Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Bestandsaufstellung"
  1. Schmedemann, B.: Konzeption und beispielhafte Umsetzung der themenorientierten Aufstellung der Sachliteratur in der Stadtbücherei Elmshorn (2004) 0.02
    0.02000142 = product of:
      0.16001137 = sum of:
        0.16001137 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 3695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16001137 = score(doc=3695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.67544067 = fieldWeight in 3695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3695)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Imprint
    Hamburg : Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, FB Bibliothek und Information
  2. Formierungen von Wissensräumen : Optionen des Zugangs zu Information und Bildung (2014) 0.01
    0.01140332 = product of:
      0.09122656 = sum of:
        0.09122656 = product of:
          0.18245313 = sum of:
            0.18245313 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18245313 = score(doc=1698,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25424787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.71761906 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    RSWK
    Bibliotheksbau / Informationsvermittlung / Architektur / Lernumwelt / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Bibliotheksbau / Informationsvermittlung / Architektur / Lernumwelt / Aufsatzsammlung
  3. Dean, B.C.: Reclassification in an automated environment (1984) 0.01
    0.011382785 = product of:
      0.09106228 = sum of:
        0.09106228 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09106228 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.3946905 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    For a variety of reasons, reclassification was a popular project in libraries in the 1960s. Although such projects have faded from the limelight, some of the reasons for doing them remain valid today, i.e., a need to cut processing costs, participation in cooperative ventures, the inconvenience caused by working with a collection split between two classification systems, and continuing changes in the Dewey schedules. This article compares the steps needed for reclassifying in a manual environment with those required when the library has an in-house computer system. The comparison shows how using the latter makes a reclassification project more feasible than it would be in a totally manual library. The article also discusses various issues associated with reclassification in an automated environment such as the problem posed by a frozen public catalog and the combining of reclassification and conversion projects.
  4. Booth, P.F.: Together or apart : the problems of stock integration (1991) 0.01
    0.007209763 = product of:
      0.057678103 = sum of:
        0.057678103 = weight(_text_:work in 4898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057678103 = score(doc=4898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.40552467 = fieldWeight in 4898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4898)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Library work. 1991, no.13, S.7-8
  5. Martínez-Ávila, D.; San Segundo, R.: Reader-Interest Classification : concept and terminology historical overview (2013) 0.00
    0.004325858 = product of:
      0.034606863 = sum of:
        0.034606863 = weight(_text_:work in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034606863 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    During the last century, the concept of reader-interest classifications and its related terminology have shown a well-established presence and commonly-agreed characteristics in the literature and other classification discourses. During the period 1952-1995, it was not unusual to find works, projects, and discourses using a common core of characteristics and terms to refer to a recognizable type of projects involving alternative classifications to the DDC and other traditional practices in libraries. However, although similar projects and characteristics are being used until the present day, such as those of implementation of BISAC in public libraries, the use of reader-interest classification-related terms and references have drastically declined since 1995. The present work attempts to overview the concept and terminology of reader-interest classifications in a historical perspective emphasizing the transformation of the concept and its remaining characteristics in time.
  6. Weaver, M.; Stanning, M.: Reclassification project at St Martin's College : a case study (2007) 0.00
    0.0036048815 = product of:
      0.028839052 = sum of:
        0.028839052 = weight(_text_:work in 852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028839052 = score(doc=852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.20276234 = fieldWeight in 852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=852)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this article is to outline the approach taken to the reclassification of the library collection within a small multi-site college of higher education - whereby 160,000 volumes were converted from the BLISS system to the Dewey Decimal Classification system, over a period of 11 weeks during Summer 2004. Design/methodology/approach - An automated approach was taken whereby the Library Systems Supplier - Talis was commissioned to convert catalogue records using a batch process. Risk analysis and critical path analysis were used as tools to keep the project on schedule and provide quality control. Findings - An automated approach allowed the project to be completed on time, within budget and with minimal disruption to services. Project planning was crucial to the success of the project. This included mapping BLISS to Dewey numbers, recruitment of a student team, management of work packages and ensuring continuity of the Library Service during the project. Practical implications - Institutional support for the project was secured because of its relevance to the College's corporate agenda and the promise of a wider impact that the project would have in terms of modernisation of the library service. Originality/value - Despite the apparent lack of current articles on re-classification, many libraries are still grappling with ongoing retrospective cataloguing projects. This case study demonstrates how one institution approached the problem and demonstrates that an automated approach can yield benefits. It will be of use to other libraries thinking of, or involved with, similar conversions. The partnership role of the Library Management System Supplier is also highlighted.
  7. De Gaetano, M.A.: Looking at the library, seeing philosophy (Trieste, Italy) (2009) 0.00
    0.0036048815 = product of:
      0.028839052 = sum of:
        0.028839052 = weight(_text_:work in 3272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028839052 = score(doc=3272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.20276234 = fieldWeight in 3272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3272)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper focuses on the job undertaken between 2003 and 2004 in order to plan a new location arrangement for the Philosophy collection of one of the libraries at the University of Trieste. The paper describes the basic needs which played a fundamental role in the planning phase. Furthermore, it examines in detail how the most widely known classification systems - particularly the DDC- did not seem the best answer to the specific needs in this context. The solution was to develop an original classification system in order to answer the specific needs. The paper describes its development and the basis upon which it was built: the classification schemes used were those of the most authoritative periodical bibliographies in this field. Among them, the International Philosophical Bibliography system seemed to be closer to the continental tradition of the organization of knowledge in the discipline. Conclusions deal with the management of the transition from the old to the new system giving some information about the possible evaluation of the work that has been carried out.
  8. Silva, C.M.A. da; Ortega, C.D.: Proposals that preceded the call number : shelf arrangement in the Francofone manuals of librarianship from the mid-nineteenth century to 1930 (2017) 0.00
    0.0036048815 = product of:
      0.028839052 = sum of:
        0.028839052 = weight(_text_:work in 4138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028839052 = score(doc=4138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.20276234 = fieldWeight in 4138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4138)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Shelf arrangement, from a bibliographic perspective, constitutes a reading proposal of the collection to the users as well as a resource for management and access to the documents. However, the centrality of the call number testifies the near forgetfulness of the different proposals that came before it and the role of the collection of documents and the target audience in the elaboration of the organization, in addition to the overlapping of the bibliographic classification to shelf arrangement. This work is justified by the need to restore shelf arrangement, seeking to understand its fundamental aspects from the literature in which the activity was systematized. Thus, this paper aims at contributing to reorient the shelf arrangement as an activity of information organization, exploring its conformation in the Francophone literature, from the midnineteenth century up to the 1930s. As for the methodology, this is an exploratory research made possible through the historical-conceptual investigation of shelf arrangement found in the Francophone manuals of librarianship of that period. This study concludes that the activity was placed by that line since the nineteenth century, when its own terminology was developed under the consideration of the intervention of the contexts, using methods and guided by the diversity of proposals.
  9. Minter, C.: Systematic or mechanical arrangement? : Revisiting a debate in German library science, 1790-1914 (2017) 0.00
    0.0036048815 = product of:
      0.028839052 = sum of:
        0.028839052 = weight(_text_:work in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028839052 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.20276234 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines changing views on "systematic" or classified shelf-arrangement in German library science from Kayser's 1790 work Ueber die Manipulation bey der Einrichtung einer Bibliothek to the 1914 Versammlung deutscher Bibliothekare in Leipzig, at which Georg Leyh delivered the seminal paper, "Systematische oder mechanische Aufstellung?" Systematic arrangement was, with few exceptions, held up as an ideal throughout the nineteenth century; but by 1914 it could be agreed to belong to a past era in which, in the words of Leyh, libraries ran as a "Kleinbetrieb" [small business] (Leyh 1913, 100, "Das Dogma von der systematischen Aufstellung II-IV." Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 30:97-135). In particular, this article seeks to explore how changing views on the ideal of systematic shelf-arrangement in German library science during this period reflected evolving conceptions of librarianship. For nineteenth-century writers such as Ebert, Molbech, and Petzholdt, systematic classification and arrangement had meaning against the backdrop of an encyclopedic tradition within which libraries and librarians played an important role in organizing and presenting a rational overview of the universe of knowledge - an overview that was to be both physical and intellectual. The waning of the ideal of systematic arrangement at the turn of the twentieth century was associated with a sense of loss, as an intellectual or "scholarly" tradition of librarianship was seen to give way to more utilitarian and "bureaucratic" expectations. The changing fortunes of the ideal of systematic arrangement in German library science between 1790 and 1914 may be seen to illustrate how progress and loss are often inextricably linked in the history of libraries and librarianship
  10. Giampietro, R.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part A (2009) 0.00
    0.002883905 = product of:
      0.02307124 = sum of:
        0.02307124 = weight(_text_:work in 3274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02307124 = score(doc=3274,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.16220987 = fieldWeight in 3274, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3274)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In the late seventies, I was asked to work on classifying our Philosophy (and Psychology) collections, which were still located partly in the stacks and partly in the so-called Seminars-a traditional didactic and research structure of our School-where the books were mostly ordered by format or collection title. As often happens, my task was not completely free of restrictions: the general "new policy" of the entire Library was oriented toward accomplishing an open-shelf decimal classification, and the first step was to avoid an overly complicated schema, as this would probably have rendered more difficult the task of the end users, that is, our students but mainly our teaching staff. At the Scuola Normale Superiore, where historicism has always had an illustrious though somewhat cumbersome tradition (I quote only two philosophers and/or historians of Philosophy: Giovanni Gentile and Eugenio Garin), ordering the Philosophy collection- with its divisions, topics, geographical notations, chronological tables et similia-strictly by the Dewey decimal system might have been unthinkable. A second requirement was to designate a main location to the large collection of the often "complete works" of the philosophical Tradition. This way, the ideal Reader, foreseen to linger for hours in the newly restored library building of the Palazzo della Gherardesca, could easily access the reservoir of the great texts, which were to be followed on the shelves by the secondary literature ad auctorem. All in all, the implicit message to our students and scholars was to be the virtuous necessity of finding, ready on the shelves, the substantial core of the textual Tradition.
  11. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.00
    0.002625104 = product of:
      0.021000832 = sum of:
        0.021000832 = product of:
          0.042001665 = sum of:
            0.042001665 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042001665 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
  12. Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996) 0.00
    0.002625104 = product of:
      0.021000832 = sum of:
        0.021000832 = product of:
          0.042001665 = sum of:
            0.042001665 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042001665 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
  13. Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998) 0.00
    0.002625104 = product of:
      0.021000832 = sum of:
        0.021000832 = product of:
          0.042001665 = sum of:
            0.042001665 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042001665 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24
  14. Rotten, C. v.d.: oderzoek naar alternatieve plaatsing : Bijna net zoveel systemen als bibliotheken (1995) 0.00
    0.002296966 = product of:
      0.018375728 = sum of:
        0.018375728 = product of:
          0.036751457 = sum of:
            0.036751457 = weight(_text_:22 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036751457 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.11, S.20-22
  15. Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992) 0.00
    0.002296966 = product of:
      0.018375728 = sum of:
        0.018375728 = product of:
          0.036751457 = sum of:
            0.036751457 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036751457 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
  16. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.00
    0.002296966 = product of:
      0.018375728 = sum of:
        0.018375728 = product of:
          0.036751457 = sum of:
            0.036751457 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036751457 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
  17. Lowisch, M.: Gesamthochschulbibliotheken und Klassifikationsentwicklung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kooperation und lokalen Bedürfnissen (2017) 0.00
    0.002296966 = product of:
      0.018375728 = sum of:
        0.018375728 = product of:
          0.036751457 = sum of:
            0.036751457 = weight(_text_:22 in 5116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036751457 = score(doc=5116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2019 16:22:59
  18. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.00
    0.0019688278 = product of:
      0.015750622 = sum of:
        0.015750622 = product of:
          0.031501245 = sum of:
            0.031501245 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031501245 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009) 0.00
    0.0019688278 = product of:
      0.015750622 = sum of:
        0.015750622 = product of:
          0.031501245 = sum of:
            0.031501245 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031501245 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    9. 1.2010 14:22:20
  20. Müller-Dreier, A.: Einheitsklassifikation : die Geschichte einer fortwirkenden Idee (1994) 0.00
    0.00164069 = product of:
      0.01312552 = sum of:
        0.01312552 = product of:
          0.02625104 = sum of:
            0.02625104 = weight(_text_:22 in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02625104 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungsblatt VdB NW N.F. 45(1995) H.3, S.332-333 (H. Lohse) [Auch wenn H. Lohse meint, das Buch bzw. die zugrundeliegende Assessorarbeit hätte nicht geschrieben werden müssen, so liefert doch gerade seine Rezension den Beweis, wie notwendig diese Arbeit war]; BuB 47(1995) H.10, S.955-959 (I. Nöther) ["Diese von einem Berufsanfänger vorgelegte Arbeit ist eine Spitzenleistung, ein Meisterwerk, auf das der Autor, seine Ausbildungsstätte sowie der Verlag und der Herausgeber der Reihe sotz sein können. Für jeden, der sich heute und in Zukunft mit Fragen der Klassifikation befaßt, ist die Lektüre dieses Buches Pflicht"]; Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 20(1996) H.1, S.134-135 (W. Gödert); Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.178 (B. Lorenz); Journal of documentation 51(1995) no.4, S.434-437 (J.S. Andrews)