Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rada, R."
  1. Rada, R.: Focus on links : a holistic view of hypertext (1991) 0.04
    0.041568883 = product of:
      0.16627553 = sum of:
        0.12013304 = weight(_text_:supported in 5227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12013304 = score(doc=5227,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.52346545 = fieldWeight in 5227, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5227)
        0.04614248 = weight(_text_:work in 5227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04614248 = score(doc=5227,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 5227, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5227)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The disciplines of human-computer interaction, computer-supported collaborative work, information storage and retrieval, and artificial intelligence should complement one another in the new discipline of hypertext. This holistic view of hypertext focuses on links: links within a document (microtext), links among documents (macrotext), links among people (grouptext), and dynamic links (expertext). The principles and systems which are relevant to creating and accessing hypertext can be usefully presented under the heading of text, microtext, macrotext, grouptext and expertext. From text to expertext, people consistently use hierarchical structures, particularly hierarchical semantic nets, to organize information
  2. Rada, R.: Maintaining thesauri and metathesauri (1990) 0.01
    0.0131395515 = product of:
      0.10511641 = sum of:
        0.10511641 = weight(_text_:supported in 2223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10511641 = score(doc=2223,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.45803228 = fieldWeight in 2223, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2223)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Maintaining a thesaurus is a time-consuming task which should go hand-in-hand with the indexing of information and should be supported by software. To connect different document databases their respective thesauri should be related. The most straightforward way to support to support this by computer is to map the terms of one thesaurus to those of another. Such a mapping creates one kind of metathesaurus. As citation systems are extended to include full-text online, a new thesaurus may be used to index individual paragraphs. To illustrate these principles several computer systems are described which help people maintain thesauri and metathesauri. Particular success has been had by the National Library of Medicine with its Medical Subject Headings and its Unified Medical Language System
  3. Chen, C.; Rada, R.: Interacting with hypertext : a meta-analysis of experimental studies (1996) 0.01
    0.00576781 = product of:
      0.04614248 = sum of:
        0.04614248 = weight(_text_:work in 5793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04614248 = score(doc=5793,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 5793, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5793)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a study on hypertext examining the cognitive styles and spatial ability of users; the complexity of tasks; and the strucutre of information organization and the visualization of the structure. Future work on hypertext usability should emphasize task taxonomies along with longitudinal and ethnographic studies for a deep understanding of the interactions between users and hypertext
  4. Chen, C.; Rada, R.; Zeb, A.: ¬An extended fisheye view browser for collaborative writing (1994) 0.01
    0.005046834 = product of:
      0.04037467 = sum of:
        0.04037467 = weight(_text_:work in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037467 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.28386727 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates information-seeking tasks and associated cognitve issues in the context of interacting with an evolving collaborative hypertext. Fishexe view browsers were used to facilitate exploring in a large information space. The fishexe view browser was extended to incorporate word frequencies. The effects of the fisheye view browser and the changing document were tested with 2x2 factorial experiment. Multivariate tests founs a significant interaction between the 2 factors and a significant main effect of the fisheye view browser. The users who had access to the word frequency information performed their tasks more effectively than the users without access to word frequencies. This work implies that several aspects of an evolving hypertext might als be useful incorporated in an associated fishexe view browser
  5. Rada, R.; Barlow, J.; Potharst, J.; Zanstra, P.; Bijstra, D.: Document ranking using an enriched thesaurus (1991) 0.00
    0.004325858 = product of:
      0.034606863 = sum of:
        0.034606863 = weight(_text_:work in 6626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034606863 = score(doc=6626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 6626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6626)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    A thesaurus may be viewed as a graph, and document retrieval algorithms can exploit this graph when both the documents and the query are represented by thesaurus terms. These retrieval algorithms measure the distance between the query and documents by using the path lengths in the graph. Previous work witj such strategies has shown that the hierarchical relations in the thesaurus are useful but the non-hierarchical are not. This paper shows that when the query explicitly mentions a particular non-hierarchical relation, the retrieval algorithm benefits from the presence of such relations in the thesaurus. Our algorithms were applied to the Excerpta Medica bibliographic citation database whose citations are indexed with terms from the EMTREE thesaurus. We also created an enriched EMTREE by systematically adding non-hierarchical relations from a medical knowledge base. Our algorithms used at one time EMTREE and, at another time, the enriched EMTREE in the course of ranking documents from Excerpta Medica against queries. When, and only when, the query specifically mentioned a particular non-hierarchical relation type, did EMTREE enriched with that relation type lead to a ranking that better corresponded to an expert's ranking
  6. Rada, R.: Interactive media (1995) 0.00
    0.004325858 = product of:
      0.034606863 = sum of:
        0.034606863 = weight(_text_:work in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034606863 = score(doc=684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The subject of this book is the relationship between people and interactive media. Written by one of the world's leading experts on this subject, this book explores how hypermedia, groupware, and networks change the way in which people, gropus and organizations work and interact. Its wide-ranging focus discusses the emergence of new technologies and demonstrates by considering real-life case studies the impact each has had on the way we view and interact with colleagues and information. With its emphasis on actual examples of usage, the author provides both practitioners and students with a fascinating glimpse of the future of these media and their applications.
  7. Rada, R.: Hypertext and paper : a special synergy (1991) 0.00
    0.002625104 = product of:
      0.021000832 = sum of:
        0.021000832 = product of:
          0.042001665 = sum of:
            0.042001665 = weight(_text_:22 in 4915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042001665 = score(doc=4915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4915)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    International journal of information management. 11(1991) no.1, S.14-22