-
Smith, P.: Book vendor-supplied cataloguing : impacts of technical services (1994)
0.13
0.12703542 = product of:
0.25407085 = sum of:
0.25407085 = sum of:
0.19826682 = weight(_text_:book in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19826682 = score(doc=2335,freq=10.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.8724182 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055804037 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A survey in spring 94 indicates that most prominent book vendor provide: cataloguing records, authority control and shelf ready book. Considers the advantages and disadvantages of using book vendor cataloguing. Currently most libraries use book vendor supplied cataloguing to process approval books. Explains the process. Procedures worked out by the fast cataloguing project, PromptCat run by OCLC, Yankee Books and Michigan State Libraries may simplify work flow further
- Date
- 17.10.1995 18:22:54
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.13
0.12641269 = product of:
0.25282538 = sum of:
0.25282538 = sum of:
0.15516832 = weight(_text_:book in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15516832 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.68277526 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.09765706 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09765706 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.13
0.12641269 = product of:
0.25282538 = sum of:
0.25282538 = sum of:
0.15516832 = weight(_text_:book in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15516832 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.68277526 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.09765706 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09765706 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Kuhlthau, C.C.: Seeking meaning : a process approach to library and information services (2003)
0.11
0.10835374 = product of:
0.21670748 = sum of:
0.21670748 = sum of:
0.13300143 = weight(_text_:book in 4585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13300143 = score(doc=4585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.58523595 = fieldWeight in 4585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4585)
0.08370605 = weight(_text_:22 in 4585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08370605 = score(doc=4585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4585)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- First published in 1993, this book presents a new process approach to library and information services.
- Date
- 25.11.2005 18:58:22
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.10
0.10469043 = product of:
0.20938087 = sum of:
0.20938087 = sum of:
0.15357682 = weight(_text_:book in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15357682 = score(doc=1427,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.6757723 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055804037 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998)
0.10
0.10469043 = product of:
0.20938087 = sum of:
0.20938087 = sum of:
0.15357682 = weight(_text_:book in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15357682 = score(doc=4642,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.6757723 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055804037 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Comments on Douglas Hofstadter's index to his book 'Le ton beau de Marot: in praise of the music of language'. Hofstadter took charge of the book design, typography, typesetting and copy-editing, and also compiled the index which covers 23 pages of 3 columnes and is set in a practically illegible 4-point. Although the index breaks all the rules of indexing, it is a masterly creation showing the author's industry, exhuberance and wit. Summarizes Hofstadter's own remarks on how creating the index gave hin new insights into what his book was essentially about
- Source
- Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.10
0.10269832 = sum of:
0.081771806 = product of:
0.2453154 = sum of:
0.2453154 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2453154 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43649027 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.020926513 = product of:
0.041853026 = sum of:
0.041853026 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041853026 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Wu, Z.; Li, R.; Zhou, Z.; Guo, J.; Jiang, J.; Su, X.: ¬A user sensitive subject protection approach for book search service (2020)
0.10
0.0958106 = product of:
0.1916212 = sum of:
0.1916212 = sum of:
0.15674368 = weight(_text_:book in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15674368 = score(doc=5617,freq=16.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.68970716 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
0.034877524 = weight(_text_:22 in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034877524 = score(doc=5617,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In a digital library, book search is one of the most important information services. However, with the rapid development of network technologies such as cloud computing, the server-side of a digital library is becoming more and more untrusted; thus, how to prevent the disclosure of users' book query privacy is causing people's increasingly extensive concern. In this article, we propose to construct a group of plausible fake queries for each user book query to cover up the sensitive subjects behind users' queries. First, we propose a basic framework for the privacy protection in book search, which requires no change to the book search algorithm running on the server-side, and no compromise to the accuracy of book search. Second, we present a privacy protection model for book search to formulate the constraints that ideal fake queries should satisfy, that is, (i) the feature similarity, which measures the confusion effect of fake queries on users' queries, and (ii) the privacy exposure, which measures the cover-up effect of fake queries on users' sensitive subjects. Third, we discuss the algorithm implementation for the privacy model. Finally, the effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated by theoretical analysis and experimental evaluation.
- Date
- 6. 1.2020 17:22:25
-
Cawkell, T.: ¬The information age : for better or for worse (1998)
0.09
0.09059949 = product of:
0.18119898 = sum of:
0.18119898 = sum of:
0.12539494 = weight(_text_:book in 2485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12539494 = score(doc=2485,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.55176574 = fieldWeight in 2485, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2485)
0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 2485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055804037 = score(doc=2485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although the 'information poor' are already present, the arrival of a much greater gap between the 'information poor' and 'information rich' is forecast in the book: Sovereign individual, by J.D. Davidson and W. Rees-Mogg. Concludes that, if the events forecast in the book come about, there will not be an information society but an unacceptable society
- Date
- 3. 1.1999 14:40:22
-
Sandler, M.: Disruptive beneficence : the Google Print program and the future of libraries (2005)
0.09
0.09059949 = product of:
0.18119898 = sum of:
0.18119898 = sum of:
0.12539494 = weight(_text_:book in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12539494 = score(doc=208,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.55176574 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055804037 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries must learn to accommodate themselves to Google, and complement its mass digitization efforts with niche digitization of our own. We need to plan for what our activities and services will look like when our primary activity is no longer the storage and circulation of widely-available print materials, and once the printed book is no longer the only major vehicle for scholarly communication.
- Object
- Google book search
- Pages
- S.5-22
-
Hoey, P.: Development in chemistry information resources since 1962 (1996)
0.09
0.09029478 = product of:
0.18058956 = sum of:
0.18058956 = sum of:
0.11083451 = weight(_text_:book in 7672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11083451 = score(doc=7672,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.4876966 = fieldWeight in 7672, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7672)
0.06975505 = weight(_text_:22 in 7672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06975505 = score(doc=7672,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7672, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7672)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Starting from the publication of the book: Use of the chemical literature; ed. by R.T. Bottle in 1962, illustrates how chemistry information resources and the ways of dealing with them have changed over the ensuing decades with particular reference to the 4 editions of Bottle's guide
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.6, S.437-445
-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.08
0.08404892 = product of:
0.16809784 = sum of:
0.16809784 = sum of:
0.14019582 = weight(_text_:book in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14019582 = score(doc=4631,freq=20.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.6168929 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.027902018 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027902018 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Kaushik, S.K.: DDC 22 : a practical approach (2004)
0.08
0.08124471 = product of:
0.16248941 = sum of:
0.16248941 = sum of:
0.08866761 = weight(_text_:book in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08866761 = score(doc=1842,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.39015728 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
0.073821805 = weight(_text_:22 in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073821805 = score(doc=1842,freq=14.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.4094577 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A system of library classification that flashed across the inquiring mind of young Melvil Louis Kossuth Dewey (known as Melvil Dewey) in 1873 is still the most popular classification scheme.. The modern library classification begins with Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Melvil Dewey devised DDC in 1876. DDC has is credit of 128 years of boudless success. The DDC is being taught as a practical subject throughout the world and it is being used in majority of libraries in about 150 countries. This is the result of continuous revision that 22nd Edition of DDC has been published in July 2003. No other classification scheme has published so many editions. Some welcome changes have been made in DDC 22. To reduce the Christian bias in 200 religion, the numbers 201 to 209 have been devoted to specific aspects of religion. In the previous editions these numbers were devoted to Christianity. to enhance the classifier's efficiency, Table 7 has been removed from DDC 22 and the provision of adding group of persons is made by direct use of notation already available in schedules and in notation -08 from Table 1 Standard Subdivision. The present book is an attempt to explain, with suitable examples, the salient provisions of DDC 22. The book is written in simple language so that the students may not face any difficulty in understanding what is being explained. The examples in the book are explained in a step-by-step procedure. It is hoped that this book will prove of great help and use to the library professionals in general and library and information science students in particular.
- Content
- 1. Introduction to DDC 22 2. Major changes in DDC 22 3. Introduction to the schedules 4. Use of Table 1 : Standard Subdivisions 5. Use of Table 2 : Areas 6. Use of Table 3 : Subdivisions for the arts, for individual literatures, for specific literary forms 7. Use to Table 4 : Subdivisions of individual languages and language families 8. Use of Table 5 : Ethic and National groups 9. Use of Table 6 : Languages 10. Treatment of Groups of Persons
- Object
- DDC-22
-
Gray, B.: Cataloging the special collections of Allegheny college (2005)
0.08
0.07927456 = product of:
0.15854912 = sum of:
0.15854912 = sum of:
0.10972058 = weight(_text_:book in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10972058 = score(doc=127,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.48279503 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.04882853 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04882853 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scholars have long noted the significance of Allegheny College's special collections to American cultural and educational history. Special collections have value to colleges and universities as publicity devices to draw scholars, students, and funding to the institution. Catalogers have an important role to play in marketing the library and the college through improved bibliographic access to these collections. Rare book and manuscript cataloging presents many challenges to catalogers, especially at smaller institutions. This report traces the evolution of Allegheny College's catalog, from book format in 1823, through card format, and finally to online. It also explores the bibliographic challenges created as the library moved from one format to another.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Teper, J.H.; Erekson, S.M.: ¬The condition of our "hidden" rare book collections : a conservation survey at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2006)
0.08
0.078517824 = product of:
0.15703565 = sum of:
0.15703565 = sum of:
0.11518262 = weight(_text_:book in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11518262 = score(doc=770,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.50682926 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
0.041853026 = weight(_text_:22 in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041853026 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In response to the Association of Research Libraries' Special Collections Task Force's interest in "hidden" special collection materials, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Conservation Unit undertook a conservation needs survey of the Rare Book and Special Collections Library's backlog of uncataloged rare book materials. The survey evaluated the binding structure; physical, biological, and chemical damage; and unique features of more than 4,000 randomly sampled pieces from the collection. The information gathered would aid in planning for the integration of immediate preservation actions with future cataloging projects and to better direct future conservation efforts. This paper details the development of the survey, interprets the results, and suggests methodologies for assessing other rare collections as well as approaches to integrating the identified immediate preservation needs with cataloging and processing projects.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Golderman, G.M.; Connolly, B.: Between the book covers : going beyond OPAC keyword searching with the deep linking capabilities of Google Scholar and Google Book Search (2004/05)
0.07
0.07285602 = product of:
0.14571203 = sum of:
0.14571203 = sum of:
0.11083451 = weight(_text_:book in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11083451 = score(doc=731,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.4876966 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.034877524 = weight(_text_:22 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034877524 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- One finding of the 2006 OCLC study of College Students' Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources was that students expressed equal levels of trust in libraries and search engines when it came to meeting their information needs in a way that they felt was authoritative. Seeking to incorporate this insight into our own instructional methodology, Schaffer Library at Union College has attempted to engineer a shift from Google to Google Scholar among our student users by representing Scholar as a viable adjunct to the catalog and to snore traditional electronic resources. By attempting to engage student researchers on their own terms, we have discovered that most of them react enthusiastically to the revelation that the Google they think they know so well is, it turns out, a multifaceted resource that is capable of delivering the sort of scholarly information that will meet with their professors' approval. Specifically, this article focuses on the fact that many Google Scholar searches link hack to our own Web catalog where they identify useful book titles that direct OPAC keyword searches have missed.
- Date
- 2.12.2007 19:39:22
- Object
- Google Book Search
-
Dominich, S.: Mathematical foundations of information retrieval (2001)
0.07
0.07285602 = product of:
0.14571203 = sum of:
0.14571203 = sum of:
0.11083451 = weight(_text_:book in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11083451 = score(doc=1753,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.4876966 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
0.034877524 = weight(_text_:22 in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034877524 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This book offers a comprehensive and consistent mathematical approach to information retrieval (IR) without which no implementation is possible, and sheds an entirely new light upon the structure of IR models. It contains the descriptions of all IR models in a unified formal style and language, along with examples for each, thus offering a comprehensive overview of them. The book also creates mathematical foundations and a consistent mathematical theory (including all mathematical results achieved so far) of IR as a stand-alone mathematical discipline, which thus can be read and taught independently. Also, the book contains all necessary mathematical knowledge on which IR relies, to help the reader avoid searching different sources. The book will be of interest to computer or information scientists, librarians, mathematicians, undergraduate students and researchers whose work involves information retrieval.
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 12:26:32
-
Kumbhar, R.: Library classification trends in the 21st century (2012)
0.07
0.07285602 = product of:
0.14571203 = sum of:
0.14571203 = sum of:
0.11083451 = weight(_text_:book in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11083451 = score(doc=736,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.4876966 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
0.034877524 = weight(_text_:22 in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034877524 = score(doc=736,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This book would serve as a good introductory textbook for a library science student or as a reference work on the types of classification currently in use. College and Research Libraries - covers all aspects of library classification - it is the only book that reviews literature published over a decade's time span (1999-2009) - well thought chapterization which is in tune with the LIS and classification curriculum - useful reference tool for researchers in classification - a valuable contribution to the bibliographic control of classification literature Library Classification Trends in the 21st Century traces development in and around library classification as reported in literature published in the first decade of the 21st century. It reviews literature published on various aspects of library classification, including modern applications of classification such as internet resource discovery, automatic book classification, text categorization, modern manifestations of classification such as taxonomies, folksonomies and ontologies and interoperable systems enabling crosswalk. The book also features classification education and an exploration of relevant topics.
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 12:23:55
-
Lavoie, B.; Connaway, L.S.; Dempsey, L.: Anatomy of aggregate collections : the example of Google print for libraries (2005)
0.07
0.07266897 = product of:
0.14533794 = sum of:
0.14533794 = sum of:
0.124411434 = weight(_text_:book in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.124411434 = score(doc=1184,freq=28.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.5474381 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.020926513 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020926513 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Google's December 2004 announcement of its intention to collaborate with five major research libraries - Harvard University, the University of Michigan, Stanford University, the University of Oxford, and the New York Public Library - to digitize and surface their print book collections in the Google searching universe has, predictably, stirred conflicting opinion, with some viewing the project as a welcome opportunity to enhance the visibility of library collections in new environments, and others wary of Google's prospective role as gateway to these collections. The project has been vigorously debated on discussion lists and blogs, with the participating libraries commonly referred to as "the Google 5". One point most observers seem to concede is that the questions raised by this initiative are both timely and significant. The Google Print Library Project (GPLP) has galvanized a long overdue, multi-faceted discussion about library print book collections. The print book is core to library identity and practice, but in an era of zero-sum budgeting, it is almost inevitable that print book budgets will decline as budgets for serials, digital resources, and other materials expand. As libraries re-allocate resources to accommodate changing patterns of user needs, print book budgets may be adversely impacted. Of course, the degree of impact will depend on a library's perceived mission. A public library may expect books to justify their shelf-space, with de-accession the consequence of minimal use. A national library, on the other hand, has a responsibility to the scholarly and cultural record and may seek to collect comprehensively within particular areas, with the attendant obligation to secure the long-term retention of its print book collections. The combination of limited budgets, changing user needs, and differences in library collection strategies underscores the need to think about a collective, or system-wide, print book collection - in particular, how can an inter-institutional system be organized to achieve goals that would be difficult, and/or prohibitively expensive, for any one library to undertake individually [4]? Mass digitization programs like GPLP cast new light on these and other issues surrounding the future of library print book collections, but at this early stage, it is light that illuminates only dimly. It will be some time before GPLP's implications for libraries and library print book collections can be fully appreciated and evaluated. But the strong interest and lively debate generated by this initiative suggest that some preliminary analysis - premature though it may be - would be useful, if only to undertake a rough mapping of the terrain over which GPLP potentially will extend. At the least, some early perspective helps shape interesting questions for the future, when the boundaries of GPLP become settled, workflows for producing and managing the digitized materials become systematized, and usage patterns within the GPLP framework begin to emerge.
This article offers some perspectives on GPLP in light of what is known about library print book collections in general, and those of the Google 5 in particular, from information in OCLC's WorldCat bibliographic database and holdings file. Questions addressed include: * Coverage: What proportion of the system-wide print book collection will GPLP potentially cover? What is the degree of holdings overlap across the print book collections of the five participating libraries? * Language: What is the distribution of languages associated with the print books held by the GPLP libraries? Which languages are predominant? * Copyright: What proportion of the GPLP libraries' print book holdings are out of copyright? * Works: How many distinct works are represented in the holdings of the GPLP libraries? How does a focus on works impact coverage and holdings overlap? * Convergence: What are the effects on coverage of using a different set of five libraries? What are the effects of adding the holdings of additional libraries to those of the GPLP libraries, and how do these effects vary by library type? These questions certainly do not exhaust the analytical possibilities presented by GPLP. More in-depth analysis might look at Google 5 coverage in particular subject areas; it also would be interesting to see how many books covered by the GPLP have already been digitized in other contexts. However, these questions are left to future studies. The purpose here is to explore a few basic questions raised by GPLP, and in doing so, provide an empirical context for the debate that is sure to continue for some time to come. A secondary objective is to lay some groundwork for a general set of questions that could be used to explore the implications of any mass digitization initiative. A suggested list of questions is provided in the conclusion of the article.
- Date
- 26.12.2011 14:08:22
- Object
- Google book search
-
Schaefer, B.: Mathematics literature : history (2009)
0.07
0.07223582 = product of:
0.14447165 = sum of:
0.14447165 = sum of:
0.08866761 = weight(_text_:book in 3843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08866761 = score(doc=3843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.39015728 = fieldWeight in 3843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3843)
0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 3843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055804037 = score(doc=3843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051484983 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3843)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:48
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
