Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Saracevic, T."
  1. Saracevic, T.: Charting the future of information science (1990) 0.01
    0.005805583 = product of:
      0.058055833 = sum of:
        0.058055833 = product of:
          0.1741675 = sum of:
            0.1741675 = weight(_text_:1990 in 4078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1741675 = score(doc=4078,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                1.2597351 = fieldWeight in 4078, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4078)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 16(1990) no.4, S.13
    Year
    1990
  2. Belkin, N.J.; Chang, S.J.; Downs, T.; Saracevic, T.; Zhao, S.: Taking account of user tasks, goals and behavior for the design of online public access catalogs (1990) 0.00
    0.0028106158 = product of:
      0.028106159 = sum of:
        0.028106159 = product of:
          0.084318474 = sum of:
            0.084318474 = weight(_text_:1990 in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084318474 = score(doc=5261,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.6098666 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Year
    1990
  3. Saracevic, T.; Mokros, H.; Su, L.: Nature of interaction between users and intermediaries in online searching : a qualitative analysis (1990) 0.00
    0.0016863694 = product of:
      0.016863694 = sum of:
        0.016863694 = product of:
          0.05059108 = sum of:
            0.05059108 = weight(_text_:1990 in 4894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05059108 = score(doc=4894,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.36591995 = fieldWeight in 4894, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4894)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Year
    1990
  4. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.00
    0.0013854074 = product of:
      0.013854073 = sum of:
        0.013854073 = product of:
          0.04156222 = sum of:
            0.04156222 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04156222 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
  5. Bellardo, T.; Saracevic, T.: Online searching and search output : relationships between overlap, relevance, recall and precision (1987) 0.00
    0.0012212053 = product of:
      0.012212053 = sum of:
        0.012212053 = product of:
          0.03663616 = sum of:
            0.03663616 = weight(_text_:problem in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03663616 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    A recent study begun at Case Western Reserve University and continued at Rutgers University compared the transcripts of 200 DIALOG searches conducted by 36 experienced searchers on real questions submitted by academic and industrial researchers. Relevance judgements by the researchers were used to give recall and precision scores to each search result. Findings included: a low degree of overlap between searches on the same question in selection of search terms or items retrieved; the more often an item was retrieved by different searchers, the more likely it was to be judged relevant; recall and precision were not necessarly inversly related; there was a significant positive impact on recall/precision from using more cycles (a sequence from selecting terms to displaying results); serious uncorrectd errors were a major problem in poor searches and proper selection of terms a key to successful searches.
  6. Saracevic, T.: Ciencia da informacao, origem, evolucao e relacoes (1996) 0.00
    0.0012212053 = product of:
      0.012212053 = sum of:
        0.012212053 = product of:
          0.03663616 = sum of:
            0.03663616 = weight(_text_:problem in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03663616 = score(doc=811,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Information science is best defined as a discipline in terms of the problems it addresses. Its origins date back to the scientific and technical revolution after the 2nd World War, and its development has been essentially characterised by interdisciplinarity. Librarianship, computer science, cognitive science and communication studies all share interests with infomation science, but with increasing emphasis on the information society and the information industry dictated by technological imparatives, information science is now at a critical point in its evolution. The problem it sets out to solve are not decreasing but changing, with the pressure to improve access to an ever increasing store of knowledge. The social need for information science is evident, whatever the name given to the knowledge and skills which it encompasses
  7. Saracevic, T.: Information science (2009) 0.00
    0.0012212053 = product of:
      0.012212053 = sum of:
        0.012212053 = product of:
          0.03663616 = sum of:
            0.03663616 = weight(_text_:problem in 3812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03663616 = score(doc=3812,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 3812, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3812)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this entry is to provide an overview of information science as a field or discipline, including a historical perspective to illustrate the events and forces that shaped it. Information science is a field of professional practice and scientific inquiry dealing with effective communication of information and information objects, particularly knowledge records, among humans in the context of social, organizational, and individual need for and use of information. Information science emerged in the aftermath of the Second World War, as did a number of other fields, addressing the problem of information explosion and using technology as a solution. Presently, information science deals with the same problems in the Web and digital environments. This entry covers problems addressed by information science, the intellectual structure of the field, and the description of main areas-information retrieval, human information behavior, metric studies, and digital libraries. This entry also includes an account of education related to information science and conclusions about major characteristics.

Authors

Languages

Themes