Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.01251151 = product of:
  0.02502302 = sum of:
    0.013677572 = weight(_text_:science in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013677572 = score(doc=986,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050463587 = queryNorm
        0.10289528 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
    0.01134545 = weight(_text_:research in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01134545 = score(doc=986,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050463587 = queryNorm
        0.078803286 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION AS A NAVIGATION TOOL Charles-Antoine Julien, Pierre Tirilly, John. E. Leide and Catherine Guastavino. Using the LCSH Hierarchy to Browse a Collection - Pierre Tirilly and Charles-Antoine Julien. Random Walks for Subject Hierarchy Simplification - Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos Maculan and Gercina Ângela Borém de Oliveira Lima. Faceted Taxonomy as Mechanism for Browsing and Accessing Digital Libraries of Thesis and Dissertations: A Case Study ONTOLOGY Michael Shepherd and Tara Sampalli. Ontology as Boundary Object - Flávio Codeço Coelho, Renato Rocha Souza and Claudia Torres Codeço. Towards an Ontology for Mathematical Modeling with Application to Epidemiology - T. Padmavathy and M. Krishnamurthy. Ontological Representation of Knowledge for Developing Information Services in Food Science and Technology - Sangeeta Deokattey, D.K. Dixit and K. Bhanumurthy. Co-word and Facet Analysis as Tools for Conceptualization in Ontologies: a Preliminary Study for a Micro-Domain
CATEGORIES IN KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION L. Hajibayova and E. K. Jacob. A Theoretical Framework for Operationalizing Basic Level Categories in Knowledge Organization Research - A. Y. Asundi. Epistemological Basis of some Common Categories - A Study of Space and Time As Common Concepts - A. Y. Asundi. Domain Specific Categories and Relations and their Potential Applications: A Case Study of Two Arrays of Agriculture Schedule of Colon Classification RELATIONSHIPS IN KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION K. S. Raghavan and A. Neelameghan. Indic Cultures and Concepts: Implications for Knowledge Organization - Eduardo Ismael Murguia and Rodrigo de Sales. CNPq.s Knowledge Area Table as a Knowledge and Power Apparatus - Maja Zumer, Marcia Lei Zeng and Joan S. Mitchell. FRBRizing KOS Relationships: Applying the FRBR Model to Versions of the DDC - D. Grant Campbell. Farradane.s Relational Indexing and its Relationship to Hyperlinking in Alzheimer.s Information - Elizabeth Milonas. Classifying Web Term Relationships: An Examination of the Search Result Pages of Two Major Search Engines - Rosa San Sengundo and Daniel Martinez Avila. New Conceptual Structures for the Digital Environment: From KOS to the Semantic Interconnection - A. Neelameghan and K.S. Raghavan. Concept of .Time., Semantic Relationships and Cultural Frames
KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION FOR ARCHIVES Renato Rocha Souza, Flávio Codeço Coelho and Suemi Higuchi. The CPDOC Semantic Portal: Applying Semantic and Knowledge Organization Systems to the Brazilian Contemporary History Domain - Natália Bolfarini Tognoli and José Augusto Chaves Guimarães. Challenges of Knowledge Representation in Contemporary Archival Science - Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros and João Batista Ernesto de Moraes. Archival Classification and Knowledge Organization: Theoretical Possibilities for the Archival Field - Pekka Henttonen. Diversity of Knowledge Organization in Records and Archives Management DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION TOOLS Leonard Will. The ISO 25964 Data Model for the Structure of an Information Retrieval Thesaurus - Wieslaw Babik. A Faceted Classification of Cartographic Materials: Problems of Construction and Use - Ming-Shu, Yuan, Fan-Hua, Nan and Gou-Chi, Lee. Constructing Knowledge Classification Scheme in Industrial Technology via Domain Analysis: An Empirical Study - B.L. Vinod Kumar and Khaiser Nikam. Sanskrit-English Bilingual Thesaurus for Yogic Sciences: A Case Study of Problems and Issues with Terms of Non-Latin Origin - Emilena Josemary Lorenzon, Luciana de Souza Gracioso, Marco Donizete Paulino da Silva, Marcele Tinelli, Roniberto Morato Amaral, Leandro Innocentini Lopes de Faria and Wanda Aparecida Machado Hoffmann. Controlled Vocabulary for Intelligence Information System for Shoes

0.010942058 = product of:
  0.04376823 = sum of:
    0.04376823 = weight(_text_:science in 3024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04376823 = score(doc=3024,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050463587 = queryNorm
        0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 3024, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3024)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In this book, Ronald Day offers a critical history of the modern tradition of documentation. Focusing on the documentary index (understood as a mode of social positioning), and drawing on the work of the French documentalist Suzanne Briet, Day explores the understanding and uses of indexicality. He examines the transition as indexes went from being explicit professional structures that mediated users and documents to being implicit infrastructural devices used in everyday information and communication acts. Doing so, he also traces three epistemic eras in the representation of individuals and groups, first in the forms of documents, then information, then data. Day investigates five cases from the modern tradition of documentation. He considers the socio-technical instrumentalism of Paul Otlet, "the father of European documentation" (contrasting it to the hermeneutic perspective of Martin Heidegger); the shift from documentation to information science and the accompanying transformation of persons and texts into users and information; social media's use of algorithms, further subsuming persons and texts; attempts to build android robots -- to embody human agency within an information system that resembles a human being; and social "big data" as a technique of neoliberal governance that employs indexing and analytics for purposes of surveillance. Finally, Day considers the status of critique and judgment at a time when people and their rights of judgment are increasingly mediated, displaced, and replaced by modern documentary techniques.

Content

Paul Otlet : friends and books for information needsRepresenting documents and persons in information systems : library and information science and citation indexing and analysis -- Social computing and the indexing of the whole -- The document as the subject : androids -- Governing expression : social big data and neoliberalism.

Footnote

Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Day, R.E.: An afterword to indexing it all: the subject in the age of documentation, information, and data. In: Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 42(2016) no.2, S.25-28. Rez. in: JASIST 67(2016) no.7, S.1784-1786 (H.A. Olson).

LCSH

Information science / Philosophy
Information science / Social aspects

Series

History and foundation of information science

Subject

Information science / Philosophy
Information science / Social aspects

0.009671504 = product of:
  0.038686015 = sum of:
    0.038686015 = weight(_text_:science in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038686015 = score(doc=2550,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050463587 = queryNorm
        0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

LCSH

Computer science
Library science

Subject

Computer science
Library science

0.005672725 = product of:
  0.0226909 = sum of:
    0.0226909 = weight(_text_:research in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0226909 = score(doc=480,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050463587 = queryNorm
        0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

LIS professionals use structures for organizing knowledge when they catalog and classify objects in the collection, when they develop databases, when they design customized taxonomies, or when they search online. Structures for Organizing Knowledge: Exploring Taxonomies, Ontologies, and Other Schema explores and explains this basic function by looking at three questions: 1) How do we organize objects so that they make sense and are useful? 2) What role do categories, classifications, taxonomies, and other structures play in the process of organizing? 3) What do information professionals need to know about organizing behaviors in order to design useful structures for organizing knowledge? Taking a broad, yet specialized approach that is a first in the field, this book answers those questions by examining three threads: traditional structures for organizing knowledge; personal structures for organizing knowledge; and socially-constructed structures for organizing knowledge. Through these threads, it offers avenues for expanding thinking on classification and classification schemes, taxonomy and ontology development, and structures. Both a history of the development of taxonomies and an analysis of current research, theories, and applications, this volume explores a wide array of topics, including the new digital, social aspect of taxonomy development. Examples of subjects covered include: Formal and informal structures Applications of knowledge structures Classification schemes Early taxonomists and their contributions Social networking, bookmarking, and cataloging sites Cataloging codes Standards and best practices Tags, tagging, and folksonomies Descriptive cataloging Metadata schema standards Thought exercises, references, and a list of helpful websites augment each section. A final chapter, "Thinking Ahead: Are We at a Crossroads?" uses "envisioning exercises" to help LIS professionals look into the future.

0.0051278393 = product of:
  0.020511357 = sum of:
    0.020511357 = product of:
      0.041022714 = sum of:
        0.041022714 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041022714 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

24. 8.2016 14:03:22

0.00453818 = product of:
  0.01815272 = sum of:
    0.01815272 = weight(_text_:research in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01815272 = score(doc=4297,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050463587 = queryNorm
        0.12608525 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The relationship between a person with a question and a source of information is complex. Indexing and abstracting often fail because too much emphasis is put on the mechanics of description, and too little has been given as to what ought to be represented. Research literature suggests that inappropriate representation results in failed searches a significant number of times, perhaps even in a majority of cases. "Doing Things with Information" seeks to rectify this unfortunate situation by emphasizing methods of modeling and constructing appropriate representations of such questions and documents. Students in programs of information studies will find focal points for discussion about system design and refinement of existing systems. Librarians, scholars, and those who work within large document collections, whether paper or electronic, will find insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the access systems they use.