Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"i"
  1. Marchitelli, A.; Piazzini, T.: OPAC, SOPAC e social networking : cataloghi di biblioteca 2.0? (2008) 0.05
    0.05022176 = product of:
      0.2343682 = sum of:
        0.028181138 = weight(_text_:web in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028181138 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
        0.028181138 = weight(_text_:web in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028181138 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
        0.17800593 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17800593 = score(doc=3862,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19842365 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.8971004 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    In this article are compared traditional OPAC systems, enriched OPAC, social OPAC and social cataloguing systems.the aim is to underline new theoretical trends and to offer a taxonomic outline of such tools, according to the interaction level granted to users and to the chance to manage user's generated contents in the point of view of the application of web 2.0 tendecies to libraries, in the library 2.0. At the end, a brief review of softwares, both open source and not, that seem promising for this future application.
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: OPAC, SOPAC and social networking: catalogues of Library 2.0?
  2. Belpassi, E.: ¬The application software RIMMF : RDA thinking in action (2016) 0.04
    0.039245505 = product of:
      0.13735926 = sum of:
        0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04452437 = score(doc=2959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
        0.02415526 = weight(_text_:web in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02415526 = score(doc=2959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
        0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04452437 = score(doc=2959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
        0.02415526 = weight(_text_:web in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02415526 = score(doc=2959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    RIMMF software is grew out of the need to visualize and realize records according to the RDA guidelines. The article describes the software structure and features in the creation of a r­ball, that is a small database populated by recordings of bibliographic and authority resources enriched by relationships between and among entities involved. At first it's introduced the need that led to RIMMF outcome, then starts the software functional analysis. With a description of the main steps of the r-ball building, emphasizing the issues raised. The results highlights some critical aspects, but above all the wide scope of possible developments that open the Cultural Heritage Institutions horizon to the web prospective. Conclusions display the RDF-linked­data development of the RIMMF incoming future.
  3. Ballestra, L.: ¬L'¬indicizzazione semantica al tempo del web (2008) 0.02
    0.019520398 = product of:
      0.13664278 = sum of:
        0.06832139 = weight(_text_:web in 619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06832139 = score(doc=619,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.6119082 = fieldWeight in 619, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=619)
        0.06832139 = weight(_text_:web in 619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06832139 = score(doc=619,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.6119082 = fieldWeight in 619, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=619)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Semantic indexing in the time of the web
  4. Serrai, A.: Funzioni e valori della bibliografia (1996) 0.02
    0.019345213 = product of:
      0.13541648 = sum of:
        0.06770824 = weight(_text_:world in 6919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06770824 = score(doc=6919,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.5148846 = fieldWeight in 6919, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6919)
        0.06770824 = weight(_text_:world in 6919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06770824 = score(doc=6919,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.5148846 = fieldWeight in 6919, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6919)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    A reprint of the introduction to Vol.IX of the author's 'History of Bibliography' (Storia della Bibliografia). Cites K. Popper's theory of the 3 worlds of reality, i.e the natural world; subjective experiences; and recorded information; arguing that over the past 50 years bibliography has been relegated to dealing with researches that relate to the 2nd world and has thus lost its true scientific character. We should restore to bibliography the attributes deriving from its roots and from its links with the 3rd world, so that it can be applied directly to the architectue of general semantics, which related both to ideas and documents
  5. Solimine, G.: Qualita totale e qualita del colloquio (1993) 0.01
    0.01484146 = product of:
      0.10389021 = sum of:
        0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 4017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051945105 = score(doc=4017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4017)
        0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 4017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051945105 = score(doc=4017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4017)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to apply the most recent theories about company wide quality control to public library reference services, and in particular to librarian user interaction during the reference interview. Elements of the interaction that directly affect the quality of the service include the librarian's ability to listen, understand the user's real requirement, and offer the most precise and apt solution to the query. There are also indirect quality factors such as the range of information sources available, the librarian's query solving routine and his educational level, and familiarity with sources and search methods. Looks at the possible outcomes of the reference interview, and how user needs are satisfied
  6. Valacchi, F.: Things in the World : the integration process of archival descriptions in intercultural systems (2016) 0.01
    0.011168963 = product of:
      0.07818274 = sum of:
        0.03909137 = weight(_text_:world in 2957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03909137 = score(doc=2957,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 2957, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2957)
        0.03909137 = weight(_text_:world in 2957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03909137 = score(doc=2957,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 2957, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2957)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  7. Tammaro, A.M.: Catalogando, catalogando ... metacatalogando (1997) 0.01
    0.008051754 = product of:
      0.056362275 = sum of:
        0.028181138 = weight(_text_:web in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028181138 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
        0.028181138 = weight(_text_:web in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028181138 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    A crucial question for librarians is whether to catalogue Internet information sources, and electronic sources in general, which may contain metainformation of the texts of articles. Librarians can help researchers with data identification and access in 4 ways: making OPAC available on the Internet; providing a complete selection of Gopher, Ftp, WWW, etc. site lists; maintaining a Web site, coordinateted by the library, that functions as an Internet access point; and organising access to existing search engines that do automatic indexing. Briefly reviews several metadata formats, including USMARC field 856, IAFA templates, SOIP (Harvest), TEI Headers, Capcas Head and URC
  8. Cheti, A.: ¬Le categorie nell'indicizzazione (1990) 0.01
    0.0059961556 = product of:
      0.083946176 = sum of:
        0.083946176 = weight(_text_:analyse in 3527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083946176 = score(doc=3527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18025847 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.46569893 = fieldWeight in 3527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3527)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Psychologists, philosophers and linguists analyse concepts and investigate their relationship to words. Concepts are also relevant to the issue of bibliographic classification, i.e. "catagorisation". Examines from a chronological point of view the various theories for the analysis and organisation of concepts ranging from the Vickery developed in 1954, to Austin's hypotheses, to Ranganathan's "fundamental categories" and the contribution made by CRG, the Classification Research Group. Illustrates other approaches to categorisation such as Farradane's (relationship between couples of concepts) and calls for a closer study of categories and concepts.
  9. Galeffi, A.; Sardo, A.L.: Cataloguing, a necessary evil : critical aspects of RDA (2016) 0.01
    0.0057512526 = product of:
      0.040258765 = sum of:
        0.020129383 = weight(_text_:web in 2952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020129383 = score(doc=2952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 2952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2952)
        0.020129383 = weight(_text_:web in 2952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020129383 = score(doc=2952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 2952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2952)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The Toolkit designed by the RDA Steering Committee makes Resource Description and Access available on the web, together with other useful documents (workflows, mappings, etc.). Reading, learning and memorizing are interconnected, and a working tool should make these activities faster and easier to perform. Some issues arise while verifying the real easiness of use and learning of the tool. The practical and formal requirements for a cataloguing code include plain language, ease of memorisation, clarity of instructions, familiarity for users, predictability and reproducibility of solutions, and general usability. From a formal point of view, the RDA text does not appear to be conceived for an uninterrupted reading, but just for reading of few paragraphs for temporary catalographic needs. From a content point of view, having a syndetic view of the description of a resource is rather difficult: catalographic details are scattered and their re-organization is not easy. The visualisation and logical organisation in the Toolkit could be improved: the table of contents occupies a sizable portion of the screen and resizing or hiding it is not easy; the indentation leaves little space to the words; inhomogeneous font styles (italic and bold) and poor contrast between background and text colours make reading not easy; simultaneous visualization of two or more parts of the text is not allowed; and Toolkit's icons are less intuitive than expected. In the conclusion, some suggestions on how to improve the Toolkit's aspects and usability are provided.
  10. Nuovo soggettario : guida al sistema italiano di indicizzazione per soggetto, prototipo del thesaurus (2007) 0.00
    0.0045129424 = product of:
      0.031590596 = sum of:
        0.015795298 = weight(_text_:world in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015795298 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.120114714 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
        0.015795298 = weight(_text_:world in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015795298 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.120114714 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Now BNI is beginning to use the new language, pointing the way for the adoption of Nuovo soggettario in Italian libraries: a difficult challenge whose success is not assured. To name only one issue: including all fields of study requires particular care in treating terms with different specialized meanings; cooperation of other libraries and institutions is foreseen. At the same time, efforts are being made to assure the system's interoperability outside the library world. It is clear that a great commitment is required. "Too complex a system!" say the naysayers. "Only at the beginning," the proponents reply. The new system goes against the mainstream, compared with the imitation of the easy way offered by search engines - but we know that they must enrich their devices to improve quality, just repeating the work on semantic and syntactic relationships that leads formal expressions to the meanings they are intended to communicate - and also compared with research to create automated devices supporting human work, for the need to simplify cataloguing. Here AI is not involved, but automation is widely used to facilitate and to support the conscious work of indexers guided by rules as clear as possible. The advantage of Nuovo soggettario is its combination of a thesaurus (a much-appreciated tool used across the world) with the equally widespread technique of subject-string construction, which is to say: the rational and predictable combination of the terms used. The appearance of this original, unparalleled working model may well be a great occasion in the international development of indexing, as, on one hand, the Nuovo soggettario uses a recognized tool (the thesaurus) and, on the other, by permitting both pre-coordination and post-coordination, it attempts to overcome the fragmentation of increasingly complex and specialized subjects into isolated, single-term descriptors. This is a serious proposition that merits consideration from both theoretical and practical points of view - and outside Italy, too."
  11. Petrucciani, A.: RDA: a critical analysis based on cataloguing theory and practice (2016) 0.00
    0.0044971164 = product of:
      0.06295963 = sum of:
        0.06295963 = weight(_text_:analyse in 2950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06295963 = score(doc=2950,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18025847 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.3492742 = fieldWeight in 2950, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2950)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    RDA appears to be an hybrid standard: a list containing a high number of bibliographic elements and a rewrite - more formal than substantial - of cataloguing practices established with AACR2. In this document, RDA guidelines are analysed trying to compare them to the requirements of good cataloguing rules. Cataloguing rules in general shold not be an abstract and self-referential model but an effective tool to analyse and represent cultural phenomena, useful to qualified staff and helpful in learning about users need. From this point of view, RDA is quite disappointing: many relevant and frequent cataloguing issues are not mentioned at all, and cataloguing itself is left without real guidelines. A certain number of omissions, mistakes and individual flawness in the text should be modified by RDA board with a deep analysis of real cataloguing activities.
  12. Atti del sminario di studi sulla CDU. Roma, 22. settembre 1975. A cura di Maria Pia Carosella (1977) 0.00
    0.002317664 = product of:
      0.032447293 = sum of:
        0.032447293 = product of:
          0.06489459 = sum of:
            0.06489459 = weight(_text_:22 in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06489459 = score(doc=3477,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03421255 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  13. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.00
    0.0013243795 = product of:
      0.018541312 = sum of:
        0.018541312 = product of:
          0.037082624 = sum of:
            0.037082624 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037082624 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03421255 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  14. Aghemo, A.: Anche l'arte ha sue regole : e possibile anche per il bibliotecario del servizio d'informazione fondare la sua attivita su un 'codice' certo? (1993) 0.00
    0.001158832 = product of:
      0.016223647 = sum of:
        0.016223647 = product of:
          0.032447293 = sum of:
            0.032447293 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032447293 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03421255 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  15. Aghemo, A.: Come valutare il servizio di informazione (1993) 0.00
    0.001158832 = product of:
      0.016223647 = sum of:
        0.016223647 = product of:
          0.032447293 = sum of:
            0.032447293 = weight(_text_:22 in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032447293 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03421255 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  16. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.00
    0.001158832 = product of:
      0.016223647 = sum of:
        0.016223647 = product of:
          0.032447293 = sum of:
            0.032447293 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032447293 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03421255 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  17. Nistico, R.: Studio e indicizzazione delle dediche librarie (1998) 0.00
    0.001158832 = product of:
      0.016223647 = sum of:
        0.016223647 = product of:
          0.032447293 = sum of:
            0.032447293 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032447293 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03421255 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:41:06