Search (4541 results, page 1 of 228)

  1. Sukiasyan, E.: ¬The new state standard of the USSR : Sytematization of documents. General requirements (1987) 0.20
    0.2040156 = product of:
      0.4080312 = sum of:
        0.4080312 = sum of:
          0.29491284 = weight(_text_:class in 938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.29491284 = score(doc=938,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.87459785 = fieldWeight in 938, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=938)
          0.11311834 = weight(_text_:22 in 938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11311834 = score(doc=938,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20883581 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 938, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=938)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vortrag, 52nd IFLA general conference, Tokio. - 161-CLASS-4-E
    Source
    International cataloguing. 16(1987), S.22-23
  2. McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress 2000 (2000) 0.20
    0.2040156 = product of:
      0.4080312 = sum of:
        0.4080312 = sum of:
          0.29491284 = weight(_text_:class in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.29491284 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.87459785 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
          0.11311834 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11311834 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20883581 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.49-75
  3. Srimurugan, A.: ¬An expert systems for generation of UDC class numbers : an investigation (2000) 0.20
    0.2040156 = product of:
      0.4080312 = sum of:
        0.4080312 = sum of:
          0.29491284 = weight(_text_:class in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.29491284 = score(doc=1013,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.87459785 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
          0.11311834 = weight(_text_:22 in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11311834 = score(doc=1013,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20883581 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.25-30
  4. Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006) 0.17
    0.16915318 = product of:
      0.33830637 = sum of:
        0.33830637 = sum of:
          0.29790697 = weight(_text_:class in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.29790697 = score(doc=5784,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.8834773 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
          0.04039941 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04039941 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20883581 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study examined Library of Congress Classification (LCC)-based class numbers assigned to a representative sample of 200 titles in 52 American library systems to determine the level of consistency within and across those systems. The results showed that under the condition that a library system has a title, the probability of that title having the same LCC-based class number across library systems is greater than 85 percent. An examination of 121 titles displaying variations in class numbers among library systems showed certain titles (for example, multi-foci titles, titles in series, bibliographies, and fiction) lend themselves to alternate class numbers. Others were assigned variant numbers either due to latitude in the schedules or for reasons that cannot be pinpointed. With increasing dependence on copy cataloging, the size of such variations may continue to decrease. As the preferred class number with its alternates represents a title more fully than just the preferred class number, this paper argues for continued use of alternates by library systems and for finding a method to link alternate class numbers to preferred class numbers for enriched subject access through local and union catalogs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Sen, B.K.: DDC readymade : a treasury to 15,000 readymade DDC class numbers relating to Indian subjects, English language and literature (2001) 0.17
    0.16915318 = product of:
      0.33830637 = sum of:
        0.33830637 = sum of:
          0.29790697 = weight(_text_:class in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.29790697 = score(doc=1484,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.8834773 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
          0.04039941 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04039941 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20883581 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The book provides around 15,000 readymade class numbers relating to Indian subjects and English language and literature. It has covered four Indic religions, namely Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism and Sikhism. For each of these religions class numbers for around fifty subdivisions of each of the impotent South Asian Languages like Assamese, Bengali, English Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Nepali, Oriya, Punjabi , Sanskrit Sindhi, Sinhalese, Tamil Telugu and Urdu have been provided. he numbers for other South Asian languages noticed in DDC have also been included. For literature of each of the aforementioned languages the class numbers for around 450 subdivisions have been provided. Around 750 class cumbers have been provided for English language and literature. More than 250 class numbers have been provided under the heading History including all the periods for such subjects as Architecture, Conservation of resources, Cultural contact, Economic development, Economic geography, Elections, Elementary educational, Fauna, Flora, Folk, dancing, Folk literature, Folk supply, General clubs, Geography Geology, Higher education, Journalism, Local public debt, Local taxes, Museums, Newspapers, Organizations, Painting and paintings Political situation, Postal organizations, Public administration, Public finance, Public policy on education, Revenue, Secondary education, Social problems/social welfare, Social welfare Problems and services, State taxes, Statistics, Strikes, and so on with more than 40 geographical subdivisions. In addition to this, more than a dozen class number have been provided for all the Indian states and union territories. Necessary instructions have been given as to how class numbers are to be located, and expanded when necessary.
    Object
    DDC-22
  6. Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation : Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane (2000) 0.15
    0.15426302 = sum of:
      0.021716004 = product of:
        0.06514801 = sum of:
          0.06514801 = weight(_text_:objects in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06514801 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31697065 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.20553327 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.13254702 = sum of:
        0.10426743 = weight(_text_:class in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10426743 = score(doc=1429,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059636198 = queryNorm
            0.30921704 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
        0.028279586 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028279586 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20883581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059636198 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
    
    Abstract
    Pauline Atherton Cochrane has been contributing to library and information science for fifty years. Think of it-from mid-century to the millennium, from ENIAC (practically) to Internet 11 (almost here). What a time to be in our field! Her work an indexing, subject access, and the user-oriented approach had immediate and sustained impact, and she continues to be one of our most heavily cited authors (see, JASIS, 49[4], 327-55) and most beloved personages. This introduction includes a few words about my own experiences with Pauline as well as a short summary of the contributions that make up this tribute. A review of the curriculum vita provided at the end of this publication Shows that Pauline Cochrane has been involved in a wide variety of work. As Marcia Bates points out in her note (See below), Pauline was (and is) a role model, but I will always think of her as simply the best teacher 1 ever had. In 1997, I entered the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science as a returning mid-life student; my previous doctorate had not led to a full-time job and I was re-tooling. I was not sure what 1 would find in library school, and the introductory course attended by more than 100 students from widely varied backgrounds had not yet convinced me I was in the right place. Then, one day, Pauline gave a guest lecture an the digital library in my introductory class. I still remember it. She put up some notes-a few words clustered an the blackboard with some circles and directional arrows-and then she gave a free, seemingly extemporaneous, but riveting narrative. She set out a vision for ideal information exchange in the digital environment but noted a host of practical concerns, issues, and potential problems that required (demanded!) continued human intervention. The lecture brought that class and the entire semester's work into focus; it created tremendous excitement for the future of librarianship. 1 saw that librarians and libraries would play an active role. I was in the right place.
    Content
    Enthält Beiträge von: FUGMANN, R.: Obstacles to progress in mechanized subject access and the necessity of a paradigm change; TELL, B.: On MARC and natural text searching: a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters; KING, D.W.: Blazing new trails: in celebration of an audacious career; FIDEL, R.: The user-centered approach; SMITH, L.: Subject access in interdisciplinary research; DRABENSTOTT, K.M.: Web search strategies; LAM, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs: table of contents added to bibliographic records; JOHNSON, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  7. AlQenaei, Z.M.; Monarchi, D.E.: ¬The use of learning techniques to analyze the results of a manual classification system (2016) 0.15
    0.14919898 = sum of:
      0.04387296 = product of:
        0.13161887 = sum of:
          0.13161887 = weight(_text_:objects in 2836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13161887 = score(doc=2836,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31697065 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 2836, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2836)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.10532602 = product of:
        0.21065204 = sum of:
          0.21065204 = weight(_text_:class in 2836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21065204 = score(doc=2836,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.62471277 = fieldWeight in 2836, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2836)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Classification is the process of assigning objects to pre-defined classes based on observations or characteristics of those objects, and there are many approaches to performing this task. The overall objective of this study is to demonstrate the use of two learning techniques to analyze the results of a manual classification system. Our sample consisted of 1,026 documents, from the ACM Computing Classification System, classified by their authors as belonging to one of the groups of the classification system: "H.3 Information Storage and Retrieval." A singular value decomposition of the documents' weighted term-frequency matrix was used to represent each document in a 50-dimensional vector space. The analysis of the representation using both supervised (decision tree) and unsupervised (clustering) techniques suggests that two pairs of the ACM classes are closely related to each other in the vector space. Class 1 (Content Analysis and Indexing) is closely related to Class 3 (Information Search and Retrieval), and Class 4 (Systems and Software) is closely related to Class 5 (Online Information Services). Further analysis was performed to test the diffusion of the words in the two classes using both cosine and Euclidean distance.
  8. Classification systems in the Internet (1995) 0.15
    0.14572543 = product of:
      0.29145086 = sum of:
        0.29145086 = sum of:
          0.21065204 = weight(_text_:class in 1902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21065204 = score(doc=1902,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.62471277 = fieldWeight in 1902, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1902)
          0.08079882 = weight(_text_:22 in 1902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08079882 = score(doc=1902,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20883581 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1902, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Hinweis auf einige Klassifikationssysteme im Internet: (1) http://www.zblmath.fiz-karlsruhe.de/class/cr-over.html [Mathematik] (2) http://www.par.univie.ac:8000/ [ACM CR] (3) gopher://gopher.ub2.lu.se/1/resources/by subject/ [UDC basierter Gopher Lund] (4) http://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/wwllb/newclass.html [UDC]
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.91-92
  9. Bliss Bibliographic Classification : Class A/AL: Philosophy and logic. 2nd ed. 1992. - Class AM/AX: Mathematics, probability and statistics. 1993. - Class AY/B: science and technology and physics. 2000. - Class D: Astronomy & space. i.V. - Class H: Anthropology, human biology, health sciences. 1980. - Class I: Psychology & psychiatry. 1978. - Class J: Education (by D.J. Foskett u. J. Foskett). 2nd rev. ed. 1990. - Class K: Society. 1984. - Class S: Law. 1994. - Class P: Religion, the occult, morals and ethics. 1977. - Class Q: Social welfare. 1977. - Class R: Politics and public administration. 1996. - Class S: Law. 1992. - Class T: Economics, management of economic enterprises. 1986. - Class W: Fine arts and music. i.V. (1977-) 0.14
    0.14277406 = product of:
      0.28554812 = sum of:
        0.28554812 = product of:
          0.57109624 = sum of:
            0.57109624 = weight(_text_:class in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.57109624 = score(doc=164,freq=30.0), product of:
                0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059636198 = queryNorm
                1.6936514 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                    30.0 = termFreq=30.0
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets (1965) 0.13
    0.1338974 = sum of:
      0.049636584 = product of:
        0.14890975 = sum of:
          0.14890975 = weight(_text_:objects in 5460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14890975 = score(doc=5460,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31697065 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 5460, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5460)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.084260814 = product of:
        0.16852163 = sum of:
          0.16852163 = weight(_text_:class in 5460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16852163 = score(doc=5460,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.4997702 = fieldWeight in 5460, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5460)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A fuzzy set is a class of objects with a continuum of grades of membership. Such a set is characterized by a membership (characteristic) function which assigns to each object a grade of membership ranging between zero and one. The notions of inclusion, union, intersection, complement, relation, convexity, etc., are extended to such sets, and various properties of theses notions in the context of fuzzy sets are established. In particular, a separation theorem for convex fuzzy sets is proved without requiring that the fuzzy sets be disjoint
  11. Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006) 0.13
    0.13254702 = product of:
      0.26509404 = sum of:
        0.26509404 = sum of:
          0.20853487 = weight(_text_:class in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20853487 = score(doc=88,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.6184341 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
          0.05655917 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05655917 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20883581 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a study conducted at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU-Boulder) to assess the extent to which its catalogers were using Classification Web (Class Web), the subscription-based, online cataloging documentation resource provided by the Library of Congress. In addition, this paper will explore assumptions made by management regarding CU-Boulder catalogers' use of the product, possible reasons for the lower-than-expected use, and recommendations for promoting a more efficient and cost-effective use of Class Web at other institutions similar to CU-Boulder.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Gottlob, G.; Shrefl, M.; Rock, B.: Extending object-oriented systems with roles (1996) 0.13
    0.12659952 = sum of:
      0.037227437 = product of:
        0.11168231 = sum of:
          0.11168231 = weight(_text_:objects in 6657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11168231 = score(doc=6657,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31697065 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 6657, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6657)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.08937208 = product of:
        0.17874417 = sum of:
          0.17874417 = weight(_text_:class in 6657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17874417 = score(doc=6657,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.53008634 = fieldWeight in 6657, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6657)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Shows how class-based object-oriented systems can be extended to handle evolving objects. Class hierarchies are complemented by role hierarchies, whose nodes represent role types that an object classified in the root may take on. At any point in time, an entity is represented by an instance of the root and an instance of every role type whose role it curently plays. In a natural way, the approach extends traditional object oriented concepts, such as classification, object identity, specialization, inheritance, and polymorphism in a natural way. Demonstartes the practicability of the approach by an implementation in Smalltalk. Roles can be provided in Smalltalk by adding a few classes. There is no need to modify the semantics of Smalltalk itself. Role hierarchies are mapped transparently onto ordinary classes. The presented implementation can easily be ported to object-oriented database programming languages based on Smalltalk such as Gemstone's OPAL
  13. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.12
    0.118957736 = sum of:
      0.09471809 = product of:
        0.28415427 = sum of:
          0.28415427 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.28415427 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.50559634 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.024239644 = product of:
        0.04847929 = sum of:
          0.04847929 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04847929 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20883581 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  14. Norman, K.L.: HyperCourseware for interactive instruction in the electronic classroom (1994) 0.12
    0.117160216 = sum of:
      0.04343201 = product of:
        0.13029602 = sum of:
          0.13029602 = weight(_text_:objects in 7468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13029602 = score(doc=7468,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31697065 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 7468, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7468)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.07372821 = product of:
        0.14745642 = sum of:
          0.14745642 = weight(_text_:class in 7468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14745642 = score(doc=7468,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.43729892 = fieldWeight in 7468, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7468)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An electronic classroom with computer workstations and multimedia offers tremendous potential for interactive instruction. To support such instruction, HyperCourseware was developed as an environment and authoring system that recreates on a computer network familiar objects of instruction, such as the syllabus, lecture notes, class rolls, seating chats, exams, and grade lists. In addition, it provides interactive and collaborative tools for group discussion, anonymous feedback, student polling, and shared collaborative wirkspaces. Applications in statistics and cognitve psychology are discussed along with the specific advantages due to hypermedia links, structure of course materials, integration of parts, and classroom interactivity. Student and faculty evaluation have supported the positive educational benefits of both the electronic classroom and HyperCourseware in general
  15. Shrejder, J.A.: ¬The algebra of classification (197?) 0.12
    0.117160216 = sum of:
      0.04343201 = product of:
        0.13029602 = sum of:
          0.13029602 = weight(_text_:objects in 29) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13029602 = score(doc=29,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31697065 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 29, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=29)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.07372821 = product of:
        0.14745642 = sum of:
          0.14745642 = weight(_text_:class in 29) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14745642 = score(doc=29,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.43729892 = fieldWeight in 29, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=29)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Any classification describes some structure of taxons on a subject field. Thus, one of the natural aspects of a classification theory is the study of possible taxon structure types. In particular, two classifications generating isomorphic taxon structures (regardless of size or how filled they are) could quite rightly be said to be of the same type. Let us formulate this situation in precise terms. Assume M is the subject field of the classification (the class of all objects to be classified). We use T to denote the set of taxon subclasses identified by the classificational features. On taxon set T the is a natural order of inclusion
  16. Gudivada, V.N.; Raghavan, V.V.: Design and evaluation of algorithms for image retrieval by spatial similarity (1995) 0.12
    0.117160216 = sum of:
      0.04343201 = product of:
        0.13029602 = sum of:
          0.13029602 = weight(_text_:objects in 2800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13029602 = score(doc=2800,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31697065 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2800, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2800)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.07372821 = product of:
        0.14745642 = sum of:
          0.14745642 = weight(_text_:class in 2800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14745642 = score(doc=2800,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.43729892 = fieldWeight in 2800, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2800)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A major class of the requests from image database users involves similarity based retrieval for finding images spatially similar to a query image. Proposes an algorithm for computing the spatial similarity between 2 symbolic images. A symbolic image is a logical representation of the original image where the image objects are uniquely labelled with symbolic names. The algorithm can deal with translation, scale and rotational variance in images. Compares the characteristics of the proposed algorithm with those previously available by using a testbed of images. The proposed algorithm is more efficient and provides a rank ordering consistently matching with an expert
  17. Jose, J.M.; Harper, D.J.: ¬An integrated approach to image retrieval (1995) 0.12
    0.117160216 = sum of:
      0.04343201 = product of:
        0.13029602 = sum of:
          0.13029602 = weight(_text_:objects in 5809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13029602 = score(doc=5809,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31697065 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 5809, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5809)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.07372821 = product of:
        0.14745642 = sum of:
          0.14745642 = weight(_text_:class in 5809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14745642 = score(doc=5809,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.43729892 = fieldWeight in 5809, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5809)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents an integrated approach to image retrieval that makes use of both image and text features. Uses objects in the image and their locations as image features which are derived semi-automatically. Defines a similarity measure which combines the result of image and text query matching, and which considers the relative importance of each to the user. Moreover, the image matching considers the spatial similarity between a query object and an image object. Uses standard techniques for text indexing and matching. Provides a multimodal query interface by which users can retrieve pictures based on image or text or both. ELCAIR, an extensible class library for information retrieval, provides the basis for the resultant picture indexing and retrieval system
  18. Vries, A.P. de: Content independence in multimedia databases (2001) 0.12
    0.117160216 = sum of:
      0.04343201 = product of:
        0.13029602 = sum of:
          0.13029602 = weight(_text_:objects in 6534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13029602 = score(doc=6534,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31697065 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 6534, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6534)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.07372821 = product of:
        0.14745642 = sum of:
          0.14745642 = weight(_text_:class in 6534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14745642 = score(doc=6534,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.43729892 = fieldWeight in 6534, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6534)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A database management system is a general-purpose software system that facilitates the processes of defining, constructing, and manipulating databases for various applications. This article investigates the role of data management in multimedia digital libraries, and its implications for the design of database management systems. The notions of content abstraction and content independence are introduced, which clearly expose the unique challenges (for database architecture) of applications involving multimedia search. A blueprint of a new class of database technology is proposed, which supports the basic functionality for the management of both content and structure of multimedia objects
  19. Castelli, V.: Still image search and retrieval (2009) 0.12
    0.117160216 = sum of:
      0.04343201 = product of:
        0.13029602 = sum of:
          0.13029602 = weight(_text_:objects in 3885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13029602 = score(doc=3885,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31697065 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3885, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3885)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.07372821 = product of:
        0.14745642 = sum of:
          0.14745642 = weight(_text_:class in 3885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14745642 = score(doc=3885,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.43729892 = fieldWeight in 3885, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3885)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We describe approaches and techniques for indexing and retrieving still images from multimedia databases. We specifically emphasize content-based image retrieval (CBIR), a class of techniques where the user composes queries that specify the content of the desired images. After a brief overview of digital image formats, we analyze different approaches to content specification: in terms of low-level visual features, of objects, and of metadata. We then describe a general progressive framework that combines these approaches. We finally conclude the entry with an overview of common applications of image repositories and digital libraries, such as medical imaging, remote-sensing imaging, and data for the oil industry.
  20. Neelameghan, A.: Application of S.R. Ranganathan's postulates and principles of the general theory of knowledge classification to database design and information retrieval (1993) 0.12
    0.11658034 = product of:
      0.23316067 = sum of:
        0.23316067 = sum of:
          0.16852163 = weight(_text_:class in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16852163 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33719823 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.4997702 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
          0.064639054 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.064639054 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20883581 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059636198 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Auch: IFLA general conference, New Dehli 1992; 2-CLASS-1-E
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.3, S.46-50

Languages

Types

  • a 3801
  • m 424
  • el 238
  • s 173
  • b 41
  • x 40
  • r 25
  • i 24
  • p 13
  • ? 8
  • d 4
  • n 4
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications