Search (57 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Szofran, N.: Internet etiquette and ethics (1994) 0.04
    0.040300667 = product of:
      0.21493688 = sum of:
        0.053062323 = weight(_text_:26 in 7424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053062323 = score(doc=7424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 7424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7424)
        0.053958185 = product of:
          0.10791637 = sum of:
            0.10791637 = weight(_text_:rules in 7424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10791637 = score(doc=7424,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.66772693 = fieldWeight in 7424, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7424)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.10791637 = weight(_text_:rules in 7424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10791637 = score(doc=7424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.66772693 = fieldWeight in 7424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7424)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Offers advice on using the Internet network. Descusses the need for training, suggests rules for Internet use and examining ethical issues including: misuse of service, viruses and security
    Date
    1. 1.1999 19:07:26
  2. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.02
    0.023495179 = product of:
      0.12530762 = sum of:
        0.035972122 = product of:
          0.071944244 = sum of:
            0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071944244 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071944244 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
        0.017391251 = product of:
          0.034782503 = sum of:
            0.034782503 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034782503 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    The statutes themselves are not the only basis for deciding whether an intellectual property rights infringement has occurred. Ethical judgments can also influence judicial rulings. This column looks at three issues of intellectual property ethics: the nature of the property, written guidelines for behavior, and enforcement mechanisms. For most active infringers digital property seems unreal, the rules ambiguous, and the enforcement statistically unlikely.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  3. Cope, J.: Librarianship as intellectual craft : the ethics of classification in the realms of leisure and waged labor (2012) 0.02
    0.022353057 = product of:
      0.11921631 = sum of:
        0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04126692 = score(doc=421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
        0.022109302 = weight(_text_:26 in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022109302 = score(doc=421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
        0.055840094 = weight(_text_:2nd in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055840094 = score(doc=421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31004354 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    This paper develops an ethical conception of library labor as an intellectual craft that can serve as an alternative to a deterministic discourse of technological transformation. In this paper, the author proposes a model of librarianship as an intellectual craft that can be used as an "ideal type" in comparison to recent transformations in the practice of librarianship. This paper then examines the rise of participatory classification in the realm of leisure in user-generated classification schemes (e.g., folksonomies) as a way of examining some of the difficult ethical questions that this ideal of intellectual craft poses when applied to contemporary conditions. Marx's concept of surplus value is used to examine how donated labor adds to the general knowledge. This paper concludes by advocating for the general expansion of leisure coupled with the promotion public institutions that support the craft of those who organize information in a broadly defined public interest. In an era of dramatic change, such a framework offers a positive ethical account of librarians and information professionals' labor that is not wholly dependent on a discourse of market exchange.
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_g.pdf.
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:26:04
  4. Dane, F.C.: ¬The importance of the sources of professional obligations (2014) 0.02
    0.022030275 = product of:
      0.1174948 = sum of:
        0.022109302 = weight(_text_:26 in 3367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022109302 = score(doc=3367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 3367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3367)
        0.031795166 = product of:
          0.06359033 = sum of:
            0.06359033 = weight(_text_:rules in 3367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06359033 = score(doc=3367,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.39346188 = fieldWeight in 3367, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3367)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06359033 = weight(_text_:rules in 3367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06359033 = score(doc=3367,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.39346188 = fieldWeight in 3367, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3367)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    The study of philosophy provides many general benefits to members of any field or discipline, the easiest of which to defend are an appreciation of, and experience with, critical thinking, including the ability to apply principles thoughtfully and logically in a variety of contexts; it is the discipline that, according to Plato, Socrates believed made life worth living. Today, however, most disciplines can lay claim to critical thinking - information science certainly involves a great deal of logical analysis - but only philosophy, in the Western world, can lay claim to having developed logic and critical thinking and thereby may have furthered the process more than any other discipline. Historically, philosophy is also the discipline in which one learns how to think about the most complex and important questions including questions about what is right and proper; that is, philosophy arguably lays claim to the development of ethics. Before going further, I should note that I am neither a philosopher nor an information scientist. I am a social psychologist and statistician whose interests have brought me into the realm of practical ethics primarily through ethical issues relevant to empirical research. I should also note that I am firmly in the camp of those who consider there to be an important distinction between morals and ethics; as do others, I argue that moral judgements essentially involve questions about whether or not rules, defined broadly, are followed, whereas ethical judgements essentially involve questions about whether or not a particular rule is worthwhile and, when there are incompatible rules, which rule should be granted higher priority.
    Date
    26. 1.2017 9:53:39
  5. Beghtol, C.: Professional values and ethics in knowledge organization and cataloguing : observations on standards and implementation (1998) 0.02
    0.021027623 = product of:
      0.16822098 = sum of:
        0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08411049 = score(doc=3026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
        0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08411049 = score(doc=3026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
  6. Chan, M.; Daniels, J.; Furger, S.; Rasmussen, D.; Shoemaker, E.; Snow, K.: ¬The development and future of the cataloguing code of ethics (2022) 0.02
    0.017346904 = product of:
      0.13877523 = sum of:
        0.069387615 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069387615 = score(doc=1149,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4863088 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
        0.069387615 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069387615 = score(doc=1149,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4863088 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    The Cataloguing Code of Ethics, released in January 2021, was the product of a multi-national, multi-year endeavor by the Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee to create a useful framework for the discussion of cataloging ethics. The six Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee members, based in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada, recount the efforts of the group and the cataloging community leading up to the release of the Code, as well as provide their thoughts on the challenges of creating the document, lessons learned, and the future of the Code.
  7. Cronin, B.; Overfelt, K.: ¬The scholar's courtesy : a survey of acknowledgement behaviour (1994) 0.02
    0.016692463 = product of:
      0.1335397 = sum of:
        0.044513233 = product of:
          0.089026466 = sum of:
            0.089026466 = weight(_text_:rules in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089026466 = score(doc=2461,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.55084664 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.089026466 = weight(_text_:rules in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089026466 = score(doc=2461,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.55084664 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Scholars in major US research universities were surveyed to explore the normative bases of acknowledgement behaviour. Measures of agreement and divergence were established in respect of five issue sets pertaining to acknowledgement practice: expectations, etiquette, ethics, equity and evaluation. The results confirm the substantive role played by acknowledgements in the primary communication process. Although few formal rules exist, it is clear that many scholars subscribe to the idea of a governing etiquette. The findings also suggest that acknowledgement data could be mined to lay bare the rules of engagement that define the dynamics of collaboration and interdependence among scholars
  8. Weber, K.: Ethikcodizes für die Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.01
    0.0147480145 = product of:
      0.07865608 = sum of:
        0.022482576 = product of:
          0.04496515 = sum of:
            0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04496515 = score(doc=1699,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04496515 = score(doc=1699,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
        0.011208346 = product of:
          0.022416692 = sum of:
            0.022416692 = weight(_text_:ed in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022416692 = score(doc=1699,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19644247 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    In the past, many professions and scientific disciplines decided to create a code of ethics which shall guide the professional activities of their members. The rules in these codes of ethics, sometimes called ethical guidelines, shall provide guidance in situations of moral conflict. Obviously, as other professionals or scholars, persons who are involved in knowledge organization face moral conflicts, too. Therefore, ISKO decided to discuss whether it would be necessary to create ethical guidelines for ISKO. In the paper two options to formulate a code of ethics are discussed: First, it is possible to identify moral values without formulating the way they can be achieved - this option is realised in the ethical guidelines of the German Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI). Second, it is feasible to clearly define morally acceptable professional actions without formulation basic moral values - this option is realised in the ACM and IEEE-CS Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice. It is argued that if ISKO should decide to implement an own code of ethics it will be inevitable to choose the second option while it also will be necessary to address the specific needs of knowledge organization and its moral problems, for instance, the conflict of copyright and open access. Additionally, the second option has to be completed by basic moral values that shall underlie the professional actions of knowledge organization.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  9. Machovec, G.S.: Internet advertising : ethics and etiquette (1994) 0.01
    0.013489546 = product of:
      0.10791637 = sum of:
        0.035972122 = product of:
          0.071944244 = sum of:
            0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071944244 = score(doc=958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=958)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071944244 = score(doc=958,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 958, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=958)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the growth in the commercial use of the Internet, and in particular its use for advertising by commercial organizations. Gives examples of good and bad use of the Internet for advertising. Also suggests a number of recommended guidelines for Internet adverstising, while noting that there are no legal rules governing this area
  10. Capurro, R.: Information technology and technologies of the self (1996) 0.01
    0.013489546 = product of:
      0.10791637 = sum of:
        0.035972122 = product of:
          0.071944244 = sum of:
            0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 7748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071944244 = score(doc=7748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 7748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 7748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071944244 = score(doc=7748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 7748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7748)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses how we can ensure that the benefits of information technology are distributed equitably and can be used by people to shape their lives. Examines some ethical aspects of the intersections between information technology and technologies of the self, as analyzed by some leading thinkers. The analyzes show that information technology shares the ambiguities of all technological products. The mutual dependency between moral rules and technologies of the self with regard to the social impact of information technology is also demonstrated
  11. Brody, R.: ¬The problem of information naïveté (2008) 0.01
    0.012374608 = product of:
      0.09899686 = sum of:
        0.066027075 = weight(_text_:author in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066027075 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.42645246 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
        0.03296979 = weight(_text_:american in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03296979 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.30134758 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    With the rapidly changing Web-enabled world, the already existing dichotomy between knowing of and knowing about, or information naïveté, widens daily. This article explores the ethical dilemmas that can result from the lack of information literacy. The article also discusses conditions and consequences of information naïveté, media bias, possessive memory, and limited contexts and abilities. To help avoid information failure, the author recommends producers, contributors, disseminators, and aggregators of information be less information naïve.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1124-1127
  12. Cox, R.J.: Archival ethics : the truth of the matter (2008) 0.01
    0.012374608 = product of:
      0.09899686 = sum of:
        0.066027075 = weight(_text_:author in 1866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066027075 = score(doc=1866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.42645246 = fieldWeight in 1866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1866)
        0.03296979 = weight(_text_:american in 1866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03296979 = score(doc=1866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.30134758 = fieldWeight in 1866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1866)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    This essay explores the question of whether records professionals are as aware of the ethical dimensions of their work as they should be. It consider first the historical and professional context of archival ethics, then examines a recent case about business archives involving the author that suggests the need for renewed attention to professional ethics, and concludes with a discussion about how archivists might reconsider the ethical dimensions of their work.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1128-1133
  13. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.01
    0.008338703 = product of:
      0.06670962 = sum of:
        0.055840094 = weight(_text_:2nd in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055840094 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31004354 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
        0.010869532 = product of:
          0.021739064 = sum of:
            0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021739064 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_f.pdf.
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  14. Smith, M.M.: Online information ethics : online searching and the searching self (1994) 0.01
    0.0058305888 = product of:
      0.04664471 = sum of:
        0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 8599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953024 = score(doc=8599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 8599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8599)
        0.015691686 = product of:
          0.031383373 = sum of:
            0.031383373 = weight(_text_:ed in 8599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031383373 = score(doc=8599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.27501947 = fieldWeight in 8599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    1. 1.1999 19:06:26
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th National Online Meeting 1994, New York, 10-12 May 1994. Ed. by M.E. Williams
  15. Benedetto, C. di; Leone, L.; Seta, M. Della: Semantic approach to bioethics in the Ethicsweb project : building a semantic architecture for a European documentation system 0.00
    0.0049976474 = product of:
      0.03998118 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
        0.013450016 = product of:
          0.026900033 = sum of:
            0.026900033 = weight(_text_:ed in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026900033 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  16. Fox, M.J.; Reece, A.: Which ethics? Whose morality? : an analysis of ethical standards for information organization (2012) 0.00
    0.0041880067 = product of:
      0.06700811 = sum of:
        0.06700811 = weight(_text_:2nd in 424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06700811 = score(doc=424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.37205225 = fieldWeight in 424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=424)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_j.pdf.
  17. Chaves Guimaraes, J.A.; Fernández-Molina, J.C.; Pinho, F.A.; Oliveira Milani, S.: Ethics in the knowledge organization environment : an overview of values and problems in the LIS literature (2008) 0.00
    0.003976808 = product of:
      0.031814463 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 2513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=2513,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 2513, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2513)
        0.011208346 = product of:
          0.022416692 = sum of:
            0.022416692 = weight(_text_:ed in 2513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022416692 = score(doc=2513,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19644247 = fieldWeight in 2513, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2513)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Content
    Reflections on Information Science have been focused mostly on information access and dissemination, not on ethical aspects of knowledge organization and representation (KOR). This leads us to investigate the existence of ethical values - and problems - which have impact on this field, especially since they are not discussed, although they are revealed in everyday practice. Therefore, and trying to contribute to a further reflection on the lack of literature on ethics in KOR, this paper analyses the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology JASIST, Journal of Documentation, Knowledge Organization, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, The Indexer and Ethics and Information Technology in the period between 1995 and 2004. The results reveal two complementary dimensions: one concerning the respect of diversity and the other concerning the specificity warrant. The latter, which may prove the relevance of the theoretical principles announced by Hudon (1997), Beghtol (2002, 2005) and Garcia Gutierrez (2002), relative to a transcultural ethics of mediation that reflects diversity (fitted with a precision that, many times, passes by the dimension of multilingualism), making use of tools that may provide cultural warrant to knowledge representation.
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
  18. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.00
    0.0039344565 = product of:
      0.031475652 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
        0.010869532 = product of:
          0.021739064 = sum of:
            0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021739064 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1134-1142
  19. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.00
    0.003863629 = product of:
      0.061818063 = sum of:
        0.061818063 = sum of:
          0.031383373 = weight(_text_:ed in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031383373 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.27501947 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
          0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030434689 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  20. Etzioni, A.: ¬The First Amendment is not an absolute even on the Internet (1997) 0.00
    0.0036108557 = product of:
      0.05777369 = sum of:
        0.05777369 = weight(_text_:author in 1580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05777369 = score(doc=1580,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3731459 = fieldWeight in 1580, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1580)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    Taking the Oklahoma bombing as a base, the author argues that although social scientists differ about the effects of pornography, there are no parallel arguments that bomb manuals on the Internet give safe vent to potential bombers. While instructions for making bombs are available in books, the procedures involved in accessing such literature in libraries may deter would be bombers. In contrast, easy access through the Internet will encourage them. It is argued that materials that endanger lives should be banned from the Internet on the basis that every right, even free speech, needs to be balanced with others, especially the right to live

Years

Languages

  • e 45
  • d 10
  • es 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 54
  • m 3
  • s 2
  • More… Less…