Search (40 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. San Segundo, R.: ¬A new conception of representation of knowledge (2004) 0.05 
    0.049093388 = product of:
  0.098186776 = sum of:
    0.098186776 = sum of:
      0.070721425 = weight(_text_:maps in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.070721425 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.2483379 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
      0.027465349 = weight(_text_:22 in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027465349 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The new term Representation of knowledge, applied to the framework of electronic segments of information, with comprehension of new material support for information, and a review and total conceptualisation of the terminology which is being applied, entails a review of all traditional documentary practices. Therefore, a definition of the concept of Representation of knowledge is indispensable. The term representation has been used in westere cultural and intellectual tradition to refer to the diverse ways that a subject comprehends an object. Representation is a process which requires the structure of natural language and human memory whereby it is interwoven in a subject and in conscience. However, at the present time, the term Representation of knowledge is applied to the processing of electronic information, combined with the aim of emulating the human mind in such a way that one has endeavoured to transfer, with great difficulty, the complex structurality of the conceptual representation of human knowledge to new digital information technologies. Thus, nowadays, representation of knowledge has taken an diverse meanings and it has focussed, for the moment, an certain structures and conceptual hierarchies which carry and transfer information, and has initially been based an the current representation of knowledge using artificial intelligence. The traditional languages of documentation, also referred to as languages of representation, offer a structured representation of conceptual fields, symbols and terms of natural and notational language, and they are the pillars for the necessary correspondence between the object or text and its representation. These correspondences, connections and symbolisations will be established within the electronic framework by means of different models and of the "goal" domain, which will give rise to organisations, structures, maps, networks and levels, as new electronic documents are not compact units but segments of information. Thus, the new representation of knowledge refers to data, images, figures and symbolised, treated, processed and structured ideas which replace or refer to documents within the framework of technical processing and the recuperation of electronic information.
    Date
    2. 1.2005 18:22:25
  2. Jackson, R.: Information Literacy and its relationship to cognitive development and reflective judgment (2008) 0.04 
    0.035360713 = product of:
  0.070721425 = sum of:
    0.070721425 = product of:
      0.14144285 = sum of:
        0.14144285 = weight(_text_:maps in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14144285 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.4966758 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This chapter maps the Association of College and Research Libraries' Information Competency Standards for Higher Education to the cognitive development levels developed by William G. Perry and Patricia King and Karen Kitchener to suggest which competencies are appropriate for which level of cognitive development.
  3. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.03 
    0.03353836 = product of:
  0.06707672 = sum of:
    0.06707672 = product of:
      0.20123015 = sum of:
        0.20123015 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20123015 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42965913 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  4. Zins, C.: Conceptions of information science (2007) 0.03 
    0.030940626 = product of:
  0.06188125 = sum of:
    0.06188125 = product of:
      0.1237625 = sum of:
        0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1237625 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The field of information science is constantly changing. Therefore, information scientists are required to regularly review-and if necessary-redefine its fundamental building blocks. This article is one of four articles that documents the results of the Critical Delphi study conducted in 2003-2005. The study, "Knowledge Map of Information Science," was aimed at exploring the foundations of information science. The international panel was composed of 57 leading scholars from 16 countries who represent nearly all the major subfields and important aspects of the field. In this study, the author documents 50 definitions of information science, maps the major theoretical issues relevant to the formulation of a systematic conception, formulates six different conceptions of the field, and discusses their implications.
  5. Zins, C.: Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge (2007) 0.03 
    0.030940626 = product of:
  0.06188125 = sum of:
    0.06188125 = product of:
      0.1237625 = sum of:
        0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1237625 = score(doc=428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=428)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The field of Information Science is constantly changing. Therefore, information scientists are required to regularly review-and if necessary-redefine its fundamental building blocks. This article is one of a group of four articles, which resulted from a Critical Delphi study conducted in 2003-2005. The study, "Knowledge Map of Information Science," was aimed at exploring the foundations of information science. The international panel was composed of 57 leading scholars from 16 countries, who represent (almost) all the major subfields and important aspects of the field. This particular article documents 130 definitions of data, information, and knowledge formulated by 45 scholars, and maps the major conceptual approaches for defining these three key concepts.
  6. dpa: Struktur des Denkorgans wird bald entschlüsselt sein (2000) 0.03 
    0.029131403 = product of:
  0.058262806 = sum of:
    0.058262806 = product of:
      0.11652561 = sum of:
        0.11652561 = weight(_text_:22 in 3952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11652561 = score(doc=3952,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3952, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3952)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
    22. 7.2000 19:05:41
  7. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.03 
    0.027465349 = product of:
  0.054930698 = sum of:
    0.054930698 = product of:
      0.109861396 = sum of:
        0.109861396 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109861396 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
  8. afp: Gehirn von Taxifahrern passt sich an : Größerer Hippocampus (2000) 0.02 
    0.02403218 = product of:
  0.04806436 = sum of:
    0.04806436 = product of:
      0.09612872 = sum of:
        0.09612872 = weight(_text_:22 in 4496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09612872 = score(doc=4496,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4496, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4496)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:05:18
  9. Houston, R.D.; Harmon, E.G.: Re-envisioning the information concept : systematic definitions (2002) 0.02 
    0.02378569 = product of:
  0.04757138 = sum of:
    0.04757138 = product of:
      0.09514276 = sum of:
        0.09514276 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09514276 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    22. 2.2007 19:22:13
  10. ap: Schlaganfall : Computer-Bild zeigt den Heilungsprozess im Gehirn (2000) 0.02 
    0.020599011 = product of:
  0.041198023 = sum of:
    0.041198023 = product of:
      0.082396045 = sum of:
        0.082396045 = weight(_text_:22 in 4231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082396045 = score(doc=4231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4231)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:05:31
  11. Nerlich, H.: Schlußveranstaltung des Kongresses 'Information und Öffentlichkeit' am 23. März 2000 in Leipzig : "Zukunft der Fachinformation" (2000) 0.02 
    0.020599011 = product of:
  0.041198023 = sum of:
    0.041198023 = product of:
      0.082396045 = sum of:
        0.082396045 = weight(_text_:22 in 4401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082396045 = score(doc=4401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4401)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2000 13:33:40
  12. kal: Hubert Markl zur Zukunft der Forschung (2000) 0.02 
    0.020599011 = product of:
  0.041198023 = sum of:
    0.041198023 = product of:
      0.082396045 = sum of:
        0.082396045 = weight(_text_:22 in 4893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082396045 = score(doc=4893,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4893, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4893)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  13. Logothetis, N.K.: ¬Das Sehen : ein Fenster zum Bewußtsein (2000) 0.02 
    0.017165843 = product of:
  0.034331687 = sum of:
    0.034331687 = product of:
      0.06866337 = sum of:
        0.06866337 = weight(_text_:22 in 4225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06866337 = score(doc=4225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4225)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:02:07
  14. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.02 
    0.017165843 = product of:
  0.034331687 = sum of:
    0.034331687 = product of:
      0.06866337 = sum of:
        0.06866337 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06866337 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
  15. Hammwöhner, R.: Besuch bei alten Bekannten : zu den Sprachspielen mit dem Informationsbegriff (2004) 0.02 
    0.017165843 = product of:
  0.034331687 = sum of:
    0.034331687 = product of:
      0.06866337 = sum of:
        0.06866337 = weight(_text_:22 in 4669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06866337 = score(doc=4669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4669)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27.11.2005 17:22:54
  16. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.02 
    0.016993318 = product of:
  0.033986636 = sum of:
    0.033986636 = product of:
      0.06797327 = sum of:
        0.06797327 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06797327 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22
  17. Cornelius, I.: Theorizing information for information science (2002) 0.02 
    0.015470313 = product of:
  0.030940626 = sum of:
    0.030940626 = product of:
      0.06188125 = sum of:
        0.06188125 = weight(_text_:maps in 4244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06188125 = score(doc=4244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.21729566 = fieldWeight in 4244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Shannon provides a model whereby an information source selects a desired message, out of a set of possible messages, that is then formed into a signal. The signal is sent over the communication channel to a receiver, which then transforms the signal back to a message that is relayed to its destination (Shannon & Weaver, 1949/1963, p. 7). Problems connected with this model have remained with us. Some of the concepts are ambiguous; the identification of information with a process has spancelled the debate; the problems of measuring the amount of information, the relation of information to meaning, and questions about the truth value of information have remained. Balancing attention between the process and the act of receiving information, and deterrnining the character of the receiver, has also been the focus of work and debate. Information science has mined work from other disciplines involving information theory and has also produced its own theory. The desire for theory remains (Hjorland, 1998; Saracevic, 1999), but what theory will deliver is unclear. The distinction between data and information, or communication and information, is not of concern here. The convention that data, at some point of use, become information, and that information is transferred in a process of communication suffices for this discussion. Substitution of any of these terms is not a problem. More problematic is the relationship between information and knowledge. It seems accepted that at some point the data by perception, or selection, become information, which feeds and alters knowledge structures in a human recipient. What that process of alteration is, and its implications, remain problematic. This review considers the following questions: 1. What can be gleaned from the history of reviews of information in information science? 2. What current maps, guides, and surveys are available to elaborate our understanding of the issues? 3. Is there a parallel development of work outside information science an information theory of use to us? 4. Is there a dominant view of information within information science? 5. What can we say about issues like measurement, meaning, and misinformation? 6. Is there other current work of relevance that can assist attempts, in information science, to develop a theory of information?
  18. Calvin, W.H.: ¬Der Sprache des Gehirns : Wie in unserem Bewußtsein Gedanken entstehen (2002) 0.01 
    0.0137326745 = product of:
  0.027465349 = sum of:
    0.027465349 = product of:
      0.054930698 = sum of:
        0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054930698 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11.11.2002 14:30:22
  19. Wissenschaftler fordern 'Open Access' : Berliner Erklärung (2003) 0.01 
    0.0137326745 = product of:
  0.027465349 = sum of:
    0.027465349 = product of:
      0.054930698 = sum of:
        0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054930698 = score(doc=2013,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Gemeinsam mit den Repräsentanten der großen deutschen und internationalen Wissenschaftsorganisationen hat Prof. Peter Gruss, der Präsident der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, am 22. Oktober die folgende »Berliner Erklärung über offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen« (Berlin Declaration an Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities) unterzeichnet. Vorausgegangen war eine dreitägige Konferenz in Berlin. Dabei diskutierten international führende Experten über neue Zugangsmöglichkeiten zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen und kulturellem Erbe durch das Internet.
  20. "Berliner Erklärung über offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen" unterzeichnet (2003) 0.01 
    0.01201609 = product of:
  0.02403218 = sum of:
    0.02403218 = product of:
      0.04806436 = sum of:
        0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04806436 = score(doc=2021,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Gemeinsam mit den Repräsentanten der großen deutschen und internationalen Wissenschaftsorganisationen hat Prof. Peter Gruss, der Präsident der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, am Mittwoch, den 22. Oktober, die "Berliner Erklärung über offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen" (Berlin Declaration an Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities) unterzeichnet. Vorausgegangen war eine dreitägige Konferenz im Berlin-Dahlemer Harnack-Haus der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Dabei diskutierten international führende Experten über neue Zugangsmöglichkeiten zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen und kulturellem Erbe durch das Internet.

Authors

Languages

  • d 24
  • e 16

Types

  • a 36
  • m 4
  • el 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications