Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Vakkari, P."
  1. Vakkari, P.: Task complexity, information types, search strategies and relevance : integrating studies on information retrieval and seeking (1999) 0.01
    0.008381055 = product of:
      0.06704844 = sum of:
        0.055840094 = weight(_text_:2nd in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055840094 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31004354 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
        0.011208346 = product of:
          0.022416692 = sum of:
            0.022416692 = weight(_text_:ed in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022416692 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19644247 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  2. Vakkari, P.; Sormunen, E.: ¬The influence of relevance levels an the effectiveness of interactive information retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.006407313 = product of:
      0.051258504 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we focus an the effect of graded relevance an the results of interactive information retrieval (IR) experiments based an assigned search tasks in a test collection. A group of 26 subjects searched for four Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) topics using automatic and interactive query expansion based an relevance feedback. The TREC- and user-suggested pools of relevant documents were reassessed an a four-level relevance scale. The results show that the users could identify nearly all highly relevant documents and about half of the marginal ones. Users also selected a fair number of irrelevant documents for query expansion. The findings suggest that the effectiveness of query expansion is closely related to the searchers' success in retrieving and identifying highly relevant documents for feedback. The implications of the results an interpreting the findings of past experiments with liberal relevance thresholds are also discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.11, S.963-969
  3. Talja, S.; Vakkari, P.; Fry, J.; Wouters, P.: Impact of research cultures on the use of digital library resources (2007) 0.01
    0.005339428 = product of:
      0.042715423 = sum of:
        0.022109302 = weight(_text_:26 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022109302 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    2.11.2007 12:12:26
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.11, S.1674-1685
  4. Pennanen, M.; Vakkari, P.: Students' conceptual structure, search process, and outcome while preparing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.00
    0.004497245 = product of:
      0.03597796 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=1682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
        0.0153718395 = product of:
          0.030743679 = sum of:
            0.030743679 = weight(_text_:22 in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030743679 = score(doc=1682,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    This article focuses an analysing students' information needs in terms of conceptual understanding of the topic they propose to study and its consequences for the search process and outcome. The research subjects were 22 undergraduates of psychology attending a seminar for preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. They were asked to make searches in the PsycINFO database for their task in the beginning and end of the seminar. A pre- and postsearch interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded, as were the transaction logs. The results show that during the preparation of research proposals different features of the students' conceptual structure were connected to the search success. Students' ability to cover their conceptual construct by query terms was the major feature affecting search success during the whole process. In the beginning also the number of concepts and the proportion of subconcepts in the construct contributed indirectly via search tactics to retrieving partly useful references. Students' ability to extract new query terms from retrieved items improved search results.
    Date
    19. 6.2003 17:22:33
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.8, S.759-770
  5. Vakkari, P.: How specific thesauri and a general thesaurus cover lay persons' vocabularies concerning health, nutrition and social services 0.00
    0.004164706 = product of:
      0.033317648 = sum of:
        0.022109302 = weight(_text_:26 in 3546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022109302 = score(doc=3546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 3546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3546)
        0.011208346 = product of:
          0.022416692 = sum of:
            0.022416692 = weight(_text_:ed in 3546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022416692 = score(doc=3546,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19644247 = fieldWeight in 3546, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3546)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  6. Mikkonen, A.; Vakkari, P.: Reader characteristics, behavior, and success in fiction book search (2017) 0.00
    0.0025791824 = product of:
      0.04126692 = sum of:
        0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 3789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04126692 = score(doc=3789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 3789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3789)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    We examined the search behaviors of diverse fiction readers in different search scenarios. The aim was to understand how fiction readers with varied reading preferences are selecting interesting novels in library catalogs. We conducted a controlled user study with 80 participants. Two reader groups were elicited according to similar reading preference patterns. The readers enjoyed the entertainment, escape, and comfort that reading as a pleasurable activity offered. The aesthetic readers valued the artistic and aesthetic pleasures, widening vocabulary, and ability to express oneself through fiction books. We compared the search queries and search actions between the 2 reader groups. Our results demonstrated that preference patterns were associated with readers' search behavior, that is, the number of viewed search result pages, opened book pages, dwell time on book pages, and the type of search queries. Based on the findings, we present 3 search tactics for fiction books in library catalogs: i) focused querying, ii) topical browsing, and iii) similarity-based tactic. The most popular search tactic in each search scenario was "focused querying" with known author in both reader groups.
  7. Vakkari, P.; Jones, S.; MacFarlane, A.; Sormunen, E.: Query exhaustivity, relevance feedback and search success in automatic and interactive query expansion (2004) 0.00
    0.0016581976 = product of:
      0.026531162 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 4435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=4435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 4435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4435)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    This study explored how the expression of search facets and relevance feedback (RF) by users was related to search success in interactive and automatic query expansion in the course of the search process. Search success was measured both in the number of relevant documents retrieved, whether identified by users or not. Research design consisted of 26 users searching for four TREC topics in Okapi IR system, half of the searchers using interactive and half automatic query expansion based on RF. The search logs were recorded, and the users filled in questionnaires for each topic concerning various features of searching. The results showed that the exhaustivity of the query was the most significant predictor of search success. Interactive expansion led to better search success than automatic expansion if all retrieved relevant items were counted, but there was no difference between the methods if only those items recognised relevant by users were observed. The analysis showed that the difference was facilitated by the liberal relevance criterion used in TREC not favouring highly relevant documents in evaluation.
  8. Vakkari, P.: Perceived influence of the use of electronic information resources on scholarly work and publication productivity (2008) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 1380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=1380,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 1380, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1380)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.4, S.602-612
  9. Numminen, P.; Vakkari, P.: Question types in public libraries' digital reference service in Finland : comparing 1999 and 2006 (2009) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 2850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=2850,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 2850, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2850)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.6, S.1249-1257
  10. Serola, S.; Vakkari, P.: ¬The anticipated and assessed contribution of information types in references retrieved for preparing a research proposal (2005) 0.00
    0.0012878824 = product of:
      0.02060612 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 3328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=3328,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 3328, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3328)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.4, S.373-381
  11. Vakkari, P.; Huuskonen, S.: Search effort degrades search output but improves task outcome (2012) 0.00
    0.0012878824 = product of:
      0.02060612 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 46) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=46,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 46, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=46)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.4, S.657-670
  12. Vakkari, P.: Information seeking in context : a challenging metatheory (1997) 0.00
    0.0011208346 = product of:
      0.017933354 = sum of:
        0.017933354 = product of:
          0.035866708 = sum of:
            0.035866708 = weight(_text_:ed in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035866708 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.31430796 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Information seeking in context: Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 14-16 August 1996, Tampere, Finland. Ed.: P. Vakkari u.a
  13. Vakkari, P.; Pennanen, M.; Serola, S.: Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.00
    6.7934574E-4 = product of:
      0.010869532 = sum of:
        0.010869532 = product of:
          0.021739064 = sum of:
            0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021739064 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    The study analyses how students' growing understanding of the topic and search experience were related to their choice of search tactics and terms while preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. In addition to that, the findings of the study are used to test Vakkari's (2001) theory of task-based IR. The research subjects were 22 students of psychology attending a seminar for preparing the proposal. They made a search for their task in PsychINFO database at the beginning and end of the seminar. Data were collected in several ways. A pre- and post-search interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded as were the transaction logs. The results show that search experience was slightly related to the change of facets. Although the students' vocabulary of the topic grew generating an increased use of specific terms between the sessions, their use of search tactics and operators remained fairly constant. There was no correlation between the terms and tactics used and the total number of useful references found. By comparing these results with the findings of relevant earlier studies the conclusion was drawn that domain knowledge has an impact on searching assuming that users have a sufficient command of the system used. This implies that the tested theory of task-based IR is valid on condition that the searchers are experienced. It is suggested that the theory should be enriched by including search experience in its scope.
  14. Wu, I.-C.; Vakkari, P.: Effects of subject-oriented visualization tools on search by novices and intermediates (2018) 0.00
    6.7934574E-4 = product of:
      0.010869532 = sum of:
        0.010869532 = product of:
          0.021739064 = sum of:
            0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021739064 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    9.12.2018 16:22:25
  15. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.00
    6.7934574E-4 = product of:
      0.010869532 = sum of:
        0.010869532 = product of:
          0.021739064 = sum of:
            0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021739064 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06