-
Lazinger, S.S.; Peritz, B.C.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Using a local area network as an interface to wide area networks in library and information science education (1993)
0.06
0.05638446 = product of:
0.11276892 = sum of:
0.046423215 = weight(_text_:science in 7125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046423215 = score(doc=7125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 7125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7125)
0.0663457 = product of:
0.1326914 = sum of:
0.1326914 = weight(_text_:network in 7125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1326914 = score(doc=7125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.59043956 = fieldWeight in 7125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7125)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Bar-Ilan, J.: ¬The use of Web search engines in information science research (2003)
0.04
0.04246547 = product of:
0.08493094 = sum of:
0.046423215 = weight(_text_:science in 4271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046423215 = score(doc=4271,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 4271, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4271)
0.03850773 = weight(_text_:research in 4271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03850773 = score(doc=4271,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.2674672 = fieldWeight in 4271, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4271)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The World Wide Web was created in 1989, but it has already become a major information channel and source, influencing our everyday lives, commercial transactions, and scientific communication, to mention just a few areas. The seventeenth-century philosopher Descartes proclaimed, "I think, therefore I am" (cogito, ergo sum). Today the Web is such an integral part of our lives that we could rephrase Descartes' statement as "I have a Web presence, therefore I am." Because many people, companies, and organizations take this notion seriously, in addition to more substantial reasons for publishing information an the Web, the number of Web pages is in the billions and growing constantly. However, it is not sufficient to have a Web presence; tools that enable users to locate Web pages are needed as well. The major tools for discovering and locating information an the Web are search engines. This review discusses the use of Web search engines in information science research. Before going into detail, we should define the terms "information science," "Web search engine," and "use" in the context of this review.
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 38(2004), S.231-288
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Peritz, B.C.: Informetric theories and methods for exploring the Internet : an analytical survey of recent research literature (2002)
0.04
0.03883488 = product of:
0.07766976 = sum of:
0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023211608 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
0.054458156 = weight(_text_:research in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054458156 = score(doc=813,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.37825575 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The Internet, and more specifically the World Wide Web, is quickly becoming one of our main information sources. Systematic evaluation and analysis can help us understand how this medium works, grows, and changes, and how it influences our lives and research. New approaches in informetrics can provide an appropriate means towards achieving the above goals, and towards establishing a sound theory. This paper presents a selective review of research based on the Internet, using bibliometric and informetric methods and tools. Some of these studies clearly show the applicability of bibliometric laws to the Internet, while others establish new definitions and methods based on the respective definitions for printed sources. Both informetrics and Internet research can gain from these additional methods.
- Footnote
- Artikel in einem Themenheft "Current theory in library and information science"
-
Shema, H.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Thelwall, M.: How is research blogged? : A content analysis approach (2015)
0.03
0.0323624 = product of:
0.0647248 = sum of:
0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 1863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019343007 = score(doc=1863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 1863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1863)
0.0453818 = weight(_text_:research in 1863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0453818 = score(doc=1863,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.31521314 = fieldWeight in 1863, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1863)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Blogs that cite academic articles have emerged as a potential source of alternative impact metrics for the visibility of the blogged articles. Nevertheless, to evaluate more fully the value of blog citations, it is necessary to investigate whether research blogs focus on particular types of articles or give new perspectives on scientific discourse. Therefore, we studied the characteristics of peer-reviewed references in blogs and the typical content of blog posts to gain insight into bloggers' motivations. The sample consisted of 391 blog posts from 2010 to 2012 in Researchblogging.org's health category. The bloggers mostly cited recent research articles or reviews from top multidisciplinary and general medical journals. Using content analysis methods, we created a general classification scheme for blog post content with 10 major topic categories, each with several subcategories. The results suggest that health research bloggers rarely self-cite and that the vast majority of their blog posts (90%) include a general discussion of the issue covered in the article, with more than one quarter providing health-related advice based on the article(s) covered. These factors suggest a genuine attempt to engage with a wider, nonacademic audience. Nevertheless, almost 30% of the posts included some criticism of the issues being discussed.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.6, S.1136-1149
-
Bar-Ilan, J.: ¬The Web as an information source on informetrics? : A content analysis (2000)
0.03
0.030027626 = product of:
0.060055252 = sum of:
0.032826174 = weight(_text_:science in 4587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032826174 = score(doc=4587,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 4587, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4587)
0.027229078 = weight(_text_:research in 4587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027229078 = score(doc=4587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 4587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4587)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article addresses the question of whether the Web can serve as an information source for research. Specifically, it analyzes by way of content analysis the Web pages retrieved by the major search engines on a particular date (June 7, 1998), as a result of the query 'informetrics OR informetric'. In 807 out of the 942 retrieved pages, the search terms were mentioned in the context of information science. Over 70% of the pages contained only indirect information on the topic, in the form of hypertext links and bibliographical references without annotation. The bibliographical references extracted from the Web pages were analyzed, and lists of most productive authors, most cited authors, works, and sources were compiled. The list of reference obtained from the Web was also compared to data retrieved from commercial databases. For most cases, the list of references extracted from the Web outperformed the commercial, bibliographic databases. The results of these comparisons indicate that valuable, freely available data is hidden in the Web waiting to be extracted from the millions of Web pages
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.5, S.432-443
-
Bar-Ilan, J.: Informetrics (2009)
0.03
0.025220342 = product of:
0.050440684 = sum of:
0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 3822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023211608 = score(doc=3822,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3822, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3822)
0.027229078 = weight(_text_:research in 3822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027229078 = score(doc=3822,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 3822, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3822)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Informetrics is a subfield of information science and it encompasses bibliometrics, scientometrics, cybermetrics, and webometrics. This encyclopedia entry provides an overview of informetrics and its subfields. In general, informetrics deals with quantitative aspects of information: its production, dissemination, evaluation, and use. Bibliometrics and scientometrics study scientific literature: papers, journals, patents, and citations; while in webometric studies the sources studied are Web pages and Web sites, and citations are replaced by hypertext links. The entry introduces major topics in informetrics: citation analysis and citation related studies, the journal impact factor, the recently defined h-index, citation databases, co-citation analysis, open access publications and its implications, informetric laws, techniques for mapping and visualization of informetric phenomena, the emerging subfields of webometrics, cybermetrics and link analysis, and research evaluation.
-
Shema, H.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Thelwall, M.: Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? : Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics (2014)
0.03
0.025220342 = product of:
0.050440684 = sum of:
0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 1258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023211608 = score(doc=1258,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1258, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1258)
0.027229078 = weight(_text_:research in 1258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027229078 = score(doc=1258,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 1258, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1258)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.5, S.1018-1027
-
Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Towards maximal unification of semantically diverse ontologies for controversial domains (2014)
0.02
0.022557836 = product of:
0.045115672 = sum of:
0.03144143 = weight(_text_:research in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03144143 = score(doc=1634,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.21838607 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.013674239 = product of:
0.027348477 = sum of:
0.027348477 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027348477 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Ontologies are prone to wide semantic variability due to subjective points of view of their composers. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new approach for maximal unification of diverse ontologies for controversial domains by their relations. Design/methodology/approach - Effective matching or unification of multiple ontologies for a specific domain is crucial for the success of many semantic web applications, such as semantic information retrieval and organization, document tagging, summarization and search. To this end, numerous automatic and semi-automatic techniques were proposed in the past decade that attempt to identify similar entities, mostly classes, in diverse ontologies for similar domains. Apparently, matching individual entities cannot result in full integration of ontologies' semantics without matching their inter-relations with all other-related classes (and instances). However, semantic matching of ontological relations still constitutes a major research challenge. Therefore, in this paper the authors propose a new paradigm for assessment of maximal possible matching and unification of ontological relations. To this end, several unification rules for ontological relations were devised based on ontological reference rules, and lexical and textual entailment. These rules were semi-automatically implemented to extend a given ontology with semantically matching relations from another ontology for a similar domain. Then, the ontologies were unified through these similar pairs of relations. The authors observe that these rules can be also facilitated to reveal the contradictory relations in different ontologies. Findings - To assess the feasibility of the approach two experiments were conducted with different sets of multiple personal ontologies on controversial domains constructed by trained subjects. The results for about 50 distinct ontology pairs demonstrate a good potential of the methodology for increasing inter-ontology agreement. Furthermore, the authors show that the presented methodology can lead to a complete unification of multiple semantically heterogeneous ontologies. Research limitations/implications - This is a conceptual study that presents a new approach for semantic unification of ontologies by a devised set of rules along with the initial experimental evidence of its feasibility and effectiveness. However, this methodology has to be fully automatically implemented and tested on a larger dataset in future research. Practical implications - This result has implication for semantic search, since a richer ontology, comprised of multiple aspects and viewpoints of the domain of knowledge, enhances discoverability and improves search results. Originality/value - To the best of the knowledge, this is the first study to examine and assess the maximal level of semantic relation-based ontology unification.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Bronstein, J.; Gazit, T.; Perez, O.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Aharony, N.; Amichai-Hamburger, Y.: ¬An examination of the factors contributing to participation in online social platforms (2016)
0.02
0.02236842 = product of:
0.08947368 = sum of:
0.08947368 = sum of:
0.055288088 = weight(_text_:network in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055288088 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
0.034185596 = weight(_text_:22 in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034185596 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine participation in online social platforms consisting of information exchange, social network interactions, and political deliberation. Despite the proven benefits of online participation, the majority of internet users read social media data but do not directly contribute, a phenomenon called lurking. Design/methodology/approach A survey was administered electronically to 507 participants and consisted of ten sections in a questionnaire to gather data on the relationship between online participation and the following variables: anonymity, social value orientation, motivations, and participation in offline activities, as well as the internet's political influence and personality traits. Findings Findings show that users with high levels of participation also identify themselves, report higher levels of extroversion, openness, and activity outside the internet, the motivations being an intermediary variable in the relationship between the variables value. Originality/value The study shows that participation in online social platforms is not only related to personality traits, but they are impacted by the nature of the motivations that drive them to participate in the particular social platform, as well as by the interest toward the specific topic, or the type or nature of the social group with whom they are communicating.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Peritz, B.C.: ¬A method for measuring the evolution of a topic on the Web : the case of "informetrics" (2009)
0.02
0.021016954 = product of:
0.042033907 = sum of:
0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019343007 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
0.0226909 = weight(_text_:research in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0226909 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The universe of information has been enriched by the creation of the World Wide Web, which has become an indispensible source for research. Since this source is growing at an enormous speed, an in-depth look of its performance to create a method for its evaluation has become necessary; however, growth is not the only process that influences the evolution of the Web. During their lifetime, Web pages may change their content and links to/from other Web pages, be duplicated or moved to a different URL, be removed from the Web either temporarily or permanently, and be temporarily inaccessible due to server and/or communication failures. To obtain a better understanding of these processes, we developed a method for tracking topics on the Web for long periods of time, without the need to employ a crawler and relying only on publicly available resources. The multiple data-collection methods used allow us to discover new pages related to the topic, to identify changes to existing pages, and to detect previously existing pages that have been removed or whose content is not relevant anymore to the specified topic. The method is demonstrated through monitoring Web pages that contain the term informetrics for a period of 8 years. The data-collection method also allowed us to analyze the dynamic changes in search engine coverage, illustrated here on Google - the search engine used for the longest period of time for data collection in this project.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.9, S.1730-1740
-
Bar-Ilan, J.: Information hub blogs (2005)
0.02
0.015474406 = product of:
0.061897624 = sum of:
0.061897624 = weight(_text_:science in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061897624 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 31(2005) no.4, S.297-307
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Gutman,T.: How do search engines respond to some non-English queries? (2005)
0.01
0.013540106 = product of:
0.054160424 = sum of:
0.054160424 = weight(_text_:science in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054160424 = score(doc=4653,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 31(2005) no.1, S.13-
-
Bar-Ilan, J.: Methods for measuring search engine performance over time (2002)
0.01
0.007737203 = product of:
0.030948812 = sum of:
0.030948812 = weight(_text_:science in 305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030948812 = score(doc=305,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 305, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=305)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.4, S.308-319
-
Lazinger, S.S.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Peritz, B.C.: Internet use by faculty members in various disciplines : a comparative case study (1997)
0.01
0.006770053 = product of:
0.027080212 = sum of:
0.027080212 = weight(_text_:science in 390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027080212 = score(doc=390,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 390, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=390)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.6, S.508-518
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Peritz, B.C.: Evolution, continuity, and disappearance of documents on a specific topic an the Web : a longitudinal study of "informetrics" (2004)
0.01
0.006770053 = product of:
0.027080212 = sum of:
0.027080212 = weight(_text_:science in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027080212 = score(doc=2886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.11, S.980-990
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Azoulay, R.: Map of nonprofit organization websites in Israel (2012)
0.01
0.005802902 = product of:
0.023211608 = sum of:
0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023211608 = score(doc=253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=253)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.6, S.1142-1167
-
Bar-Ilan, J.: Web links and search engine ranking : the case of Google and the query "Jew" (2006)
0.00
0.004835752 = product of:
0.019343007 = sum of:
0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 6104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019343007 = score(doc=6104,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 6104, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6104)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.12, S.1581-1589
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Belous, Y.: Children as architects of Web directories : an exploratory study (2007)
0.00
0.004835752 = product of:
0.019343007 = sum of:
0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019343007 = score(doc=289,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.6, S.895-907
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Keenoy, K.; Yaari, E.; Levene, M.: User rankings of search engine results (2007)
0.00
0.004835752 = product of:
0.019343007 = sum of:
0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019343007 = score(doc=470,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 470, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=470)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.9, S.1254-1266
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Keenoy, K.; Levene, M.; Yaari, E.: Presentation bias is significant in determining user preference for search results : a user study (2009)
0.00
0.004835752 = product of:
0.019343007 = sum of:
0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019343007 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.1, S.135-149
