Search (48 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × type_ss:"n"
  1. ¬The preparation of indexes to books, periodicals and other publications (1976) 0.00 
    0.004201617 = product of:
  0.021008085 = sum of:
    0.021008085 = weight(_text_:of in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021008085 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  2. ISO 2788 Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri (1986) 0.00 
    0.004201617 = product of:
  0.021008085 = sum of:
    0.021008085 = weight(_text_:of in 2493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021008085 = score(doc=2493,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2493, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2493)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  3. Proposed American National Standard guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual thesauri (1991) 0.00 
    0.004201617 = product of:
  0.021008085 = sum of:
    0.021008085 = weight(_text_:of in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021008085 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  4. ISO/TR 12618:1994: Computational aids in terminology : creation and use of terminological databases and text corpora (1994) 0.00 
    0.004201617 = product of:
  0.021008085 = sum of:
    0.021008085 = weight(_text_:of in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021008085 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  5. ISO 11179: Specification and standardization of data elements (1999) 0.00 
    0.004201617 = product of:
  0.021008085 = sum of:
    0.021008085 = weight(_text_:of in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021008085 = score(doc=3893,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  6. OWL Web Ontology Language Guide (2004) 0.00 
    0.0041520875 = product of:
  0.020760437 = sum of:
    0.020760437 = weight(_text_:of in 4687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020760437 = score(doc=4687,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 4687, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4687)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web as it is currently constituted resembles a poorly mapped geography. Our insight into the documents and capabilities available are based on keyword searches, abetted by clever use of document connectivity and usage patterns. The sheer mass of this data is unmanageable without powerful tool support. In order to map this terrain more precisely, computational agents require machine-readable descriptions of the content and capabilities of Web accessible resources. These descriptions must be in addition to the human-readable versions of that information. The OWL Web Ontology Language is intended to provide a language that can be used to describe the classes and relations between them that are inherent in Web documents and applications. This document demonstrates the use of the OWL language to - formalize a domain by defining classes and properties of those classes, - define individuals and assert properties about them, and - reason about these classes and individuals to the degree permitted by the formal semantics of the OWL language. The sections are organized to present an incremental definition of a set of classes, properties and individuals, beginning with the fundamentals and proceeding to more complex language components.
  7. Miller, E.; Schloss. B.; Lassila, O.; Swick, R.R.: Resource Description Framework (RDF) : model and syntax (1997) 0.00 
    0.0040062806 = product of:
  0.020031402 = sum of:
    0.020031402 = weight(_text_:of in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020031402 = score(doc=5903,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.2635841 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    RDF - the Resource Description Framework - is a foundation for processing metadata; it provides interoperability between applications that exchange machine-understandable information on the Web. RDF emphasizes facilities to enable automated processing of Web resources. RDF metadata can be used in a variety of application areas; for example: in resource discovery to provide better search engine capabilities; in cataloging for describing the content and content relationships available at a particular Web site, page, or digital library; by intelligent software agents to facilitate knowledge sharing and exchange; in content rating; in describing collections of pages that represent a single logical "document"; for describing intellectual property rights of Web pages, and in many others. RDF with digital signatures will be key to building the "Web of Trust" for electronic commerce, collaboration, and other applications. Metadata is "data about data" or specifically in the context of RDF "data describing web resources." The distinction between "data" and "metadata" is not an absolute one; it is a distinction created primarily by a particular application. Many times the same resource will be interpreted in both ways simultaneously. RDF encourages this view by using XML as the encoding syntax for the metadata. The resources being described by RDF are, in general, anything that can be named via a URI. The broad goal of RDF is to define a mechanism for describing resources that makes no assumptions about a particular application domain, nor defines the semantics of any application domain. The definition of the mechanism should be domain neutral, yet the mechanism should be suitable for describing information about any domain. This document introduces a model for representing RDF metadata and one syntax for expressing and transporting this metadata in a manner that maximizes the interoperability of independently developed web servers and clients. The syntax described in this document is best considered as a "serialization syntax" for the underlying RDF representation model. The serialization syntax is XML, XML being the W3C's work-in-progress to define a richer Web syntax for a variety of applications. RDF and XML are complementary; there will be alternate ways to represent the same RDF data model, some more suitable for direct human authoring. Future work may lead to including such alternatives in this document.
    Content
    RDF Data Model At the core of RDF is a model for representing named properties and their values. These properties serve both to represent attributes of resources (and in this sense correspond to usual attribute-value-pairs) and to represent relationships between resources. The RDF data model is a syntax-independent way of representing RDF statements. RDF statements that are syntactically very different could mean the same thing. This concept of equivalence in meaning is very important when performing queries, aggregation and a number of other tasks at which RDF is aimed. The equivalence is defined in a clean machine understandable way. Two pieces of RDF are equivalent if and only if their corresponding data model representations are the same. Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. RDF Data Model 3. RDF Grammar 4. Signed RDF 5. Examples 6. Appendix A: Brief Explanation of XML Namespaces
  8. Codes for the representation of languages for information interchange (2001) 0.00 
    0.00371374 = product of:
  0.0185687 = sum of:
    0.0185687 = weight(_text_:of in 3927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0185687 = score(doc=3927,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 3927, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3927)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The newly revised standard of 3-letter codes for languages is based an the MARC language codes and ISO 6392/B
  9. Z39.4-199X: Indexes and related information retrieval devices (1993) 0.00 
    0.0036764152 = product of:
  0.018382076 = sum of:
    0.018382076 = weight(_text_:of in 8518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018382076 = score(doc=8518,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 8518, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8518)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This draft standard provides guidelines and a uniform vocabulary to prepare back-of-the-book and machine generated indexes
  10. Austin, D.; Waters, J.: Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri (1980) 0.00 
    0.0036764152 = product of:
  0.018382076 = sum of:
    0.018382076 = weight(_text_:of in 0) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018382076 = score(doc=0,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 0, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=0)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  11. ISO 8825: Information processing systems - open systems interconnection : specifications of basic encoding rules for abstract syntax notation one (ASN.1) (1987) 0.00 
    0.0036764152 = product of:
  0.018382076 = sum of:
    0.018382076 = weight(_text_:of in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018382076 = score(doc=4297,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  12. BS 5723: Guide to establishment and development of monolingual thesauri (1987) 0.00 
    0.0036764152 = product of:
  0.018382076 = sum of:
    0.018382076 = weight(_text_:of in 5015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018382076 = score(doc=5015,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 5015, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5015)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  13. ISO 25964-2: Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies : Part 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies (2013) 0.00 
    0.0036764152 = product of:
  0.018382076 = sum of:
    0.018382076 = weight(_text_:of in 4832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018382076 = score(doc=4832,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 4832, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4832)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    ISO 25964-2:2013 is applicable to thesauri and other types of vocabulary that are commonly used for information retrieval. It describes, compares and contrasts the elements and features of these vocabularies that are implicated when interoperability is needed. It gives recommendations for the establishment and maintenance of mappings between multiple thesauri, or between thesauri and other types of vocabularies.
  14. ISO 15836:2003 The Dublin Core metadata element set. (2003) 0.00 
    0.0035231633 = product of:
  0.017615816 = sum of:
    0.017615816 = weight(_text_:of in 2079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017615816 = score(doc=2079,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 2079, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2079)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The Dublin Core metadata standard provides a core set of 15 metadata elements for cross-domain information resource sharing. Since the original workshop, held in March 1995 in Dublin, Ohio - thus the name Dublin Core - this core set of metadata elements has gained worldwide recognition and use, with translations in over 20 languages. The issuance of the ISO standard provides the official international endorsement for use of theDublin Core metadata. Under NISO's leadership this standard was fast-tracked in ISO Technical Committee 45 (Information and documentation) Subcommittee 4 (Technical Interoperability) through the ISO approval process using a version identical to ANSI/NISO Z39.85-2001
    Footnote
    ISO 15836 is available for purchase in electronic or paper formats, in English and French, from ISO <http://www.iso.ch/>. A free downloadable pdf file of the ANSI/NISO version is available from the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) website: <http:www.niso.org/standards/resources/Z39-85.pdf>
  15. Bechhofer, S.; Harmelen, F. van; Hendler, J.; Horrocks, I.; McGuinness, D.L.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.; Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference (2004) 0.00 
    0.003183869 = product of:
  0.015919344 = sum of:
    0.015919344 = weight(_text_:of in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015919344 = score(doc=4684,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The Web Ontology Language OWL is a semantic markup language for publishing and sharing ontologies on the World Wide Web. OWL is developed as a vocabulary extension of RDF (the Resource Description Framework) and is derived from the DAML+OIL Web Ontology Language. This document contains a structured informal description of the full set of OWL language constructs and is meant to serve as a reference for OWL users who want to construct OWL ontologies.
  16. Guidelines for bibliographic description of interactive multimedia (1994) 0.00 
    0.003151213 = product of:
  0.015756065 = sum of:
    0.015756065 = weight(_text_:of in 2975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015756065 = score(doc=2975,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2975, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2975)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  17. Le Boeuf, P.; Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: FRBR - Library Reference Model : draft for World-Wide Review (2016) 0.00 
    0.003151213 = product of:
  0.015756065 = sum of:
    0.015756065 = weight(_text_:of in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015756065 = score(doc=2881,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The FRBR Review Group worked actively towards a consolidated model starting in 2010, in a series of working meetings held in conjunction with IFLA conferences and at an additional mid-year meeting in April 2012 during which the user task consolidation was first drafted. In 2013 in Singapore, the FRBR Review Group constituted a Consolidation Editorial Group (CEG) to focus on the detailed reassessment of attribute s and relationships, and the drafting of this model document. The CEG (at times with other FRBR Review Group members or invited experts) held five multi-day meetings, as well as discussing progress in detail with the FRBR Review Group as a whole during a working meeting in 2014 in Lyon and another in 2015 in Cape Town.
    Editor
    IFLA / Consolidation Editorial Group of the IFLA FRBR Review Group
  18. OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax (2004) 0.00 
    0.0027290303 = product of:
  0.013645152 = sum of:
    0.013645152 = weight(_text_:of in 4683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013645152 = score(doc=4683,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.17955035 = fieldWeight in 4683, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4683)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This description of OWL, the Web Ontology Language being designed by the W3C Web Ontology Working Group, contains a high-level abstract syntax for both OWL DL and OWL Lite, sublanguages of OWL. A model-theoretic semantics is given to provide a formal meaning for OWL ontologies written in this abstract syntax. A model-theoretic semantics in the form of an extension to the RDF semantics is also given to provide a formal meaning for OWL ontologies as RDF graphs (OWL Full). A mapping from the abstract syntax to RDF graphs is given and the two model theories are shown to have the same consequences on OWL ontologies that can be written in the abstract syntax.
  19. Z39.58-1992: Common command language for online interactive information retrieval (1992) 0.00 
    0.002626011 = product of:
  0.013130054 = sum of:
    0.013130054 = weight(_text_:of in 4801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013130054 = score(doc=4801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 4801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4801)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Useful to system designers that want to specify a uniform command terminology, Z39.58-1992 describes nineteen non-proprietary command terms for use in online information retrieval systems. Defines the vocabulary, syntax, and operational meaning of the commands
  20. ISO 8459: Bibliographic data element directory : Pt.1: Interloan applications (ISO 8459-1:1988). - Pt.2: Acquisition applications (ISO 8459-2:1992). - Pt.3: Information retrieval applications (ISO 8459-3:1994). - Pt.4: Circulation applications (ISO/CD 8459-4:1996) - Pt.5: Data elements for the exchange of cataloguing and metadata (ISO/DIS 8459-5:2000) (1988-) 0.00 
    0.002626011 = product of:
  0.013130054 = sum of:
    0.013130054 = weight(_text_:of in 4439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013130054 = score(doc=4439,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 4439, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4439)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 45
  • d 3
  • More… Less…

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications