-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.08
0.07746877 = product of:
0.11620315 = sum of:
0.027630134 = weight(_text_:of in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027630134 = score(doc=1427,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.088573016 = sum of:
0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0320066 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.07
0.07207365 = product of:
0.10811047 = sum of:
0.019537456 = weight(_text_:of in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019537456 = score(doc=4824,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.088573016 = sum of:
0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0320066 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
- Source
- Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.1, S.29-41
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.05
0.052750885 = product of:
0.07912633 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.056566417 = product of:
0.113132834 = sum of:
0.113132834 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113132834 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.05
0.051608056 = product of:
0.077412084 = sum of:
0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027916465 = score(doc=4172,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.049495615 = product of:
0.09899123 = sum of:
0.09899123 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09899123 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.05
0.046157025 = product of:
0.06923553 = sum of:
0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01973992 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.049495615 = product of:
0.09899123 = sum of:
0.09899123 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09899123 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.05
0.045085754 = product of:
0.06762863 = sum of:
0.027630134 = weight(_text_:of in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027630134 = score(doc=6940,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.039998498 = product of:
0.079996996 = sum of:
0.079996996 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079996996 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Wordmanship is a humorous dictionary cum index. Analyzing its structure, considers general aspects of the design of a reference work in relation to its index. Indexers should be consulted at the design stage of reference books, as they may suggest reversal of the primary entries, and the index entries; refine the cross-reference-structure; revise locator notation; and select appropriate typography
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992)
0.04
0.044235475 = product of:
0.06635321 = sum of:
0.023928396 = weight(_text_:of in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023928396 = score(doc=5396,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.042424813 = product of:
0.084849626 = sum of:
0.084849626 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084849626 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
- Imprint
- London : Society of Indexers
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.04
0.04348083 = product of:
0.06522124 = sum of:
0.025222747 = weight(_text_:of in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025222747 = score(doc=882,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.039998498 = product of:
0.079996996 = sum of:
0.079996996 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079996996 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The article discusses a series of usability studies on indexes from a systems engineering and human factors perspective. The purpose of these studies is to establish a set of user requirements that indexes need to satisfy. The results from the first set of studies are presented and suggestions made as to how these can be applied to improve the usability and quality of indexes.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.04
0.039850555 = product of:
0.05977583 = sum of:
0.02442182 = weight(_text_:of in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02442182 = score(doc=113,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.03535401 = product of:
0.07070802 = sum of:
0.07070802 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07070802 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The development of international relations and technology predominated in indexing through these four years, 1992-95, as reflected in the four societies' international journal, The Indexer.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.04
0.039563164 = product of:
0.059344746 = sum of:
0.016919931 = weight(_text_:of in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016919931 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.042424813 = product of:
0.084849626 = sum of:
0.084849626 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084849626 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Information Today / American Society of Indexers
-
Bennion, B.C.: Performance testing of a book and its index as an information retrieval system (1980)
0.04
0.037281495 = product of:
0.05592224 = sum of:
0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 7763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027916465 = score(doc=7763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 7763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7763)
0.028005775 = product of:
0.05601155 = sum of:
0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 7763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05601155 = score(doc=7763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 7763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 31(1980), S.264-270
-
Hodges, J.E.: Automated systems for the generation of document indexes (2000)
0.04
0.037281495 = product of:
0.05592224 = sum of:
0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027916465 = score(doc=4668,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
0.028005775 = product of:
0.05601155 = sum of:
0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05601155 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.66, [=Suppl.29]
-
Bernier, C.L.: Subject indexes (1980)
0.04
0.036377676 = product of:
0.05456651 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.29
-
Garfield, E.: ¬The Permuterm Subject Index : an autobiographic review (1976)
0.04
0.036377676 = product of:
0.05456651 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 3299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=3299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3299)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 3299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=3299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 3299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 27(1976), S.88-291
-
Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998)
0.04
0.035670638 = product of:
0.053505957 = sum of:
0.025222747 = weight(_text_:of in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025222747 = score(doc=4642,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.028283209 = product of:
0.056566417 = sum of:
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Comments on Douglas Hofstadter's index to his book 'Le ton beau de Marot: in praise of the music of language'. Hofstadter took charge of the book design, typography, typesetting and copy-editing, and also compiled the index which covers 23 pages of 3 columnes and is set in a practically illegible 4-point. Although the index breaks all the rules of indexing, it is a masterly creation showing the author's industry, exhuberance and wit. Summarizes Hofstadter's own remarks on how creating the index gave hin new insights into what his book was essentially about
- Source
- Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
-
Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998)
0.04
0.035109516 = product of:
0.052664272 = sum of:
0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027916465 = score(doc=4640,freq=16.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.024747808 = product of:
0.049495615 = sum of:
0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049495615 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
- Date
- 9. 4.2000 17:22:00
-
Olanlokun, S.O.; Ojo, J.A.: ¬A survey of the effectiveness and coverage of indexing of Nigerian publications from 1986 to 1996 (1998)
0.03
0.034355037 = product of:
0.051532555 = sum of:
0.031528432 = weight(_text_:of in 4646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031528432 = score(doc=4646,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 4646, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4646)
0.020004123 = product of:
0.040008247 = sum of:
0.040008247 = weight(_text_:science in 4646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040008247 = score(doc=4646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Examines the coverage and effectiveness of Nigerian publications indexed within a 10 year period
- Source
- African journal of library, archives and information science. 8(1998) no.2, S.97-104
-
Diodato, V.; Gandt, G.: Back of book indexes and the characteristics of author and nonauthor indexing : report of an exploratory study (1991)
0.03
0.032128956 = product of:
0.048193432 = sum of:
0.034190547 = weight(_text_:of in 1114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034190547 = score(doc=1114,freq=24.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 1114, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1114)
0.0140028875 = product of:
0.028005775 = sum of:
0.028005775 = weight(_text_:science in 1114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028005775 = score(doc=1114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This study examined the content of back of book indexes produced by 37 authors and 27 nonauthors. The purpose was to see if differences between the two groups of indexers could be discerned by counting the occurrence of characteristics in their indexes. The nonauthors, many or all of whom were probably professional indexers, provided significantly more index pages, modified headings, and modifiers than did the author indexers. The two groups were almost identical in their frequency of cross reference use. The simple counting technique is a feasible method. It should be applied to othe populations of back of book indexes to determine how generalizable are the author/nonauthor differences seen here
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991), S.341-350
-
Tejomurty, A.: Chain procedure : the first model of pre-coordinate indexing (1986)
0.03
0.031955566 = product of:
0.047933348 = sum of:
0.023928396 = weight(_text_:of in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023928396 = score(doc=334,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
0.02400495 = product of:
0.0480099 = sum of:
0.0480099 = weight(_text_:science in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0480099 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Ranganathan's philosophy: assessment, impact and relevance. Proc. of the Int. Conf. organised by the Indian Library Association an co-sponsored by Sarada Ranganathan' Endowment for Library Science. Ed.: T.S. Rajagopalan
-
Lavallee, C.: Indexation manuelle et indexation assistee par ordinateur : comparison de la performance de deux index d'une monographie (1996)
0.03
0.031938553 = product of:
0.04790783 = sum of:
0.03190453 = weight(_text_:of in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03190453 = score(doc=740,freq=16.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
0.0160033 = product of:
0.0320066 = sum of:
0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0320066 = score(doc=740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports an experiment, conducted in Mar 95 in the context of a course at the School of Library and Information Science at the University of Montreal, which evaluates the information retrieval capabilities of a manual index and a semi automated index developed according to the Bennion method. The application of a formula developed by Bennion shows that the indexes are almost identical
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Manual and automated indexing: a comparison of the performance of 2 indexes of a monograph
