-
Winget, M.A.: Videogame preservation and massively multiplayer online role-playing games : a review of the literature (2011)
0.03
0.027787952 = product of:
0.08336385 = sum of:
0.017962547 = weight(_text_:of in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017962547 = score(doc=4760,freq=16.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
0.0245278 = weight(_text_:systems in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0245278 = score(doc=4760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
0.040873505 = weight(_text_:software in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040873505 = score(doc=4760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Videogames are important cultural and economic artifacts. They also present challenges that anticipate the problems inherent in any complex digital interactive system. Not only are they digital and hence very difficult to preserve but they also are software systems that have significant hardware, peripheral, and network dependencies, which are difficult to collect and formally represent. This article reviews the literature related to videogame preservation. In addition to covering the traditional technology-related issues inherent in all digital preservation endeavors, this review also attempts to describe the complexities and relationships between the traditional acts of technology preservation, representation, and collection development. Future work should include the identification of important user groups, an examination of games' context of use, and the development of representational models to describe interaction of players with the game and the interactions between players playing the game.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.1869-1883
-
Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014)
0.03
0.027272148 = product of:
0.08181644 = sum of:
0.050336715 = weight(_text_:applications in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050336715 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2918479 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.015556021 = weight(_text_:of in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015556021 = score(doc=2608,freq=12.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.015923709 = product of:
0.031847417 = sum of:
0.031847417 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031847417 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011)
0.01
0.011549704 = product of:
0.051973667 = sum of:
0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014818345 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
0.037155323 = product of:
0.074310645 = sum of:
0.074310645 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074310645 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Date
- 27.12.2014 18:54:22
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.367-430
-
Fagan, J.C.: Usability studies of faceted browsing : a literature review (2010)
0.01
0.010715243 = product of:
0.048218597 = sum of:
0.01960283 = weight(_text_:of in 4396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01960283 = score(doc=4396,freq=14.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 4396, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4396)
0.028615767 = weight(_text_:systems in 4396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028615767 = score(doc=4396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 4396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4396)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Faceted browsing is a common feature of new library catalog interfaces. But to what extent does it improve user performance in searching within today's library catalog systems? This article reviews the literature for user studies involving faceted browsing and user studies of "next-generation" library catalogs that incorporate faceted browsing. Both the results and the methods of these studies are analyzed by asking, What do we currently know about faceted browsing? How can we design better studies of faceted browsing in library catalogs? The article proposes methodological considerations for practicing librarians and provides examples of goals, tasks, and measurements for user studies of faceted browsing in library catalogs.
-
Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015)
0.01
0.0084845545 = product of:
0.038180493 = sum of:
0.01960283 = weight(_text_:of in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01960283 = score(doc=2092,freq=14.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
0.018577661 = product of:
0.037155323 = sum of:
0.037155323 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037155323 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- The object of this literature review is to provide a historical perspective of R and D work in the area of Knowledge Organization (KO). This overview/summarization will provide information on major areas of KO. Journal articles published in core areas of KO: (Classification, Indexing, Thesauri and Taxonomies, Internet and Subject approach to information in the electronic era and Ontologies will be predominantly covered in this literature review. Coverage in this overview may not be completely exhaustive, but it succinctly showcases major developments in the area of KO. This review is a good source of additional reading material on KO apart from prescribed reading material on KO
- Date
- 22. 6.2015 16:13:38
-
Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010)
0.01
0.008161413 = product of:
0.036726356 = sum of:
0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018148692 = score(doc=4309,freq=12.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.018577661 = product of:
0.037155323 = sum of:
0.037155323 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037155323 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Meschede, C.; Henkel, C.M.: Library and information science and sustainable development : a structured literature review (2019)
0.01
0.007868583 = product of:
0.035408624 = sum of:
0.014968789 = weight(_text_:of in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014968789 = score(doc=5472,freq=16.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
0.020439833 = weight(_text_:systems in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020439833 = score(doc=5472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Purpose Awareness on and importance of sustainability in all aspects of our lives is becoming more and more important. The question arises, how - not if - scientists can contribute to a sustainable development. As information plays an important role for development, information scientists should be included in this debate. However, is there a sustainable information science or an information science of sustainability? The purpose of this paper is to perform a mapping of publications in library and information science (LIS) directly dealing with sustainability and sustainable development. Design/methodology/approach A structured literature review was conducted, enhanced by bibliometric analyses. For this purpose, 102 LIS journals and conferences were considered. The authors identified 81 publications dealing with sustainability and sustainable development and analyzed the concrete contents and methodological approaches of these. Findings A large proportion of articles could be found dealing with sustainable development and libraries. Other publications focus on information and communication technology or information systems. Only few articles deal with further topics like government, urban development or scientific output. Research limitations/implications Sustainability and sustainable development are complex topics. This work only considers literature whose title or keywords contain the string sustainab*. Originality/value The presented work helps to get an overview on sustainability research and activities in the LIS field and additionally, potential research gaps may be identified. The authors call for more research in this area and concrete ideas to help develop a sustainable future.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 75(2019) no.6, S.1356-1369
-
Sugimoto, C.R.; Work, S.; Larivière, V.; Haustein, S.: Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics : A review of the literature (2017)
0.00
0.0028225419 = product of:
0.025402877 = sum of:
0.025402877 = weight(_text_:of in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025402877 = score(doc=3781,freq=32.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Social media has become integrated into the fabric of the scholarly communication system in fundamental ways, principally through scholarly use of social media platforms and the promotion of new indicators on the basis of interactions with these platforms. Research and scholarship in this area has accelerated since the coining and subsequent advocacy for altmetrics-that is, research indicators based on social media activity. This review provides an extensive account of the state-of-the art in both scholarly use of social media and altmetrics. The review consists of 2 main parts: the first examines the use of social media in academia, reviewing the various functions these platforms have in the scholarly communication process and the factors that affect this use. The second part reviews empirical studies of altmetrics, discussing the various interpretations of altmetrics, data collection and methodological limitations, and differences according to platform. The review ends with a critical discussion of the implications of this transformation in the scholarly communication system.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.9, S.2037-2062
-
Terrill, L.J.: ¬The state of cataloging research : an analysis of peer-reviewed journal literature, 2010-2014 (2016)
0.00
0.0026033178 = product of:
0.023429861 = sum of:
0.023429861 = weight(_text_:of in 5137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023429861 = score(doc=5137,freq=20.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 5137, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5137)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- The importance of cataloging research was highlighted by a resolution declaring 2010 as "The Year of Cataloging Research." This study of the peer-reviewed journal literature from 2010 to 2014 examined the state of cataloging literature since this proclamation. The goals were to determine the percentage of cataloging literature that can be classified as research, what research methods were used, and whether the articles contributed to the library assessment conversation. Nearly a quarter of the cataloging literature qualifies as research; however, a majority of researchers fail to make explicit connections between their work and the missions of their libraries.
-
Caidi, N.; Allard, D.; Quirke, L.: Information practices of information (2010)
0.00
0.0023284785 = product of:
0.020956306 = sum of:
0.020956306 = weight(_text_:of in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020956306 = score(doc=4204,freq=4.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010), S.xxx-xxx
-
Ekbia, H.: Fifty years of research in artificial intelligence (2010)
0.00
0.0023284785 = product of:
0.020956306 = sum of:
0.020956306 = weight(_text_:of in 1598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020956306 = score(doc=1598,freq=4.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 1598, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1598)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.201-242
-
Desale, S.K.; Kumbhar, R.: Research on automatic classification of documents in library environment : a literature review (2013)
0.00
0.0021169065 = product of:
0.019052157 = sum of:
0.019052157 = weight(_text_:of in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019052157 = score(doc=1071,freq=18.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- This paper aims to provide an overview of automatic classification research, which focuses on issues related to the automatic classification of documents in a library environment. The review covers literature published in mainstream library and information science studies. The review was done on literature published in both academic and professional LIS journals and other documents. This review reveals that basically three types of research are being done on automatic classification: 1) hierarchical classification using different library classification schemes, 2) text categorization and document categorization using different type of classifiers with or without using training documents, and 3) automatic bibliographic classification. Predominantly this research is directed towards solving problems of organization of digital documents in an online environment. However, very little research is devoted towards solving the problems of arrangement of physical documents.
-
Brown, C.: Communication in the sciences (2010)
0.00
0.0018816947 = product of:
0.016935252 = sum of:
0.016935252 = weight(_text_:of in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016935252 = score(doc=4205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010), S.xxx-xxx
-
Kurtz, M.; Bollen, J.: Usage bibliometrics (2010)
0.00
0.0018816947 = product of:
0.016935252 = sum of:
0.016935252 = weight(_text_:of in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016935252 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010), S.xxx-xxx
-
Candela, L.; Castelli, D.; Manghi, P.; Tani, A.: Data journals : a survey (2015)
0.00
0.0018669361 = product of:
0.016802425 = sum of:
0.016802425 = weight(_text_:of in 2156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016802425 = score(doc=2156,freq=14.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 2156, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2156)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Data occupy a key role in our information society. However, although the amount of published data continues to grow and terms such as data deluge and big data today characterize numerous (research) initiatives, much work is still needed in the direction of publishing data in order to make them effectively discoverable, available, and reusable by others. Several barriers hinder data publishing, from lack of attribution and rewards, vague citation practices, and quality issues to a rather general lack of a data-sharing culture. Lately, data journals have overcome some of these barriers. In this study of more than 100 currently existing data journals, we describe the approaches they promote for data set description, availability, citation, quality, and open access. We close by identifying ways to expand and strengthen the data journals approach as a means to promote data set access and exploitation.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.9, S.1747-1762
-
Wacholder, N.: Interactive query formulation (2011)
0.00
0.0016464829 = product of:
0.014818345 = sum of:
0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 4196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014818345 = score(doc=4196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 4196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4196)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.157-196
-
Furner, J.: Philosophy and information studies (2010)
0.00
0.0016464829 = product of:
0.014818345 = sum of:
0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 1559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014818345 = score(doc=1559,freq=2.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1559, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1559)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.159-200
-
LaBarre, K.: Facet analysis (2010)
0.00
0.0016464829 = product of:
0.014818345 = sum of:
0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 1596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014818345 = score(doc=1596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1596)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.243-284
-
Blake, C.: Text mining (2011)
0.00
0.0016464829 = product of:
0.014818345 = sum of:
0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 1599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014818345 = score(doc=1599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1599)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.121-155
-
Bornmann, L.: Scientific peer review (2011)
0.00
0.0016464829 = product of:
0.014818345 = sum of:
0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 1600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014818345 = score(doc=1600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1600)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.197-245
