Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.02 
    0.024414266 = product of:
  0.04882853 = sum of:
    0.04882853 = product of:
      0.09765706 = sum of:
        0.09765706 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09765706 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  2. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.02 
    0.019729706 = product of:
  0.03945941 = sum of:
    0.03945941 = product of:
      0.07891882 = sum of:
        0.07891882 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07891882 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  3. Courrier, Y.: SYNTOL (2009) 0.02 
    0.01939604 = product of:
  0.03879208 = sum of:
    0.03879208 = product of:
      0.07758416 = sum of:
        0.07758416 = weight(_text_:book in 3887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07758416 = score(doc=3887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.34138763 = fieldWeight in 3887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3887)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  4. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.02 
    0.017438762 = product of:
  0.034877524 = sum of:
    0.034877524 = product of:
      0.06975505 = sum of:
        0.06975505 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06975505 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.11-22
  5. Hoerman, H.L.; Furniss, K.A.: Turning practice into principles : a comparison of the IFLA Principles underlying Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) and the principles underlying the Library of Congress Subject Headings system (2000) 0.02 
    0.016625179 = product of:
  0.033250358 = sum of:
    0.033250358 = product of:
      0.066500716 = sum of:
        0.066500716 = weight(_text_:book in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066500716 = score(doc=5611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.29261798 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing's Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Headings Languages has identified a set of eleven principles for subject heading languages and excerpted the texts that match each principle from the instructions for each of eleven national subject indexing systems, including excerpts from the LC's Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. This study compares the IFLA principles with other texts that express the principles underlying LCSH, especially Library of Congress Subject Headings: Principles of Structure and Policies for Application, prepared by Lois Mai Chan for the Library of Congress in 1990, Chan's later book on LCSH, and earlier documents by Haykin and Cutter. The principles are further elaborated for clarity and discussed
  6. Coates, E.J.: Significance and term relationship in compound headings (1985) 0.02 
    0.015674368 = product of:
  0.031348735 = sum of:
    0.031348735 = product of:
      0.06269747 = sum of:
        0.06269747 = weight(_text_:book in 3634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06269747 = score(doc=3634,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.27588287 = fieldWeight in 3634, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3634)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In the continuing search for criteria for determining the form of compound headings (i.e., headings containing more than one word), many authors have attempted to deal with the problem of entry element and citation order. Among the proposed criteria are Cutter's concept of "significance," Kaiser's formula of "concrete/process," Prevost's "noun rule," and Farradane's categories of relationships*' (q.v.). One of the problems in applying the criteria has been the difficulty in determining what is "significant," particularly when two or more words in the heading all refer to concrete objects. In the following excerpt from Subject Catalogues: Headings and Structure, a widely cited book an the alphabetical subject catalog, E. J. Coates proposes the concept of "term significance," that is, "the word which evokes the clearest mental image," as the criterion for determining the entry element in a compound heading. Since a concrete object generally evokes a clearer mental image than an action or process, Coates' theory is in line with Kaiser's theory of "concrete/process" (q.v.) which Coates renamed "thing/action." For determining the citation order of component elements in a compound heading where the elements are equally "significant" (i.e., both or all evoking clear mental images), Coates proposes the use of "term relationship" as the determining factor. He has identified twenty different kinds of relationships among terms and set down the citation order for each. Another frequently encountered problem related to citation order is the determination of the entry element for a compound heading which contains a topic and a locality. Entering such headings uniformly under either the topic or the locality has proven to be infeasible in practice. Many headings of this type have the topic as the main heading, subdivided by the locality; others are entered under the locality as the main heading with the topic as the subdivision. No criteria or rules have been proposed that ensure consistency or predictability. In the following selection, Coates attempts to deal with this problem by ranking the "main areas of knowledge according to the extent to which they appear to be significantly conditioned by locality." The theory Coates expounded in his book was put into practice in compiling the British Technology Index for which Coates served as the editor from 1961 to 1977.
  7. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.01 
    0.012207133 = product of:
  0.024414266 = sum of:
    0.024414266 = product of:
      0.04882853 = sum of:
        0.04882853 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04882853 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  8. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.01 
    0.012207133 = product of:
  0.024414266 = sum of:
    0.024414266 = product of:
      0.04882853 = sum of:
        0.04882853 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04882853 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  9. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.01 
    0.012207133 = product of:
  0.024414266 = sum of:
    0.024414266 = product of:
      0.04882853 = sum of:
        0.04882853 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04882853 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  10. Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997) 0.01 
    0.010463256 = product of:
  0.020926513 = sum of:
    0.020926513 = product of:
      0.041853026 = sum of:
        0.041853026 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041853026 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  11. Foskett, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels (1985) 0.01 
    0.00969802 = product of:
  0.01939604 = sum of:
    0.01939604 = product of:
      0.03879208 = sum of:
        0.03879208 = weight(_text_:book in 3639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03879208 = score(doc=3639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.17069381 = fieldWeight in 3639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3639)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Very interesting experimental work was done by Douglas Foskett and other British classificationists during the fifteen-year period following the end of World War II. The research was effective in demonstrating that it was possible to make very sophisticated classification systems for virtually any subject-systems suitable for experts and for the general user needing a detailed subject classification. The success of these special systems led to consideration of the possibility of putting them together to form a new general classification system. To do such a thing would require a general, overall framework of some kind, since systems limited to a special subject are easier to construct because one does not have to worry about including all of the pertinent facets needed for a general system. Individual subject classifications do not automatically coalesce into a general pattern. For example, what is central to one special classification might be fringe in another or in several others. Fringe terminologies may not coincide in terms of logical relationships. Homographs and homonyms may not rear their ugly heads until attempts at merger are made. Foskett points out that even identifying a thing in terms of a noun or verb involves different assumptions in approach. For these and other reasons, it made sense to look for existing work in fields where the necessary framework already existed. Foskett found the rudiments of such a system in a number of writings, culminating in a logical system called "integrative levels" suggested by James K. Feibleman (q.v.). This system consists of a set of advancing conceptual levels relating to the apparent organization of nature. These levels are irreversible in that if one once reached a certain level there was no going back. Foskett points out that with higher levels and greater complexity in structure the analysis needed to establish valid levels becomes much more difficult, especially as Feibleman stipulates that a higher level must not be reducible to a lower one. (That is, one cannot put Humpty Dumpty together again.) Foskett is optimistic to the extent of suggesting that references from level to level be made upwards, with inductive reasoning, a system used by Derek Austin (q.v.) for making reference structures in PRECIS. Though the method of integrative levels so far has not been used successfully with the byproducts of human social behavior and thought, so much has been learned about these areas during the past twenty years that Foskett may yet be correct in his optimism. Foskett's name has Jong been associated with classification in the social sciences. As with many of the British classificationists included in this book, he has been a member of the Classification Research Group for about forty years. Like the others, he continues to contribute to the field.
  12. Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021) 0.01 
    0.008719381 = product of:
  0.017438762 = sum of:
    0.017438762 = product of:
      0.034877524 = sum of:
        0.034877524 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034877524 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:24:32
  13. Farradane, J.E.L.: Fundamental fallacies and new needs in classification (1985) 0.01 
    0.0083125895 = product of:
  0.016625179 = sum of:
    0.016625179 = product of:
      0.033250358 = sum of:
        0.033250358 = weight(_text_:book in 3642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033250358 = score(doc=3642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.14630899 = fieldWeight in 3642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3642)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The basic fallacy of mechanised information retrieval systems seems to be the often unconscious but apparently implied assumption that the machine can inject meaning into a group of juxtaposed terms although no methods of conceptual analysis and re-synthesis have been programmed (p. 203). As an example, he suggests considering the slight but vital differences in the meaning of the word "of" in selected examples: swarm of bees house of the mayor House of Lords spectrum of the sun basket of fish meeting of councillors cooking of meat book of the film Farradane's distinctive contribution is his matrix of basic relationships. The rows concern time and memory, in degree of happenstance: coincidentally, occasionally, or always. The columns represent degree of the "powers of discrimination": occurring together, linked by common elements only, or standing alone. To make these relationships easily managed, he used symbols for each of the nine kinds - "symbols found an every typewriter": /O (Theta) /* /; /= /+ /( /) /_ /: Farradane has maintained his basic insights to the present day. Though he has gone an to do other kinds of research in classification, his work indicates that he still believes that "the primary task ... is that of establishing satisfactory and enduring principles of subject analysis, or classification" (p. 208).
  14. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.01 
    0.0061035664 = product of:
  0.012207133 = sum of:
    0.012207133 = product of:
      0.024414266 = sum of:
        0.024414266 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024414266 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.

Authors

Years

Languages

Themes