Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  1. Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Formale Begriffsanalyse von Literaturdaten (1992) 0.03
    0.03200227 = product of:
      0.25601816 = sum of:
        0.25601816 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 3141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25601816 = score(doc=3141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            1.080705 = fieldWeight in 3141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3141)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Imprint
    Darmstadt : Technische Hochschule / Fb Mathematik
  2. Viehmann, V.: Formale Begriffsanalyse in der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung (1996) 0.03
    0.03200227 = product of:
      0.25601816 = sum of:
        0.25601816 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 4570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25601816 = score(doc=4570,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            1.080705 = fieldWeight in 4570, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4570)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Imprint
    Darmstadt : Technische Hochschule / Fachbereich Mathematik
  3. De Maio, C.; Fenza, G.; Loia, V.; Senatore, S.: Hierarchical web resources retrieval by exploiting Fuzzy Formal Concept Analysis (2012) 0.03
    0.031417284 = product of:
      0.12566914 = sum of:
        0.09106228 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 2737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09106228 = score(doc=2737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.3946905 = fieldWeight in 2737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2737)
        0.034606863 = weight(_text_:work in 2737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034606863 = score(doc=2737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 2737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2737)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, knowledge structuring is assuming important roles in several real world applications such as decision support, cooperative problem solving, e-commerce, Semantic Web and, even in planning systems. Ontologies play an important role in supporting automated processes to access information and are at the core of new strategies for the development of knowledge-based systems. Yet, developing an ontology is a time-consuming task which often needs an accurate domain expertise to tackle structural and logical difficulties in the definition of concepts as well as conceivable relationships. This work presents an ontology-based retrieval approach, that supports data organization and visualization and provides a friendly navigation model. It exploits the fuzzy extension of the Formal Concept Analysis theory to elicit conceptualizations from datasets and generate a hierarchy-based representation of extracted knowledge. An intuitive graphical interface provides a multi-facets view of the built ontology. Through a transparent query-based retrieval, final users navigate across concepts, relations and population.
  4. Scheich, P.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Conceptual data systems (1992) 0.03
    0.028001986 = product of:
      0.22401589 = sum of:
        0.22401589 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 3147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22401589 = score(doc=3147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.9456169 = fieldWeight in 3147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3147)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Imprint
    Darmstadt : Technische Hochschule / Fb Mathematik
  5. Hereth, J.; Stumme, G.; Wille, R.; Wille, U.: Conceptual knowledge discovery and data analysis (2000) 0.01
    0.009385394 = product of:
      0.07508315 = sum of:
        0.07508315 = weight(_text_:supported in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07508315 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.3271659 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we discuss Conceptual Knowledge Discovery in Databases (CKDD) in its connection with Data Analysis. Our approach is based on Formal Concept Analysis, a mathematical theory which has been developed and proven useful during the last 20 years. Formal Concept Analysis has led to a theory of conceptual information systems which has been applied by using the management system TOSCANA in a wide range of domains. In this paper, we use such an application in database marketing to demonstrate how methods and procedures of CKDD can be applied in Data Analysis. In particular, we show the interplay and integration of data mining and data analysis techniques based on Formal Concept Analysis. The main concern of this paper is to explain how the transition from data to knowledge can be supported by a TOSCANA system. To clarify the transition steps we discuss their correspondence to the five levels of knowledge representation established by R. Brachman and to the steps of empirically grounded theory building proposed by A. Strauss and J. Corbin
  6. Sedelow, W.A.: ¬The formal analysis of concepts (1993) 0.01
    0.00576781 = product of:
      0.04614248 = sum of:
        0.04614248 = weight(_text_:work in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04614248 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The present paper focuses on the extraction, by means of a formal logical/mathematical methodology (i.e. automatically, exclusively by rule), of concept content, as in, for example, continuous discourse. The approach to a fully formal defintion of concept content ultimately is owing to a German government initiative to establish 'standards' regarding concepts, in conjunction with efforts to stipulate precisely (and then, derivatively, through computer prgrams) data and information needs according to work role in certain government offices
  7. Prediger, S.: Kontextuelle Urteilslogik mit Begriffsgraphen : Ein Beitrag zur Restrukturierung der mathematischen Logik (1998) 0.00
    0.00328138 = product of:
      0.02625104 = sum of:
        0.02625104 = product of:
          0.05250208 = sum of:
            0.05250208 = weight(_text_:22 in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05250208 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    26. 2.2008 15:58:22
  8. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.00
    0.002625104 = product of:
      0.021000832 = sum of:
        0.021000832 = product of:
          0.042001665 = sum of:
            0.042001665 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042001665 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81
  9. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.00
    0.002296966 = product of:
      0.018375728 = sum of:
        0.018375728 = product of:
          0.036751457 = sum of:
            0.036751457 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036751457 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06
  10. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.00
    0.002296966 = product of:
      0.018375728 = sum of:
        0.018375728 = product of:
          0.036751457 = sum of:
            0.036751457 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036751457 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31