Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Weller, K.: Anforderungen an die Wissensrepräsentation im Social Semantic Web (2010) 0.05
    0.046489805 = product of:
      0.09297961 = sum of:
        0.09297961 = product of:
          0.18595922 = sum of:
            0.18595922 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18595922 = score(doc=4061,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.6343458 = fieldWeight in 4061, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Artikel gibt einen Einblick in die aktuelle Verschmelzung von Web 2.0-und Semantic Web-Ansätzen, die als Social Semantic Web beschrieben werden kann. Die Grundidee des Social Semantic Web wird beschrieben und einzelne erste Anwendungsbeispiele vorgestellt. Ein wesentlicher Schwerpunkt dieser Entwicklung besteht in der Umsetzung neuer Methoden und Herangehensweisen im Bereich der Wissensrepräsentation. Dieser Artikel stellt vier Schwerpunkte vor, in denen sich die Wissensrepräsentationsmethoden im Social Semantic Web weiterentwickeln müssen und geht dabei jeweils auf den aktuellen Stand ein.
    Object
    Web 2.0
  2. Weller, K.: Knowledge representation in the Social Semantic Web (2010) 0.04
    0.04026135 = product of:
      0.0805227 = sum of:
        0.0805227 = product of:
          0.1610454 = sum of:
            0.1610454 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1610454 = score(doc=4515,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.54935956 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The main purpose of this book is to sum up the vital and highly topical research issue of knowledge representation on the Web and to discuss novel solutions by combining benefits of folksonomies and Web 2.0 approaches with ontologies and semantic technologies. This book contains an overview of knowledge representation approaches in past, present and future, introduction to ontologies, Web indexing and in first case the novel approaches of developing ontologies. This title combines aspects of knowledge representation for both the Semantic Web (ontologies) and the Web 2.0 (folksonomies). Currently there is no monographic book which provides a combined overview over these topics. focus on the topic of using knowledge representation methods for document indexing purposes. For this purpose, considerations from classical librarian interests in knowledge representation (thesauri, classification schemes etc.) are included, which are not part of most other books which have a stronger background in computer science.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.4, S.205-206 (C. Carstens): "Welche Arten der Wissensrepräsentation existieren im Web, wie ausgeprägt sind semantische Strukturen in diesem Kontext, und wie können soziale Aktivitäten im Sinne des Web 2.0 zur Strukturierung von Wissen im Web beitragen? Diesen Fragen widmet sich Wellers Buch mit dem Titel Knowledge Representation in the Social Semantic Web. Der Begriff Social Semantic Web spielt einerseits auf die semantische Strukturierung von Daten im Sinne des Semantic Web an und deutet andererseits auf die zunehmend kollaborative Inhaltserstellung im Social Web hin. Weller greift die Entwicklungen in diesen beiden Bereichen auf und beleuchtet die Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen, die aus der Kombination der Aktivitäten im Semantic Web und im Social Web entstehen. Der Fokus des Buches liegt dabei primär auf den konzeptuellen Herausforderungen, die sich in diesem Kontext ergeben. So strebt die originäre Vision des Semantic Web die Annotation aller Webinhalte mit ausdrucksstarken, hochformalisierten Ontologien an. Im Social Web hingegen werden große Mengen an Daten von Nutzern erstellt, die häufig mithilfe von unkontrollierten Tags in Folksonomies annotiert werden. Weller sieht in derartigen kollaborativ erstellten Inhalten und Annotationen großes Potenzial für die semantische Indexierung, eine wichtige Voraussetzung für das Retrieval im Web. Das Hauptinteresse des Buches besteht daher darin, eine Brücke zwischen den Wissensrepräsentations-Methoden im Social Web und im Semantic Web zu schlagen. Um dieser Fragestellung nachzugehen, gliedert sich das Buch in drei Teile. . . .
    Object
    Web 2.0
    RSWK
    World Wide Web 2.0
    Subject
    World Wide Web 2.0
  3. ¬The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010 : 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part 2. (2010) 0.03
    0.033207003 = product of:
      0.066414006 = sum of:
        0.066414006 = product of:
          0.13282801 = sum of:
            0.13282801 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13282801 = score(doc=4706,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Subject
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
  4. Cahier, J.-P.; Zaher, L'H.; Isoard , G.: Document et modèle pour l'action, une méthode pour le web socio-sémantique : application à un web 2.0 en développement durable (2010) 0.03
    0.032873254 = product of:
      0.06574651 = sum of:
        0.06574651 = product of:
          0.13149302 = sum of:
            0.13149302 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13149302 = score(doc=4836,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 4836, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4836)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. ¬The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010 : 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. (2010) 0.03
    0.026565602 = product of:
      0.053131204 = sum of:
        0.053131204 = product of:
          0.10626241 = sum of:
            0.10626241 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10626241 = score(doc=4707,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.36248332 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Subject
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
  6. Luo, Y.; Picalausa, F.; Fletcher, G.H.L.; Hidders, J.; Vansummeren, S.: Storing and indexing massive RDF datasets (2012) 0.02
    0.023480896 = product of:
      0.04696179 = sum of:
        0.04696179 = product of:
          0.09392358 = sum of:
            0.09392358 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09392358 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.320393 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The resource description framework (RDF for short) provides a flexible method for modeling information on the Web [34,40]. All data items in RDF are uniformly represented as triples of the form (subject, predicate, object), sometimes also referred to as (subject, property, value) triples. As a running example for this chapter, a small fragment of an RDF dataset concerning music and music fans is given in Fig. 2.1. Spurred by efforts like the Linking Open Data project, increasingly large volumes of data are being published in RDF. Notable contributors in this respect include areas as diverse as the government, the life sciences, Web 2.0 communities, and so on. To give an idea of the volumes of RDF data concerned, as of September 2012, there are 31,634,213,770 triples in total published by data sources participating in the Linking Open Data project. Many individual data sources (like, e.g., PubMed, DBpedia, MusicBrainz) contain hundreds of millions of triples (797, 672, and 179 millions, respectively). These large volumes of RDF data motivate the need for scalable native RDF data management solutions capabable of efficiently storing, indexing, and querying RDF data. In this chapter, we present a general and up-to-date survey of the current state of the art in RDF storage and indexing.
  7. Neubauer, G.: Visualization of typed links in linked data (2017) 0.02
    0.023480896 = product of:
      0.04696179 = sum of:
        0.04696179 = product of:
          0.09392358 = sum of:
            0.09392358 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09392358 = score(doc=3912,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.320393 = fieldWeight in 3912, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3912)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Das Themengebiet der Arbeit behandelt Visualisierungen von typisierten Links in Linked Data. Die wissenschaftlichen Gebiete, die im Allgemeinen den Inhalt des Beitrags abgrenzen, sind das Semantic Web, das Web of Data und Informationsvisualisierung. Das Semantic Web, das von Tim Berners Lee 2001 erfunden wurde, stellt eine Erweiterung zum World Wide Web (Web 2.0) dar. Aktuelle Forschungen beziehen sich auf die Verknüpfbarkeit von Informationen im World Wide Web. Um es zu ermöglichen, solche Verbindungen wahrnehmen und verarbeiten zu können sind Visualisierungen die wichtigsten Anforderungen als Hauptteil der Datenverarbeitung. Im Zusammenhang mit dem Sematic Web werden Repräsentationen von zusammenhängenden Informationen anhand von Graphen gehandhabt. Der Grund des Entstehens dieser Arbeit ist in erster Linie die Beschreibung der Gestaltung von Linked Data-Visualisierungskonzepten, deren Prinzipien im Rahmen einer theoretischen Annäherung eingeführt werden. Anhand des Kontexts führt eine schrittweise Erweiterung der Informationen mit dem Ziel, praktische Richtlinien anzubieten, zur Vernetzung dieser ausgearbeiteten Gestaltungsrichtlinien. Indem die Entwürfe zweier alternativer Visualisierungen einer standardisierten Webapplikation beschrieben werden, die Linked Data als Netzwerk visualisiert, konnte ein Test durchgeführt werden, der deren Kompatibilität zum Inhalt hatte. Der praktische Teil behandelt daher die Designphase, die Resultate, und zukünftige Anforderungen des Projektes, die durch die Testung ausgearbeitet wurden.
  8. Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016) 0.02
    0.017120589 = product of:
      0.034241177 = sum of:
        0.034241177 = product of:
          0.068482354 = sum of:
            0.068482354 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068482354 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  9. Eckert, K.: SKOS: eine Sprache für die Übertragung von Thesauri ins Semantic Web (2011) 0.01
    0.01369647 = product of:
      0.02739294 = sum of:
        0.02739294 = product of:
          0.05478588 = sum of:
            0.05478588 = weight(_text_:22 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05478588 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 3.2011 19:21:22
  10. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.01
    0.011984412 = product of:
      0.023968823 = sum of:
        0.023968823 = product of:
          0.047937647 = sum of:
            0.047937647 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047937647 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.01
    0.010272353 = product of:
      0.020544706 = sum of:
        0.020544706 = product of:
          0.04108941 = sum of:
            0.04108941 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04108941 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
  12. Hooland, S. van; Verborgh, R.; Wilde, M. De; Hercher, J.; Mannens, E.; Wa, R.Van de: Evaluating the success of vocabulary reconciliation for cultural heritage collections (2013) 0.01
    0.010272353 = product of:
      0.020544706 = sum of:
        0.020544706 = product of:
          0.04108941 = sum of:
            0.04108941 = weight(_text_:22 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04108941 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:29:20
  13. Prud'hommeaux, E.; Gayo, E.: RDF ventures to boldly meet your most pedestrian needs (2015) 0.01
    0.010272353 = product of:
      0.020544706 = sum of:
        0.020544706 = product of:
          0.04108941 = sum of:
            0.04108941 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04108941 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.18-22
  14. Firnkes, M.: Schöne neue Welt : der Content der Zukunft wird von Algorithmen bestimmt (2015) 0.01
    0.010272353 = product of:
      0.020544706 = sum of:
        0.020544706 = product of:
          0.04108941 = sum of:
            0.04108941 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04108941 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 7.2015 22:02:31
  15. Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012) 0.01
    0.010272353 = product of:
      0.020544706 = sum of:
        0.020544706 = product of:
          0.04108941 = sum of:
            0.04108941 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04108941 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2016 14:03:22
  16. Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018) 0.01
    0.008560294 = product of:
      0.017120589 = sum of:
        0.017120589 = product of:
          0.034241177 = sum of:
            0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034241177 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2018 14:22:01
  17. Metadata and semantics research : 7th Research Conference, MTSR 2013 Thessaloniki, Greece, November 19-22, 2013. Proceedings (2013) 0.01
    0.00847426 = product of:
      0.01694852 = sum of:
        0.01694852 = product of:
          0.03389704 = sum of:
            0.03389704 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03389704 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 12:51:22
  18. Brunetti, J.M.; Roberto García, R.: User-centered design and evaluation of overview components for semantic data exploration (2014) 0.01
    0.006848235 = product of:
      0.01369647 = sum of:
        0.01369647 = product of:
          0.02739294 = sum of:
            0.02739294 = weight(_text_:22 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02739294 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  19. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Towards maximal unification of semantically diverse ontologies for controversial domains (2014) 0.01
    0.006848235 = product of:
      0.01369647 = sum of:
        0.01369647 = product of:
          0.02739294 = sum of:
            0.02739294 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02739294 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Languages

Types