Search (4517 results, page 1 of 226)

  1. Mehl, S.: Systematic alternatives in lexicalization : the cases of gerund translation (1996) 0.19 
    0.18922961 = product of:
  0.47307402 = sum of:
    0.34395564 = weight(_text_:systematic in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.34395564 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.340428 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        1.0103624 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
    0.12911838 = weight(_text_:22 in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12911838 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2085778 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  2. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.17 
    0.17336825 = product of:
  0.28894708 = sum of:
    0.11154432 = weight(_text_:objects in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11154432 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.316579 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
    0.12898336 = weight(_text_:systematic in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12898336 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.340428 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
    0.048419394 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048419394 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2085778 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    The digital library system Daffodil is targeted at strategic support of users during the information search process. For searching, exploring and managing digital library objects it provides user-customisable information seeking patterns over a federation of heterogeneous digital libraries. In this paper evaluation results with respect to retrieval effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction are presented. The analysis focuses on strategic support for the scientific work-flow. Daffodil supports the whole work-flow, from data source selection over information seeking to the representation, organisation and reuse of information. By embedding high level search functionality into the scientific work-flow, the user experiences better strategic system support due to a more systematic work process. These ideas have been implemented in Daffodil followed by a qualitative evaluation. The evaluation has been conducted with 28 participants, ranging from information seeking novices to experts. The results are promising, as they support the chosen model.
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
  3. Houston, R.D.; Harmon, E.G.: Re-envisioning the information concept : systematic definitions (2002) 0.14 
    0.14201328 = product of:
  0.3550332 = sum of:
    0.24321339 = weight(_text_:systematic in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24321339 = score(doc=136,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.340428 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.71443415 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
    0.1118198 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1118198 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.2085778 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This paper suggests a framework and systematic definitions for 6 words commonly used in dthe field of information science: data, information, knowledge, wisdom, inspiration, and intelligence. We intend these definitions to lead to a quantification of information science, a quantification that will enable their measurement, manipulastion, and prediction.
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    22. 2.2007 19:22:13
  4. Smiraglia, R.P.: Theoretical considerations in the bibliographic control of music materials in libraries (1985) 0.13 
    0.13380773 = product of:
  0.33451933 = sum of:
    0.18403874 = weight(_text_:objects in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18403874 = score(doc=343,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.316579 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
    0.15048058 = weight(_text_:systematic in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15048058 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.340428 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic control does not differ in substance from one type of material to another. Therefore it is not possible to separate the bibliographic control of music materials entirely from the larger domain of bibliographic control activity. The literature of music librarianship is examined for relevant theoretical explanations. Specific problems of description and access are used to show that, in general, the requirements for bibliographic control of music fit neatly into the theoretical structure for all bibliographic control. The primary purpose of descriptive cataloging of musical objects is to identify and differentiate among objects in a library collection. Where the concept of responsibility is relevant, access is provided through the names of composers or performers. Systematic access is provided through co-equal facets: medium, manifestation, and form.
  5. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.13 
    0.13288903 = product of:
  0.33222258 = sum of:
    0.2838032 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2838032 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5049717 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.048419394 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048419394 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2085778 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  6. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.13 
    0.13178252 = product of:
  0.32945627 = sum of:
    0.09295361 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09295361 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.316579 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.23650268 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23650268 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5049717 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  7. Balaban, M.: ¬The music structures approach to knowledge representation for music processing (1996) 0.13 
    0.12828143 = product of:
  0.32070357 = sum of:
    0.14872576 = weight(_text_:objects in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14872576 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.316579 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
    0.17197782 = weight(_text_:systematic in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17197782 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.340428 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.5051812 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Introduces a framework for formal design and construction of music systems. It is demonsrated using the music structures approach, starting with an ontology of music objects, and ending with symbolic and visual representation frameworks and their implementations. A visual formalism based on the music structures approach is introduced. A systematic development of knowledge-representation frameworks for music is essential for obtaining manageable, reliable, user-friendly music processing tools such as composition systems. It is also essential for deepening our understanding of the capabilities and limitations of a computational account for music
  8. Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019) 0.13 
    0.12670375 = product of:
  0.31675938 = sum of:
    0.2602701 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2602701 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.316579 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.056489293 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056489293 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2085778 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
    Date
    21.11.2019 18:46:22
  9. Kaiser, J.: Systematic indexing (1911) 0.12 
    0.1216067 = product of:
  0.6080335 = sum of:
    0.6080335 = weight(_text_:systematic in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.6080335 = score(doc=225,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.340428 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        1.7860854 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Object
    Kaiser systematic indexing
  10. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.11 
    0.11352128 = product of:
  0.5676064 = sum of:
    0.5676064 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5676064 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5049717 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  11. Zackland, M.; Fontaine, D.: Systematic building of conceptual classification systems with C-KAT (1996) 0.11 
    0.11224625 = product of:
  0.28061563 = sum of:
    0.13013504 = weight(_text_:objects in 5145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13013504 = score(doc=5145,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.316579 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 5145, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5145)
    0.15048058 = weight(_text_:systematic in 5145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15048058 = score(doc=5145,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.340428 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 5145, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5145)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    C-KAT is a method and a tool which supports the design of feature oriented classification systems for knowlegde based systems. It uses a specialized Heuristic Classification conceptual model named 'classification by structural shift' which sees the classification process as the matching of different classifications of the same set of objects or situations organized around different structural principles. To manage the complexity induced by the cross-product, C-KAT supports the use of a leastcommittment strategy which applies in a context of constraint-directed reasoning. Presents this method using an example from the field of industrial fire insurance
  12. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.11 
    0.11074088 = product of:
  0.2768522 = sum of:
    0.23650268 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23650268 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5049717 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.0403495 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0403495 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2085778 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  13. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.11 
    0.10995567 = product of:
  0.27488917 = sum of:
    0.21033 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21033 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.316579 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.06455919 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06455919 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2085778 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  14. Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998) 0.11 
    0.10995567 = product of:
  0.27488917 = sum of:
    0.21033 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21033 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.316579 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.06455919 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06455919 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2085778 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  15. Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016) 0.11 
    0.106642485 = product of:
  0.2666062 = sum of:
    0.18590721 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18590721 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.316579 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.080699 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.080699 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2085778 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  16. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.10 
    0.09928004 = product of:
  0.24820009 = sum of:
    0.20785059 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20785059 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.316579 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.0403495 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0403495 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2085778 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  17. Siqueira, J.; Martins, D.L.: Workflow models for aggregating cultural heritage data on the web : a systematic literature review (2022) 0.10 
    0.09798479 = product of:
  0.24496198 = sum of:
    0.09295361 = weight(_text_:objects in 464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09295361 = score(doc=464,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.316579 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 464, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=464)
    0.15200837 = weight(_text_:systematic in 464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15200837 = score(doc=464,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.340428 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.44652134 = fieldWeight in 464, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=464)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In recent years, different cultural institutions have made efforts to spread culture through the construction of a unique search interface that integrates their digital objects and facilitates data retrieval for lay users. However, integrating cultural data is not a trivial task; therefore, this work performs a systematic literature review on data aggregation workflows, in order to answer five questions: What are the projects? What are the planned steps? Which technologies are used? Are the steps performed manually, automatically, or semi-automatically? Which perform semantic search? The searches were carried out in three databases: Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, Scopus and Web of Science. In Q01, 12 projects were selected. In Q02, 9 stages were identified: Harvesting, Ingestion, Mapping, Indexing, Storing, Monitoring, Enriching, Displaying, and Publishing LOD. In Q03, 19 different technologies were found it. In Q04, we identified that most of the solutions are semi-automatic and, in Q05, that most of them perform a semantic search. The analysis of the workflows allowed us to identify that there is no consensus regarding the stages, their nomenclatures, and technologies, besides presenting superficial discussions. But it allowed to identify the main steps for the implementation of the aggregation of cultural data.
  18. Kaiser, J.: Systematic indexing (1926) 0.10 
    0.09728535 = product of:
  0.48642677 = sum of:
    0.48642677 = weight(_text_:systematic in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.48642677 = score(doc=217,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.340428 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        1.4288683 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Object
    Kaiser systematic indexing
  19. Falquet, G.; Guyot, J.; Nerima, L.: Languages and tools to specify hypertext views on databases (1999) 0.10 
    0.09664794 = product of:
  0.24161986 = sum of:
    0.19320045 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19320045 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.316579 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.048419394 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048419394 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2085778 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models
    Date
    21.10.2000 15:01:22
  20. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994) 0.10 
    0.09621122 = product of:
  0.24052803 = sum of:
    0.18403874 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18403874 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.316579 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.056489293 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056489293 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2085778 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05956252 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3795
  • m 416
  • el 234
  • s 176
  • b 40
  • x 40
  • i 24
  • r 24
  • p 9
  • ? 8
  • n 4
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications