-
Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986)
0.05
0.05484921 = product of:
0.19197223 = sum of:
0.0514505 = weight(_text_:subject in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0514505 = score(doc=1524,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4791082 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=1524,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=1524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.0526639 = weight(_text_:classification in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526639 = score(doc=1524,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
- Source
- International classification. 13(1986), S.73-78
-
Lorenz, B.: ¬The Regensburg Classification Scheme : users and partners (1995)
0.02
0.02346724 = product of:
0.10951379 = sum of:
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=2886,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=2886,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
0.016272005 = product of:
0.03254401 = sum of:
0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03254401 = score(doc=2886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Description of the history and development of the home-made Regensburg Classification Scheme since 1964 and its notation which has been built according to the one of the Library of Congress. Although not intended in the beginning, the scheme has become the common tool for a number of Bavarian libraries since 1970 and also of libraries in Switzerland (since 1986) and the socalled new German states (after 1990). The individual schedules are listed and also the classification aids published with the scheme's progressing. Concludingly future plans are outlined
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.158-161
-
Pflug, G.: Classification in the libraries of the German Federal Republic (1982)
0.02
0.021751886 = product of:
0.1522632 = sum of:
0.0761316 = weight(_text_:classification in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0761316 = score(doc=1248,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
0.0761316 = weight(_text_:classification in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0761316 = score(doc=1248,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- International classification. 9(1982), S.27-29
-
Clarke, R.I.: Library classification systems in the U.S. : basic ideas and examples (2021)
0.02
0.02127943 = product of:
0.148956 = sum of:
0.074478 = weight(_text_:classification in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074478 = score(doc=705,freq=20.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7788835 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
0.074478 = weight(_text_:classification in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074478 = score(doc=705,freq=20.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7788835 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- This article offers a basic introduction to classification in the context of librarianship in the United States with an aim toward filling gaps in formal education and practical experience. The article defines the concept of classification and discusses the goals and purposes of classification, both functional and intellectual. Overviews of two common classification systems frequently used in U.S. libraries are presented: Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), Library of Congress Classification (LCC), as well as an introduction to a group of classifications known as "reader-interest classifications."
- Content
- Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1881008. Teil eines Themenheftes: Cataloging and Classification: Back to Basics
- Object
- Reader Interest Classification
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.2/3, S.203-224
-
Haykin, D.J.: Book classification and the problem of change (1955)
0.02
0.015380906 = product of:
0.107666336 = sum of:
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 6231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=6231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 6231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6231)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 6231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=6231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 6231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6231)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Rider, A.F.: Rider's International Classification for the arrangement of books on the shelves of general libraries (1961)
0.01
0.01153568 = product of:
0.08074976 = sum of:
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 6162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=6162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 6162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6162)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 6162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=6162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 6162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6162)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Lorenz, B.: Systematische Aufstellung in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart (2002)
0.01
0.0074252896 = product of:
0.03465135 = sum of:
0.0142746745 = weight(_text_:classification in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0142746745 = score(doc=1786,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.14928313 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
0.0142746745 = weight(_text_:classification in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0142746745 = score(doc=1786,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.14928313 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
0.0061020018 = product of:
0.0122040035 = sum of:
0.0122040035 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0122040035 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 17:56:19
- LCSH
- Classification / Books / History
- Subject
- Classification / Books / History
-
Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken : Theorie - Anwendung - Nutzen (2018)
0.01
0.0054379716 = product of:
0.0380658 = sum of:
0.0190329 = weight(_text_:classification in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0190329 = score(doc=5682,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19904417 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
0.0190329 = weight(_text_:classification in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0190329 = score(doc=5682,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19904417 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- LCSH
- Classification
- Subject
- Classification
-
Jager, K. de: Obsolescence and stress : a study of the use of books on open shelves at a university library (1994)
0.00
0.004806533 = product of:
0.03364573 = sum of:
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 7655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=7655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 7655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7655)
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 7655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=7655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 7655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7655)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Reports the results of a study at the main library of Cape Town University, to investigate complaints about ageing book stock and declining resources and observations that many books were hardly circulating. The study aimed to establish the proportion of the books in the library which were actively circulating and whether the accepted phenomenon of decline in use with age, or obsolescence, would be supported in an environment where a reduction in the purchase of new books was evident. Two separate investigations were conducted: a diachronous study of accession dates, classification numbers and date labels of the open shelf collection; and a synchronous study of books on loan during the period of investigation. The resulting database consisted of 2654 and 1023 records respectively. Evidence suggests that older books, do not exhibit the expected characteristics of obsolescence and, while a certain measure of decline of use with age was demonstrated, such decline may be reversed in times of decreasing resources or increasing demands from existing resources. Suggests that the library could develop an informed weeding policy that will enable it to remove from the shelves those materials that have remained unused or little used for 25 years or more
-
Lorenz, B.: Systematische Aufstellung in deutschen wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken (1985)
0.00
0.004806533 = product of:
0.03364573 = sum of:
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=2073,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2073, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2073)
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 2073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=2073,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2073, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2073)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: International Classification 13(1986) S.37-38 (G. Heinrich); ZfBB 34(1987) S.141-143 (J. Hönscheid); Mitteilungsblatt NW 36(1986) S.74-77 (H. Lohse); ZfB 100(1986) S.221-224 (H. Beck); Bibliothek. Forschung und Praxis 12(1988) S.107-109 (W. Gödert) / Rez. zur 2. Aufl. in: Mitteilungsblatt NW 44(1994) H.2, S.268-269 (H. Lohse); ZfBB 42(1995) H.4, S.396-399 (W. Traiser); Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 19(1995) H.3, S.xxx-xxx (A. Halle)
-
Sandner, M.: Neues aus der Kommission für Sacherschließung (2003)
0.00
0.0038452265 = product of:
0.026916584 = sum of:
0.013458292 = weight(_text_:classification in 1783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013458292 = score(doc=1783,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 1783, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1783)
0.013458292 = weight(_text_:classification in 1783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013458292 = score(doc=1783,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 1783, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1783)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Content
- "Der für den 10. April 2003 in Wien angekündigte Round Table zum Thema Aufstellungssystematiken stieß auf so großes Interesse, dass wir uns spontan dazu entschlossen, ihn zu einer Podiumsdiskussion umzufunktionieren: natürlich mit beträchtlicher Beteiligung aus dem Auditorium! Die Veranstaltung hat deutlich gemacht, dass systematische Freihandaufstellungen in modernen Bibliotheken gewissermaßen zur "Grundausstattung" gehören und den Benutzerbedürfnissen sehr gut entsprechen, dass aber der Pflege vor Ort auch viel Einsatz erfordert. Umso wichtiger erscheint es daher, vor Neueinführung einer Klassifikation für Aufstellungs-zwecke sorgfältig zu prüfen, welche sowohl den räumlichen und personellen Möglichkeiten als auch den fachlichen Erfordernissen und v.a. dem Benutzerbedarf am besten entspricht. Die während der Veranstaltung gebotenen Forschungs-, Praxis- und Erfahrungsberichte gaben beste Gelegenheit zur Gewichtung unterschiedlichster Argumente, und alle Teilnehmer/-innen haben v.a. die Anwesenheit von Frau Leiwesmeyer und ihre Bereitschaft, geduldig auf alle Fragen einzugehen, genutzt, um RVK aus erster Hand kennen zu lernen. Auch die Wortmeldungen aus Innsbruck, wo eine Umstellung auf die Regensburger Verbundklassifikation bereits durchgeführt wurde, und wo seit einem Jahr RVK praktiziert wird, waren im Hinblick auf mögliche Umstiegsszenarien besonders gefragt. Basis der Innsbrucker Entscheidung war mit auch die ausführliche Studie, die einige Jahre zuvor an der FB f. Germanistik in Wien gemacht worden war (Oberhauser / Seidler), und in der vieles sowohl für DDC als auch für RVK gesprochen hatte. Der zweite Schwerpunkt unseres Interesses galt an diesem Tag der Frage, ob auch die Dewey Decimal Classification für Freihandaufstellungen in österreichischen Bibliotheken gut geeignet wäre. Beide Optionen bieten erhebliche Fremddatennutzungsmöglichkeiten - selbstverständlich abhängig vom jeweiligen Buchbestand - und es käme wohl in erster Linie darauf an, ob künftige Benutzer/-innen eher internationale Usancen bevorzugen (vgl. die deutschen Goethe-Institute in aller WeIt od. international besuchte Postgraduate-Universitäten), oder ob das zu versorgende Fachgebiet sehr viel Literaturaufkommen im deutschen Sprachraum aufweist und die Klientel vorwiegend diesem Kulturraum angehört. Ein überzeugendes europäisches Beispiel stellte Michael Staudinger von der Musikuniversität Wien dar. Anlässlich seines Praktikums in Bologna hat er die intensive Nutzung der DDC in Italien zur Klassifizierung ebenso wie zur Aufstellung, und zwar in Kombination mit verbaler Erschließung auf der Basis des "Soggetario" (Pendant zur SWD), kennen gelernt. In unserem Nachbarland wird die Dewey bereits seit 1958 verwendet. Ein interessantes Beispiel der DDC-Anwendung hat schließlich noch Michael Grünbart von der FB f. Byzantinistik und Neogräzistik vorgestellt. Die griechische bibliothekarische Vereinigung arbeitet nämlich seit den späten Siebzigerjahren an einer Länderausgabe, die sich in so einer Fachbibliothek hervorragend eignet, weil fachspezifische Spezialindices gut genutzt werden können. Selbstverständlich wird mit der jeweils aktuellen Standard Edition abgeglichen, und auch in diesem Fall spricht die hohe Zahl der Fremddatennutzungen für die Verwendung der Dewey."
-
Lorenz, B.: Handbuch zur Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (2002)
0.00
0.0024032665 = product of:
0.016822865 = sum of:
0.008411433 = weight(_text_:classification in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008411433 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.08796592 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
0.008411433 = weight(_text_:classification in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008411433 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.08796592 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Der erste Schritt zur Verbundklassifikation war die Übernahme der Regensburger Aufstellungssystematik durch die UB Augsburg 1970 und die sich daran knüpfende enge Kooperation in allen Fragen der Sacherschließung. In den Siebzigerund Achtzigerjahren kamen die Bibliotheken der neu gegründeten bayerischen Universitäten und die Bibliotheken der bayerischen Fachhochschulen als Anwender hinzu. In den Neunzigerjahren entschlossen sich auf bayerischem Beitrittsgebiet die alten Universitäten mit zweischichtigen Bibliothekssystemen vermehrt zu Reklassifikationen ihrer Freihandbestände nach der RVK; es vollzog sich auch die Expansion der Verbundklassifikation in die neuen Bundesländer und in das deutschsprachige Ausland. Diese Erfolgsgeschichte der Verbundklassifikation basiert einerseits auf der Grundstruktur der Systematik - sie ist primär Aufstellungsordnung, retrievalfähig, optimierbar und in gewissen Grenzen tolerant gegenüber Doppelstellen, also ansatzweise Reader-Interest-Classification andererseits hat die Verbundkoordinierung in Regensburg eine glückliche Hand bewiesen, indem sie nicht nur solide Redaktionsarbeit geleistet, sondern vor allem auch den Anwenderbibliotheken ihre guten Dienste zur Unterstützung in der Einführung oder weiteren Anwendung der Systematik angeboten hat. Entscheidend ist aber auch der Umstand, dass Aktualisierungen und - wenn nötig - tief greifende Revisionen möglich und erwünscht sind, von allen Anwendern eingebracht werden können und im Konsens beschlossen werden.
-
Werr, N.; Ball, R.: ¬Die "neue" Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) oder die Zukunft eines Erfolgsmodells (2009)
0.00
5.085002E-4 = product of:
0.0071190023 = sum of:
0.0071190023 = product of:
0.014238005 = sum of:
0.014238005 = weight(_text_:22 in 3040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014238005 = score(doc=3040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 12:00:39
