Search (119 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Fang, Z.; Dudek, J.; Costas, R.: Facing the volatility of tweets in altmetric research (2022) 0.06
    0.063941434 = product of:
      0.12788287 = sum of:
        0.12788287 = product of:
          0.25576574 = sum of:
            0.25576574 = weight(_text_:2.6 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25576574 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42922258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.59588134 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The data re-collection for tweets from data snapshots is a common methodological step in Twitter-based research. Understanding better the volatility of tweets over time is important for validating the reliability of metrics based on Twitter data. We tracked a set of 37,918 original scholarly tweets mentioning COVID-19-related research daily for 56 days and captured the reasons for the changes in their availability over time. Results show that the proportion of unavailable tweets increased from 1.6 to 2.6% in the time window observed. Of the 1,323 tweets that became unavailable at some point in the period observed, 30.5% became available again afterwards. "Revived" tweets resulted mainly from the unprotecting, reactivating, or unsuspending of users' accounts. Our findings highlight the importance of noting this dynamic nature of Twitter data in altmetric research and testify to the challenges that this poses for the retrieval, processing, and interpretation of Twitter data about scientific papers.
  2. Thelwall, M.; Levitt, J.M.: National scientific performance evolution patterns : retrenchment, successful expansion, or overextension (2018) 0.05
    0.053284526 = product of:
      0.10656905 = sum of:
        0.10656905 = product of:
          0.2131381 = sum of:
            0.2131381 = weight(_text_:2.6 in 4225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2131381 = score(doc=4225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42922258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.4965678 = fieldWeight in 4225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    National governments would like to preside over an expanding and increasingly high-impact science system but are these two goals largely independent or closely linked? This article investigates the relationship between changes in the share of the world's scientific output and changes in relative citation impact for 2.6 million articles from 26 fields in the 25 countries with the most Scopus-indexed journal articles from 1996 to 2015. There is a negative correlation between expansion and relative citation impact, but their relationship varies. China, Spain, Australia, and Poland were successful overall across the 26 fields, expanding both their share of the world's output and its relative citation impact, whereas Japan, France, Sweden, and Israel had decreased shares and relative citation impact. In contrast, the USA, UK, Germany, Italy, Russia, The Netherlands, Switzerland, Finland, and Denmark all enjoyed increased relative citation impact despite a declining share of publications. Finally, India, South Korea, Brazil, Taiwan, and Turkey all experienced sustained expansion but a recent fall in relative citation impact. These results may partly reflect changes in the coverage of Scopus and the selection of fields.
  3. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.03
    0.0258782 = product of:
      0.0517564 = sum of:
        0.0517564 = product of:
          0.1035128 = sum of:
            0.1035128 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1035128 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  4. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03
    0.0258782 = product of:
      0.0517564 = sum of:
        0.0517564 = product of:
          0.1035128 = sum of:
            0.1035128 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1035128 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  5. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.03
    0.0258782 = product of:
      0.0517564 = sum of:
        0.0517564 = product of:
          0.1035128 = sum of:
            0.1035128 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1035128 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  6. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02
    0.022873314 = product of:
      0.04574663 = sum of:
        0.04574663 = product of:
          0.09149326 = sum of:
            0.09149326 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09149326 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  7. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.022873314 = product of:
      0.04574663 = sum of:
        0.04574663 = product of:
          0.09149326 = sum of:
            0.09149326 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09149326 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  8. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02
    0.022643425 = product of:
      0.04528685 = sum of:
        0.04528685 = product of:
          0.0905737 = sum of:
            0.0905737 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0905737 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  9. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02
    0.022643425 = product of:
      0.04528685 = sum of:
        0.04528685 = product of:
          0.0905737 = sum of:
            0.0905737 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0905737 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  10. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.02
    0.022643425 = product of:
      0.04528685 = sum of:
        0.04528685 = product of:
          0.0905737 = sum of:
            0.0905737 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0905737 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  11. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.02
    0.019408649 = product of:
      0.038817298 = sum of:
        0.038817298 = product of:
          0.077634595 = sum of:
            0.077634595 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077634595 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  12. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.02
    0.019408649 = product of:
      0.038817298 = sum of:
        0.038817298 = product of:
          0.077634595 = sum of:
            0.077634595 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077634595 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  13. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01
    0.013723989 = product of:
      0.027447978 = sum of:
        0.027447978 = product of:
          0.054895956 = sum of:
            0.054895956 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054895956 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  14. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.013723989 = product of:
      0.027447978 = sum of:
        0.027447978 = product of:
          0.054895956 = sum of:
            0.054895956 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054895956 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  15. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01
    0.0129391 = product of:
      0.0258782 = sum of:
        0.0258782 = product of:
          0.0517564 = sum of:
            0.0517564 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0517564 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  16. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01
    0.0129391 = product of:
      0.0258782 = sum of:
        0.0258782 = product of:
          0.0517564 = sum of:
            0.0517564 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0517564 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  17. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01
    0.0129391 = product of:
      0.0258782 = sum of:
        0.0258782 = product of:
          0.0517564 = sum of:
            0.0517564 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0517564 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  18. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.01
    0.0129391 = product of:
      0.0258782 = sum of:
        0.0258782 = product of:
          0.0517564 = sum of:
            0.0517564 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0517564 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  19. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.01
    0.0129391 = product of:
      0.0258782 = sum of:
        0.0258782 = product of:
          0.0517564 = sum of:
            0.0517564 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0517564 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
  20. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01
    0.0129391 = product of:
      0.0258782 = sum of:
        0.0258782 = product of:
          0.0517564 = sum of:
            0.0517564 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0517564 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047750622 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22

Years

Languages

  • e 110
  • d 8
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 117
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…