Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.02 
    0.022394788 = product of:
  0.111973934 = sum of:
    0.111973934 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111973934 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  2. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.02 
    0.022394788 = product of:
  0.111973934 = sum of:
    0.111973934 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111973934 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  3. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.02 
    0.022394788 = product of:
  0.111973934 = sum of:
    0.111973934 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111973934 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  4. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.02 
    0.022394788 = product of:
  0.111973934 = sum of:
    0.111973934 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111973934 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  5. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.02 
    0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  6. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.02 
    0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  7. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.02 
    0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  8. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.02 
    0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  9. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.02 
    0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  10. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.02 
    0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  11. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.02 
    0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  12. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.02 
    0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  13. Woods, X.B.: Envisioning the word : Multimedia CD-ROM indexing (2000) 0.02 
    0.017379025 = product of:
  0.08689512 = sum of:
    0.08689512 = weight(_text_:cd in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08689512 = score(doc=223,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.40772915 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    If you are an indexer who is accustomed to working in solitude with static words, you might face some big surprises in the production of a multimedia CD-ROM. You will not be working alone. You will not be working from a manuscript. Your dexterity with a dedicated software tool for indexing will be irrelevant. The coding or tagging might not be your worry either, because it will likely be done by members of a separate technical staff. The CD-ROM can currently hold 660 megabytes of data. Its production is a massive team effort. Because of the sheer volume of data involved, it is unlikely that one indexer working alone can handle the job in a reasonable period of time. The database for the actual index entries is likely to have been designed specifically for the project at hand, so the indexers will learn the software tools on the job. The entire project will probably be onscreen. So, if you choose to thrust yourself into this teeming amalgam of production, what are the prerequisites and what new things can you expect to learn? CD-ROM is an amorphous new medium with few rules. Your most important resume items might be your flexibility, imagination, and love of words. What remains unchanged from traditional back-of-the-book indexing is the need for empathy with the user; you will still need to come up with exactly the right word for the situation. What is new here is the situation: you might learn to envision the words that correspond to non-textual media such as graphics, photos, video clips, and musical passages. And because you will be dealing with vast amounts of textual and sensory data, you might find yourself rethinking the nature and purpose of an index as a whole. CD-ROM production can take many forms; three will be discussed here
  14. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.02 
    0.015835507 = product of:
  0.07917753 = sum of:
    0.07917753 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07917753 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  15. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.01 
    0.013996742 = product of:
  0.069983706 = sum of:
    0.069983706 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069983706 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  16. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01 
    0.011197394 = product of:
  0.055986967 = sum of:
    0.055986967 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055986967 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  17. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01 
    0.009797719 = product of:
  0.048988596 = sum of:
    0.048988596 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048988596 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  18. Beyond book indexing : how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media (2000) 0.01 
    0.009715169 = product of:
  0.048575845 = sum of:
    0.048575845 = weight(_text_:cd in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048575845 = score(doc=215,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.2279275 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Part 1: Beyond stand-alone indexes: embedded indexing: WRIGHT; J.C.: The world of embedded indexing; MONCRIEF, L.: Indexing computer-related documents - Part 2: Beyond the book: Web indexing: WALKER, D.: Subject-oriented Web indexing; BROCCOLI, K. u. G.V. RAVENSWAAY: Web indexing - anchors away; MAISLIN, S.: Ripping out the pages; ROWLAND, M.J.: Plunging in: Creating a Web site index for an online newsletter - Part 3: Special topics in computer-based indexing: ROWLAND, M.J.: <Meta> tags; WOODS. X.B.: Envisioning the word: Multimedia CD-ROM indexing; HOLBERT, S.: How to index Windows-based online help - Part 4: Beyond traditional marketing - selling yourself in hyperspace: ROWLAND, M.J.: Web site design for indexers; RICE, R.: Putting sample indexes on your Web site; CONNOLLY, D.A.: The many uses of Email discussion lists
  19. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.01 
    0.006998371 = product of:
  0.034991853 = sum of:
    0.034991853 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034991853 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
  20. Rosemann, L.: ¬Die Volltextabfrage und das Alleinstellungsmerkmal des physischen Buches (2006) 0.01 
    0.005829102 = product of:
  0.029145509 = sum of:
    0.029145509 = weight(_text_:cd in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029145509 = score(doc=5142,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.13675651 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    . . . Ich plädiere hier aus den oben genannten wissenstheoretischen Gründen nicht nur für die Aufrechterhaltung eines Mindestmaßes an Registern und Indexen im Anhang von physischen Büchern, sondern sogar für deren Ausbau, deren standardmäßige Zugabe bei Sach- und wissenschaftlichen Büchern gerade angesichts der Volltextnutzung durch Online-Abfragen. Warum? Hierzu sechs Argumente: 1. Wie oben bereits angerissen, lehrt die Erfahrung bei CD-ROM-Zugaben zu opulenten Werken, dass Parallelmedien mit Parallelinhalten von den Nutzern nicht wirklich angenommen werden; es ist umständlich, zur Auffindung bestimmter Textstellen den Computer befragen zu müssen und die Fundstellen dann zwischen zwei Buchdeckeln nachzuschlagen. 2. Über frei wählbare Suchbegriffe seitens des Nutzers ist noch keine Qualität der Suchergebnisse garantiert. Erst das Einrechnen entsprechender Verweisungsbegriffe und Synonyme in die Suchabfrage führt zu Qualität des Ergebnisses. Die scheinbar eingesparten Kosten einer einmaligen bzw. abonnementartigen Investition in eine Online-Verfügbarkeit der Buchinhalte vonseiten der Verlage werden dann über die Hintertür doch wieder fällig, wenn sich nämlich herausstellt, dass Nutzer bei der von ihnen gesuchten Information nicht fündig werden, weil sie unter dem "falschen", d.h. entweder ihnen nicht bekannten oder einem ihnen gerade nicht präsenten Schlagwort gesucht haben. Die Online-Suchabfrage, die auf den ersten Blick höchst nutzerfreundlich erscheint, da eine ungeheure Menge an Titeln die Abfrage umfasst, erweist sich womöglich als wenig brauchbar, wenn sich die Trefferqualität aus den genannten Gründen als beschränkt herausstellt. 3. Nur bei entsprechenden Restriktionen des Zugangs bzw. der präsentierten Textausschnitte werden die Verlage es gewährleistet sehen, dass die Nutzerin, der Nutzer nicht vom Kauf des physischen Buches Abstand nehmen. Nur wenn die Nutzer wissen, dass ihnen gerade jene Informationen am Bildschirm vorenthalten werden, die sie im zu erwerbenden Buch mit Gewissheit finden werden, werden sie das Buch noch erwerben wollen. Wer auf die Schnelle nur ein Kochrezept aus einem teuer bebilderten Kochbuch der Oberklasse abrufen kann, wird das teure Kochbuch eben nicht mehr kaufen. Analog stellt sich die Frage, ob nicht aus diesem Grunde auch Bibliotheken erwägen werden, angesichts der elektronischen Präsenz teuerer physischer Bücher auf den Erwerb der Letzteren zu verzichten, wohl wissend, dass den Wissenschaftlern im Zweifel einige Mausklicks genügen, um die gewünschte Begriffsrecherche erschöpfend beantwortet zu finden.

Authors

Languages

  • e 19
  • d 2

Types

  • a 20
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes