Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Soergel, D."
  1. Fidel, R.; Soergel, D.: Factors affecting online bibliographic retrieval : a conceptual framework for research (1983) 0.07
    0.06725425 = product of:
      0.1345085 = sum of:
        0.061897624 = weight(_text_:science in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061897624 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
        0.07261088 = weight(_text_:research in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07261088 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.504341 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 34(1983), S.163-180
  2. Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018) 0.03
    0.031826958 = product of:
      0.063653916 = sum of:
        0.03630544 = weight(_text_:research in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03630544 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
        0.027348477 = product of:
          0.054696955 = sum of:
            0.054696955 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054696955 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2019 19:04:22
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  3. Wang, P.; Soergel, D.: ¬A cognitive model of document use during a research project : Study I: Document selection (1998) 0.03
    0.025716392 = product of:
      0.051432785 = sum of:
        0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019343007 = score(doc=443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
        0.032089777 = weight(_text_:research in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032089777 = score(doc=443,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes a model of document selection by real users of a bibliographic retrieval system. It reports on Part 1 of a longitudinal study of decision making on document use by academics during a actual research project. (Part 2 followed up the same users on how the selected documents were actually used in subsequent stages). The participants are 25 self-selected faculty and graduate students in Agricultural Economics. After a reference interview, the researcher conducted a search of DIALOG databases and prepared a printout. The users selected documents from this printout, They were asked to read and think aloud while selecting documents. There verbal reports were recorded and analyzed from a utiliy-theoretic perspective. The following model of the decision-making in the selection process emerged: document information lemenets (DIEs) in document records provide the information for judging the documents on 11 criteria (including topicality, orientation, quality, novelty, and authority); the criteria judgments are comninded in an assessment of document value along 5 dimensions (Epistemic, functional, conditional, social, and emotional values), leading to the use decision. This model accounts for the use of personal knowledge and decision strategies applied in the selection process. The model has implications for the design of an intelligent document selection assistant
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.2, S.115-133
  4. Golub, K.; Soergel, D.; Buchanan, G.; Tudhope, D.; Lykke, M.; Hiom, D.: ¬A framework for evaluating automatic indexing or classification in the context of retrieval (2016) 0.03
    0.02502302 = product of:
      0.05004604 = sum of:
        0.027355144 = weight(_text_:science in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027355144 = score(doc=3311,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
        0.0226909 = weight(_text_:research in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0226909 = score(doc=3311,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Tools for automatic subject assignment help deal with scale and sustainability in creating and enriching metadata, establishing more connections across and between resources and enhancing consistency. Although some software vendors and experimental researchers claim the tools can replace manual subject indexing, hard scientific evidence of their performance in operating information environments is scarce. A major reason for this is that research is usually conducted in laboratory conditions, excluding the complexities of real-life systems and situations. The article reviews and discusses issues with existing evaluation approaches such as problems of aboutness and relevance assessments, implying the need to use more than a single "gold standard" method when evaluating indexing and retrieval, and proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework. The framework is informed by a systematic review of the literature on evaluation approaches: evaluating indexing quality directly through assessment by an evaluator or through comparison with a gold standard, evaluating the quality of computer-assisted indexing directly in the context of an indexing workflow, and evaluating indexing quality indirectly through analyzing retrieval performance.
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.1, S.3-16
  5. Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking (2014) 0.02
    0.022223972 = product of:
      0.044447944 = sum of:
        0.027355144 = weight(_text_:science in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027355144 = score(doc=1344,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
        0.017092798 = product of:
          0.034185596 = sum of:
            0.034185596 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034185596 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:55:39
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1733-1756
  6. Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006) 0.02
    0.021861482 = product of:
      0.043722965 = sum of:
        0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023211608 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
        0.020511357 = product of:
          0.041022714 = sum of:
            0.041022714 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041022714 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:04:19
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.803-897
  7. Soergel, D.: ¬The rise of ontologies or the reinvention of classification (1999) 0.02
    0.016751537 = product of:
      0.06700615 = sum of:
        0.06700615 = weight(_text_:science in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06700615 = score(doc=4335,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.5040819 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: The 50th Anniversary of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Pt.2: Paradigms, models, and models of information science
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.12, S.1119-1120
  8. Soergel, D.: Software support for thesaurus construction and display (1994) 0.02
    0.015883628 = product of:
      0.06353451 = sum of:
        0.06353451 = weight(_text_:research in 8890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06353451 = score(doc=8890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 8890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8890)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 5th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 16, 1994, Alexandria, VA. Ed.: R. Fidel u.a
  9. Soergel, D.: Framework for data element standardization (1995) 0.02
    0.015883628 = product of:
      0.06353451 = sum of:
        0.06353451 = weight(_text_:research in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06353451 = score(doc=4574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 6th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 8, 1995, Chicago, IL. Ed.: R.P. Schwartz et al
  10. Soergel, D.: Data structure and software support for for integrated thesauri (1996) 0.01
    0.013614539 = product of:
      0.054458156 = sum of:
        0.054458156 = weight(_text_:research in 6052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054458156 = score(doc=6052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.37825575 = fieldWeight in 6052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6052)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Compatibility and integration of order systems: Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995
  11. Soergel, D.: Indexing and retrieval performance : the logical evidence (1997) 0.01
    0.012835911 = product of:
      0.051343642 = sum of:
        0.051343642 = weight(_text_:research in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051343642 = score(doc=578,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.35662293 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist
  12. Ding, W.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Performance of visual, verbal, and combined video surrogates (1999) 0.01
    0.009574301 = product of:
      0.038297202 = sum of:
        0.038297202 = weight(_text_:science in 6679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038297202 = score(doc=6679,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 6679, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6679)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  13. Balakrishnan, U.; Voß, J.; Soergel, D.: Towards integrated systems for KOS management, mapping, and access : Coli-conc and its collaborative computer-assisted KOS mapping tool Cocoda (2018) 0.01
    0.00907636 = product of:
      0.03630544 = sum of:
        0.03630544 = weight(_text_:research in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03630544 = score(doc=4825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  14. Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014) 0.01
    0.008460504 = product of:
      0.033842016 = sum of:
        0.033842016 = product of:
          0.06768403 = sum of:
            0.06768403 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06768403 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.22-32
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  15. Wang, P.; Soergel, D.: Beyond topical relevance : document selection behaviour of real users of IR systems (1993) 0.01
    0.007737203 = product of:
      0.030948812 = sum of:
        0.030948812 = weight(_text_:science in 7960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030948812 = score(doc=7960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 7960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7960)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Integrating technologies - converging professions: proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Columbus, OH, 24-28 October 1993. Ed.: S. Bonzi
  16. Soergel, D.: Indexing and retrieval performance : the logical evidence (1994) 0.01
    0.006770053 = product of:
      0.027080212 = sum of:
        0.027080212 = weight(_text_:science in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027080212 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.589-599
  17. Soergel, D.: Digital libraries and knowledge organization (2009) 0.01
    0.005672725 = product of:
      0.0226909 = sum of:
        0.0226909 = weight(_text_:research in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0226909 = score(doc=672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter describes not so much what digital libraries are but what digital libraries with semantic support could and should be. It discusses the nature of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) and how KOS can support digital library users. It projects a vision for designers to make and for users to demand better digital libraries. What is a digital library? The term \Digital Library" (DL) is used to refer to a range of systems, from digital object and metadata repositories, reference-linking systems, archives, and content management systems to complex systems that integrate advanced digital library services and support for research and practice communities. A DL may offer many technology-enabled functions and services that support users, both as information producers and as information users. Many of these functions appear in information systems that would not normally be considered digital libraries, making boundaries even more blurry. Instead of pursuing the hopeless quest of coming up with the definition of digital library, we present a framework that allows a clear and somewhat standardized description of any information system so that users can select the system(s) that best meet their requirements. Section 2 gives a broad outline for more detail see the DELOS DL Reference Model.
  18. Ahn, J.-w.; Soergel, D.; Lin, X.; Zhang, M.: Mapping between ARTstor terms and the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus (2014) 0.01
    0.0051278393 = product of:
      0.020511357 = sum of:
        0.020511357 = product of:
          0.041022714 = sum of:
            0.041022714 = weight(_text_:22 in 1421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041022714 = score(doc=1421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  19. Huang, X.; Soergel, D.: Relevance: an improved framework for explicating the notion (2013) 0.00
    0.004835752 = product of:
      0.019343007 = sum of:
        0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019343007 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.1, S.18-35
  20. Huang, X.; Soergel, D.; Klavans, J.L.: Modeling and analyzing the topicality of art images (2015) 0.00
    0.004835752 = product of:
      0.019343007 = sum of:
        0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019343007 = score(doc=2127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.8, S.1616-1644