Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Dang, E.K.F.; Luk, R.W.P.; Allan, J.: Beyond bag-of-words : bigram-enhanced context-dependent term weights (2014) 0.05 
    0.04936115 = product of:
  0.24680576 = sum of:
    0.24680576 = weight(_text_:grams in 1283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24680576 = score(doc=1283,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.39198354 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.059301 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.62963295 = fieldWeight in 1283, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.059301 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1283)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    While term independence is a widely held assumption in most of the established information retrieval approaches, it is clearly not true and various works in the past have investigated a relaxation of the assumption. One approach is to use n-grams in document representation instead of unigrams. However, the majority of early works on n-grams obtained only modest performance improvement. On the other hand, the use of information based on supporting terms or "contexts" of queries has been found to be promising. In particular, recent studies showed that using new context-dependent term weights improved the performance of relevance feedback (RF) retrieval compared with using traditional bag-of-words BM25 term weights. Calculation of the new term weights requires an estimation of the local probability of relevance of each query term occurrence. In previous studies, the estimation of this probability was based on unigrams that occur in the neighborhood of a query term. We explore an integration of the n-gram and context approaches by computing context-dependent term weights based on a mixture of unigrams and bigrams. Extensive experiments are performed using the title queries of the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC)-6, TREC-7, TREC-8, and TREC-2005 collections, for RF with relevance judgment of either the top 10 or top 20 documents of an initial retrieval. We identify some crucial elements needed in the use of bigrams in our methods, such as proper inverse document frequency (IDF) weighting of the bigrams and noise reduction by pruning bigrams with large document frequency values. We show that enhancing context-dependent term weights with bigrams is effective in further improving retrieval performance.
  2. Dannenberg, R.B.; Birmingham, W.P.; Pardo, B.; Hu, N.; Meek, C.; Tzanetakis, G.: ¬A comparative evaluation of search techniques for query-by-humming using the MUSART testbed (2007) 0.03 
    0.034903605 = product of:
  0.17451802 = sum of:
    0.17451802 = weight(_text_:grams in 269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17451802 = score(doc=269,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39198354 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.059301 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.44521773 = fieldWeight in 269, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.059301 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=269)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Query-by-humming systems offer content-based searching for melodies and require no special musical training or knowledge. Many such systems have been built, but there has not been much useful evaluation and comparison in the literature due to the lack of shared databases and queries. The MUSART project testbed allows various search algorithms to be compared using a shared framework that automatically runs experiments and summarizes results. Using this testbed, the authors compared algorithms based on string alignment, melodic contour matching, a hidden Markov model, n-grams, and CubyHum. Retrieval performance is very sensitive to distance functions and the representation of pitch and rhythm, which raises questions about some previously published conclusions. Some algorithms are particularly sensitive to the quality of queries. Our queries, which are taken from human subjects in a realistic setting, are quite difficult, especially for n-gram models. Finally, simulations on query-by-humming performance as a function of database size indicate that retrieval performance falls only slowly as the database size increases.
  3. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.02 
    0.021087032 = product of:
  0.105435155 = sum of:
    0.105435155 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105435155 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  4. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02 
    0.018451152 = product of:
  0.09225576 = sum of:
    0.09225576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09225576 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  5. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02 
    0.018451152 = product of:
  0.09225576 = sum of:
    0.09225576 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09225576 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  6. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02 
    0.015815273 = product of:
  0.079076365 = sum of:
    0.079076365 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079076365 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  7. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02 
    0.015815273 = product of:
  0.079076365 = sum of:
    0.079076365 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079076365 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  8. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.01 
    0.010543516 = product of:
  0.052717578 = sum of:
    0.052717578 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052717578 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  9. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.01 
    0.010543516 = product of:
  0.052717578 = sum of:
    0.052717578 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052717578 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  10. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.01 
    0.010543516 = product of:
  0.052717578 = sum of:
    0.052717578 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052717578 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  11. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01 
    0.010543516 = product of:
  0.052717578 = sum of:
    0.052717578 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052717578 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  12. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.01 
    0.010543516 = product of:
  0.052717578 = sum of:
    0.052717578 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052717578 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  13. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.01 
    0.009319239 = product of:
  0.046596196 = sum of:
    0.046596196 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046596196 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
  14. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.01 
    0.009225576 = product of:
  0.04612788 = sum of:
    0.04612788 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04612788 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  15. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.01 
    0.009225576 = product of:
  0.04612788 = sum of:
    0.04612788 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04612788 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
  16. Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996) 0.01 
    0.007907636 = product of:
  0.039538182 = sum of:
    0.039538182 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039538182 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    12. 9.1996 13:56:22
  17. Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996) 0.01 
    0.007907636 = product of:
  0.039538182 = sum of:
    0.039538182 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039538182 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  18. Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003) 0.01 
    0.007907636 = product of:
  0.039538182 = sum of:
    0.039538182 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039538182 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:36
  19. Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004) 0.01 
    0.007907636 = product of:
  0.039538182 = sum of:
    0.039538182 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039538182 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    31. 5.2004 19:22:06
  20. Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003) 0.01 
    0.007907636 = product of:
  0.039538182 = sum of:
    0.039538182 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039538182 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17031991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04863741 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:32:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 27
  • d 4

Types

  • a 29
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications