend aus den Titeldaten des "WorldCat") als die Druckausgabe, sowie Mappings zu den aktuellsten Normdatensätzen aus LCSH und McSH. Aktuell Die personelle Zusammensetzung des EPC (Editorial Policy Committee) hat sich im letzten Jahr verändert. Dieses oberste Gremium der DDC hat Prioritäten für den aktuellen Arbeitsplan festgelegt. Es wurde vereinbart, größere Änderungsvorhaben via Dewey-Website künftig wie in einem Stellungnahmeverfahren zur fachlichen Diskussion zu stellen. www.oclc.org/dewey/discussion/."
-
Oberhauser, O.: Implementierung und Parametrisierung klassifikatorischer Recherchekomponenten im OPAC (2005)
0.03
0.025343709 = product of:
0.076031126 = sum of:
0.076031126 = sum of:
0.052287128 = weight(_text_:index in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052287128 = score(doc=3353,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.23897146 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
0.023743998 = weight(_text_:22 in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023743998 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Das in den letzten Jahren wiedererwachte Interesse an der klassifikatorischen Erschließung und Recherche hat sich allem Anschein nach noch nicht ausreichend bis zu den Herstellern integrierter Bibliothekssysteme herumgesprochen. Wie wäre es sonst zu erklären, dass im OPAC-Modul eines führenden Systems wie Aleph 500 so gut wie keine Features für klassifikationsbasierte Recherchen zu erblicken sind? Tatsächlich finden wir heute einen im Vergleich zum einstigen System Bibos kaum veränderten Zustand vor: Notationen eines oder mehrerer Klassifikationssysteme können in einer durch MAB dafür bestimmten Kategorie (700, nebst Indikatoren) katalogisiert und dann recherchiert bzw. angezeigt werden. Doch welcher Benutzer weiß schon, was diese Notationen im einzelnen bedeuten? Wer macht sich die Mühe, dies selbst herauszufinden, um dann danach zu recherchieren? Hier liegt im wesentlich dasselbe Problem vor, das schon dem systematischen Zettelkatalog anhaftete und ihn zu einem zwar mühevoll erstellten, aber wenig genutzten Rechercheinstrument machte, das nur dann (zwangsläufig) angenommen wurde, wenn ein verbaler Sachkatalog fehlte. Nun könnte eingewandt werden, dass im Vergleich zu früher unter Aleph 500 wenigstens das Aufblättern von Indizes möglich sei, sodass im OPAC ein Index für die vergebenen Notationen angeboten werden kann (bzw. mehrere solche Indizes bei Verwendung von mehr als nur einem Klassifikationssystem). Gewiss, doch was bringt dem Uneingeweihten das Aufblättern des Notationsindex - außer einer alphabetischen Liste von kryptischen Codes? Weiter könnte man einwenden, dass es im Aleph-500-OPAC die so genannten Suchdienste ("services") gibt, mithilfe derer von bestimmten Elementen einer Vollanzeige hypertextuell weiternavigiert werden kann. Richtig, doch damit kann man bloß wiederum den Index aufblättern oder alle anderen Werke anzeigen lassen, die dieselbe Notationen - also einen Code, dessen Bedeutung meist unbekannt ist - aufweisen. Wie populär mag dieses Feature beim Publikum wohl sein? Ein anderer Einwand wäre der Hinweis auf das inzwischen vom Hersteller angebotene Thesaurus-Modul, das vermutlich auch für Klassifikationssysteme eingesetzt werden könnte. Doch wie viele Bibliotheken unseres Verbundes waren bisher bereit, für dieses Modul, das man eigentlich als Bestandteil des Basissystems erwarten könnte, gesondert zu bezahlen? Schließlich mag man noch einwenden, dass es im Gegensatz zur Bibos-Zeit nun die Möglichkeit gibt, Systematiken und Klassifikationen als Normdateien zu implementieren und diese beim Retrieval für verbale Einstiege in die klassifikatorische Recherche oder zumindest für die Veranschaulichung der Klassenbenennungen in der Vollanzeige zu nutzen. Korrekt - dies ist möglich und wurde sogar einst für die MSC (Mathematics Subject Classification, auch bekannt als "AMS-Klassifikation") versucht. Dieses Projekt, das noch unter der Systemversion 11.5 begonnen wurde, geriet jedoch nach einiger Zeit ins Stocken und fand bedauerlicherweise nie seinen Weg in die folgende Version (14.2). Mag auch zu hoffen sein, dass es unter der neuen Version 16 wieder weitergeführt werden kann, so weist dieses Beispiel doch auf die grundsätzliche Problematik des Normdatei-Ansatzes (zusätzlicher Aufwand, Kontinuität) hin. Zudem lohnt sich die Implementierung einer eigenen Normdatei 4 wohl nur bei einem größeren bzw. komplexen Klassifikationssystem, wogegen man im Falle kleinerer Systematiken kaum daran denken würde.
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.1, S.22-37
-
Markey, K.: Dewey Decimal Classification online project: integration of a library schedule and index into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog (1985)
0.02
0.024648389 = product of:
0.073945165 = sum of:
0.073945165 = product of:
0.14789033 = sum of:
0.14789033 = weight(_text_:index in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14789033 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Lee, H.-L.; Olson, H.A.: Hierarchical navigation : an exploration of Yahoo! directories (2005)
0.02
0.024329849 = product of:
0.072989546 = sum of:
0.072989546 = weight(_text_:citation in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072989546 = score(doc=3991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.31085873 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Although researchers have theorized the critical importance of classification in the organization of information, the classification approach seems to have given way to the alphabetical subject approach in retrieval tools widely used in libraries, and research an how users utilize classification or classification-like arrangements in information seeking has been scant. To better understand whether searchers consider classificatory structures a viable alternative to information retrieval, this article reports an a study of how 24 library and information science students used Yahoo! directories, a popular search service resembling classification, in completing an assigned simple task. Several issues emerged from the students' reporting of their search process and a comparison between hierarchical navigation and keyword searching: citation order of facets, precision vs. recall, and other factors influencing searchers' successes and preferences. The latter included search expertise, knowledge of the discipline, and time required to complete the search. Without a definitive conclusion, we suggest a number of directoons for further research.
-
Broadbent, E.: Classification access in the online catalog (1995)
0.02
0.02112719 = product of:
0.06338157 = sum of:
0.06338157 = product of:
0.12676314 = sum of:
0.12676314 = weight(_text_:index in 5571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12676314 = score(doc=5571,freq=8.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 5571, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5571)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- With the development during the last few years of the USMARC Format for Classification Data, the potential for improving call number browsing in online catalogs has increased dramatically. For example, it is now possible to create various types of indexes to classification numbers in the online catalog. Two types of possible indexes, a chain index and an index using Library of Congress subject headings as an index to the Library of Congress classification are discussed and examples given in appendices. It is also noted that these two indexes are only two of various forms an online index to classification numbers could take.
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: New wine in old bottles : problems of maintaining classification schemes (1996)
0.02
0.020274874 = product of:
0.06082462 = sum of:
0.06082462 = weight(_text_:citation in 5168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06082462 = score(doc=5168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.25904894 = fieldWeight in 5168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5168)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Editors of long-standing classifications have to adopt their schemes to totally different circumstances from those they were originally designed to suit. The need to retrieve information accurately in an online environment and a world dominated by the Internet is vital and contrasts with the basic linear approach for which these classifications were intended. The latter need still has to be satisfied, so ways of achieving both goals must be explored. The need for greater synthesis, clearly defined factes, with distinctive notation and a closely adhered to citation order is essential. An expressive notation is attractive in an online environmen. Modern educational approaches make traditional structures meaningless and the current economic climate and expense of developing new publication formats is reducing revision budgets. Co-operation between editors and the use of one scheme, e.g. DDC, as a switching language between other schemes, e.g., UDC, thesauri and subject headings lists are one way forward. Existing co-operative projects and future plans between the editors of DDC, UDC and BC2 are discussed and the complementing of classification by a thesaurus is recommended
-
Van der Walt, M.: ¬The structure of classification schemes used in Internet search engines (1998)
0.02
0.020274874 = product of:
0.06082462 = sum of:
0.06082462 = weight(_text_:citation in 84) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06082462 = score(doc=84,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.25904894 = fieldWeight in 84, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=84)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this paper is to determine some of the structural features of the classification schemes used in the directories (guides, channels) of search engines to organise information sources on the Internet. Ten search engines were examined at the main class level and the full hierarchies of a sample of three specific subjects were analysed in four of these engines, namely Excite, Infoseek, Lycos and Yahoo! It was found that there are major differences between the main classes of the search engines and those found in standard library schemes like Dewey, UDC and LCC. There are large gaps in subject coverage at main class level in the search engines and the general tendency is to use a topic-based approach in the formation of classes, rather than a discipline-based approach. The subdivision of the main classes is according to hierarchical tree structures, but a number of anomalies in this regard were identified. Another deviation from library classification theory is that various principles of division are employed to form classes at the same hierarchical level. In an analysis of citation orders many examples were found that conform to the principles followed in library classifications, but a number of inconsistencies in this regard were also noted
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001)
0.02
0.020274874 = product of:
0.06082462 = sum of:
0.06082462 = weight(_text_:citation in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06082462 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.25904894 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users
-
Gödert, W.: Facet classification in online retrieval (1991)
0.02
0.020274874 = product of:
0.06082462 = sum of:
0.06082462 = weight(_text_:citation in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06082462 = score(doc=5825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.25904894 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The study of faceted classification systems has primarily been directed towards application for precombined catalogues or bibliographies, not so much for use in post coordinated retrieval systems. Argues that faceted classification systems in some respects are superior to other techniques of on-line retrieval as far as facet and concept analysis is combined with an expressive notational system in order to guide a form of retrieval which will use Boolean operators (for combining the facets regardless of one special citation order) and truncation for retrieving hierarchically different sets of documents. This point of view is demonstrated by 2 examples. The 1st one uses a short classification system derived from B. Buchanan and the 2nd is built upon the classification system used by Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Further discussion is concerned with some possible consequences which could be derived from a retrieval with PRECIS strings
-
Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984)
0.02
0.018090667 = product of:
0.054272 = sum of:
0.054272 = product of:
0.108544 = sum of:
0.108544 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108544 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
-
Markey, K.; Demeyer, A.N.: Dewey Decimal Classification online project: evaluation of a library schedule and index integrated into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog : final report to the Council of Library Resources (1986)
0.02
0.017605992 = product of:
0.052817974 = sum of:
0.052817974 = product of:
0.10563595 = sum of:
0.10563595 = weight(_text_:index in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10563595 = score(doc=3472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Kinsella, J.: Classification and the OPAC (1992)
0.02
0.017605992 = product of:
0.052817974 = sum of:
0.052817974 = product of:
0.10563595 = sum of:
0.10563595 = weight(_text_:index in 3903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10563595 = score(doc=3903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 3903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3903)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Catalogue and index. 1992, nos.105/106, S.1,3-10
-
Svenonius, E.; Liu, S.; Subrahmanyam, B.: Automation of chain indexing (1992)
0.01
0.01493918 = product of:
0.044817537 = sum of:
0.044817537 = product of:
0.089635074 = sum of:
0.089635074 = weight(_text_:index in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089635074 = score(doc=2114,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The last several years have seen the evolution of prototype systems exploiting the use of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) as an interface to online catalogs. One such system, calles DORS (Dewy Online Retrieval System) was developed at the University of California, Los Angeles by the authors. The feature distinguishing this system is an automatically generated chain index, in particular the algorithms that were created for its automatic generation and the problems that were encountered. The problems were of three kinds: those that were overcome, but were not for lack of time and resources and those that we believe cannot be overcome. The paper concludes with suggestions for future resaerch and possible formatting changes to the DDC feature headings that would facilitate chain-index generation
-
Liu, S.; Svenonius, E.: DORS: DDC online retrieval system (1991)
0.01
0.014084793 = product of:
0.042254377 = sum of:
0.042254377 = product of:
0.084508754 = sum of:
0.084508754 = weight(_text_:index in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084508754 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A model system, the Dewey Online Retrieval System (DORS), was implemented as an interface to an online catalog for the purpose of experimenting with classification-based search strategies and generally seeking further understanding of the role of traditional classifications in automated information retrieval. Specifications for a classification retrieval interface were enumerated and rationalized and the system was developed in accordance with them. The feature that particularly distinguishes the system and enables it to meet its stated specifications is an automatically generated chain index
-
Mitchell, J.S.: In this age of WWW is classification redundant? (1998)
0.01
0.014084793 = product of:
0.042254377 = sum of:
0.042254377 = product of:
0.084508754 = sum of:
0.084508754 = weight(_text_:index in 5443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084508754 = score(doc=5443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 5443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Catalogue and index. 1998, no.127, S.5
-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.01
0.013567999 = product of:
0.040703997 = sum of:
0.040703997 = product of:
0.081407994 = sum of:
0.081407994 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081407994 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
