Search (45 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Kilgour, F.G.: Retrieval on information from computerized book texts (1989) 0.03
    0.033250358 = product of:
      0.066500716 = sum of:
        0.066500716 = product of:
          0.13300143 = sum of:
            0.13300143 = weight(_text_:book in 2965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13300143 = score(doc=2965,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.58523595 = fieldWeight in 2965, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.02
    0.024414266 = product of:
      0.04882853 = sum of:
        0.04882853 = product of:
          0.09765706 = sum of:
            0.09765706 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09765706 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  3. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.02
    0.024414266 = product of:
      0.04882853 = sum of:
        0.04882853 = product of:
          0.09765706 = sum of:
            0.09765706 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09765706 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  4. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.02
    0.024414266 = product of:
      0.04882853 = sum of:
        0.04882853 = product of:
          0.09765706 = sum of:
            0.09765706 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09765706 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  5. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.02
    0.024414266 = product of:
      0.04882853 = sum of:
        0.04882853 = product of:
          0.09765706 = sum of:
            0.09765706 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09765706 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  6. Drabenstott, K.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Using subject headings for online retrieval : theory, practice and potential (1994) 0.02
    0.023511553 = product of:
      0.047023106 = sum of:
        0.047023106 = product of:
          0.09404621 = sum of:
            0.09404621 = weight(_text_:book in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09404621 = score(doc=386,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.41382432 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Using subject headings for Online Retrieval is an indispensable tool for online system desingners who are developing new systems or refining exicting ones. The book describes subject analysis and subject searching in online catalogs, including the limitations of retrieval, and demonstrates how such limitations can be overcome through system design and programming. The book describes the Library of Congress Subject headings system and system characteristics, shows how information is stored in machine readable files, and offers examples of and recommendations for successful methods. Tables are included to support these recommendations, and diagrams, graphs, and bar charts are used to provide results of data analyses.
  7. Tague-Sutcliffe, J.: Information retrieval experimentation (2009) 0.02
    0.022166902 = product of:
      0.044333804 = sum of:
        0.044333804 = product of:
          0.08866761 = sum of:
            0.08866761 = weight(_text_:book in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08866761 = score(doc=3801,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.39015728 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  8. Voorhees, E.M.: Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) (2009) 0.02
    0.022166902 = product of:
      0.044333804 = sum of:
        0.044333804 = product of:
          0.08866761 = sum of:
            0.08866761 = weight(_text_:book in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08866761 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.39015728 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  9. Carterette, B.: Test collections (2009) 0.02
    0.022166902 = product of:
      0.044333804 = sum of:
        0.044333804 = product of:
          0.08866761 = sum of:
            0.08866761 = weight(_text_:book in 3891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08866761 = score(doc=3891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.39015728 = fieldWeight in 3891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  10. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.K.: ¬The Text REtrieval Conference (2005) 0.02
    0.021685433 = product of:
      0.043370865 = sum of:
        0.043370865 = product of:
          0.08674173 = sum of:
            0.08674173 = weight(_text_:book in 5082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08674173 = score(doc=5082,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.38168296 = fieldWeight in 5082, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5082)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This book chronicles the evolution of retrieval systems over the course of TREC. To be sure, there has already been a wealth of information written about TREC. Each conference has produced a proceedings containing general overviews of the various tasks, papers written by the individual participants, and evaluation results.1 Reports on expanded versions of TREC experiments frequently appear in the wider information retrieval literature. There also have been special issues of journals devoted to particular TRECs [3; 13] and particular TREC tasks [6; 4]. No single volume could hope to be a comprehensive record of all TREC-related research. Instead, this book looks to distill the overabundance of detail into a manageable whole that summarizes the main lessons learned from TREC. The book consists of three main parts. The first part contains introductory and descriptive chapters on TREC's history, the major products of TREC (the test collections), and the retrieval evaluation methodology. Part II includes chapters describing the major TREC ''tracks,'' evaluations of special subtopics such as cross-language retrieval and question answering. Part III contains contributions from research groups that have participated in TREC. The epilogue to the book is written by Karen Sparck Jones, who reflects on the impact TREC has had on the information retrieval field. The structure of this introductory chapter is similar to that of the book as a whole. The chapter begins with a short history of TREC; expanded descriptions of specific aspects of the history are included in subsequent chapters to make those chapters self-contained. Section 1.2 describes TREC's track structure, which has been responsible for the growth of TREC and allows TREC to adapt to changing needs. The final section lists both the major accomplishments of TREC and some remaining challenges.
  11. TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval (2005) 0.02
    0.02078147 = product of:
      0.04156294 = sum of:
        0.04156294 = product of:
          0.08312588 = sum of:
            0.08312588 = weight(_text_:book in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08312588 = score(doc=636,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.36577243 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Text REtrieval Conference (TREC), a yearly workshop hosted by the US government's National Institute of Standards and Technology, provides the infrastructure necessary for large-scale evaluation of text retrieval methodologies. With the goal of accelerating research in this area, TREC created the first large test collections of full-text documents and standardized retrieval evaluation. The impact has been significant; since TREC's beginning in 1992, retrieval effectiveness has approximately doubled. TREC has built a variety of large test collections, including collections for such specialized retrieval tasks as cross-language retrieval and retrieval of speech. Moreover, TREC has accelerated the transfer of research ideas into commercial systems, as demonstrated in the number of retrieval techniques developed in TREC that are now used in Web search engines. This book provides a comprehensive review of TREC research, summarizing the variety of TREC results, documenting the best practices in experimental information retrieval, and suggesting areas for further research. The first part of the book describes TREC's history, test collections, and retrieval methodology. Next, the book provides "track" reports -- describing the evaluations of specific tasks, including routing and filtering, interactive retrieval, and retrieving noisy text. The final part of the book offers perspectives on TREC from such participants as Microsoft Research, University of Massachusetts, Cornell University, University of Waterloo, City University of New York, and IBM. The book will be of interest to researchers in information retrieval and related technologies, including natural language processing.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.6, S.910-911 (J.L. Vicedo u. J. Gomez): "The Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) is a yearly workshop hosted by the U.S. government's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) that fosters and supports research in information retrieval as well as speeding the transfer of technology between research labs and industry. Since 1992, TREC has provided the infrastructure necessary for large-scale evaluations of different text retrieval methodologies. TREC impact has been very important and its success has been mainly supported by its continuous adaptation to the emerging information retrieval needs. Not in vain, TREC has built evaluation benchmarks for more than 20 different retrieval problems such as Web retrieval, speech retrieval, or question-answering. The large and intense trajectory of annual TREC conferences has resulted in an immense bulk of documents reflecting the different eval uation and research efforts developed. This situation makes it difficult sometimes to observe clearly how research in information retrieval (IR) has evolved over the course of TREC. TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval succeeds in organizing and condensing all this research into a manageable volume that describes TREC history and summarizes the main lessons learned. The book is organized into three parts. The first part is devoted to the description of TREC's origin and history, the test collections, and the evaluation methodology developed. The second part describes a selection of the major evaluation exercises (tracks), and the third part contains contributions from research groups that had a large and remarkable participation in TREC. Finally, Karen Spark Jones, one of the main promoters of research in IR, closes the book with an epilogue that analyzes the impact of TREC on this research field.
    ... TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval is a reliable and comprehensive review of the TREC program and has been adopted by NIST as the official history of TREC (see http://trec.nist.gov). We were favorably surprised by the book. Well structured and written, chapters are self-contained and the existence of references to specialized and more detailed publications is continuous, which makes it easier to expand into the different aspects analyzed in the text. This book succeeds in compiling TREC evolution from its inception in 1992 to 2003 in an adequate and manageable volume. Thanks to the impressive effort performed by the authors and their experience in the field, it can satiate the interests of a great variety of readers. While expert researchers in the IR field and IR-related industrial companies can use it as a reference manual, it seems especially useful for students and non-expert readers willing to approach this research area. Like NIST, we would recommend this reading to anyone who may be interested in textual information retrieval."
  12. Kilgour, F.: ¬An experiment using coordinate title word searches (2004) 0.02
    0.01939604 = product of:
      0.03879208 = sum of:
        0.03879208 = product of:
          0.07758416 = sum of:
            0.07758416 = weight(_text_:book in 2065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07758416 = score(doc=2065,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.34138763 = fieldWeight in 2065, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2065)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study, the fourth and last of a series designed to produce new information to improve retrievability of books in libraries, explores the effectiveness of retrieving a known-item book using words from titles only. From daily printouts of circulation records at the Walter Royal Davis Library of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 749 titles were taken and then searched an the 4-million entry catalog at the library of the University of Michigan. The principal finding was that searches produced titles having personal authors 81.4% of the time and anonymous titles 91.5% of the time; these figures are 15 and 5%, respectively, lower than the lowest findings presented in the previous three articles of this series (Kilgour, 1995; 1997; 2001).
  13. Gödert, W.; Liebig, M.: Maschinelle Indexierung auf dem Prüfstand : Ergebnisse eines Retrievaltests zum MILOS II Projekt (1997) 0.02
    0.01939604 = product of:
      0.03879208 = sum of:
        0.03879208 = product of:
          0.07758416 = sum of:
            0.07758416 = weight(_text_:book in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07758416 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.34138763 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The test ran between Nov 95-Aug 96 in Cologne Fachhochschule fur Bibliothekswesen (College of Librarianship).The test basis was a database of 190,000 book titles published between 1990-95. MILOS II mechanized indexing methods proved helpful in avoiding or reducing numbers of unsatisfied/no result retrieval searches. Retrieval from mechanised indexing is 3 times more successful than from title keyword data. MILOS II also used a standardized semantic vocabulary. Mechanised indexing demands high quality software and output data
  14. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.02
    0.017438762 = product of:
      0.034877524 = sum of:
        0.034877524 = product of:
          0.06975505 = sum of:
            0.06975505 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06975505 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  15. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.02
    0.017438762 = product of:
      0.034877524 = sum of:
        0.034877524 = product of:
          0.06975505 = sum of:
            0.06975505 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06975505 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  16. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.02
    0.017438762 = product of:
      0.034877524 = sum of:
        0.034877524 = product of:
          0.06975505 = sum of:
            0.06975505 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06975505 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
  17. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.01
    0.013951009 = product of:
      0.027902018 = sum of:
        0.027902018 = product of:
          0.055804037 = sum of:
            0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055804037 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
  18. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01
    0.013951009 = product of:
      0.027902018 = sum of:
        0.027902018 = product of:
          0.055804037 = sum of:
            0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055804037 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  19. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.01
    0.013951009 = product of:
      0.027902018 = sum of:
        0.027902018 = product of:
          0.055804037 = sum of:
            0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055804037 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  20. ¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997) 0.01
    0.013951009 = product of:
      0.027902018 = sum of:
        0.027902018 = product of:
          0.055804037 = sum of:
            0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055804037 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051484983 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information

Languages

  • e 39
  • d 4
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types