Search (136 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Smrzka, B.: ¬Der Web-OPAC der Büchereien Wien : Usability Untersuchung (2003) 0.07
    0.06802279 = product of:
      0.27209115 = sum of:
        0.27209115 = weight(_text_:master in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27209115 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3116585 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.8730426 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Master-Thesis des Lehrgangs "Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement" an der Donau-Universität Krems
  2. Brenner, S.: LibraryThing for Libraries in Deutschland : Community-generierte Anreicherung deutschsprachiger Bibliothekskatalog mit LibraryThing for Libraries (2011) 0.07
    0.06802279 = product of:
      0.27209115 = sum of:
        0.27209115 = weight(_text_:master in 149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27209115 = score(doc=149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3116585 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.8730426 = fieldWeight in 149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=149)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Master-Thesis im Studiengang MALIS [nicht öffentlich].
  3. McCurley, H.H.; Weisbrod, E.J.: Use of series title authority cross-references at a large university library (1996) 0.06
    0.06466791 = product of:
      0.12933582 = sum of:
        0.06924136 = weight(_text_:reference in 5544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06924136 = score(doc=5544,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 5544, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5544)
        0.060094457 = product of:
          0.120188914 = sum of:
            0.120188914 = weight(_text_:file in 5544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.120188914 = score(doc=5544,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.47376698 = fieldWeight in 5544, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5544)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study, conducted at the Ralph Brown Draughton Library, Auburn University, Alabama, to determine whether users employ the cross references provided by the series title authority file in their searches of the library's OPAC. Presents and discusses the results of a transaction log analysis focusing attention on the usefulness of cross references from series title authority records, since only searches that required such cross reference appeared in the transaction log report. Results indicate that users do use the cross references gathered by series title authority records
  4. Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002) 0.05
    0.04840336 = product of:
      0.19361344 = sum of:
        0.19361344 = sum of:
          0.1487262 = weight(_text_:file in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1487262 = score(doc=156,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047329273 = queryNorm
              0.58625674 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.04488724 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04488724 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047329273 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access in the OPAC, as discussed in this article, is predicated on two different kinds of searching: subject (authority, alphabetic, or controlled vocabulary searching) or keyword (uncontrolled, free text, natural language vocabulary). The literature has focused on demonstrating that both approaches are needed, but very few authors address the need to integrate keyword into authority searching. The article discusses this difference and compares, with a query on the term garbage, search results in two online catalogs, one that performs keyword searches through the authority file and one where only bibliographic records are included in keyword searches.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Nuttall, H.D.; McAbee, S.L.: Pathfinders on-line : adding pathfinders to a NOTIS on-line system (1997) 0.05
    0.047445606 = product of:
      0.09489121 = sum of:
        0.06924136 = weight(_text_:reference in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06924136 = score(doc=510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
        0.025649851 = product of:
          0.051299702 = sum of:
            0.051299702 = weight(_text_:22 in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051299702 = score(doc=510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    For decades print pathfinders have complemented card catalogues and been useful reference tools. They are overlooked as components of online catalogues, even though they can extend the depth of the catalogue. To encourage librarians to consider integrating pathfinders into online catalogues discusses problems in OPAC searching, describes the value and styles of pathfinders, and illustrates how to include them in a NOTIS system
    Date
    27.11.1995 17:07:22
  6. Martin, L.M.: Evaluating OPACs or, OPACs are reference tools, too! (1992) 0.05
    0.045798857 = product of:
      0.18319543 = sum of:
        0.18319543 = weight(_text_:reference in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18319543 = score(doc=4550,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.9514028 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Althogh the library literature contains numerous papers on the functional and performance evaluation of OPACs, as well as on the evaluation of many facets of reference service, it presents little assistance for the evaluation of OPACs as the central facet of reference service. In order to alleviate this lack, evaluates OPACs as if they were any other reference tool, judging them against Norman D. Stevens' classic 18 criteria for the evaluation of reference books. Includes a selective bibliography of works on both OPAC and reference book evaluation
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1992, no.38, S.201-220
  7. Brenner, S.; Ehlen, D.: Zusatzinformationen im interaktiven Katalog : LibraryThing - Social Cataloging-Plattform und Kataloganreicherung für Bibliotheken (2012) 0.05
    0.045348525 = product of:
      0.1813941 = sum of:
        0.1813941 = weight(_text_:master in 574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1813941 = score(doc=574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3116585 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.5820284 = fieldWeight in 574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=574)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Brenner, S.: LibraryThing for Libraries in Deutschland: Community-generierte Anreicherung deutschsprachiger Bibliothekskatalog mit LibraryThing for Libraries [Master-Thesis, 2011].
  8. Porter, M.; Galpin, V.: Relevance feedback in a public access catalogue for a research library : Muscat at the Scott Polar Research Institute (1988) 0.04
    0.042872153 = product of:
      0.17148861 = sum of:
        0.17148861 = sum of:
          0.120188914 = weight(_text_:file in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.120188914 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047329273 = queryNorm
              0.47376698 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
          0.051299702 = weight(_text_:22 in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051299702 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047329273 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the successful introduction of a sophisticated online catalogue system at the library of the Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, using the Muscat program package. The system provides to both end-users and library staff a choice between boolean searching on keywords and access using relevance feedback based on free text in English, mixed with UDC classification numbers. The system is implemented on an IBM 3084 computer. Significant benefits from the application of relevance feedback are reported with 10,000 records on file.
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.1-20
  9. Piccotti, P.: ¬Les nouvelles technologies et la recherche documentaire (1998) 0.04
    0.041514903 = product of:
      0.08302981 = sum of:
        0.060586188 = weight(_text_:reference in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060586188 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
        0.02244362 = product of:
          0.04488724 = sum of:
            0.04488724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04488724 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Venice University Institute of Architecture has developed Easyweb, a software package to integrate its heterogeneous non-compatible bibliographic and multimedia databases, standardise access and create internal links, by transferring all existing OPAC applications to the Web. Features include importation of UNIMARC data, multiple window searching, multibase searching and special applications, e.g. circulation management. Easyweb is notable user friendly and has become the point of reference for OPACs in Italy
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1998, no.178, S.20-22
  10. Kühle, G.: Lokale Kooperation öffentlicher Bibliotheken unterschiedlicher Träger in Bezug auf ein Konzept für einen gemeinsamen Online-Katalog am Beispiel der ÖBs in Willich (2009) 0.04
    0.03967996 = product of:
      0.15871984 = sum of:
        0.15871984 = weight(_text_:master in 3202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15871984 = score(doc=3202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3116585 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.50927484 = fieldWeight in 3202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3202)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Master's Thesis im Master-Zusatzstudiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Fachhochschule Köln. - Vgl.: http://opus.bibl.fh-koeln.de/volltexte/2009/243/.
  11. Thorne, R.; Whitlatch, J.B.: Patron online catalog success (1994) 0.04
    0.037101313 = product of:
      0.14840525 = sum of:
        0.14840525 = weight(_text_:reference in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14840525 = score(doc=855,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.7707243 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The project explored the ways in which the online catalogue contributes, or does not contribute to the success of library users. Key issues examined included: whether students are really getting appropriate assistance when using the online catalogue; the most common searching successes and failures observed for people using the online catalogue without staff assistance; and the effectiveness of online catalogue use by librarians providing reference assistance compared to other sources (reference books, electronic and printed indexes). Reviews relevant studies of online catalogues and reference success and describes the methodology and results of 3 different online catalogue studies: the Reference Assessment Survey; the online catalogue study of unassisted users; and the document availability study; all conducted at San José State University Library; California, using the Reference Transaction Assessment Instrument. Considers the implications of the results for reference practice and study methodology
  12. Greenberg, J.: Reference structures : stagnation, progress, and future challenges (1997) 0.04
    0.037101313 = product of:
      0.14840525 = sum of:
        0.14840525 = weight(_text_:reference in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14840525 = score(doc=1103,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.7707243 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Assesses the current state of reference structures in OPACs in a framework defined by stagnation, progress, and future challenges. 'Stagnation' referes to the limited and inconsistent reference structure access provided in current OPACs. 'Progress' refers to improved OPAC reference structure access and reference structure possibilities that extend beyond those commonly represented in existing subject autgority control tools. The progress discussion is supported by a look at professional committee work, data modelling ideas, ontological theory, and one area of linguistic research. The discussion ends with a list of 6 areas needing attention if reference structure access is to be improved in the future OPAC environment
  13. Roose, T.: Online catalogs : making them better reference tools (1988) 0.03
    0.03462068 = product of:
      0.13848272 = sum of:
        0.13848272 = weight(_text_:reference in 2904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13848272 = score(doc=2904,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.71919286 = fieldWeight in 2904, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2904)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Hildreth, C.R.: Pursuing the ideal : generations of online catalogs (1984) 0.03
    0.03462068 = product of:
      0.13848272 = sum of:
        0.13848272 = weight(_text_:reference in 5408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13848272 = score(doc=5408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.71919286 = fieldWeight in 5408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5408)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Online catalogs, online reference: converging trends. Ed: Brian Aveney and Brett Butler
  15. Zink, D.: Monitoring user search success through transaction log analysis : the WolfPAC example (1991) 0.03
    0.03462068 = product of:
      0.13848272 = sum of:
        0.13848272 = weight(_text_:reference in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13848272 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.71919286 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Reference services review. 19(1991), S.49-56
  16. Deschâtelets, G.: ¬The three languages theory in information retrieval (1986) 0.03
    0.034011394 = product of:
      0.13604558 = sum of:
        0.13604558 = weight(_text_:master in 1635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13604558 = score(doc=1635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3116585 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.4365213 = fieldWeight in 1635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1635)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    To an overwhelming extent, storage and retrieval systems were designed for information intermediaries who were specialists in formal, controlled documentation languages (e.g. classification systems, indexing languages) and who were then trained to utilize the query language of each retrieval system. However, with the advent of the microcomputer, there now exists, in the information retrieval industry, an obvious will to tackle both the professional and the personal information markets, as evidences by their more sophisticated yet more user-friendly systems and by the design and marketing of all sorts of interface software (front-end, gateway, intermediary). In order to make full advantage of these systems, the user must be able to master three different languages: the natural language of the discipline, the indexing language, and the system's query language. The author defines and characterizes each of these languages and identifies their issues and trends in the IR cycle and specifically in public online search services. Finally he proposes a theoretical model for the analysis of IR languages and suggests a few research avenues
  17. Oberhauser, O.: Card-Image Public Access Catalogues (CIPACS) : Verbreitung und Charakteristika einer kostengünstigen OPAC-Alternative (2004) 0.03
    0.034011394 = product of:
      0.13604558 = sum of:
        0.13604558 = weight(_text_:master in 2201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13604558 = score(doc=2201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3116585 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.4365213 = fieldWeight in 2201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2201)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Kurzfassung eines Master-Arbeit, Univ. of Central England, Birmingham, 2002, Volltext unter: http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/cipacs/d-i.html. Vgl. auch die Übersicht: http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/cipacs/c-i.html
  18. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.03
    0.030892981 = product of:
      0.061785962 = sum of:
        0.048961036 = weight(_text_:reference in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048961036 = score(doc=1447,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.2542731 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
        0.012824926 = product of:
          0.025649851 = sum of:
            0.025649851 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025649851 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  19. Walker, S.; Jones, R.M.: Improving subject retrieval in online catalogues : T.1: Stemming, automatic spelling correction and cross-reference tables (1987) 0.03
    0.030293094 = product of:
      0.121172376 = sum of:
        0.121172376 = weight(_text_:reference in 2141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.121172376 = score(doc=2141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.62929374 = fieldWeight in 2141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2141)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  20. Burke, J.: ¬The future OPAC : content, form and boundaries (1991) 0.03
    0.030293094 = product of:
      0.121172376 = sum of:
        0.121172376 = weight(_text_:reference in 7692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.121172376 = score(doc=7692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.62929374 = fieldWeight in 7692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7692)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Imprint
    Chicago : ALA / Reference and Adult Services Division

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 125
  • s 4
  • x 4
  • m 3
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…