Search (112 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Praxishandbuch Forschungsdatenmanagement (2021) 0.04 
    0.039397016 = product of:
  0.11819105 = sum of:
    0.11819105 = weight(_text_:title in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11819105 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.43078408 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.degruyter.com/view/title/554542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110657807.
  2. Bodoff, D.; Richter-Levin, Y.: Viewpoints in indexing term assignment (2020) 0.03 
    0.033768874 = product of:
  0.10130662 = sum of:
    0.10130662 = weight(_text_:title in 5765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10130662 = score(doc=5765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.3692435 = fieldWeight in 5765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5765)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The literature on assigned indexing considers three possible viewpoints-the author's viewpoint as evidenced in the title, the users' viewpoint, and the indexer's viewpoint-and asks whether and which of those views should be reflected in an indexer's choice of terms to assign to an item. We study this question empirically, as opposed to normatively. Based on the literature that discusses whose viewpoints should be reflected, we construct a research model that includes those same three viewpoints as factors that might be influencing term assignment in actual practice. In the unique study design that we employ, the records of term assignments made by identified indexers in academic libraries are cross-referenced with the results of a survey that those same indexers completed on political views. Our results indicate that in our setting, variance in term assignment was best explained by indexers' personal political views.
  3. Lee, D.: Hornbostel-Sachs Classification of Musical Instruments (2020) 0.03 
    0.028140724 = product of:
  0.08442217 = sum of:
    0.08442217 = weight(_text_:title in 5755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08442217 = score(doc=5755,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.3077029 = fieldWeight in 5755, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5755)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Footnote
    Derived from the article of similar title in the ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization Version 1.1 (= 1.0 plus details on electrophones and Wikipedia); version 1.0 published 2019-01-17, this version 2019-05-29. Article category: KOS, specific (domain specific). The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments, as well as the editor, Professor Birger Hjørland, for all of his insightful comments and ideas.
  4. Rubel, A.; Castro, C.; Pham, A.: Algorithms and autonomy : the ethics of automated decision systems (2021) 0.03 
    0.028140724 = product of:
  0.08442217 = sum of:
    0.08442217 = weight(_text_:title in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08442217 = score(doc=671,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.3077029 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Algorithms influence every facet of modern life: criminal justice, education, housing, entertainment, elections, social media, news feeds, work... the list goes on. Delegating important decisions to machines, however, gives rise to deep moral concerns about responsibility, transparency, freedom, fairness, and democracy. Algorithms and Autonomy connects these concerns to the core human value of autonomy in the contexts of algorithmic teacher evaluation, risk assessment in criminal sentencing, predictive policing, background checks, news feeds, ride-sharing platforms, social media, and election interference. Using these case studies, the authors provide a better understanding of machine fairness and algorithmic transparency. They explain why interventions in algorithmic systems are necessary to ensure that algorithms are not used to control citizens' participation in politics and undercut democracy. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core
  5. Pech, G.; Delgado, C.; Sorella, S.P.: Classifying papers into subfields using Abstracts, Titles, Keywords and KeyWords Plus through pattern detection and optimization procedures : an application in Physics (2022) 0.03 
    0.028140724 = product of:
  0.08442217 = sum of:
    0.08442217 = weight(_text_:title in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08442217 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.3077029 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Classifying papers according to the fields of knowledge is critical to clearly understand the dynamics of scientific (sub)fields, their leading questions, and trends. Most studies rely on journal categories defined by popular databases such as WoS or Scopus, but some experts find that those categories may not correctly map the existing subfields nor identify the subfield of a specific article. This study addresses the classification problem using data from each paper (Abstract, Title, Keywords, and the KeyWords Plus) and the help of experts to identify the existing subfields and journals exclusive of each subfield. These "exclusive journals" are critical to obtain, through a pattern detection procedure that uses machine learning techniques (from software NVivo), a list of the frequent terms that are specific to each subfield. With that list of terms and with the help of optimization procedures, we can identify to which subfield each paper most likely belongs. This study can contribute to support scientific policy-makers, funding, and research institutions-via more accurate academic performance evaluations-, to support editors in their tasks to redefine the scopes of journals, and to support popular databases in their processes of refining categories.
  6. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.03 
    0.026077747 = product of:
  0.07823324 = sum of:
    0.07823324 = product of:
      0.23469973 = sum of:
        0.23469973 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23469973 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41760176 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  7. Wu, M.; Liu, Y.-H.; Brownlee, R.; Zhang, X.: Evaluating utility and automatic classification of subject metadata from Research Data Australia (2021) 0.02 
    0.022018244 = product of:
  0.06605473 = sum of:
    0.06605473 = product of:
      0.13210946 = sum of:
        0.13210946 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13210946 = score(doc=453,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.5549339 = fieldWeight in 453, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=453)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present a case study of how well subject metadata (comprising headings from an international classification scheme) has been deployed in a national data catalogue, and how often data seekers use subject metadata when searching for data. Through an analysis of user search behaviour as recorded in search logs, we find evidence that users utilise the subject metadata for data discovery. Since approximately half of the records ingested by the catalogue did not include subject metadata at the time of harvest, we experimented with automatic subject classification approaches in order to enrich these records and to provide additional support for user search and data discovery. Our results show that automatic methods work well for well represented categories of subject metadata, and these categories tend to have features that can distinguish themselves from the other categories. Our findings raise implications for data catalogue providers; they should invest more effort to enhance the quality of data records by providing an adequate description of these records for under-represented subject categories.
  8. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.02 
    0.021731457 = product of:
  0.06519437 = sum of:
    0.06519437 = product of:
      0.1955831 = sum of:
        0.1955831 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1955831 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41760176 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  9. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.02 
    0.021731457 = product of:
  0.06519437 = sum of:
    0.06519437 = product of:
      0.1955831 = sum of:
        0.1955831 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1955831 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41760176 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  10. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.02 
    0.015571849 = product of:
  0.046715546 = sum of:
    0.046715546 = product of:
      0.09343109 = sum of:
        0.09343109 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09343109 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  11. Provost, A. Le; Nicolas, .: IdRef, Paprika and Qualinka : atoolbox for authority data quality and interoperability (2020) 0.01 
    0.014830943 = product of:
  0.04449283 = sum of:
    0.04449283 = product of:
      0.08898566 = sum of:
        0.08898566 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 1076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08898566 = score(doc=1076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.37378973 = fieldWeight in 1076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1076)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Authority data has always been at the core of library catalogues. Today, authority data is reference data on a wider scale. The former authorities of the "Sudoc" union catalogue mutated into "IdRef", a read/write platform of open data and services which seeks to become a national supplier of reliable identifiers for French universities. To support their dissemination and comply with high quality standards, Paprika and Qualinka have been added to our toolbox, to expedite the massive and secure linking of scientific publications to IdRef authorities.
  12. Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020) 0.01 
    0.0133473 = product of:
  0.040041897 = sum of:
    0.040041897 = product of:
      0.080083795 = sum of:
        0.080083795 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080083795 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    2. 3.2020 14:08:22
  13. Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023) 0.01 
    0.0133473 = product of:
  0.040041897 = sum of:
    0.040041897 = product of:
      0.080083795 = sum of:
        0.080083795 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080083795 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
  14. Wells, D.: Online Public Access Catalogues and library discovery systems (2021) 0.01 
    0.012712238 = product of:
  0.038136713 = sum of:
    0.038136713 = product of:
      0.07627343 = sum of:
        0.07627343 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07627343 = score(doc=588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.3203912 = fieldWeight in 588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=588)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This article provides an overview of computer based catalogue systems designed for use by library clients, seeing present day 'discovery systems' on the same trajectory as the older 'online public access catalogues' (OPACs) which they are gradually replacing, both in technical development and their approach to client use scenarios. It traces the history of the OPAC/discovery system from its origins in the library automation of the 1960s through to the present and discusses the main technical standards which have formed its development. The article goes on to consider questions relating to the usability of electronic library catalogues and highlights semiotic and ethical issues inherent to their design. It concludes with reflections on the future of the OPAC/discovery system in an information universe apparently dominated by the internet search engine.
  15. Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020) 0.01 
    0.01112275 = product of:
  0.03336825 = sum of:
    0.03336825 = product of:
      0.0667365 = sum of:
        0.0667365 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0667365 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    17. 1.2020 22:15:11
  16. Wagner, E.: Über Impfstoffe zur digitalen Identität? (2020) 0.01 
    0.01112275 = product of:
  0.03336825 = sum of:
    0.03336825 = product of:
      0.0667365 = sum of:
        0.0667365 = weight(_text_:22 in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0667365 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    4. 5.2020 17:22:40
  17. Engel, B.: Corona-Gesundheitszertifikat als Exitstrategie (2020) 0.01 
    0.01112275 = product of:
  0.03336825 = sum of:
    0.03336825 = product of:
      0.0667365 = sum of:
        0.0667365 = weight(_text_:22 in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0667365 = score(doc=5906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    4. 5.2020 17:22:28
  18. Arndt, O.: Totale Telematik (2020) 0.01 
    0.01112275 = product of:
  0.03336825 = sum of:
    0.03336825 = product of:
      0.0667365 = sum of:
        0.0667365 = weight(_text_:22 in 5907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0667365 = score(doc=5907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5907)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 6.2020 19:11:24
  19. Arndt, O.: Erosion der bürgerlichen Freiheiten (2020) 0.01 
    0.01112275 = product of:
  0.03336825 = sum of:
    0.03336825 = product of:
      0.0667365 = sum of:
        0.0667365 = weight(_text_:22 in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0667365 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 6.2020 19:16:24
  20. Baecker, D.: ¬Der Frosch, die Fliege und der Mensch : zum Tod von Humberto Maturana (2021) 0.01 
    0.01112275 = product of:
  0.03336825 = sum of:
    0.03336825 = product of:
      0.0667365 = sum of:
        0.0667365 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0667365 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    7. 5.2021 22:10:24

Authors

Languages

  • e 82
  • d 30

Types

  • a 104
  • el 19
  • m 4
  • p 2
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications