Search (26635 results, page 1 of 1332)

  1. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.40
    0.39990804 = product of:
      0.59986204 = sum of:
        0.02265832 = weight(_text_:of in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02265832 = score(doc=80,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05241601 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
        0.5772037 = sum of:
          0.5203905 = weight(_text_:informatrics in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.5203905 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.55551934 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.936764 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
          0.056813166 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056813166 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    There is a decrease in the incidence of explicit references to a paper over time, hence the assumption that information ages. In a study which attempts to discover whether information really ages it is necessary to include eponyms, anonyms and footnote references. Reports a pilot study which demonstrates that there is an increase over time in the frequency of use of eponyms
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  2. Pillai, C.V.R.; Girijakumari, S.: Widening horizons of informetrics (1996) 0.19
    0.19196396 = product of:
      0.28794593 = sum of:
        0.02775066 = weight(_text_:of in 7172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02775066 = score(doc=7172,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05241601 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 7172, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7172)
        0.26019526 = product of:
          0.5203905 = sum of:
            0.5203905 = weight(_text_:informatrics in 7172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.5203905 = score(doc=7172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.55551934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05241601 = queryNorm
                0.936764 = fieldWeight in 7172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Traces the origin and development of informetrics in the field of library and information science. 'Informatrics' is seen as a generic term to denote studies in which quantitative methods are applied. Discusses various applications of informetrics including citation analysis; impact factor; absolescence and ageing studies; bibliographic coupling; co-citation; and measurement of information such as retrieval performance assessment. Outlines recent developments in informetrics and calls for attention to be paid to the quality of future research in the field to ensure its reliability
  3. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.14
    0.14301792 = product of:
      0.21452686 = sum of:
        0.19328469 = product of:
          0.28992704 = sum of:
            0.08180073 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08180073 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05241601 = queryNorm
                0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
            0.2081263 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2081263 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.44438353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05241601 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
        0.021242172 = weight(_text_:of in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021242172 = score(doc=76,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05241601 = queryNorm
            0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Content
    Originally published July 1981 as Internal Report 81-2, Dept. of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 3400 Gottingen, W.-Germany.
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  4. Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019) 0.13
    0.13094214 = sum of:
      0.076347336 = product of:
        0.22904201 = sum of:
          0.22904201 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22904201 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.029739043 = weight(_text_:of in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029739043 = score(doc=5455,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
      0.02485576 = product of:
        0.04971152 = sum of:
          0.04971152 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04971152 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
    Date
    21.11.2019 18:46:22
    Series
    Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization
  5. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.12
    0.123555034 = sum of:
      0.08325052 = product of:
        0.24975155 = sum of:
          0.24975155 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24975155 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.44438353 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.018999578 = weight(_text_:of in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.018999578 = score(doc=562,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.021304937 = product of:
        0.042609874 = sum of:
          0.042609874 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042609874 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
    Source
    Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2004), 1-4 November 2004, Brighton, UK
  6. Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998) 0.12
    0.11543733 = sum of:
      0.06169797 = product of:
        0.18509391 = sum of:
          0.18509391 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18509391 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.025332773 = weight(_text_:of in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025332773 = score(doc=2341,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
      0.028406583 = product of:
        0.056813166 = sum of:
          0.056813166 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056813166 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  7. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994) 0.11
    0.10858053 = sum of:
      0.053985726 = product of:
        0.16195717 = sum of:
          0.16195717 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16195717 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.029739043 = weight(_text_:of in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029739043 = score(doc=735,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
      0.02485576 = product of:
        0.04971152 = sum of:
          0.04971152 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04971152 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
  8. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.11
    0.10766471 = sum of:
      0.038173668 = product of:
        0.114521004 = sum of:
          0.114521004 = weight(_text_:objects in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114521004 = score(doc=2746,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.034339692 = weight(_text_:of in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034339692 = score(doc=2746,freq=24.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
            4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
              24.0 = termFreq=24.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
      0.035151355 = product of:
        0.07030271 = sum of:
          0.07030271 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07030271 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Fundamental forms of information, as well as the term information itself, are defined and developed for the purposes of information science/studies. Concepts of natural and represented information (taking an unconventional sense of representation), encoded and embodied information, as well as experienced, enacted, expressed, embedded, recorded, and trace information are elaborated. The utility of these terms for the discipline is illustrated with examples from the study of information-seeking behavior and of information genres. Distinctions between the information and curatorial sciences with respect to their social (and informational) objects of study are briefly outlined.
    Content
    Vgl. Erwiderung: Hjoerland, B.: The controversy over the concept of information: a rejoinder to Professor Bates. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.8, S.1033-1045
  9. Forsyth, D.A.: Finding pictures of objects in large collections of images (1997) 0.11
    0.10703911 = sum of:
      0.04627348 = product of:
        0.13882044 = sum of:
          0.13882044 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13882044 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.030635899 = weight(_text_:of in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030635899 = score(doc=763,freq=26.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
            5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
              26.0 = termFreq=26.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
      0.030129733 = product of:
        0.060259465 = sum of:
          0.060259465 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060259465 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    3. 1.1999 12:21:22
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  10. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.11
    0.106126405 = sum of:
      0.06169797 = product of:
        0.18509391 = sum of:
          0.18509391 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18509391 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.016021851 = weight(_text_:of in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016021851 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.028406583 = product of:
        0.056813166 = sum of:
          0.056813166 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056813166 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  11. Falquet, G.; Guyot, J.; Nerima, L.: Languages and tools to specify hypertext views on databases (1999) 0.10
    0.10201092 = sum of:
      0.05667321 = product of:
        0.17001963 = sum of:
          0.17001963 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17001963 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.024032777 = weight(_text_:of in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024032777 = score(doc=3968,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
      0.021304937 = product of:
        0.042609874 = sum of:
          0.042609874 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042609874 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models
    Date
    21.10.2000 15:01:22
  12. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.10
    0.09996695 = sum of:
      0.060970664 = product of:
        0.18291199 = sum of:
          0.18291199 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18291199 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.021242172 = weight(_text_:of in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021242172 = score(doc=2754,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
      0.017754115 = product of:
        0.03550823 = sum of:
          0.03550823 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03550823 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.666-678
  13. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.10
    0.09601133 = sum of:
      0.053985726 = product of:
        0.16195717 = sum of:
          0.16195717 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16195717 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.017169846 = weight(_text_:of in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017169846 = score(doc=4198,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.02485576 = product of:
        0.04971152 = sum of:
          0.04971152 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04971152 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.363-374
  14. Understanding metadata (2004) 0.09
    0.094691955 = sum of:
      0.043627053 = product of:
        0.13088116 = sum of:
          0.13088116 = weight(_text_:objects in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13088116 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.02265832 = weight(_text_:of in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02265832 = score(doc=2686,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
      0.028406583 = product of:
        0.056813166 = sum of:
          0.056813166 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056813166 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
    Date
    10. 9.2004 10:22:40
  15. Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998) 0.09
    0.09437713 = sum of:
      0.038173668 = product of:
        0.114521004 = sum of:
          0.114521004 = weight(_text_:objects in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114521004 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.031347703 = weight(_text_:of in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031347703 = score(doc=771,freq=20.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
            4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
              20.0 = termFreq=20.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
      0.02485576 = product of:
        0.04971152 = sum of:
          0.04971152 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04971152 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
    Date
    24. 1.2007 19:38:22
    Footnote
    Festschrift article to mark the retirement of Douglas Anderson from 24 years at the School of Information and Media, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
  16. Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998) 0.09
    0.092768475 = sum of:
      0.038173668 = product of:
        0.114521004 = sum of:
          0.114521004 = weight(_text_:objects in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114521004 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.029739043 = weight(_text_:of in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029739043 = score(doc=3383,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
      0.02485576 = product of:
        0.04971152 = sum of:
          0.04971152 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04971152 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
  17. Ortega, C.D.: Conceptual and procedural grounding of documentary systems (2012) 0.09
    0.09240532 = sum of:
      0.047227673 = product of:
        0.14168301 = sum of:
          0.14168301 = weight(_text_:objects in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14168301 = score(doc=143,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.508563 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.02742353 = weight(_text_:of in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02742353 = score(doc=143,freq=30.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
            5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
              30.0 = termFreq=30.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
      0.017754115 = product of:
        0.03550823 = sum of:
          0.03550823 = weight(_text_:22 in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03550823 = score(doc=143,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Documentary activities are informational operations of selection and representation of objects made from their features and predictable use. In order to make them more dynamic, these activities are carried out systemically, according to institutionally limited (in the sense of social institution) information projects. This organic approach leads to the constitution of information systems, or, more specifically, systems of documentary information, inasmuch as they refer to actions about documents as objects from which information is produced. Thus, systems of documentary information are called documentary systems. This article aims to list and systematize elements with the potential to a generalizing and categorical approach of documentary systems. We approach the systems according to: elements of reference (the documents and their information, the users, and the institutional context); constitutive elements (collection and references); structural elements (constituent units and the relation among them); modes of production (pre or post representation of the document); management aspects (flow of documents and of their information); and, finally, typology (management systems and information retrieval systems). Thus, documentary systems can be considered products due to operations involving objects institutionally limited for the production of collections (virtual or not) and their references, whose objective is the appropriation of information by the user.
    Content
    Beitrag einer Section "Selected Papers from the 1ST Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization And Representation, Faculdade de Ciência da Informação, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Brasília, DF Brasil, October 20-22, 2011" Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_3_h.pdf.
  18. Ridenour, L.: Boundary objects : measuring gaps and overlap between research areas (2016) 0.09
    0.09161119 = sum of:
      0.04627348 = product of:
        0.13882044 = sum of:
          0.13882044 = weight(_text_:objects in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13882044 = score(doc=2835,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.024032777 = weight(_text_:of in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024032777 = score(doc=2835,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
      0.021304937 = product of:
        0.042609874 = sum of:
          0.042609874 = weight(_text_:22 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042609874 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to develop methodology to determine conceptual overlap between research areas. It investigates patterns of terminology usage in scientific abstracts as boundary objects between research specialties. Research specialties were determined by high-level classifications assigned by Thomson Reuters in their Essential Science Indicators file, which provided a strictly hierarchical classification of journals into 22 categories. Results from the query "network theory" were downloaded from the Web of Science. From this file, two top-level groups, economics and social sciences, were selected and topically analyzed to provide a baseline of similarity on which to run an informetric analysis. The Places & Spaces Map of Science (Klavans and Boyack 2007) was used to determine the proximity of disciplines to one another in order to select the two disciplines use in the analysis. Groups analyzed share common theories and goals; however, groups used different language to describe their research. It was found that 61% of term words were shared between the two groups.
  19. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.09
    0.09106767 = sum of:
      0.038173668 = product of:
        0.114521004 = sum of:
          0.114521004 = weight(_text_:objects in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114521004 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.028038241 = weight(_text_:of in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028038241 = score(doc=4640,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.02485576 = product of:
        0.04971152 = sum of:
          0.04971152 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04971152 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  20. Chowdhury, G.G.; Neelameghan, A.; Chowdhury, S.: VOCON: Vocabulary control online in MicroIsis databases (1995) 0.09
    0.09049487 = sum of:
      0.038173668 = product of:
        0.114521004 = sum of:
          0.114521004 = weight(_text_:objects in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114521004 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27859482 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.017169846 = weight(_text_:of in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017169846 = score(doc=1087,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.08196592 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05241601 = queryNorm
          0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
      0.035151355 = product of:
        0.07030271 = sum of:
          0.07030271 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07030271 = score(doc=1087,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18355194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05241601 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the need for facilities for online vocabulary control and standardization of terms, codes, etc., so as to secure consistency in naming of subjects, objects, countries, languages, etc., in databases at data entry stage. Most information storage and retrieval packages for microcomputers including MicroIsis provide for online vocabulary control in formulating search expressions for information retrieval, but not at the data entry stage. VOCON.PAS is a Pascal interface program for use with MicroIsis software for (a) online selection of term(s) and/or code(s) from vocabulary control tool, such as, thesaurus, subject heading list, classification scheme, nomenclature list(s)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.18-22

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications