Search (122 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Wang, P.; White, M.D.: ¬A qualitative study of scholars' citation behaviour (1996) 0.05 
    0.04542875 = product of:
  0.0908575 = sum of:
    0.0908575 = product of:
      0.181715 = sum of:
        0.181715 = weight(_text_:styles in 7352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.181715 = score(doc=7352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.5318353 = fieldWeight in 7352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Identifies aspects of citing behaviour by directly questioning researchers about decisions to cite or not to cite specific docuements. Finds the existence of meta-level concerns which may indictae documentation styles which influence a decision to cite a document in addition to situation factors related to its actual use during research. Reports the preliminary results of the citing decisions in an empirical, longitudinal study of document use by academic economists and gradutae students during several phases of their research projects
  2. Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000) 0.04 
    0.03893893 = product of:
  0.07787786 = sum of:
    0.07787786 = product of:
      0.15575571 = sum of:
        0.15575571 = weight(_text_:styles in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15575571 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.45585886 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
  3. Maharana, B.; Nayak, K.; Sahu, N.K.: Scholarly use of web resources in LIS research : a citation analysis (2006) 0.03 
    0.032449108 = product of:
  0.064898215 = sum of:
    0.064898215 = product of:
      0.12979643 = sum of:
        0.12979643 = weight(_text_:styles in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12979643 = score(doc=53,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.3798824 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The essential purpose of this paper is to measure the amount of web resources used for scholarly contributions in the area of library and information science (LIS) in India. It further aims to make an analysis of the nature and type of web resources and studies the various standards for web citations. Design/methodology/approach - In this study, the result of analysis of 292 web citations spread over 95 scholarly papers published in the proceedings of the National Conference of the Society for Information Science, India (SIS-2005) has been reported. All the 292 web citations were scanned and data relating to types of web domains, file formats, styles of citations, etc., were collected through a structured check list. The data thus obtained were systematically analyzed, figurative representations were made and appropriate interpretations were drawn. Findings - The study revealed that 292 (34.88 per cent) out of 837 were web citations, proving a significant correlation between the use of Internet resources and research productivity of LIS professionals in India. The highest number of web citations (35.6 per cent) was from .edu/.ac type domains. Most of the web resources (46.9 per cent) cited in the study were hypertext markup language (HTML) files. Originality/value - The paper is the result of an original analysis of web citations undertaken in order to study the dependence of LIS professionals in India on web sources for their scholarly contributions. This carries research value for web content providers, authors and researchers in LIS.
  4. Pellack, L.J.; Kappmeyer, L.O.: ¬The ripple effect of women's name changes in indexing, citation, and authority control (2011) 0.03 
    0.032449108 = product of:
  0.064898215 = sum of:
    0.064898215 = product of:
      0.12979643 = sum of:
        0.12979643 = weight(_text_:styles in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12979643 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.3798824 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study investigated name changes of women authors to determine how they were represented in indexes and cited references and identify problem areas. A secondary purpose of the study was to investigate whether or not indexing services were using authority control and how this influenced the search results. The works of eight library science authors who had published under multiple names were examined. The researchers compared author names as they appeared on title pages of publications versus in four online databases and in bibliographies by checking 380 publications and 1,159 citations. Author names were correctly provided 81.22% of the time in indexing services and 90.94% in citation lists. The lowest accuracy (54.55%) occurred when limiting to publications found in Library Literature. The highest accuracy (94.18%) occurred with works published before a surname changed. Author names in indexes and citations correctly matched names on journal articles more often than for any other type of publication. Indexes and citation style manuals treated author names in multiple ways, often altering names substantially from how they appear on the title page. Recommendations are made for changes in editorial styles by indexing services and by the authors themselves to help alleviate future confusion in author name searching.
  5. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.03 
    0.026927408 = product of:
  0.053854816 = sum of:
    0.053854816 = product of:
      0.10770963 = sum of:
        0.10770963 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10770963 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  6. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03 
    0.026927408 = product of:
  0.053854816 = sum of:
    0.053854816 = product of:
      0.10770963 = sum of:
        0.10770963 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10770963 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  7. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.03 
    0.026927408 = product of:
  0.053854816 = sum of:
    0.053854816 = product of:
      0.10770963 = sum of:
        0.10770963 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10770963 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  8. White, H.D.: Authors as citers over time (2001) 0.03 
    0.025959287 = product of:
  0.051918574 = sum of:
    0.051918574 = product of:
      0.10383715 = sum of:
        0.10383715 = weight(_text_:styles in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10383715 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3416753 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.3039059 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.8766055 = idf(docFreq=123, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study explores the tendency of authors to recite themselves and others in multiple works over time, using the insights gained to build citation theory. The set of all authors whom an author cites is defined as that author's citation identity. The study explains how to retrieve citation identities from the Institute for Scientific Information's files on Dialog and how to deal with idiosyncrasies of these files. As the author's oeuvre grows, the identity takes the form of a core-and-scatter distribution that may be divided into authors cited only once (unicitations) and authors cited at least twice (recitations). The latter group, especially those recited most frequently, are interpretable as symbols of a citer's main substantive concerns. As illustrated by the top recitees of eight information scientists, identities are intelligible, individualized, and wide-ranging. They are ego-centered without being egotistical. They are often affected by social ties between citers and citees, but the universal motivator seems to be the perceived relevance of the citees' works. Citing styles in identities differ: "scientific-paper style" authors recite heavily, adding to core; "bibliographic-essay style" authors are heavy on unicitations, adding to scatter; "literature-review style" authors do both at once. Identities distill aspects of citers' intellectual lives, such as orienting figures, interdisciplinary interests, bidisciplinary careers, and conduct in controversies. They can also be related to past schemes for classifying citations in categories such as positive-negative and perfunctory- organic; indeed, one author's frequent recitation of another, whether positive or negative, may be the readiest indicator of an organic relation between them. The shape of the core-and-scatter distribution of names in identities can be explained by the principle of least effort. Citers economize on effort by frequently reciting only a relatively small core of names in their identities. They also economize by frequent use of perfunctory citations, which require relatively little context, and infrequent use of negative citations, which require contexts more laborious to set
  9. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02 
    0.02380069 = product of:
  0.04760138 = sum of:
    0.04760138 = product of:
      0.09520276 = sum of:
        0.09520276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09520276 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  10. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.02380069 = product of:
  0.04760138 = sum of:
    0.04760138 = product of:
      0.09520276 = sum of:
        0.09520276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09520276 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  11. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02 
    0.023561481 = product of:
  0.047122963 = sum of:
    0.047122963 = product of:
      0.094245926 = sum of:
        0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094245926 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  12. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02 
    0.023561481 = product of:
  0.047122963 = sum of:
    0.047122963 = product of:
      0.094245926 = sum of:
        0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094245926 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  13. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.02 
    0.023561481 = product of:
  0.047122963 = sum of:
    0.047122963 = product of:
      0.094245926 = sum of:
        0.094245926 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094245926 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  14. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.02 
    0.020195555 = product of:
  0.04039111 = sum of:
    0.04039111 = product of:
      0.08078222 = sum of:
        0.08078222 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08078222 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  15. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.02 
    0.020195555 = product of:
  0.04039111 = sum of:
    0.04039111 = product of:
      0.08078222 = sum of:
        0.08078222 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08078222 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  16. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01 
    0.014280415 = product of:
  0.02856083 = sum of:
    0.02856083 = product of:
      0.05712166 = sum of:
        0.05712166 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05712166 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  17. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.014280415 = product of:
  0.02856083 = sum of:
    0.02856083 = product of:
      0.05712166 = sum of:
        0.05712166 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05712166 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  18. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01 
    0.013463704 = product of:
  0.026927408 = sum of:
    0.026927408 = product of:
      0.053854816 = sum of:
        0.053854816 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053854816 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  19. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01 
    0.013463704 = product of:
  0.026927408 = sum of:
    0.026927408 = product of:
      0.053854816 = sum of:
        0.053854816 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053854816 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  20. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01 
    0.013463704 = product of:
  0.026927408 = sum of:
    0.026927408 = product of:
      0.053854816 = sum of:
        0.053854816 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053854816 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1739941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049686626 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 113
  • d 8
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 120
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications