Search (166 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.32 
    0.3166941 = product of:
  0.6333882 = sum of:
    0.048722174 = product of:
      0.14616652 = sum of:
        0.14616652 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14616652 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26007444 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14616652 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14616652 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26007444 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03067635 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.14616652 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14616652 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26007444 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03067635 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.14616652 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14616652 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26007444 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03067635 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.14616652 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14616652 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26007444 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03067635 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.5 = coord(5/10)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.26 
    0.26391178 = product of:
  0.52782357 = sum of:
    0.040601816 = product of:
      0.121805444 = sum of:
        0.121805444 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.121805444 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26007444 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.121805444 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.121805444 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26007444 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03067635 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.121805444 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.121805444 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26007444 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03067635 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.121805444 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.121805444 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26007444 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03067635 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.121805444 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.121805444 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26007444 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03067635 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.5 = coord(5/10)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Wilke, M.; Pauen, M.; Ayan, S.: »Wir überschätzen die Rolle des Bewusstseins systematisch« : Leib-Seele-Problem (2022) 0.05 
    0.05490011 = product of:
  0.5490011 = sum of:
    0.5490011 = sum of:
      0.26867765 = weight(_text_:leib in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.26867765 = score(doc=490,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.24804801 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03067635 = queryNorm
          1.0831679 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
      0.21987686 = weight(_text_:seele in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21987686 = score(doc=490,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.22439323 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03067635 = queryNorm
          0.97987294 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
      0.060446583 = weight(_text_:problem in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060446583 = score(doc=490,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03067635 = queryNorm
          0.46424055 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    In den vergangenen 20 Jahren haben Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler vieles über das Bewusstsein gelernt. Einer der größten Fortschritte: Das Bewusstsein ist inzwischen ein etablierter Gegenstand der empirischen Forschung, sagen die Neurowissenschaftlerin Melanie Wilke und der Philosoph Michael Pauen. Im Interview erklären Sie, vor welchen Hürden Forscherinnen und Forscher immer noch stehen und wie sie die »harte Nuss« des Leib-Seele-Problems endlich knacken wollen. Ein Gespräch über Geist, Gehirn und ihre Beziehung zueinander mit der Neurowissenschaftlerin Melanie Wilke und dem Philosophen Michael Pauen.
    Source
    https://www.spektrum.de/news/leib-seele-problem-was-wissen-wir-ueber-das-bewusstsein/1974235?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
  4. Krauß, P.; Maier, A.: ¬Der Geist in der Maschine (2021) 0.03 
    0.027768666 = product of:
  0.27768666 = sum of:
    0.27768666 = weight(_text_:neurowissenschaftler in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27768666 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25347564 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03067635 = queryNorm
        1.0955162 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Neurowissenschaftler nutzen vermehrt künstliche neuronale Netze, um Modelle des Gehirns zu erstellen. Könnten selbstlernende Algorithmen vielleicht sogar eine Art Bewusstsein erzeugen?
  5. Blume, M.; Stalinski, S.: Sitzt Gott im Gehirn? : Neue Erkenntnisse aus der Hirnforschung (2021) 0.02 
    0.018512445 = product of:
  0.18512444 = sum of:
    0.18512444 = weight(_text_:neurowissenschaftler in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18512444 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25347564 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03067635 = queryNorm
        0.7303441 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Warum sind manche Menschen religiös und andere nicht? Ist Gott vielleicht nur ein Hirngespinst? Mit diesen Fragen beschäftigen sich Neurowissenschaftler schon lange. Ihre jüngste Entdeckung erklärt der Religionswissenschaftler Michael Blume.
  6. Nagel, T.: Was bedeutet das alles? : Eine ganz kurze Einführung in die Philosophie (2020) 0.02 
    0.015954185 = product of:
  0.15954185 = sum of:
    0.15954185 = weight(_text_:willensfreiheit in 204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15954185 = score(doc=204,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2515577 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03067635 = queryNorm
        0.6342157 = fieldWeight in 204, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=204)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Thomas Nagels ebenso kurze wie genaue und umfassende Einführung in die Philosophie findet in verständlicher Form Antworten auf die großen Fragen des Lebens: Woher wissen wir etwas? Wie hängen Körper und Geist zusammen? Was bedeuten Wörter? Gibt es Willensfreiheit wirklich? Was ist Recht und was ist Unrecht? Was ist der Tod? Und worin könnte der Sinn des Lebens bestehen?
  7. Roth, G.: Über den Menschen (2021) 0.01 
    0.011395847 = product of:
  0.11395847 = sum of:
    0.11395847 = weight(_text_:willensfreiheit in 394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11395847 = score(doc=394,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2515577 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03067635 = queryNorm
        0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 394, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=394)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Kaum ein Forschungsgebiet hat sich in den vergangenen drei Jahrzehnten so stürmisch entwickelt wie die Neurowissenschaften. Sie sind aber auch zum Gegenstand heftiger interdisziplinärer Debatten geworden, die sich vor allem um eine Frage drehen: Zwingen uns die neurowissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisse zu einer Revision unseres etablierten Menschenbildes? Entschieden verneint wird das vor allem von Philosophen, die den Neurowissenschaften mitunter sogar die Berechtigung absprechen, Aussagen über die geistig-kulturelle Welt des Menschen zu treffen. Sinnhaftes Verstehen, Geschichtlichkeit, Lebensweltlichkeit, Willensfreiheit sowie Sprache als Grundlage von Soziabilität können, so ihr Argument, prinzipiell nicht mit naturwissenschaftlichem Besteck untersucht werden.
  8. Geras, A.; Siudem, G.; Gagolewski, M.: Should we introduce a dislike button for academic articles? (2020) 0.01 
    0.005116579 = product of:
  0.025582895 = sum of:
    0.017270451 = product of:
      0.051811352 = sum of:
        0.051811352 = weight(_text_:problem in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051811352 = score(doc=5620,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.39792046 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.008312443 = product of:
      0.02493733 = sum of:
        0.02493733 = weight(_text_:22 in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02493733 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    There is a mutual resemblance between the behavior of users of the Stack Exchange and the dynamics of the citations accumulation process in the scientific community, which enabled us to tackle the outwardly intractable problem of assessing the impact of introducing "negative" citations. Although the most frequent reason to cite an article is to highlight the connection between the 2 publications, researchers sometimes mention an earlier work to cast a negative light. While computing citation-based scores, for instance, the h-index, information about the reason why an article was mentioned is neglected. Therefore, it can be questioned whether these indices describe scientific achievements accurately. In this article we shed insight into the problem of "negative" citations, analyzing data from Stack Exchange and, to draw more universal conclusions, we derive an approximation of citations scores. Here we show that the quantified influence of introducing negative citations is of lesser importance and that they could be used as an indicator of where the attention of the scientific community is allocated.
    Date
    6. 1.2020 18:10:22
  9. Ma, Y.: Relatedness and compatibility : the concept of privacy in Mandarin Chinese and American English corpora (2023) 0.00 
    0.0047641667 = product of:
  0.047641665 = sum of:
    0.047641665 = product of:
      0.0714625 = sum of:
        0.046525165 = weight(_text_:2010 in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046525165 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.31708103 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
        0.02493733 = weight(_text_:22 in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02493733 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    This study investigates how privacy as an ethical concept exists in two languages: Mandarin Chinese and American English. The exploration relies on two genres of corpora from 10 years: social media posts and news articles, 2010-2019. A mixed-methods approach combining structural topic modeling (STM) and human interpretation were used to work with the data. Findings show various privacy-related topics across the two languages. Moreover, some of these different topics revealed fundamental incompatibilities for understanding privacy across these two languages. In other words, some of the variations of topics do not just reflect contextual differences; they reveal how the two languages value privacy in different ways that can relate back to the society's ethical tradition. This study is one of the first empirically grounded intercultural explorations of the concept of privacy. It has shown that natural language is promising to operationalize intercultural and comparative privacy research, and it provides an examination of the concept as it is understood in these two languages.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:59:40
  10. Sewing, S.: Bestandserhaltung und Archivierung : Koordinierung auf der Basis eines gemeinsamen Metadatenformates in den deutschen und österreichischen Bibliotheksverbünden (2021) 0.00 
    0.004416318 = product of:
  0.044163182 = sum of:
    0.044163182 = product of:
      0.06624477 = sum of:
        0.041307446 = weight(_text_:1990 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041307446 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.2987724 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
        0.02493733 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02493733 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    In den Handlungsempfehlungen der Koordinierungsstelle für die Erhaltung des schriftlichen Kulturguts (KEK) von 2015 (KEK-Handlungsempfehlungen) wird ein nationaler Standard bei der Dokumentation von Bestandserhaltung gefordert: "In den Bibliothekskatalogen sollten künftig für den verbundübergreifenden Abgleich Bestandserhaltungsmaßnahmen für die Bestände ab 1851 [.] in standardisierter Form dokumentiert und recherchierbar gemacht werden. Dies bedarf einer gemeinsamen Festlegung mit den Bibliotheksverbünden [.]." In den KEK-Handlungsempfehlungen werden auf der Basis einer im Jahr 2015 erfolgten Erhebung für Monografien fast neun Millionen Bände aus dem Zeitabschnitt 1851-1990 als Pflichtexemplare an Bundes- und Ländereinrichtungen angegeben, die akut vom Papierzerfall bedroht und als erste Stufe einer Gesamtstrategie zu entsäuern sind. Ein Ziel der KEK ist es, standardisierte und zertifizierte Verfahren zur Massenentsäuerung zu fördern. Im Metadatenformat sind zunächst fünf Verfahren der Massenentsäuerung in Form von kontrolliertem Vokabular dokumentiert: DEZ, Mg3/MBG, METE, MgO, MMMC[2]. Mit diesen Angaben, die gezielt selektiert werden können, ist mittel- und langfristig die Anwendung einzelner Verfahren der Massenentsäuerung abrufbar und statistisch auswertbar.
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  11. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.00 
    0.004060182 = product of:
  0.040601816 = sum of:
    0.040601816 = product of:
      0.121805444 = sum of:
        0.121805444 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.121805444 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26007444 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  12. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.00 
    0.0039701387 = product of:
  0.039701387 = sum of:
    0.039701387 = product of:
      0.05955208 = sum of:
        0.03877097 = weight(_text_:2010 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03877097 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.2642342 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
        0.02078111 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02078111 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
  13. Irrgang, B.: Roboterbewusstsein, automatisiertes Entscheiden und Transhumanismus : Anthropomorphisierungen von KI im Licht evolutionär-phänomenologischer Leib-Anthropologie (2020) 0.00 
    0.0036933597 = product of:
  0.036933597 = sum of:
    0.036933597 = product of:
      0.11080079 = sum of:
        0.11080079 = weight(_text_:leib in 5999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11080079 = score(doc=5999,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24804801 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.4466909 = fieldWeight in 5999, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5999)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  14. Yang, F.; Zhang, X.: Focal fields in literature on the information divide : the USA, China, UK and India (2020) 0.00 
    0.0034207494 = product of:
  0.017103747 = sum of:
    0.010176711 = product of:
      0.03053013 = sum of:
        0.03053013 = weight(_text_:problem in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03053013 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0069270367 = product of:
      0.02078111 = sum of:
        0.02078111 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02078111 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify key countries and their focal research fields on the information divide. Design/methodology/approach Literature was retrieved to identify key countries and their primary focus. The literature research method was adopted to identify aspects of the primary focus in each key country. Findings The key countries with literature on the information divide are the USA, China, the UK and India. The problem of health is prominent in the USA, and solutions include providing information, distinguishing users' profiles and improving eHealth literacy. Economic and political factors led to the urban-rural information divide in China, and policy is the most powerful solution. Under the influence of humanism, research on the information divide in the UK focuses on all age groups, and solutions differ according to age. Deep-rooted patriarchal concepts and traditional marriage customs make the gender information divide prominent in India, and increasing women's information consciousness is a feasible way to reduce this divide. Originality/value This paper is an extensive review study on the information divide, which clarifies the key countries and their focal fields in research on this topic. More important, the paper innovatively analyzes and summarizes existing literature from a country perspective.
    Date
    13. 2.2020 18:22:13
  15. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.00 
    0.0034207494 = product of:
  0.017103747 = sum of:
    0.010176711 = product of:
      0.03053013 = sum of:
        0.03053013 = weight(_text_:problem in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03053013 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0069270367 = product of:
      0.02078111 = sum of:
        0.02078111 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02078111 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10742335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
  16. Wolfangel, E.: DeepMind will Problem der Proteinfaltung gelöst haben (2020) 0.00 
    0.0028784086 = product of:
  0.028784085 = sum of:
    0.028784085 = product of:
      0.08635225 = sum of:
        0.08635225 = weight(_text_:problem in 5635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08635225 = score(doc=5635,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.66320074 = fieldWeight in 5635, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5635)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Source
    https://www.spektrum.de/news/deepmind-will-problem-der-proteinfaltung-geloest-haben/1802324?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
  17. Vaas, R.: Wo die Wissenschaft endet (2020) 0.00 
    0.0024424107 = product of:
  0.024424106 = sum of:
    0.024424106 = product of:
      0.07327232 = sum of:
        0.07327232 = weight(_text_:problem in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07327232 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.5627445 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Series
    Titelthema: Wissenschaft löst Ihr Problem
  18. Vaas, R.: Wo endet die Wissenschaft? (2020) 0.00 
    0.0024424107 = product of:
  0.024424106 = sum of:
    0.024424106 = product of:
      0.07327232 = sum of:
        0.07327232 = weight(_text_:problem in 5786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07327232 = score(doc=5786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.5627445 = fieldWeight in 5786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5786)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Series
    Titelthema: Wissenschaft löst Ihr Problem
  19. Hornung, P.: Im Kampf gegen Fake-Verlage (2021) 0.00 
    0.0024424107 = product of:
  0.024424106 = sum of:
    0.024424106 = product of:
      0.07327232 = sum of:
        0.07327232 = weight(_text_:problem in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07327232 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.5627445 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Deutsche Hochschulen gehen einer Umfrage des NDR zufolge zunehmend gegen das Problem fragwürdiger Online-Fachzeitschriften vor. Diese schaden ihrer Ansicht nach dem Ansehen der Wissenschaft.
  20. Metz, C.: ¬The new chatbots could change the world : can you trust them? (2022) 0.00 
    0.0024424107 = product of:
  0.024424106 = sum of:
    0.024424106 = product of:
      0.07327232 = sum of:
        0.07327232 = weight(_text_:problem in 854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07327232 = score(doc=854,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1302053 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03067635 = queryNorm
            0.5627445 = fieldWeight in 854, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=854)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Siri, Google Search, online marketing and your child's homework will never be the same. Then there's the misinformation problem.

Authors

Languages

  • e 117
  • d 49

Types

  • a 150
  • el 33
  • m 7
  • p 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications