Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Bestandsaufstellung"
  1. Chen, K.-n.: Dynamic subject numbers replace traditional classification numbers (2013) 0.03
    0.028306793 = product of:
      0.15096956 = sum of:
        0.07003229 = weight(_text_:author in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07003229 = score(doc=787,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.45232117 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
        0.026979093 = product of:
          0.053958185 = sum of:
            0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053958185 = score(doc=787,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053958185 = score(doc=787,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a new idea on shelving printed books and finding books in libraries. The author advocates that traditional book classification number (TBCN) systems should be replaced by a better indexing method for books in libraries. The author proposes a new way of seeking books for library users wishing to locate them called a 'dynamic book subject number' (DBSN) system. The new system combines new indexing rules and automated system technology to create settings in which a book's 'subject number' can change rather than having a particular permanent classification number assigned to it. The new way encourages library users to seek books through a user-friendly cataloging system by choosing subjects from the embedded database. The database contains thousands of subjects with their corresponding Arabic codes. For printed books, the DBSN ushers in a new era in the relationship between library users and the books.
  2. Smiraglia, R.P.: Shelflisting music : guidelines for use with the Library of Congress Classification: M (2008) 0.02
    0.020114532 = product of:
      0.16091625 = sum of:
        0.13401622 = weight(_text_:2nd in 4238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13401622 = score(doc=4238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.7441045 = fieldWeight in 4238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4238)
        0.026900033 = product of:
          0.053800065 = sum of:
            0.053800065 = weight(_text_:ed in 4238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053800065 = score(doc=4238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.47146195 = fieldWeight in 4238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4238)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Issue
    2nd ed.
  3. Booth, P.F.: Together or apart : the problems of stock integration (1991) 0.02
    0.016861932 = product of:
      0.13489546 = sum of:
        0.04496515 = product of:
          0.0899303 = sum of:
            0.0899303 = weight(_text_:rules in 4898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0899303 = score(doc=4898,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.5564391 = fieldWeight in 4898, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4898)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0899303 = weight(_text_:rules in 4898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0899303 = score(doc=4898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5564391 = fieldWeight in 4898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4898)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Examines decisions made about the arrangement of stock in libraries and warns against rigid rules. Every library should have its own policy, taking into account the types of users and their particular information needs, and the kinds of information materials held and their particular characteristics
  4. Massey, S.A.; Malinconico, S.M.: Cutting cataloging costs : accepting LC Classification call numbers from OCLC cataloging copy (1997) 0.01
    0.012266113 = product of:
      0.09812891 = sum of:
        0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049064454 = score(doc=507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=507)
        0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049064454 = score(doc=507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=507)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging policy at the Alabama University Libraries allows the acceptance of LCC call numbers from OCLC cataloguing copy into the local database without shelflisting. Reports results of a study to measure error rates for locally unshelflisted samples and a control group of locally assigned and shelflisted call numbers to determine whether this policy produces disarrangement of the local online shelflist. Results show no significant differences between samples, indicating that the cataloguer's task of local shelflisting is not a cost effective use of their time. Analysis of the error data suggests that the types of disorder created by shelflisting errors would not impede the retrieval of items while subject browsing, but further study is needed to confirm this
  5. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.01
    0.012115209 = product of:
      0.096921675 = sum of:
        0.08170433 = weight(_text_:author in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08170433 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.527708 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.015217344 = product of:
          0.030434689 = sum of:
            0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030434689 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    As part of her doctoral dissertation at Brabant Catholic University in the Netherlands A. Oomens recently held a survey to determine the relative merits of author and subject arrangements for non fiction collections. Although users browsing through the collections were more likely to find material of interest via a subject arrangement, those looking for a particular title were best served by an author arrangement. All users interviewed preferred the arrangement with which they were familiar
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
  6. Weaver, M.; Stanning, M.: Reclassification project at St Martin's College : a case study (2007) 0.01
    0.008761509 = product of:
      0.070092075 = sum of:
        0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035046037 = score(doc=852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=852)
        0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035046037 = score(doc=852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=852)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this article is to outline the approach taken to the reclassification of the library collection within a small multi-site college of higher education - whereby 160,000 volumes were converted from the BLISS system to the Dewey Decimal Classification system, over a period of 11 weeks during Summer 2004. Design/methodology/approach - An automated approach was taken whereby the Library Systems Supplier - Talis was commissioned to convert catalogue records using a batch process. Risk analysis and critical path analysis were used as tools to keep the project on schedule and provide quality control. Findings - An automated approach allowed the project to be completed on time, within budget and with minimal disruption to services. Project planning was crucial to the success of the project. This included mapping BLISS to Dewey numbers, recruitment of a student team, management of work packages and ensuring continuity of the Library Service during the project. Practical implications - Institutional support for the project was secured because of its relevance to the College's corporate agenda and the promise of a wider impact that the project would have in terms of modernisation of the library service. Originality/value - Despite the apparent lack of current articles on re-classification, many libraries are still grappling with ongoing retrospective cataloguing projects. This case study demonstrates how one institution approached the problem and demonstrates that an automated approach can yield benefits. It will be of use to other libraries thinking of, or involved with, similar conversions. The partnership role of the Library Management System Supplier is also highlighted.
  7. Rotten, C. v.d.: oderzoek naar alternatieve plaatsing : Bijna net zoveel systemen als bibliotheken (1995) 0.01
    0.005771296 = product of:
      0.04617037 = sum of:
        0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953024 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
        0.015217344 = product of:
          0.030434689 = sum of:
            0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030434689 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    26. 7.1996 8:54:30
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.11, S.20-22
  8. Blinten, B.: Perspektiven der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation als Aufstellungssystematik in deutschsprachigen Bibliotheken (2008) 0.00
    0.004515161 = product of:
      0.07224257 = sum of:
        0.07224257 = weight(_text_:anglo in 2155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07224257 = score(doc=2155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20485519 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3526519 = fieldWeight in 2155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2155)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    Während die DDC in den USA als Aufstellungssystematik vor allem in öffentlichen Bibliotheken weit verbreitet ist, stellt sie in deutschen Freihandbeständen bisher ein Randphänomen dar. Stattdessen arbeiten deutsche Bibliotheken häufig noch mit Haussystematiken oder setzen auf die RVK. Seit sich die RVK nach der deutschen Wiedervereinigung über die bayerischen Grenzen hinaus verbreitet hat, ist sie meist die erste Wahl, wenn bei der Aufstellungssystematik eine Umstiegsentscheidung ansteht. Ihr hoher Verbreitungsgrad und das damit verbundene umfangreiche Fremddatenangebot machen die RVK zur attraktiven Alternative zu den Haussystematiken, die zwar für die eigenen Bedürfnisse maßgeschneidert sind, deren Anwendung durch das fehlende Fremddatenangebot im Zeitalter der Onlinekatalogisierung jedoch unwirtschaftlich geworden ist. Durch ihre starke Verbreitung im anglo-amerikanischen Raum besteht für die DDC traditionell ein großes Fremddatenangebot bei englischsprachigen Titeln. Dies führte dazu, dass einige deutsche Bibliotheken mit hohem Anteil englischsprachiger Literatur, wie etwa die Bibliothek des John-F.-Kennedy-Instituts für Nordamerikastudien an der Freien Universität Berlin (JFKI), die DDC zur Aufstellung ihrer Bücher gewählt haben. Aufgrund der mangelnden Fremddaten für deutschsprachige Titel blieb die Ausbreitung der DDC jedoch auf diese Ausnahmen beschränkt. Diese Rahmenbedingungen ändern sich nun mit dem Vorliegen der deutschen DDC-Übersetzung und dem daran anknüpfenden neuen Sacherschließungskonzept der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB), das 2007 eingeführt wurde. Mit dem wachsenden DDC-Fremddatenangebot auch für deutschsprachige Titel stellt sich jetzt die Frage, unter welchen Umständen die DDC bei einem Umstieg auf eine überregionale Aufstellungssystematik eine Alternative zur RVK darstellen kann. Dieser Frage widmet sich der vorliegende Beitrag nach einer Darstellung der unterschiedlichen Ausgangssituationen in den USA und Deutschland, einem überblicksartigen Vergleich der beiden Klassifikationen und der Beschreibung der praktischen DDC-Anwendung am JFKI.
  9. Orvig, M.: ¬The reader interest arrangement : an american shelving system with a future (1955) 0.00
    0.004121224 = product of:
      0.06593958 = sum of:
        0.06593958 = weight(_text_:american in 5263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06593958 = score(doc=5263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.60269517 = fieldWeight in 5263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5263)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
  10. Update 2014 der SfB liegt vor (2014) 0.00
    0.003869128 = product of:
      0.061906047 = sum of:
        0.061906047 = weight(_text_:26 in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061906047 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5462547 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    10. 5.2013 16:33:26
  11. Waal, J. d.: genre-indeling van digitale media : Nieuwe media passen niet in SISO (1995) 0.00
    0.0022109302 = product of:
      0.035374884 = sum of:
        0.035374884 = weight(_text_:26 in 4659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035374884 = score(doc=4659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 4659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4659)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    26. 7.1996 8:54:30
  12. Beguet, B.; Hadjopoulou, C.: ¬Les collections en libre access de la Bibliothèque Nationale de France : organisation par departments et usage de la Dewey (1996) 0.00
    0.0022109302 = product of:
      0.035374884 = sum of:
        0.035374884 = weight(_text_:26 in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035374884 = score(doc=5732,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    3. 2.1999 14:36:26
  13. Crow, L.: Shelf arrangement systems for sound recordings : survey of american academic music libraries (1991) 0.00
    0.0018030355 = product of:
      0.028848568 = sum of:
        0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 2473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028848568 = score(doc=2473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 2473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2473)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
  14. Martínez-Ávila, D.: Reader interest classifications : an alternative arrangement for libraries (2017) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=3626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of reader-interest classifications and its related terminology have shown a well-established presence and common characteristics in the knowledge organization literature for more than half a century. During the period 1952-1995, it was not unusual to find works, projects and discourses using a common core of characteristics and terms to refer to a recognizable type of projects involving alternative classifications to the DDC and other traditional practices in libraries. The use of reader-interest classification related terms and references drastically declined since 1995, although similar projects and characteristics are being used until the present day such as those of implementation of BISAC in American public libraries. The present paper attempts to overview the concept and terminology of reader-interest classifications in a historical perspective emphasizing the transformation of the concept and its remaining characteristics in time.
  15. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.00
    0.0010869532 = product of:
      0.017391251 = sum of:
        0.017391251 = product of:
          0.034782503 = sum of:
            0.034782503 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034782503 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
  16. Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996) 0.00
    0.0010869532 = product of:
      0.017391251 = sum of:
        0.017391251 = product of:
          0.034782503 = sum of:
            0.034782503 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034782503 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
  17. Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998) 0.00
    0.0010869532 = product of:
      0.017391251 = sum of:
        0.017391251 = product of:
          0.034782503 = sum of:
            0.034782503 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034782503 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24
  18. Sapiie, J.: Reader-interest classification : the user-friendly schemes (1995) 0.00
    9.807304E-4 = product of:
      0.015691686 = sum of:
        0.015691686 = product of:
          0.031383373 = sum of:
            0.031383373 = weight(_text_:ed in 5548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031383373 = score(doc=5548,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.27501947 = fieldWeight in 5548, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5548)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Classification: options and opportunities. Ed.: A.R. Thomas
  19. Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992) 0.00
    9.51084E-4 = product of:
      0.015217344 = sum of:
        0.015217344 = product of:
          0.030434689 = sum of:
            0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030434689 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
  20. Lowisch, M.: Gesamthochschulbibliotheken und Klassifikationsentwicklung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kooperation und lokalen Bedürfnissen (2017) 0.00
    9.51084E-4 = product of:
      0.015217344 = sum of:
        0.015217344 = product of:
          0.030434689 = sum of:
            0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 5116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030434689 = score(doc=5116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2019 16:22:59