Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  1. Schneider, R.: Bibliothek 1.0, 2.0 oder 3.0? (2008) 0.14
    0.13784513 = product of:
      0.27569026 = sum of:
        0.27569026 = sum of:
          0.2277526 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 6122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2277526 = score(doc=6122,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.7769118 = fieldWeight in 6122, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6122)
          0.047937647 = weight(_text_:22 in 6122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047937647 = score(doc=6122,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6122, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Noch ist nicht entschieden mit welcher Vehemenz das sogenannte Web 2.0 die Bibliotheken verändern wird. Allerdings wird hier und da bereits mit Bezugnahme auf das sogenannte Semantic Web von einer dritten und mancherorts von einer vierten Generation des Web gesprochen. Der Vortrag hinterfragt kritisch, welche Konzepte sich hinter diesen Bezeichnungen verbergen und geht der Frage nach, welche Herausforderungen eine Übernahme dieser Konzepte für die Bibliothekswelt mit sich bringen würde. Vgl. insbes. Folie 22 mit einer Darstellung von der Entwicklung vom Web 1.0 zum Web 4.0
    Object
    Web 2.0
  2. Wesch, M.: Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us (2006) 0.13
    0.13365535 = product of:
      0.2673107 = sum of:
        0.2673107 = sum of:
          0.21252482 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21252482 = score(doc=3478,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.72496665 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
          0.05478588 = weight(_text_:22 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05478588 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Web 2.0 in just under 5 minutes.
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  3. Maaß, C.; Pietsch, G.: Web 2.0 als Mythos, Symbol und Erwartung (2007) 0.09
    0.09297961 = product of:
      0.18595922 = sum of:
        0.18595922 = product of:
          0.37191844 = sum of:
            0.37191844 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 5037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.37191844 = score(doc=5037,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                1.2686917 = fieldWeight in 5037, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5037)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    Web 2.0
  4. Keen, A.; Weinberger, D.: Keen vs. Weinberger : July 18, 2007. (2007) 0.06
    0.05635415 = product of:
      0.1127083 = sum of:
        0.1127083 = product of:
          0.2254166 = sum of:
            0.2254166 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2254166 = score(doc=1304,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.7689432 = fieldWeight in 1304, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1304)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This is the full text of a "Reply All" debate on Web 2.0 between authors Andrew Keen and David Weinberger
    Content
    "Mr. Keen begins: So what, exactly, is Web 2.0? It is the radical democratization of media which is enabling anyone to publish anything on the Internet. Mainstream media's traditional audience has become Web 2.0's empowered author. Web 2.0 transforms all of us -- from 90-year-old grandmothers to eight-year-old third graders -- into digital writers, music artists, movie makers and journalists. Web 2.0 is YouTube, the blogosphere, Wikipedia, MySpace or Facebook. Web 2.0 is YOU! (Time Magazine's Person of the Year for 2006). Is Web 2.0 a dream or a nightmare? Is it a remix of Disney's "Cinderella" or of Kafka's "Metamorphosis"? Have we -- as empowered conversationalists in the global citizen media community -- woken up with the golden slipper of our ugly sister (aka: mainstream media) on our dainty little foot? Or have we -- as authors-formerly-know-as-the-audience -- woken up as giant cockroaches doomed to eternally stare at our hideous selves in the mirror of Web 2.0? Silicon Valley, of course, interprets Web 2.0 as Disney rather than Kafka. After all, as the sales and marketing architects of this great democratization argue, what could be wrong with a radically flattened media? Isn't it dreamy that we can all now publish ourselves, that we each possess digital versions of Johannes Gutenberg's printing press, that we are now able to easily create, distribute and sell our content on the Internet? This is personal liberation with an early 21st Century twist -- a mash-up of the countercultural Sixties, the free market idealism of the Eighties, and the technological determinism and consumer-centricity of the Nineties. The people have finally spoken. The media has become their message and the people are self-broadcasting this message of emancipation on their 70 million blogs, their hundreds of millions of YouTube videos, their MySpace pages and their Wikipedia entries. ..."
  5. Veelen, I. van: ¬The truth according to Wikipedia (2008) 0.04
    0.037569433 = product of:
      0.07513887 = sum of:
        0.07513887 = product of:
          0.15027773 = sum of:
            0.15027773 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15027773 = score(doc=2139,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 2139, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2139)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Google or Wikipedia? Those of us who search online -- and who doesn't? -- are getting referred more and more to Wikipedia. For the past two years, this free online "encyclopedia of the people" has been topping the lists of the world's most popular websites. But do we really know what we're using? Backlight plunges into the story behind Wikipedia and explores the wonderful world of Web 2.0. Is it a revolution, or pure hype? Director IJsbrand van Veelen goes looking for the truth behind Wikipedia. Only five people are employed by the company, and all its activities are financed by donations and subsidies. The online encyclopedia that everyone can contribute to and revise is now even bigger than the illustrious Encyclopedia Britannica. Does this spell the end for traditional institutions of knowledge such as Britannica? And should we applaud this development as progress or mourn it as a loss? How reliable is Wikipedia? Do "the people" really hold the lease on wisdom? And since when do we believe that information should be free for all? In this film, "Wikipedians," the folks who spend their days writing and editing articles, explain how the online encyclopedia works. In addition, the parties involved discuss Wikipedia's ethics and quality of content. It quickly becomes clear that there are camps of both believers and critics. Wiki's Truth introduces us to the main players in the debate: Jimmy Wales (founder and head Wikipedian), Larry Sanger (co-founder of Wikipedia, now head of Wiki spin-off Citizendium), Andrew Keen (author of The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy), Phoebe Ayers (a Wikipedian in California), Ndesanjo Macha (Swahili Wikipedia, digital activist), Tim O'Reilly (CEO of O'Reilly Media, the "inventor" of Web 2.0), Charles Leadbeater (philosopher and author of We Think, about crowdsourcing), and Robert McHenry (former editor-in-chief of Encyclopedia Britannica). Opening is a video by Chris Pirillo. The questions surrounding Wikipedia lead to a bigger discussion of Web 2.0, a phenomenon in which the user determines the content. Examples include YouTube, MySpace, Facebook, and Wikipedia. These sites would appear to provide new freedom and opportunities for undiscovered talent and unheard voices, but just where does the boundary lie between expert and amateur? Who will survive according to the laws of this new "digital Darwinism"? Are equality and truth really reconcilable ideals? And most importantly, has the Internet brought us wisdom and truth, or is it high time for a cultural counterrevolution?
    Object
    Web 2.0
  6. Danowski, P.: Step one: blow up the silo! : Open bibliographic data, the first step towards Linked Open Data (2010) 0.03
    0.028177075 = product of:
      0.05635415 = sum of:
        0.05635415 = product of:
          0.1127083 = sum of:
            0.1127083 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1127083 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    Web 2.0
  7. Hannemann, J.; Kett, J.: Linked data for libraries (2010) 0.03
    0.028177075 = product of:
      0.05635415 = sum of:
        0.05635415 = product of:
          0.1127083 = sum of:
            0.1127083 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1127083 = score(doc=3964,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    Web 2.0
  8. Ask me[@sk.me]: your global information guide : der Wegweiser durch die Informationswelten (1996) 0.03
    0.02739294 = product of:
      0.05478588 = sum of:
        0.05478588 = product of:
          0.10957176 = sum of:
            0.10957176 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10957176 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.11.1996 13:22:37
  9. Schultz, S.: ¬Die eine App für alles : Mobile Zukunft in China (2016) 0.02
    0.019369734 = product of:
      0.03873947 = sum of:
        0.03873947 = product of:
          0.07747894 = sum of:
            0.07747894 = weight(_text_:22 in 4313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07747894 = score(doc=4313,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 4313, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4313)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2018 14:22:02
  10. Beuth, P.: Voyeure gesucht : Böse Nachbarn (2008) 0.01
    0.014088538 = product of:
      0.028177075 = sum of:
        0.028177075 = product of:
          0.05635415 = sum of:
            0.05635415 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05635415 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.1922358 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Viel Wirbel - dabei ist das Ende der Aufmerksamkeit für die öffentliche Nachbarschaftsschelte bereits abzusehen. Zu sehr ähneln sich die Anfeindungen, zu gering ist der Nutzwert, als dass die Seite lange interessant bleiben könnte. Sobald die Medien und Blogger mit dem Thema durch sind, werden die Abrufe wieder klar sinken. Das Abendland wird nicht untergehen. Das zeigt auch die Geschichte, denn "Anschwärzen 2.0" ist beileibe kein neues Phänomen. Den fragwürdigen Titel eines Pionier-Prangers im Internet darf sogar das deutsche Angebot von rache-ist-suess.de für sich beanspruchen. Die Seite wurde 1999 zum Anlaufpunkt für Teenager, die über Ex-Freunde und zickige Rivalinnen lästern wollten. Im vorigen Jahr wurde die Seite stillgelegt. Zwar sind die Tiraden immer noch zu lesen, aber keiner spricht mehr über das Portal. Über langfristige gesamtgesellschaftliche Schäden ist nichts bekannt. Auch die Seite dontdatehimgirl.com ist so ein Fall: Frauen warnen vor Dates mit Männern, die sie für Fremdgänger, Lügner oder Verlierer halten - oft mit komplettem Namen und sogar Fotos. Auch diese Seite kommt aus den USA, auch hier finden sich Einträge aus Frankfurt, Bonn und Berlin. Wie verdreht oder erlogen die Infos sind, kann niemand prüfen. Aber Webstatistiken zufolge hat das Portal selbst in den USA kaum 90000 Besucher im Monat und dürfte so eher als Frust-Abladestation dienen denn als Warnsystem. Psychologin Katja Schwab, Autorin des "Psychologieblogs" (psychologieblog.de), erklärt die Motive der Denunzianten mit simplen Rachebedürfnissen: "Sie wollen nach einem Konflikt ihr Selbstwertgefühl wiederherstellen. Dafür bedienen sich die Menschen immer der am einfachsten zugänglichen Mittel."Den "Tätern" gebe es ein gutes Gefühl, wenigstens irgendetwas unternommen zu haben, und auch den Lesern der Schmähungen gehe es ums Selbstwertgefühl. "Es ist menschlich, sich nach unten zu vergleichen, um das Selbst zu erhöhen. Wenn wir sehen, dass andere Probleme haben, fühlen wir uns besser."
  11. Landwehr, A.: China schafft digitales Punktesystem für den "besseren" Menschen (2018) 0.01
    0.01369647 = product of:
      0.02739294 = sum of:
        0.02739294 = product of:
          0.05478588 = sum of:
            0.05478588 = weight(_text_:22 in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05478588 = score(doc=4314,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2018 14:29:46
  12. Schrenk, P.: Gesamtnote 1 für Signal - Telegram-Defizite bei Sicherheit und Privatsphäre : Signal und Telegram im Test (2022) 0.01
    0.01369647 = product of:
      0.02739294 = sum of:
        0.02739294 = product of:
          0.05478588 = sum of:
            0.05478588 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05478588 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2022 14:01:14
  13. Schetsche, M.: ¬Die ergoogelte Wirklichkeit : Verschwörungstheorien und das Internet (2005) 0.01
    0.010272353 = product of:
      0.020544706 = sum of:
        0.020544706 = product of:
          0.04108941 = sum of:
            0.04108941 = weight(_text_:22 in 3397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04108941 = score(doc=3397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3397)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    "Zweimal täglich googeln" empfiehlt Mathias Bröckers in seinem Buch "Verschwörungen, Verschwörungstheorien und die Geheimnisse des 11.9.". Der Band gilt den gutbürgerlichen Medien von FAZ bis Spiegel als Musterbeispiel krankhafter Verschwörungstheorie. Dabei wollte der Autor - nach eigenem Bekunden - keine Verschwörungstheorie zum 11. September vorlegen, sondern lediglich auf Widersprüche und Fragwürdigkeiten in den amtlichen Darstellungen und Erklärungen der US-Regierung zu jenem Terroranschlag hinweisen. Unabhängig davon, wie ernst diese Einlassungen des Autors zu nehmen sind, ist der "Fall Bröckers" für die Erforschung von Verschwörungstheorien unter zwei Aspekten interessant: Erstens geht der Band auf ein [[extern] ] konspirologisches Tagebuch zurück, das der Autor zwischen dem 13. September 2001 und dem 22. März 2002 für das Online-Magazin Telepolis verfasst hat; zweitens behauptet Bröckers in der Einleitung zum Buch, dass er für seine Arbeit ausschließlich über das Netz zugängliche Quellen genutzt habe. Hierbei hätte ihm Google unverzichtbare Dienste geleistet: Um an die Informationen in diesem Buch zu kommen, musste ich weder über besondere Beziehungen verfügen, noch mich mit Schlapphüten und Turbanträgern zu klandestinen Treffen verabreden - alle Quellen liegen offen. Sie zu finden, leistete mir die Internet-Suchmaschine Google unschätzbare Dienste. Mathias Bröckers
  14. Firnkes, M.: Schöne neue Welt : der Content der Zukunft wird von Algorithmen bestimmt (2015) 0.01
    0.010272353 = product of:
      0.020544706 = sum of:
        0.020544706 = product of:
          0.04108941 = sum of:
            0.04108941 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04108941 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 7.2015 22:02:31
  15. Bünte, O.: Bundesdatenschutzbeauftragte bezweifelt Facebooks Datenschutzversprechen (2018) 0.01
    0.008560294 = product of:
      0.017120589 = sum of:
        0.017120589 = product of:
          0.034241177 = sum of:
            0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034241177 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 3.2018 13:41:22
  16. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.01
    0.006848235 = product of:
      0.01369647 = sum of:
        0.01369647 = product of:
          0.02739294 = sum of:
            0.02739294 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02739294 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  17. cis: Nationalbibliothek will das deutsche Internet kopieren (2008) 0.01
    0.005992206 = product of:
      0.011984412 = sum of:
        0.011984412 = product of:
          0.023968823 = sum of:
            0.023968823 = weight(_text_:22 in 4609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023968823 = score(doc=4609,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 4609, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4609)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24.10.2008 14:19:22