Search (28 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004) 0.03
    0.026741663 = product of:
      0.06685416 = sum of:
        0.038860675 = weight(_text_:cd in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038860675 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.18234201 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
        0.027993483 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027993483 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    1. Introduction With the diversification of the material available in library collections such as: music, film, 3D objects, cartographic material and electronic resources like CD-ROMS and Web sites, the existing cataloguing principles and codes are no longer adequate to enable the user to find, identify, select and obtain a particular entity. The problem is not only that material fails to be appropriately represented in the catalogue records but also access to such material, or parts of it, is difficult if possible at all. Consequently, the need emerged to develop new rules and build up a new conceptual model able to cope with all the requirements demanded by the existing library material. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records developed by an IFLA Study Group from 1992 through 1997 present a generalised view of the bibliographic universe and are intended to be independent of any cataloguing code or implementation (Tillett, 2002). Outstanding scholars like Antonio Panizzi, Charles A. Cutter and Seymour Lubetzky formulated the basic cataloguing principles of which some can be retrieved, as Denton (2003) argues as updated versions, between the basic lines of the FRBR model: - the relation work-author groups all the works of an author - all the editions, translations, adaptations of a work are clearly separated (as expressions and manifestations) - all the expressions and manifestations of a work are collocated with their related works in bibliographic families - any document (manifestation and item) can be found if the author, title or subject of that document is known - the author is authorised by the authority control - the title is an intrinsic part of the work + authority control entity
    Date
    17. 6.2015 14:40:22
  2. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.02
    0.022394788 = product of:
      0.111973934 = sum of:
        0.111973934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.111973934 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  3. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.02
    0.022394788 = product of:
      0.111973934 = sum of:
        0.111973934 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.111973934 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  4. Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982) 0.02
    0.01679609 = product of:
      0.08398045 = sum of:
        0.08398045 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08398045 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:49:22
  5. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.02
    0.01679609 = product of:
      0.08398045 = sum of:
        0.08398045 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08398045 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  6. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.01
    0.013996742 = product of:
      0.069983706 = sum of:
        0.069983706 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069983706 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.01
    0.01187663 = product of:
      0.059383146 = sum of:
        0.059383146 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059383146 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  8. Barrett, B.B.: Hit rates with the OCLC CD450 cataloging system : a test with recent, academic approval books (1990) 0.01
    0.011658204 = product of:
      0.058291018 = sum of:
        0.058291018 = weight(_text_:cd in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058291018 = score(doc=504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The work begins by reviewing publications on the use of optical-disc technology in cataloging departments. This section includes descriptive information on specific products and comparative considerations on the value of the CD genre. Most commentary to date seems to find cost advantages to the optical format for smaller libraries but fewer attractions for larger institutions who would lose online immediacy. An outline of the design and results of the OCLC test follows along with various tables showing the class makeup of the overall sample, the hit-rate for the two vendors, and other data. Most of the sample consisted of English-language titles that would support the general academic mission of a variety of disciplines. Well over 90% of the titles searched had MARC records on discs within two issues or three months. Although concluding that departments acquiring over 5000 titles per year may find online utilities more effective, the article still urges a careful analysis of laser cataloging products with a variety of acquisition samples and for a variety of libraries.
  9. Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.01
    0.011197394 = product of:
      0.055986967 = sum of:
        0.055986967 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055986967 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
  10. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01
    0.011197394 = product of:
      0.055986967 = sum of:
        0.055986967 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055986967 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.01
    0.011197394 = product of:
      0.055986967 = sum of:
        0.055986967 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055986967 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.01
    0.011197394 = product of:
      0.055986967 = sum of:
        0.055986967 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055986967 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Hillmann, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.01
    0.009797719 = product of:
      0.048988596 = sum of:
        0.048988596 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048988596 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  14. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000) 0.01
    0.009797719 = product of:
      0.048988596 = sum of:
        0.048988596 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048988596 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
  15. Randall, N.B.: Spelling errors in the database : shadow or substance? (1999) 0.01
    0.009797719 = product of:
      0.048988596 = sum of:
        0.048988596 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048988596 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.01
    0.009797719 = product of:
      0.048988596 = sum of:
        0.048988596 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048988596 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Morgan, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloging services (1996) 0.01
    0.009797719 = product of:
      0.048988596 = sum of:
        0.048988596 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048988596 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170
  18. McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996) 0.01
    0.009797719 = product of:
      0.048988596 = sum of:
        0.048988596 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048988596 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125
  19. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.01
    0.009797719 = product of:
      0.048988596 = sum of:
        0.048988596 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048988596 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
  20. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.01
    0.008398045 = product of:
      0.041990224 = sum of:
        0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041990224 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23