Search (4032 results, page 2 of 202)

0.085913435 = product of:
  0.17182687 = sum of:
    0.17182687 = sum of:
      0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1237625 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
      0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04806436 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

To improve searching, filtering and processing of information on the Web, a common effort is made in the direction of metadata, defined as machine understandable information about Web resources or other things. In particular, the eXtensible Markup Language (XML) aims at providing a common syntax to emerging metadata formats. Proposes the Structured Graph Format (SGF) an XML compliant markup language based on structured graphs, for capturing Web sites' structure. Presents SGMapper, a client-site tool, which aims to facilitate navigation in large Web sites by generating highly interactive site maps using SGF metadata

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06

0.085913435 = product of:
  0.17182687 = sum of:
    0.17182687 = sum of:
      0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 2500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1237625 = score(doc=2500,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 2500, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2500)
      0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 2500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04806436 = score(doc=2500,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2500, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2500)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Semantische Netze unterstützen den Suchvorgang im Information Retrieval. Sie bestehen aus relationierten Begriffen und helfen dem Nutzer das richtige Vokabular zur Fragebildung zu finden. Eine leicht und intuitiv erfassbare Darstellung und eine interaktive Bedienungsmöglichkeit optimieren den Suchprozess mit der Begriffsstruktur. Als Interaktionsform bietet sich Hy-pertext mit dem etablierte Point- und Klickverfahren an. Eine Visualisierung zur Unterstützung kognitiver Fähigkeiten kann durch eine Darstellung der Informationen mit Hilfe von Punkten und Linien erfolgen. Vorgestellt wer-den die Anwendungsbeispiele Wissensnetz im Brockhaus multimedial, WordSurfer der Firma BiblioMondo, SpiderSearch der Firma BOND und Topic Maps Visualization in dandelon.com und im Portal Informationswis-senschaft der Firma AGI - Information Management Consultants.

Date

30. 1.2007 18:22:41

0.085913435 = product of:
  0.17182687 = sum of:
    0.17182687 = sum of:
      0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1237625 = score(doc=2853,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
      0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04806436 = score(doc=2853,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The management of library "pick-up books" - a phrase that refers to books pulled off the shelves by readers, discarded in the library after use, and picked up by library assistants for reshelving - is an issue for many collection managers. This research attempts to use geographic information system (GIS) software as a tool to monitor the use of such books so that their distributions by book shelf-ranges can be displayed visually. With GIS, library floor layouts are drawn as maps. This research produces some explanations of the habits of library patrons browsing shelved materials, and makes suggestions to librarians on the expansion of library collections and the rearrangement potential for library space.

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.209-216

0.085913435 = product of:
  0.17182687 = sum of:
    0.17182687 = sum of:
      0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1237625 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
      0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04806436 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Topic maps

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.085913435 = product of:
  0.17182687 = sum of:
    0.17182687 = sum of:
      0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1237625 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
      0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04806436 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper maps the concepts "space" and "dimensionality" in classifications, in particular in visualizations hereof, from a historical perspective. After a historical excursion in the domain of classification theory of what in mathematics is known as dimensionality reduction in representations of a single universe of knowledge, its potentiality will be explored for information retrieval and navigation in the multiverse of the World Wide Web.

Date

22. 2.2013 11:31:25

0.085913435 = product of:
  0.17182687 = sum of:
    0.17182687 = sum of:
      0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1237625 = score(doc=1423,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
      0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04806436 = score(doc=1423,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper explores relationships between different classification schemes. It suggests how these relationships could be considered part of the reception of a scheme, in particular as an aspect of its "Wirkung". Both intra-domain and inter-domain scheme relationships are examined, and are combined with pre-existing research on intra-scheme relationships. A model is posited which maps inter-scheme relationships, showing some of the complexities evoked in analysing the connections between classification schemes. Musical instrument (organology) classification is used as examples throughout the paper, to illustrate the ideas being discussed.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.08424257 = sum of:
  0.06707672 = product of:
    0.20123015 = sum of:
      0.20123015 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20123015 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42965913 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017165843 = product of:
    0.034331687 = sum of:
      0.034331687 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034331687 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.082928225 = product of:
  0.16585645 = sum of:
    0.16585645 = product of:
      0.3317129 = sum of:
        0.3317129 = weight(_text_:maps in 4727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3317129 = score(doc=4727,freq=44.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            1.164808 = fieldWeight in 4727, product of:
              6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
                44.0 = termFreq=44.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4727)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

XML Topic Maps (XTM) represent a powerful new tool for transforming the Web from a vast, chaotic sea of data into a highly usable information resource. XML Topic Maps is the first comprehensive, authoritative guide to this new technology. Edited by Jack Park, a leader of the XTM community, with contributions from leading members of the community, it covers every aspect of XML Topic Map creation and usage. Drawing on the XTM 1.0 standard, a complete XML grammar for interchanging Web-based Topic Maps, this book shows how XML Topic Maps can be utilized as an enabling technology for the new "Semantic Web," in which information is given well-defined meaning, making it possible for computers and people to cooperate more effectively than ever before. Coverage includes: creating, using, and extending XML Topic Maps; ontological engineering; and the use of XML Topic Maps to create next-generation knowledge representation systems and search tools. Park shows how to use Topic Maps to visualize data; how Topic Maps relate to RDF and semantic networks; and finally, how Topic Maps presage a profound paradigm shift in the way information is represented, shared, and learned on the Internet -- and everywhere else. For every Web designer, developer, and content specialist concerned with delivering and sharing information in more useful and meaningful forms.

Content

Inhalt: Let There Be Light / Jack Park - Introduction to the Topic Maps Paradigm / Michel Biezunski - A Perspective on the Quest for Global Knowledge Interchange / Steven R. Newcomb - The Rise and Rise of Topic Maps / Sam Hunting - Topic Maps from Representation to Identity: Conversation, Names, and Published Subject Indicators / Bernard Vatant - How to Start Topic Mapping Right Away with the XTM Specification / Sam Hunting - Knowledge Representation, Ontological Engineering, and Topic Maps / Leo Obrst and Howard Liu - Topic Maps in the Life Sciences / John Park arid Nefer Park - Creating and Maintaining Enterprise Web Sites with Topic Maps and XSLT / Nikita Ogievetsky - SemanText / Eric Freese - XTM Programming with TM4J / Kal Ahmed - Nexist Topic MapTestbed / Jack Park - GooseWorks Toolkit / Sam Hunting - Topic Map Visualization / Benedicte Le Grand - Topic Maps and RDF / Eric Freese - Topic Maps and Semantic Networks / Eric Freese - Topic Map Fundamentals for Knowledge Representation / H. Holger Rath - Topic Maps in Knowledge Organization / Alexander Sigel - Prediction: A Profound Paradigm Shift / Kathleen M. Fisher - Topic Maps, the Semantic Web, and Education / Jack Park

Object

Topic maps

0.0818612 = product of:
  0.1637224 = sum of:
    0.1637224 = product of:
      0.3274448 = sum of:
        0.3274448 = weight(_text_:maps in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3274448 = score(doc=472,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            1.1498206 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Maps have bibliographic characteristics which present unusual challenges to traditional cataloging practices. Rare maps carry these challenges even further by requiring bibliographic descriptions that identify and distinguish the item in hand from any other copies. While it has been acknowledged that rare maps should be bibliographically described in a different manner than modern maps, as rare printed texts are described in a differently than modern texts, the map cataloging community is uncertain about how this should be accomplished. This article attempts to identify some problems unique to the cataloging of rare maps. It also discusses the appropriateness of current map cataloging rules for rare maps and the importance of thorough cartobibliographic research.

0.0818612 = product of:
  0.1637224 = sum of:
    0.1637224 = product of:
      0.3274448 = sum of:
        0.3274448 = weight(_text_:maps in 4724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3274448 = score(doc=4724,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            1.1498206 = fieldWeight in 4724, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4724)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Topic maps are a new ISO standard for describing knowledge structures and associating them with information resources. As such they constitute an enabling technology for knowledge management. Dubbed "the GPS of the information universe", topic maps are also destined to provide powerful new ways of navigating large and interconnected corpora. While it is possible to represent immensely complex structures using topic maps, the basic concepts of the model - Topics, Associations, and Occurrences (TAO) - are easily grasped. This paper provides a non-technical introduction to these and other concepts (the IFS and BUTS of topic maps), relating them to things that are familiar to all of us from the realms of publishing and information management, and attempting to convey some idea of the uses to which topic maps will be put in the future.

Object

Topic maps

0.080492064 = product of:
  0.16098413 = sum of:
    0.16098413 = product of:
      0.48295236 = sum of:
        0.48295236 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.48295236 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42965913 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.07967535 = product of:
  0.1593507 = sum of:
    0.1593507 = sum of:
      0.125019 = weight(_text_:maps in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.125019 = score(doc=107,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.43900353 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
      0.034331687 = weight(_text_:22 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034331687 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Forty-five years have passed since Lubetzky outlined the primary objectives of the catalog, which should facilitate the identification of specific bibliographic entities, and the explicit recoguition of works and relationships amongthem. Still, our catalogs are better designed to identify specific bibliographic entities than they are to guide users among the network of potential related editions and translations of works. In this paper, we seck to examine qualitatively some interesting examples of families of related works, defined as bibliographic families. Although the cases described here were derived from a random sample, this is a qualitative analysis. We selected these bibliographic families for their ability to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of Leazer's model, which incorporates relationship taxonomies by Tillett and Smiraglia Qualitatice analysis is intended to produce on explanation of a phenomenou, particularly an identification of any palterns observed. Patterns observed in qualitative analysis can be used to affirm external observations of the same phenomena; conclusions can contribute to what is knoton as grounded theory-a unique explanation grounded in the phenomenon under study. We arrive at two statements of grounded theory concerning bibliographic families: cataloger-generated implicit maps among works are inadequate, and qualitative analysis suggests the complexity of even the smallest bibliographic families. We conclude that user behavior study is needed to suggest which alternative maps are preferable.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.07967535 = product of:
  0.1593507 = sum of:
    0.1593507 = sum of:
      0.125019 = weight(_text_:maps in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.125019 = score(doc=2376,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.43900353 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
      0.034331687 = weight(_text_:22 in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034331687 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Knowledge organization is needed everywhere. Its importance is marked by its pervasiveness. This paper will show many areas, tasks, and functions where proper use of knowledge organization, construed as broadly as the term implies, provides support for learning and understanding, for sense making and meaning making, for inference, and for discovery by people and computer programs and thereby will make the world a better place. The paper focuses not on metadata but rather on structuring and representing the actual data or knowledge itself and argues for more communication between the largely separated KO, ontology, data modeling, and semantic web communities to address the many problems that need better solutions. In particular, the paper discusses the application of knowledge organization in knowledge bases for question answering and cognitive systems, knowledge bases for information extraction from text or multimedia, linked data, big data and data analytics, electronic health records as one example, influence diagrams (causal maps), dynamic system models, process diagrams, concept maps, and other node-link diagrams, information systems in organizations, knowledge organization for understanding and learning, and knowledge transfer between domains. The paper argues for moving beyond triples to a more powerful representation using entities and multi-way relationships but not attributes.

Date

27.11.2015 20:52:22

0.07906896 = product of:
  0.15813792 = sum of:
    0.15813792 = product of:
      0.31627584 = sum of:
        0.31627584 = weight(_text_:maps in 4726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31627584 = score(doc=4726,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            1.1106008 = fieldWeight in 4726, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

There is a natural overlap and complement between Knowledge Organization (KO) and Topic Maps. I am convinced that KO, with its relevant knowledge of an experiences in concept organization, can strongly contribute in this area. Since this ides impacts both the KO and TM communities, this chapter offers an invitation to anyone interested in TMs to draw from the KO background and to KO experts to include the case of KO with TMs in their research.

Object

Topic maps

Source

XML topic maps: creating and using topic maps for the Web. Eds.: Park, J. u. S. Hunting

0.076558195 = product of:
  0.15311639 = sum of:
    0.15311639 = product of:
      0.30623278 = sum of:
        0.30623278 = weight(_text_:maps in 975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30623278 = score(doc=975,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            1.0753347 = fieldWeight in 975, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=975)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Geographic information systems are computerised systems designed to store maps in digital form together with specific spatial data related to the maps. Reviews a range of specialised software designed for theses applications

0.076558195 = product of:
  0.15311639 = sum of:
    0.15311639 = product of:
      0.30623278 = sum of:
        0.30623278 = weight(_text_:maps in 6415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30623278 = score(doc=6415,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            1.0753347 = fieldWeight in 6415, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6415)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses the nature and purpose of cartobibliography; the study of bibliography as applied specifically to maps. Maps, although bibliographically and physically awkward, present valuable information in much more concentrated form than books. Cartobibliographies, reflecting the complexity of maps, come in many varieties, depending on the purposes and rationales behind them

0.076558195 = product of:
  0.15311639 = sum of:
    0.15311639 = product of:
      0.30623278 = sum of:
        0.30623278 = weight(_text_:maps in 3111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30623278 = score(doc=3111,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            1.0753347 = fieldWeight in 3111, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3111)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Briefly summarizes spatial data cataloguing in the US libraries in this century. Describes the catalogued holdings of maps held at University of California libraries. Outlines strategies for searching maps on the MELVYL system

0.0750114 = product of:
  0.1500228 = sum of:
    0.1500228 = product of:
      0.3000456 = sum of:
        0.3000456 = weight(_text_:maps in 1068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3000456 = score(doc=1068,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            1.0536084 = fieldWeight in 1068, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1068)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Interactive dynamic maps (IDMs) help users interactively explore webs of hypermedia documents. IDMs provide automatically generated abstract graphical views at different levels of granularity. Visual cues give users a better understanding of the content of the web, which results in better navigation control and more accurate and effective expressions of queries. IDMs consist of: topic maps, which provide visual abstractions of the semantic content of a web documents and document maps, which provide visual abstractions of subsets of documents. The major contribution of this work include: automatique techniques for building maps directly from a web of documents, including extraction of semantic content and use of a spatial metaphor for generating layout and filing space, a direct manipulation interaction paradigm for exploring webs of documents, using maps and an integrated graphical query language, and the ability to use the maps themselves as documents that can be customized, stored in a library and shared among users

Object

Topic maps

0.073640086 = product of:
  0.14728017 = sum of:
    0.14728017 = sum of:
      0.10608215 = weight(_text_:maps in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10608215 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
      0.041198023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041198023 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Mit der Suchmaschine Google, den Satelitenkarten auf Google Maps, mit der Volltextsuche in Google Books, mit dem Bildprogramm Picasa, dem Mail-Programm Google Mail, Google Docs und vielen weiteren Services entwickelt sich die Firma von Larry Page und Sergej Brin zur unkontrollierten Weltmacht im Internet: Immer mehr Firmen entwickeln Dienste und Geräte, die ausschließlich auf Google abgestimmt sind. Praktisch zählt nur mehr das Wissen, das man über Google findet. Diese Monopolstellung ist für eine Wissensgesellschaft gefährlich. Sie erleichtert die politische Zensur, wie sie bei Google in China stattfindet, und sie erleichtert das Ausspionieren unserer Privatsphäre. Denn jede Suchanfrage bleibt bei Google über Jahre gespeichert: In den USA wird derzeit eine Frau des Mordes an ihrem Mann verdächtigt, weil sie einmal in Google den Suchbegriff "murder" eingetippt hat.

Date

7. 4.2008 21:22:57

0.073640086 = product of:
  0.14728017 = sum of:
    0.14728017 = sum of:
      0.10608215 = weight(_text_:maps in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10608215 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
      0.041198023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041198023 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06