Search (511 results, page 1 of 26)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Wisser, K.: ¬The errors of our ways : using metadata quality research to understand common error patterns in the application of name headings (2014) 0.09
    0.0879529 = product of:
      0.11727053 = sum of:
        0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023211608 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
        0.060886066 = weight(_text_:research in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060886066 = score(doc=1574,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.42290276 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
        0.03317285 = product of:
          0.0663457 = sum of:
            0.0663457 = weight(_text_:network in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0663457 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Using data culled during a metadata quality research project for the Social Network and Archival Context (SNAC) project, this article discusses common errors and problems in the use of standardized languages, specifically unambiguous names for persons and corporate bodies. Errors such as misspelling, qualifiers, format, and miss-encoding point to several areas where quality control measures can improve aggregation of data. Results from a large data set indicate that there are predictable problems that can be retrospectively corrected before aggregation. This research looked specifically at name formation and expression in metadata records, but the errors detected could be extended to other controlled vocabularies as well.
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 478
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
  2. Salarelli, A.: Nella notte dove tuttel la vacche sono nere qualcuno prova ad accendere un cerino (1996) 0.08
    0.080226555 = product of:
      0.106968746 = sum of:
        0.032826174 = weight(_text_:science in 5763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032826174 = score(doc=5763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 5763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5763)
        0.027229078 = weight(_text_:research in 5763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027229078 = score(doc=5763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 5763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5763)
        0.046913497 = product of:
          0.093826994 = sum of:
            0.093826994 = weight(_text_:network in 5763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.093826994 = score(doc=5763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.41750383 = fieldWeight in 5763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Library science may well have an essential role to play in efficiently organising the huge amount of Internet information available in the various scientific disciplines. The basic problem is to develop a cataloguing theory sufficiently flexible to cope with the impact of an ever changing store of network data. Such a theory would abondon the utopian idea of a 'catalogue of ctalogues', seeking instead to match each specific user query to the most appropriate catalogue. Examines 2 important USA projects for cataloguing network resources: Digital Libraries Research (funded by the National Science Foundation), which uses a combination of search engines to retrieve net data; and the Internet Public Library. Lists the Management and Library Schools now on the WWW
  3. D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011) 0.08
    0.078456774 = product of:
      0.104609035 = sum of:
        0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023211608 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
        0.060886066 = weight(_text_:research in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060886066 = score(doc=4190,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.42290276 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
        0.020511357 = product of:
          0.041022714 = sum of:
            0.041022714 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041022714 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    National exercises for the evaluation of research activity by universities are becoming regular practice in ever more countries. These exercises have mainly been conducted through the application of peer-review methods. Bibliometrics has not been able to offer a valid large-scale alternative because of almost overwhelming difficulties in identifying the true author of each publication. We will address this problem by presenting a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometric datasets for large-scale research assessments. The application proposed concerns the Italian university system, comprising 80 universities and a research staff of over 60,000 scientists. The key advantage of the proposed approach is the ease of implementation. The algorithms are of practical application and have considerably better scalability and expandability properties than state-of-the-art unsupervised approaches. Moreover, the performance in terms of precision and recall, which can be further improved, seems thoroughly adequate for the typical needs of large-scale bibliometric research assessments.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:06:52
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.257-269
  4. Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015) 0.07
    0.07195186 = product of:
      0.095935814 = sum of:
        0.027080212 = weight(_text_:science in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027080212 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
        0.044925686 = weight(_text_:research in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044925686 = score(doc=2609,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.31204507 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
        0.023929918 = product of:
          0.047859836 = sum of:
            0.047859836 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047859836 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Schwarz, A.W.: ¬The virtual catalogue, the virtual library, and the virtual librarian (1995) 0.07
    0.07116914 = product of:
      0.09489219 = sum of:
        0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023211608 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
        0.03850773 = weight(_text_:research in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03850773 = score(doc=4694,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.2674672 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
        0.03317285 = product of:
          0.0663457 = sum of:
            0.0663457 = weight(_text_:network in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0663457 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the concept of the virtual library and how it might work in practice. The basic function of a catalogue is to provide a short route to getting one's hands on the document itself. The correspondence between the catalogue record and the object catalogued could be called the complementarity principle of library science. This is the basic organizational principle for the virtual library, the location of items becoming irrelevant as long as there are addresses and links. Discusses the management of the complementarity between bibliographic records and the document itself, where the complementarity manifests itself as a pointer or link between object anywhere on the network, the access route being irrelevant to the user, who simply has to 'click'. If the document itself is marked up with hypertext links one can then move within the document, and follow further links to other sources referred to in the text. Thus the catalogue record is no longer a separate entity but just a window to the item catalogued. Illustrates how the fully fledged electronic library might work through a search in the area of High Energy Physics research
    Source
    European Research Libraries cooperation. 5(1995) no.4, S.361-372
  6. Kim, J.; Diesner, J.: Distortive effects of initial-based name disambiguation on measurements of large-scale coauthorship networks (2016) 0.07
    0.06531672 = product of:
      0.087088965 = sum of:
        0.027355144 = weight(_text_:science in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027355144 = score(doc=2936,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
        0.032089777 = weight(_text_:research in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032089777 = score(doc=2936,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
        0.027644044 = product of:
          0.055288088 = sum of:
            0.055288088 = weight(_text_:network in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055288088 = score(doc=2936,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Scholars have often relied on name initials to resolve name ambiguities in large-scale coauthorship network research. This approach bears the risk of incorrectly merging or splitting author identities. The use of initial-based disambiguation has been justified by the assumption that such errors would not affect research findings too much. This paper tests that assumption by analyzing coauthorship networks from five academic fields-biology, computer science, nanoscience, neuroscience, and physics-and an interdisciplinary journal, PNAS. Name instances in data sets of this study were disambiguated based on heuristics gained from previous algorithmic disambiguation solutions. We use disambiguated data as a proxy of ground-truth to test the performance of three types of initial-based disambiguation. Our results show that initial-based disambiguation can misrepresent statistical properties of coauthorship networks: It deflates the number of unique authors, number of components, average shortest paths, clustering coefficient, and assortativity, while it inflates average productivity, density, average coauthor number per author, and largest component size. Also, on average, more than half of top 10 productive or collaborative authors drop off the lists. Asian names were found to account for the majority of misidentification by initial-based disambiguation due to their common surname and given name initials.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.6, S.1446-1461
  7. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.06
    0.062083043 = product of:
      0.08277739 = sum of:
        0.027080212 = weight(_text_:science in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027080212 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
        0.031767257 = weight(_text_:research in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031767257 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
        0.023929918 = product of:
          0.047859836 = sum of:
            0.047859836 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047859836 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; vol.4172
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  8. Calhoun, K.: Supporting digital scholarship : bibliographic control, library co-operatives and open access repositories (2013) 0.06
    0.058257613 = product of:
      0.11651523 = sum of:
        0.077813566 = weight(_text_:research in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077813566 = score(doc=1482,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.5404779 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
        0.03870166 = product of:
          0.07740332 = sum of:
            0.07740332 = weight(_text_:network in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07740332 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.3444231 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Research libraries have entered an era of discontinuous change-a time when the cumulated assets of the past do not guarantee future success. Bibliographic control, cooperative cataloguing systems and library catalogues have been key assets in the research library service framework for supporting scholarship. This chapter examines these assets in the context of changing library collections, new metadata sources and methods, open access repositories, digital scholarship and the purposes of research libraries. Advocating a fundamental rethinking of the research library service framework, the chapter concludes with a call for research libraries to collectively consider new approaches that could strengthen their roles as essential contributors to emergent, network-level scholarly research infrastructures.
  9. Knowlton, S.A.: Power and change in the US cataloging community (2014) 0.06
    0.05523473 = product of:
      0.22093892 = sum of:
        0.22093892 = sum of:
          0.17307909 = weight(_text_:network in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17307909 = score(doc=2599,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050463587 = queryNorm
              0.77015346 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
          0.047859836 = weight(_text_:22 in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047859836 = score(doc=2599,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050463587 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The US cataloging community is an interorganizational network with the Library of Congress (LC) as the lead organization, which reserves to itself the power to shape cataloging rules. Peripheral members of the network who are interested in modifying changes to the rules or to the network can use various strategies for organizational change that incorporate building ties to the decision-makers located at the hub of the network. The story of William E. Studwell's campaign for a subject heading code illustrates how some traditional scholarly methods of urging change-papers and presentations-are insufficient to achieve reform in an interorganizational network, absent strategies to build alliances with the decision makers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011) 0.05
    0.053214032 = product of:
      0.07095204 = sum of:
        0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023211608 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.027229078 = weight(_text_:research in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027229078 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.020511357 = product of:
          0.041022714 = sum of:
            0.041022714 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041022714 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:25:32
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.395-405
  11. Smiraglia, R.P.: Derivative bibliographic relationships : linkages in the bibliographic universe (1994) 0.05
    0.05225846 = product of:
      0.06967795 = sum of:
        0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019343007 = score(doc=3043,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
        0.0226909 = weight(_text_:research in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0226909 = score(doc=3043,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
        0.027644044 = product of:
          0.055288088 = sum of:
            0.055288088 = weight(_text_:network in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055288088 = score(doc=3043,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    A major problem for bibliographic retrieval is an absence of explicit linkages to guide users among manifestations of a work. The purpose of this research was to enhance the power of bibliographic retrieval systems by providing contextual information about the derivative bibliographic relationship. Descriptive survey method was employed. A sample of 411 works from the Georgetown University on-line catalog was drawn. 49.9% of works were derivative. Age of a progenitor work is the characteristic most strongly associated with derivation; language and country of origin are indifferent predictors. Popularity of works might contribute to the phenomenon of derivation. The mean size of bibliographic families of derivative works was 8.44 members. The majority of bibliographic families had successive derivations, large groups of bibliographic families had translations and simultaneous editions; few had extractions, amplifications, or performances; none had adaptations. Successive derivations are the most commonly found members of bibliographic families, and are associated with most other types of derivation within bibliographic families. The bibliographic data required for explicit control of works might easily be compiled from existing records. The development of bibliographic retrieval systems in the network environment could play a dramatic role in improving retrieval of works
    Source
    Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al
  12. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.05
    0.051394187 = product of:
      0.06852558 = sum of:
        0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019343007 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.032089777 = weight(_text_:research in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032089777 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.017092798 = product of:
          0.034185596 = sum of:
            0.034185596 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034185596 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.168-185
  13. Burnett, I.S.: Quality, speed and access : alternative cataloguing sources (1994) 0.04
    0.044949904 = product of:
      0.17979962 = sum of:
        0.17979962 = sum of:
          0.12510265 = weight(_text_:network in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12510265 = score(doc=2336,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050463587 = queryNorm
              0.5566718 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
          0.054696955 = weight(_text_:22 in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054696955 = score(doc=2336,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050463587 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Offers advice on avaluating alternative cataloguing sources. The steps should be: identify the possible providers; network for advice; test or sample attractive systems; develop criteria based on library size, type and location (e.g. cost and equipment needs, currency of records, types of materials accessed, customer service and reputation of vendor, impact on staff/time and other library services and ability to share or network information); and evaluate the possible services; and implement the new service
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
  14. Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003) 0.04
    0.04434503 = product of:
      0.059126705 = sum of:
        0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019343007 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
        0.0226909 = weight(_text_:research in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0226909 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
        0.017092798 = product of:
          0.034185596 = sum of:
            0.034185596 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034185596 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; vol.2769
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  15. Omekwu, C.O.: Cataloguers in a global information network environment (2008) 0.04
    0.042343073 = product of:
      0.084686145 = sum of:
        0.027229078 = weight(_text_:research in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027229078 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
        0.05745707 = product of:
          0.11491414 = sum of:
            0.11491414 = weight(_text_:network in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11491414 = score(doc=2536,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.51133573 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to explore the traditional and emerging roles of cataloguing professionals in a global network information environment. That exploration becomes even more critical in view of migration of information resources into digital, electronic and virtual domains. Design/methodology/approach - An exploratory research design was adopted. The method was to first examine current issues in library and information practice with specific focus on digital technology, the electronic environment, automation, networking, the internet, cyberspace and virtual libraries. The next approach was to examine the challenges of operating in a globalized information environment. Findings - Cataloguers have key roles in knowledge segmentation, identification, organization and authentication. They are vital as content and system managers, software specialists and information retrieval system designers. In all, more than 23 roles are articulated for forward-looking cataloguing professionals. Originality/value - The paper's originality lies in its argument that roles are correlates of competencies and that as the practice of knowledge organization migrates to a dominantly global information network environment, cataloguers must upgrade their competencies in order to effectively operate in the emerging environment.
  16. Dodge, C.; Marx, B.; Pfeiffenberger, H.: Web cataloguing through cache exploitation and steps toward consistency maintenance (1995) 0.04
    0.04181367 = product of:
      0.08362734 = sum of:
        0.044925686 = weight(_text_:research in 2164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044925686 = score(doc=2164,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.31204507 = fieldWeight in 2164, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2164)
        0.03870166 = product of:
          0.07740332 = sum of:
            0.07740332 = weight(_text_:network in 2164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07740332 = score(doc=2164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.3444231 = fieldWeight in 2164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a new Web cataloguing strategy based upon the automatic analysis of documents stored in a proxy server cache. This could be an elegant method of Web cataloguing as it creates no extra network load and runs completely automatically. Naturally such a mechanism will only reach a subset of Web documents, but at an institute such as the Alfred Wegner Institute, due to the fact that scientists tend to make quite good search engines, the cache usually contains large numbers of documents related to polar and marine research. Details of a database for polar, marine and global change research, based upon a cache scanning mechanism are given, and it is shown that it is becoming an increasingly uaseful resource
  17. Taylor, M.; Winstanley, B.: Bibliographic control of computer files : the feasibility of a union catalogue of computer files (1990) 0.04
    0.04181367 = product of:
      0.08362734 = sum of:
        0.044925686 = weight(_text_:research in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044925686 = score(doc=832,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.31204507 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
        0.03870166 = product of:
          0.07740332 = sum of:
            0.07740332 = weight(_text_:network in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07740332 = score(doc=832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.3444231 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a project based at the ESRC Data Archive, Esses University to examine standards for cataloguing computer files and the feasibility of creating a union catalogue of computer files. A pilot scheme was set up to enable the MARC record output of the ESRC Data Archive to be merged with the software records of the NISS (National Information on Software and Services) data base, which is available on the JANET network.
    Imprint
    London : British Library Board [for] British Library Research and Development Department
    Series
    British Library Research Paper; 89
  18. Marín-Arraiza, P.: ORCID in the Open Science scenario : opportunities for academic libraries (2019) 0.04
    0.041611444 = product of:
      0.08322289 = sum of:
        0.038297202 = weight(_text_:science in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038297202 = score(doc=5704,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
        0.044925686 = weight(_text_:research in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044925686 = score(doc=5704,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.31204507 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The persistent identification of authors and contributors plays a decisive role within the Open Science landscape. The increasing number of published research products and new open publishing models and infrastructures requires author identification which goes beyond fields or infrastructures and guarantees interoperability. ORCID iD is presented as a persistent identifier for researchers in this context. As information managers and organisers, many academic libraries have taken the lead in offering ORCID-related services and implementing it in their systems. This paper scans the implementation models across Europe and the actions carried out by libraries. Finally, it also depicts perspectives for integration in the Austrian library and research context.
  19. Eilts, J.: Non-Roman script materials in North American libraries : automation and international exchange (1996) 0.04
    0.04026795 = product of:
      0.0805359 = sum of:
        0.03630544 = weight(_text_:research in 6528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03630544 = score(doc=6528,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 6528, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6528)
        0.04423047 = product of:
          0.08846094 = sum of:
            0.08846094 = weight(_text_:network in 6528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08846094 = score(doc=6528,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.3936264 = fieldWeight in 6528, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6528)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes various methods of cataloguing non-Roman script materials in North American libraries. Discusses JACKPHY languages; Anglo American Cataloguing Rules for non-Roman script materials, accomodation of non-Roman script by USMARC and through ASCII representation; the RLIN East Asian Character Code and the introduction of Chinese, Japanase and Korean (CJK) into the Research Libraries Group (RLG) network; OCLC's implementation of CJK; the RLG's support for Cyrillic, Hebraic, Arabic and Greek scripts
  20. Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012) 0.04
    0.039476212 = product of:
      0.078952424 = sum of:
        0.055022508 = weight(_text_:research in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055022508 = score(doc=2600,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.38217562 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
        0.023929918 = product of:
          0.047859836 = sum of:
            0.047859836 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047859836 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050463587 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 470
  • m 25
  • b 15
  • el 14
  • s 12
  • r 4
  • ? 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…