-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A measure for the cohesion of weighted networks (2003)
0.08
0.08493506 = product of:
0.11324675 = sum of:
0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 5157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019343007 = score(doc=5157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 5157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5157)
0.032089777 = weight(_text_:research in 5157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032089777 = score(doc=5157,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 5157, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5157)
0.06181396 = product of:
0.12362792 = sum of:
0.12362792 = weight(_text_:network in 5157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12362792 = score(doc=5157,freq=10.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.5501096 = fieldWeight in 5157, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Measurement of the degree of interconnectedness in graph like networks of hyperlinks or citations can indicate the existence of research fields and assist in comparative evaluation of research efforts. In this issue we begin with Egghe and Rousseau who review compactness measures and investigate the compactness of a network as a weighted graph with dissimilarity values characterizing the arcs between nodes. They make use of a generalization of the Botofogo, Rivlin, Shneiderman, (BRS) compaction measure which treats the distance between unreachable nodes not as infinity but rather as the number of nodes in the network. The dissimilarity values are determined by summing the reciprocals of the weights of the arcs in the shortest chain between two nodes where no weight is smaller than one. The BRS measure is then the maximum value for the sum of the dissimilarity measures less the actual sum divided by the difference between the maximum and minimum. The Wiener index, the sum of all elements in the dissimilarity matrix divided by two, is then computed for Small's particle physics co-citation data as well as the BRS measure, the dissimilarity values and shortest paths. The compactness measure for the weighted network is smaller than for the un-weighted. When the bibliographic coupling network is utilized it is shown to be less compact than the co-citation network which indicates that the new measure produces results that confirm to an obvious case.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.3, S.193-202
-
Egghe, L.: Little science, big science and beyond (1994)
0.08
0.07867156 = product of:
0.15734312 = sum of:
0.09380861 = weight(_text_:science in 6883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09380861 = score(doc=6883,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.7057147 = fieldWeight in 6883, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6883)
0.06353451 = weight(_text_:research in 6883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06353451 = score(doc=6883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 6883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6883)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses the quality of bibliometrics, informetrics and scientometrics research, intradisciplinary communication and science policy
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.04
0.036435805 = product of:
0.07287161 = sum of:
0.038686015 = weight(_text_:science in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038686015 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.034185596 = product of:
0.06837119 = sum of:
0.06837119 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06837119 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000)
0.03
0.030027626 = product of:
0.060055252 = sum of:
0.032826174 = weight(_text_:science in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032826174 = score(doc=4384,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
0.027229078 = weight(_text_:research in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027229078 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- One aim of science evaluation studies is to determine quantitatively the contribution of different players (authors, departments, countries) to the whole system. This information is then used to study the evolution of the system, for instance to gauge the results of special national or international programs. Taking articles as our basic data, we want to determine the exact relative contribution of each coauthor or each country. These numbers are brought together to obtain country scores, or department scores, etc. It turns out, as we will show in this article, that different scoring methods can yield totally different rankings. Conseqeuntly, a ranking between countries, universities, research groups or authors, based on one particular accrediting methods does not contain an absolute truth about their relative importance
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.145-157
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.02
0.021861482 = product of:
0.043722965 = sum of:
0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023211608 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.020511357 = product of:
0.041022714 = sum of:
0.041022714 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041022714 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990)
0.02
0.017911877 = product of:
0.07164751 = sum of:
0.07164751 = weight(_text_:science in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07164751 = score(doc=1515,freq=14.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.5389985 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- COMPASS
- Information science / Statistical mathematics
- LCSH
- Information science / Statistical methods
Library science / Statistical methods
- Subject
- Information science / Statistical mathematics
Information science / Statistical methods
Library science / Statistical methods
-
Egghe, L.: Special features of the author - publication relationship and a new explanation of Lotka's law based on convolution theory (1994)
0.01
0.011605804 = product of:
0.046423215 = sum of:
0.046423215 = weight(_text_:science in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046423215 = score(doc=5068,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.6, S.422-427
-
Egghe, L.: Note on a possible decomposition of the h-Index (2013)
0.01
0.011605804 = product of:
0.046423215 = sum of:
0.046423215 = weight(_text_:science in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046423215 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.871
-
Egghe, L.: ¬The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010)
0.01
0.011605804 = product of:
0.046423215 = sum of:
0.046423215 = weight(_text_:science in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046423215 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.65-114
-
Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014)
0.01
0.009671504 = product of:
0.038686015 = sum of:
0.038686015 = weight(_text_:science in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038686015 = score(doc=1508,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.10, S.2052-2054
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011)
0.01
0.0082065435 = product of:
0.032826174 = sum of:
0.032826174 = weight(_text_:science in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032826174 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1637-1644
-
Egghe, L.; Bornmann, L.: Fallout and miss in journal peer review (2013)
0.01
0.007941814 = product of:
0.031767257 = sum of:
0.031767257 = weight(_text_:research in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031767257 = score(doc=1759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The authors exploit the analogy between journal peer review and information retrieval in order to quantify some imperfections of journal peer review. Design/methodology/approach - The authors define fallout rate and missing rate in order to describe quantitatively the weak papers that were accepted and the strong papers that were missed, respectively. To assess the quality of manuscripts the authors use bibliometric measures. Findings - Fallout rate and missing rate are put in relation with the hitting rate and success rate. Conclusions are drawn on what fraction of weak papers will be accepted in order to have a certain fraction of strong accepted papers. Originality/value - The paper illustrates that these curves are new in peer review research when interpreted in the information retrieval terminology.
-
Egghe, L.: On the law of Zipf-Mandelbrot for multi-word phrases (1999)
0.01
0.007737203 = product of:
0.030948812 = sum of:
0.030948812 = weight(_text_:science in 3058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030948812 = score(doc=3058,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3058, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3058)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.3, S.233-241
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000)
0.01
0.007737203 = product of:
0.030948812 = sum of:
0.030948812 = weight(_text_:science in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030948812 = score(doc=4385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.158-165
-
Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009)
0.01
0.007737203 = product of:
0.030948812 = sum of:
0.030948812 = weight(_text_:science in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030948812 = score(doc=6759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.11, S.2362-2365
-
Egghe, L.: Dynamic h-index : the Hirsch index in function of time (2007)
0.01
0.007737203 = product of:
0.030948812 = sum of:
0.030948812 = weight(_text_:science in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030948812 = score(doc=147,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.3, S.452-454
-
Egghe, L.: On the relation between the association strength and other similarity measures (2010)
0.01
0.007737203 = product of:
0.030948812 = sum of:
0.030948812 = weight(_text_:science in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030948812 = score(doc=3598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.7, S.1502-1504
-
Egghe, L.: Informetric explanation of some Leiden Ranking graphs (2014)
0.01
0.007737203 = product of:
0.030948812 = sum of:
0.030948812 = weight(_text_:science in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030948812 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.737-741
-
Egghe, L.; Ravichandra Rao, I.K.: ¬The influence of the broadness of a query of a topic on its h-index : models and examples of the h-index of n-grams (2008)
0.01
0.006838786 = product of:
0.027355144 = sum of:
0.027355144 = weight(_text_:science in 2009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027355144 = score(doc=2009,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2009, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2009)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The article studies the influence of the query formulation of a topic on its h-index. In order to generate pure random sets of documents, we used N-grams (N variable) to measure this influence: strings of zeros, truncated at the end. The used databases are WoS and Scopus. The formula h=T**1/alpha, proved in Egghe and Rousseau (2006) where T is the number of retrieved documents and is Lotka's exponent, is confirmed being a concavely increasing function of T. We also give a formula for the relation between h and N the length of the N-gram: h=D10**(-N/alpha) where D is a constant, a convexly decreasing function, which is found in our experiments. Nonlinear regression on h=T**1/alpha gives an estimation of , which can then be used to estimate the h-index of the entire database (Web of Science [WoS] and Scopus): h=S**1/alpha, , where S is the total number of documents in the database.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.10, S.1688-1693
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Topological aspects of information retrieval (1998)
0.01
0.006770053 = product of:
0.027080212 = sum of:
0.027080212 = weight(_text_:science in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027080212 = score(doc=2157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.13, S.1144-1160
