Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Bestandsaufstellung"
  1. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.09
    0.09436589 = product of:
      0.14154883 = sum of:
        0.11819105 = weight(_text_:title in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11819105 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.43078408 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.023357773 = product of:
          0.046715546 = sum of:
            0.046715546 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046715546 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As part of her doctoral dissertation at Brabant Catholic University in the Netherlands A. Oomens recently held a survey to determine the relative merits of author and subject arrangements for non fiction collections. Although users browsing through the collections were more likely to find material of interest via a subject arrangement, those looking for a particular title were best served by an author arrangement. All users interviewed preferred the arrangement with which they were familiar
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
  2. Giampietro, R.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part A (2009) 0.02
    0.022512581 = product of:
      0.06753774 = sum of:
        0.06753774 = weight(_text_:title in 3274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06753774 = score(doc=3274,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.24616233 = fieldWeight in 3274, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3274)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In the late seventies, I was asked to work on classifying our Philosophy (and Psychology) collections, which were still located partly in the stacks and partly in the so-called Seminars-a traditional didactic and research structure of our School-where the books were mostly ordered by format or collection title. As often happens, my task was not completely free of restrictions: the general "new policy" of the entire Library was oriented toward accomplishing an open-shelf decimal classification, and the first step was to avoid an overly complicated schema, as this would probably have rendered more difficult the task of the end users, that is, our students but mainly our teaching staff. At the Scuola Normale Superiore, where historicism has always had an illustrious though somewhat cumbersome tradition (I quote only two philosophers and/or historians of Philosophy: Giovanni Gentile and Eugenio Garin), ordering the Philosophy collection- with its divisions, topics, geographical notations, chronological tables et similia-strictly by the Dewey decimal system might have been unthinkable. A second requirement was to designate a main location to the large collection of the often "complete works" of the philosophical Tradition. This way, the ideal Reader, foreseen to linger for hours in the newly restored library building of the Palazzo della Gherardesca, could easily access the reservoir of the great texts, which were to be followed on the shelves by the secondary literature ad auctorem. All in all, the implicit message to our students and scholars was to be the virtuous necessity of finding, ready on the shelves, the substantial core of the textual Tradition.
  3. Eaton, G.: Lost in the library : are spatial skills important in shelf searches? (1991) 0.02
    0.01694965 = product of:
      0.05084895 = sum of:
        0.05084895 = product of:
          0.1016979 = sum of:
            0.1016979 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 4863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1016979 = score(doc=4863,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.42718828 = fieldWeight in 4863, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4863)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The failure of children (or adults) to find items on the shelf, after locating the item in the catalogue, may be due to spatial confusion. Describes a field study designed to test the possibility that spatial skills are related to subjects' speed and directness in retrieving books from the stacks of an unfamiliar library
  4. Weaver, M.; Stanning, M.: Reclassification project at St Martin's College : a case study (2007) 0.01
    0.010593532 = product of:
      0.031780593 = sum of:
        0.031780593 = product of:
          0.063561186 = sum of:
            0.063561186 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063561186 = score(doc=852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.2669927 = fieldWeight in 852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this article is to outline the approach taken to the reclassification of the library collection within a small multi-site college of higher education - whereby 160,000 volumes were converted from the BLISS system to the Dewey Decimal Classification system, over a period of 11 weeks during Summer 2004. Design/methodology/approach - An automated approach was taken whereby the Library Systems Supplier - Talis was commissioned to convert catalogue records using a batch process. Risk analysis and critical path analysis were used as tools to keep the project on schedule and provide quality control. Findings - An automated approach allowed the project to be completed on time, within budget and with minimal disruption to services. Project planning was crucial to the success of the project. This included mapping BLISS to Dewey numbers, recruitment of a student team, management of work packages and ensuring continuity of the Library Service during the project. Practical implications - Institutional support for the project was secured because of its relevance to the College's corporate agenda and the promise of a wider impact that the project would have in terms of modernisation of the library service. Originality/value - Despite the apparent lack of current articles on re-classification, many libraries are still grappling with ongoing retrospective cataloguing projects. This case study demonstrates how one institution approached the problem and demonstrates that an automated approach can yield benefits. It will be of use to other libraries thinking of, or involved with, similar conversions. The partnership role of the Library Management System Supplier is also highlighted.
  5. Frigerio, L.: From disorder to order : a challenge for the philosopher and the librarian (Milan, Italy) (2009) 0.01
    0.010593532 = product of:
      0.031780593 = sum of:
        0.031780593 = product of:
          0.063561186 = sum of:
            0.063561186 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063561186 = score(doc=3270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.2669927 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Philosophy Library at the University of Milan was born in the fifties by the merger of the two Institutes of Philosophy and the History of Philosophy. Once the restoration had been completed, it was necessary to devise a suitable classification system in order to arrange the books and to meet the new research needs of the Institutes. The project was untrusted to Prof. Corrado Mangione and Prof. Maria Assunta del Torre, with the theoretical contribution of Giuliana Sapori, chief Director of Central Library of the Faculty of Laws and Humanities. The model had been conceived as completely anew, without any reference toother existing classification systems. The inspiring principles were from one hand the choice for an open shelving system, from the other one the idea that the orientation criteria and the book search had to be user-friendly for everyone. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the making-up of the call number as applied to each section of the collection, and how the scheme has been developed over the past fifty years. Points of strenght and weakness of the scheme are also discussed at the light of the technological innovations which have gradually affected the whole of the library activities, notably with the introduction of the electronic catalogue. The original classification scheme has maintened its coherence and functionality over time, in spite of the expansion of the collection and the automation of all stages of the classification process. This is the main reason to keep using it in the future.
  6. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.01
    0.0088982 = product of:
      0.026694598 = sum of:
        0.026694598 = product of:
          0.053389195 = sum of:
            0.053389195 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053389195 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
  7. Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996) 0.01
    0.0088982 = product of:
      0.026694598 = sum of:
        0.026694598 = product of:
          0.053389195 = sum of:
            0.053389195 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053389195 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
  8. Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998) 0.01
    0.0088982 = product of:
      0.026694598 = sum of:
        0.026694598 = product of:
          0.053389195 = sum of:
            0.053389195 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053389195 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24
  9. Rotten, C. v.d.: oderzoek naar alternatieve plaatsing : Bijna net zoveel systemen als bibliotheken (1995) 0.01
    0.0077859247 = product of:
      0.023357773 = sum of:
        0.023357773 = product of:
          0.046715546 = sum of:
            0.046715546 = weight(_text_:22 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046715546 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.11, S.20-22
  10. Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992) 0.01
    0.0077859247 = product of:
      0.023357773 = sum of:
        0.023357773 = product of:
          0.046715546 = sum of:
            0.046715546 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046715546 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
  11. Lowisch, M.: Gesamthochschulbibliotheken und Klassifikationsentwicklung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kooperation und lokalen Bedürfnissen (2017) 0.01
    0.0077859247 = product of:
      0.023357773 = sum of:
        0.023357773 = product of:
          0.046715546 = sum of:
            0.046715546 = weight(_text_:22 in 5116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046715546 = score(doc=5116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2019 16:22:59
  12. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.01
    0.00667365 = product of:
      0.020020949 = sum of:
        0.020020949 = product of:
          0.040041897 = sum of:
            0.040041897 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040041897 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009) 0.01
    0.00667365 = product of:
      0.020020949 = sum of:
        0.020020949 = product of:
          0.040041897 = sum of:
            0.040041897 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040041897 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9. 1.2010 14:22:20
  14. Müller-Dreier, A.: Einheitsklassifikation : die Geschichte einer fortwirkenden Idee (1994) 0.01
    0.005561375 = product of:
      0.016684124 = sum of:
        0.016684124 = product of:
          0.03336825 = sum of:
            0.03336825 = weight(_text_:22 in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03336825 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungsblatt VdB NW N.F. 45(1995) H.3, S.332-333 (H. Lohse) [Auch wenn H. Lohse meint, das Buch bzw. die zugrundeliegende Assessorarbeit hätte nicht geschrieben werden müssen, so liefert doch gerade seine Rezension den Beweis, wie notwendig diese Arbeit war]; BuB 47(1995) H.10, S.955-959 (I. Nöther) ["Diese von einem Berufsanfänger vorgelegte Arbeit ist eine Spitzenleistung, ein Meisterwerk, auf das der Autor, seine Ausbildungsstätte sowie der Verlag und der Herausgeber der Reihe sotz sein können. Für jeden, der sich heute und in Zukunft mit Fragen der Klassifikation befaßt, ist die Lektüre dieses Buches Pflicht"]; Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 20(1996) H.1, S.134-135 (W. Gödert); Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.178 (B. Lorenz); Journal of documentation 51(1995) no.4, S.434-437 (J.S. Andrews)
  15. Bonse, C.; Fischer, N.: So wird die Sucheffizienz gesteigert : Stadtbibliothek Siegburg stellt nach Kundenbefragung den Bestand fast komplett um (2008) 0.00
    0.0038929624 = product of:
      0.011678887 = sum of:
        0.011678887 = product of:
          0.023357773 = sum of:
            0.023357773 = weight(_text_:22 in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023357773 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11. 5.2008 15:11:22