Search (519 results, page 1 of 26)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Rathert, W.; Schwandt, S.: ¬Die Katalogisierung des Notenaltbestands an der Hochschule der Künste Berlin (1996) 0.08
    0.075612135 = product of:
      0.30244854 = sum of:
        0.12141637 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 6928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12141637 = score(doc=6928,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.526254 = fieldWeight in 6928, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6928)
        0.18103218 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 6928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18103218 = score(doc=6928,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.76417387 = fieldWeight in 6928, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6928)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The catalguing project at the Hochschule der Künste ran from 1992-95. The computerised catalogue was based on RAK-Musik. Entries are in the Berlin-Brandenburg cooperative and are accessible supra-regionally. 11.000 titles were covered, of church music mainly from the 16th and 17th centuries and other classical and romantic works. Cataloguing old material involves research into dating. The project should assist other score cataloguers
  2. Morris, D.E.; Hobert, C.B.; Osmus, L.; Wool, G.: Cataloging staff costs revisited (2000) 0.07
    0.070228636 = product of:
      0.18727636 = sum of:
        0.12013304 = weight(_text_:supported in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12013304 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.52346545 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
        0.04614248 = weight(_text_:work in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04614248 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
        0.021000832 = product of:
          0.042001665 = sum of:
            0.042001665 = weight(_text_:22 in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042001665 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Staff costs for cataloging have declined at Iowa State University Library. This is demonstrated by data from a longitudinal time and cost study begun in 1987. We discuss the national developments, technological advancements, and reengineering efforts that have supported greater cataloging effectiveness and quality. We use the ISU findings as an example of a nationwide phenomenon resulting from the remarkable ability of catalogers to share work through national bibliographic utilities.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Franks, A.R.D.; Cristán, A.: International cooperation in the program for cooperative cataloging : present and prospects (2000) 0.06
    0.056096643 = product of:
      0.22438657 = sum of:
        0.1840119 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 5399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1840119 = score(doc=5399,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.79756135 = fieldWeight in 5399, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5399)
        0.04037467 = weight(_text_:work in 5399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037467 = score(doc=5399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.28386727 = fieldWeight in 5399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5399)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The past ten years have seen an expansion in participation by non-U.S. institutions in what were once solely American cooperative cataloging programs. Overlaying older bilateral relationships between national libraries, membership in the Program for Cooperative Cataloging has come to include willing institutions in a variety of organizational models: single membership, participation in a group ''funnel'' specially formed for the purpose, or as an outgrowth of a local bibliographic network. The resulting dispersion of bibliographic and authority work among many institutions gives rise to a welcome participatory model in standards and rule-setting.
  4. Folsom, S.M.: Using the Program for Cooperative Cataloging's past and present to project a Linked Data future (2020) 0.05
    0.054462783 = product of:
      0.21785113 = sum of:
        0.17170866 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 5747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17170866 = score(doc=5747,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.7442355 = fieldWeight in 5747, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5747)
        0.04614248 = weight(_text_:work in 5747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04614248 = score(doc=5747,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 5747, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5747)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Drawing on the PCC's history with linked data and related work this article identifies and gives context to pressing areas PCC will need to focus on moving forward. These areas include defining plausible data targets, tractable implementation models and data flows, engaging in related tool development, and participating in the broader linked data community.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
  5. Bourdon, F.: Functional requirements and numbering of authority records (FRANAR) : to what extent can authority control be supported by technical means? (2002) 0.05
    0.052925203 = product of:
      0.21170081 = sum of:
        0.18019956 = weight(_text_:supported in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18019956 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.7851982 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
        0.031501245 = product of:
          0.06300249 = sum of:
            0.06300249 = weight(_text_:22 in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06300249 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Date
    30. 8.2005 9:22:54
  6. Samples, J.; Bigelow, I.: MARC to BIBFRAME : converting the PCC to Linked Data (2020) 0.05
    0.051835872 = product of:
      0.20734349 = sum of:
        0.15024509 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15024509 = score(doc=119,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.6512061 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
        0.057098407 = weight(_text_:work in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057098407 = score(doc=119,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.40144894 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) has formal relationships with the Library of Congress (LC), Share-VDE, and Linked Data for Production Phase 2 (LD4P2) for work on Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), and PCC institutions have been very active in the exploration of MARC to BIBFRAME conversion processes. This article will review the involvement of PCC in the development of BIBFRAME and examine the work of LC, Share-VDE, and LD4P2 on MARC to BIBFRAME conversion. It will conclude with a discussion of areas for further exploration by the PCC leading up to the creation of PCC conversion specifications and PCC BIBFRAME data.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
  7. Byrd, J.: ¬A cooperative cataloguing proposal for Slavic and East European languages and the languages of the former Soviet Union (1993) 0.05
    0.050596908 = product of:
      0.20238763 = sum of:
        0.1840119 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1840119 = score(doc=564,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.79756135 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
        0.018375728 = product of:
          0.036751457 = sum of:
            0.036751457 = weight(_text_:22 in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036751457 = score(doc=564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes, as a backlog reduction strategy, a national cooperative cataloging program among libraries with major collections in the Slavic and East European languages and in the languages of the former Soviet Union. The long-standing problem of cataloging backlogs is discussed, including a brief discussion of some of the other ways that have been used to address the problem. The proposal for a cooperative effort is outlined and some of the cataloging issues to be considered are discussed.
    Date
    12. 1.2007 13:22:35
  8. Khurshid, Z.: Cooperative cataloging : prospects and problems for libraries in Saudi Arabia (1997) 0.05
    0.049468793 = product of:
      0.19787517 = sum of:
        0.18212456 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18212456 = score(doc=541,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.789381 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
        0.015750622 = product of:
          0.031501245 = sum of:
            0.031501245 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031501245 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Despite witnessing the enormous success of cooperative cataloguing programmes in Europe and North America, libraries in Saudi Arabia and other Arabian Gulf states have made no concerted afforts in initiating similar programmes. Emphasizes the need for cooperation in cataloguing, especially of local materials. Due to unavailability of cataloguing copy from the Library of Congress and other sources for a high percentage of imprints from Arab countries and in the absence of bibliographic cooperation, libraries are doing redundant cataloguing and thus wasting both time and money. Reviews the current state of bibliographic cooperation, discusses prospects for further cooperation, and highlights difficulties in cooperation. Concludes with recommendations that the King Fahd National Library develop a national cooperative cataloguing programme with specific goals, set guidelines and prepare rules and procedures for participating libraries to contribute in various cooperative cataloguing programmes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:11:38
  9. Sobottke, I.: Katalogisierung mit Hilfe der elektronischen Datenverarbeitung : ein Erfahrungs- und Situationsbericht (1995) 0.05
    0.046667922 = product of:
      0.18667169 = sum of:
        0.12141637 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 5103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12141637 = score(doc=5103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.526254 = fieldWeight in 5103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5103)
        0.06525532 = weight(_text_:work in 5103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06525532 = score(doc=5103,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.4587988 = fieldWeight in 5103, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5103)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Bochum university library's cataloguing automation work of 1963 pioineered developments in Germany and Europe. From 1060 external data were included and standards development began. The Bochum documentation system was taken over and developed by the North Rhine-Westphalian library cooperative. In 1985 online cataloguing was introduced. Some recataloguing is taking place. This work is expensive and time consuming, demanding highly qualified staff. Data once recorded can be reused for different purposes
  10. Kellsey, C.: Cooperative cataloging, vendor records, and European language monographs (2002) 0.04
    0.043368775 = product of:
      0.1734751 = sum of:
        0.15772448 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15772448 = score(doc=160,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.683624 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
        0.015750622 = product of:
          0.031501245 = sum of:
            0.031501245 = weight(_text_:22 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031501245 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The appearance in OCLC and RLIN of minimal level catalog records from European book vendors for European language monographs and their effect on cataloging department workflows and cooperative cataloging efforts have been matters of concern expressed recently at ALA meetings and in the library literature. A study of 8,778 catalog records was undertaken to discover how many current European language monographs were being cataloged by the Library of Congress, by member libraries, and by vendors. It was found that vendor records accounted for 16. 7% of Spanish books, 18% of French books, 33.6% of German books, and 52.5% of those in Italian. The number of libraries enhancing vendor records in OCLC was found to be only approximately one-third the number of libraries contributing original records for European language books. Ongoing increases in European book publishing and the increasing globalization of cataloging databases mean that the results of this study have implications not only for local cataloging practice but for cooperative cataloging as a whole.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Riemer, J.J.: CONSER'S aggregator survey and the work of the PCC Task Group (1999) 0.04
    0.04083443 = product of:
      0.16333772 = sum of:
        0.10623932 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 5360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10623932 = score(doc=5360,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.46047226 = fieldWeight in 5360, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5360)
        0.057098407 = weight(_text_:work in 5360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057098407 = score(doc=5360,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.40144894 = fieldWeight in 5360, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5360)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The author presents the results of the December 1998 CONSER "Survey on Providing Access to Serial Titles within Aggregator Databases." Major findings include 71% of respondents desiring to see full-text serial titles incorporated into the online catalog and nearly 75% interested in acquiring record sets. Also included are an analysis of the numerous survey comments received, strategies toward creating the necessary records and integrating them into OPACs, examples of aggregator analytic records, and other background information on the work of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging's Task Group on Journals in Aggregator Databases.
  12. Ivany, J.: Cooperative cataloging organizations merge (1998) 0.04
    0.040154688 = product of:
      0.3212375 = sum of:
        0.3212375 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 3191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3212375 = score(doc=3191,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            1.3923372 = fieldWeight in 3191, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3191)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the merger of 2 major cooperative cataloguing organizations: the CONSER program and the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC). This move positions the PCC as the umbrella cooperative cataloguing organization, and in addition to CONSER, the Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO), the Subject Authority Cooperative Program (SACO), and the Bibliographic Cooperative Program (BIBCO) noew reside under it. Enumerates some of the benefits for both CONSER and the PCC
  13. Larmore, D.P.: ¬A new kid on the block : the start of a NACO Funnel Project and what is needed to start your own (2006) 0.04
    0.036653496 = product of:
      0.14661399 = sum of:
        0.10623932 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10623932 = score(doc=5773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.46047226 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
        0.04037467 = weight(_text_:work in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037467 = score(doc=5773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.28386727 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a new Program for Cooperative Cataloging NACO funnel project that was begun in August 2004 among four academic and one state library in South Dakota. The desire to start this project originated from the South Dakota State Library, whose cataloging staff wanted to receive training on authority record creation in order to create and update authority records for state agency names. Details the work and steps that go into creating a funnel project, the training process, and includes a brief discussion of the types and scope of records that the South Dakota NACO Funnel Project has created to date.
  14. Burger, R.H.: NACO at the University of Illinois at U-C : a narrative case study (1986) 0.04
    0.036653496 = product of:
      0.14661399 = sum of:
        0.10623932 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10623932 = score(doc=380,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.46047226 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
        0.04037467 = weight(_text_:work in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037467 = score(doc=380,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.28386727 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Although the Name Authority Cooperative Project (NACO) is now almost ten years old, little has been written about it from the perspective of NACO participants. This article provides a narrative case study of the effects of NACO on one academic research library, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The decision to accept NACO membership, NACO training at the Library of Congress, post-training implementation at the University of Illinois and effects on work flow, productivity and morale are portrayed in this description. It is hoped that the information contained here can provide more insight into the pros and cons of NACO membership that could be generalized to any library.
  15. Naun, C.C.: Expanding the use of Linked Data value vocabularies in PCC cataloging (2020) 0.04
    0.036653496 = product of:
      0.14661399 = sum of:
        0.10623932 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10623932 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.46047226 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
        0.04037467 = weight(_text_:work in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04037467 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.28386727 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    In 2015, the PCC Task Group on URIs in MARC was tasked to identify and address linked data identifiers deployment in the current MARC format. By way of a pilot test, a survey, MARC Discussion papers, Proposals, etc., the Task Group initiated and introduced changes to MARC encoding. The Task Group succeeded in laying the ground work for preparing library data transition from MARC data to a linked data, RDF environment.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
  16. Münnich, M.: Katalogisieren auf dem PC : ein Pflichtenheft für die Formalkatalogisierung (1988) 0.04
    0.03528347 = product of:
      0.14113387 = sum of:
        0.12013304 = weight(_text_:supported in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12013304 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.52346545 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
        0.021000832 = product of:
          0.042001665 = sum of:
            0.042001665 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042001665 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03875087 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856
  17. Fourie, R.: Standardising catalogue records (1996) 0.03
    0.032195374 = product of:
      0.257563 = sum of:
        0.257563 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 6439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.257563 = score(doc=6439,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            1.1163533 = fieldWeight in 6439, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6439)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Topics covered included: problems in cooperative databases and barriers to cooperation; causes of poor quality records in cooperative databases; why library cooperation must get back on track; and strategies for the future
  18. Hu, L.; Tam, O.; Lo, P.: Chinese name authority control in Asia : an overview (2004) 0.03
    0.031417284 = product of:
      0.12566914 = sum of:
        0.09106228 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09106228 = score(doc=5688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.3946905 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
        0.034606863 = weight(_text_:work in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034606863 = score(doc=5688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    This research paper provides an overview on the latest developments of Chinese authority control work implemented in Mainland China, Taiwan, Japan, and Hong Kong. In this research, a variety of authority databases developed by different national libraries and leading academic institutions are featured, together with detailed statistical data on coverage, size, and subscription rates of individual databases. Authority record samples collected from individual databases are also documented. This research study provides materials for discussions that can generate an increased understanding of the practical manifestations of authority control works carried out by different libraries among the regions of East Asia. It is hoped that the research findings documented in this paper can facilitate better cooperative cataloguing and resources sharing of Chinese/Japanese/Korean (CJK) materials among libraries on a global scale.
  19. Hudson, J.: Revisions to contributed cataloging in a cooperative cataloging database (1981) 0.03
    0.030354092 = product of:
      0.24283274 = sum of:
        0.24283274 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24283274 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            1.052508 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  20. Bowen, J.B.: Creating a culture of cataloging (1998) 0.03
    0.030354092 = product of:
      0.24283274 = sum of:
        0.24283274 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 4628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24283274 = score(doc=4628,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            1.052508 = fieldWeight in 4628, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4628)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress inspired Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) has aroused controversy by promoting the value of cataloguer judgement in its Bibliographic Record Cooperative Program (BIBCO Program). Because this issue at time eclipses broader discussions about the PCC, some long term values and issues in cooperative cataloguing are revisited to gain a better understanding of the Program. The PCC is attempting to find realistic approaches to the issues of cost effectiveness and local flexibility while continuing to address the professional values that have historically motivated cooperative cataloguing

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 473
  • el 29
  • m 25
  • b 15
  • s 13
  • r 3
  • x 3
  • ? 1
  • ag 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects