Search (96 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.19 
    0.18848664 = product of:
  0.502631 = sum of:
    0.071804434 = product of:
      0.21541329 = sum of:
        0.21541329 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21541329 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.21541329 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21541329 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
    0.21541329 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21541329 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.13 
    0.1346333 = product of:
  0.35902214 = sum of:
    0.05128888 = product of:
      0.15386663 = sum of:
        0.15386663 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15386663 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15386663 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15386663 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.15386663 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15386663 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32853028 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Shah, C.: Collaborative information seeking : the art and science of making the whole greater than the sum of all (2012) 0.09 
    0.08851315 = product of:
  0.23603508 = sum of:
    0.10403827 = weight(_text_:supported in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10403827 = score(doc=360,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.4533344 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
    0.08585433 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08585433 = score(doc=360,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.37211776 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
    0.04614248 = weight(_text_:work in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04614248 = score(doc=360,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Abstract
    Today's complex, information-intensive problems often require people to work together. Mostly these tasks go far beyond simply searching together; they include information lookup, sharing, synthesis, and decision-making. In addition, they all have an end-goal that is mutually beneficial to all parties involved. Such "collaborative information seeking" (CIS) projects typically last several sessions and the participants all share an intention to contribute and benefit. Not surprisingly, these processes are highly interactive. Shah focuses on two individually well-understood notions: collaboration and information seeking, with the goal of bringing them together to show how it is a natural tendency for humans to work together on complex tasks. The first part of his book introduces the general notions of collaboration and information seeking, as well as related concepts, terminology, and frameworks; and thus provides the reader with a comprehensive treatment of the concepts underlying CIS. The second part of the book details CIS as a standalone domain. A series of frameworks, theories, and models are introduced to provide a conceptual basis for CIS. The final part describes several systems and applications of CIS, along with their broader implications on other fields such as computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) and human-computer interaction (HCI). With this first comprehensive overview of an exciting new research field, Shah delivers to graduate students and researchers in academia and industry an encompassing description of the technologies involved, state-of-the-art results, and open challenges as well as research opportunities.
    Content
    Inhalt: Part I Introduction.- Introduction.- Collaboration.- Collaborative Information Seeking (CIS) in Context.- Part II Conceptual Understanding of CIS.- Frameworks for CIS Research and Development.- Toward a Model for CIS.- Part III CIS Systems, Applications, and Implications.- Systems and Tools for CIS.- Evaluation.- Conclusion.- Ten Stories of Five Cs.- Brief Overview of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).- Brief Overview of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL).- Brief Overview of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC).
  4. Folsom, S.M.: Using the Program for Cooperative Cataloging's past and present to project a Linked Data future (2020) 0.05 
    0.054462783 = product of:
  0.21785113 = sum of:
    0.17170866 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 5747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17170866 = score(doc=5747,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.7442355 = fieldWeight in 5747, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5747)
    0.04614248 = weight(_text_:work in 5747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04614248 = score(doc=5747,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 5747, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5747)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Drawing on the PCC's history with linked data and related work this article identifies and gives context to pressing areas PCC will need to focus on moving forward. These areas include defining plausible data targets, tractable implementation models and data flows, engaging in related tool development, and participating in the broader linked data community.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
  5. Naun, C.C.: Expanding the use of Linked Data value vocabularies in PCC cataloging (2020) 0.04 
    0.036653496 = product of:
  0.14661399 = sum of:
    0.10623932 = weight(_text_:cooperative in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10623932 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23071818 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.46047226 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.953884 = idf(docFreq=311, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
    0.04037467 = weight(_text_:work in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04037467 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.28386727 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    In 2015, the PCC Task Group on URIs in MARC was tasked to identify and address linked data identifiers deployment in the current MARC format. By way of a pilot test, a survey, MARC Discussion papers, Proposals, etc., the Task Group initiated and introduced changes to MARC encoding. The Task Group succeeded in laying the ground work for preparing library data transition from MARC data to a linked data, RDF environment.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
  6. Probstmeyer, J.: Analyse von maschinell generierten Korrelationen zwischen der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) und der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) (2009) 0.02 
    0.016971767 = product of:
  0.13577414 = sum of:
    0.13577414 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13577414 = score(doc=3216,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.57313037 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Content
    Bachelorarbeit im Fach Wissensmanagement Studiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement der Hochschule der Medien
    Imprint
    Stuttgart : Hochschule der Medien
  7. Heel, F.: Abbildungen zwischen der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC), der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) und der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) für die Recherche in heterogen erschlossenen Datenbeständen : Möglichkeiten und Problembereiche (2007) 0.01 
    0.01414314 = product of:
  0.11314512 = sum of:
    0.11314512 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11314512 = score(doc=4434,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.47760868 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Content
    Bachelorarbeit im Studiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement, Fakultät Information und Kommunikation, Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart
    Imprint
    Stuttgart : Hochschule der Medien / Fakultät Information und Kommunikation
  8. Euzenat, J.; Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching (2010) 0.01 
    0.012615244 = product of:
  0.050460976 = sum of:
    0.03996056 = weight(_text_:work in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03996056 = score(doc=168,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.28095573 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
    0.010500416 = product of:
      0.021000832 = sum of:
        0.021000832 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021000832 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Ontologies are viewed as the silver bullet for many applications, but in open or evolving systems, different parties can adopt different ontologies. This increases heterogeneity problems rather than reducing heterogeneity. This book proposes ontology matching as a solution to the problem of semantic heterogeneity, offering researchers and practitioners a uniform framework of reference to currently available work. The techniques presented apply to database schema matching, catalog integration, XML schema matching and more. Ontologies tend to be found everywhere. They are viewed as the silver bullet for many applications, such as database integration, peer-to-peer systems, e-commerce, semantic web services, or social networks. However, in open or evolving systems, such as the semantic web, different parties would, in general, adopt different ontologies. Thus, merely using ontologies, like using XML, does not reduce heterogeneity: it just raises heterogeneity problems to a higher level. Euzenat and Shvaiko's book is devoted to ontology matching as a solution to the semantic heterogeneity problem faced by computer systems. Ontology matching aims at finding correspondences between semantically related entities of different ontologies. These correspondences may stand for equivalence as well as other relations, such as consequence, subsumption, or disjointness, between ontology entities. Many different matching solutions have been proposed so far from various viewpoints, e.g., databases, information systems, artificial intelligence. With Ontology Matching, researchers and practitioners will find a reference book which presents currently available work in a uniform framework. In particular, the work and the techniques presented in this book can equally be applied to database schema matching, catalog integration, XML schema matching and other related problems. The objectives of the book include presenting (i) the state of the art and (ii) the latest research results in ontology matching by providing a detailed account of matching techniques and matching systems in a systematic way from theoretical, practical and application perspectives.
    Date
    20. 6.2012 19:08:22
  9. Levergood, B.; Farrenkopf, S.; Frasnelli, E.: ¬The specification of the language of the field and interoperability : cross-language access to catalogues and online libraries (CACAO) (2008) 0.01 
    0.012589371 = product of:
  0.050357483 = sum of:
    0.034606863 = weight(_text_:work in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034606863 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
    0.015750622 = product of:
      0.031501245 = sum of:
        0.031501245 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031501245 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    The CACAO Project (Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries) has been designed to implement natural language processing and cross-language information retrieval techniques to provide cross-language access to information in libraries, a critical issue in the linguistically diverse European Union. This project report addresses two metadata-related challenges for the library community in this context: "false friends" (identical words having different meanings in different languages) and term ambiguity. The possible solutions involve enriching the metadata with attributes specifying language or the source authority file, or associating potential search terms to classes in a classification system. The European Library will evaluate an early implementation of this work in late 2008.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  10. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: In pursuit of interoperability : can we standardize mapping types? (2011) 0.01 
    0.011262473 = product of:
  0.09009978 = sum of:
    0.09009978 = weight(_text_:supported in 4788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09009978 = score(doc=4788,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.3925991 = fieldWeight in 4788, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4788)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    In the last few years projects such as DESIRE, MACS, CrissCross and KoMoHe have demonstrated the benefits as well as the challenges of mapping between controlled vocabularies. Each project has taken a slightly different approach to the definition and implementation of appropriate types of mapping. The mapping types supported by SKOS are slightly different again. In an ideal world, all major databases would be interconnected; all widely used thesauri, classification schemes and subject heading schemes would map to each other; and all of us would use the same basic types of mapping to enable universal interoperability. Or would we? This paper will discuss the feasibility and desirability of agreeing and implementing standardized mapping types.
  11. Panzer, M.: Two tales of a concept : aligning FRSAD with SKOS (2011) 0.01 
    0.011262473 = product of:
  0.09009978 = sum of:
    0.09009978 = weight(_text_:supported in 4789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09009978 = score(doc=4789,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.3925991 = fieldWeight in 4789, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4789)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    The FRSAD model provides an abstract analysis of subject authority data. The article tries to assess the compatibility of this conceptual framework with formalisms and practices that have emerged from the Semantic Web community. Through applying SKOS, it becomes apparent that some interpretive decisions necessary to accommodate the rigor of formal knowledge representation languages are not supported by FRSAD itself. Difficulties in clearly aligning the thema entity with either a SKOS or OWL counterpart reveal ambiguities in the FRSAD model regarding the ontological status of thema, which seems to reflect a general uncertainty regarding the aboutness of subject authority data in the library domain.
  12. Smith, A.: Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) (2022) 0.01 
    0.011262473 = product of:
  0.09009978 = sum of:
    0.09009978 = weight(_text_:supported in 1094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09009978 = score(doc=1094,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.3925991 = fieldWeight in 1094, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1094)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System) is a recommendation from the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) for representing controlled vocabularies, taxonomies, thesauri, classifications, and similar systems for organizing and indexing information as linked data elements in the Semantic Web, using the Resource Description Framework (RDF). The SKOS data model is centered on "concepts", which can have preferred and alternate labels in any language as well as other metadata, and which are identified by addresses on the World Wide Web (URIs). Concepts are grouped into hierarchies through "broader" and "narrower" relations, with "top concepts" at the broadest conceptual level. Concepts are also organized into "concept schemes", also identified by URIs. Other relations, mappings, and groupings are also supported. This article discusses the history of the development of SKOS and provides notes on adoption, uses, and limitations.
  13. Effenberger, C.: ¬Die Dewey Dezimalklassifikation als Erschließungsinstrument : optimiertes Retrieval durch eine Versionierung der DDC (2011) 0.01 
    0.01000071 = product of:
  0.08000568 = sum of:
    0.08000568 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08000568 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.33772033 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Imprint
    Darmstadt : Hochschule Darmstadt / Fachbereich Media
  14. Keil, S.: Terminologie Mapping : Grundlagen und aktuelle Normungsvorhaben (2012) 0.01 
    0.01000071 = product of:
  0.08000568 = sum of:
    0.08000568 = weight(_text_:hochschule in 29) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08000568 = score(doc=29,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23689921 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.33772033 = fieldWeight in 29, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=29)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Der Artikel basiert auf einer Bachelorarbeit mit dem Titel "Terminologie Mapping: Grundlagen und aktuelle Standardisierung", die im Sommersemester 2011 an der Hochschule Darmstadt geschrieben wurde. Er befasst sich mit den Grundlagen des Terminologie Mappings, also der Erstellung von Querverbindungen zwischen verschiedenen kontrollierten Vokabularen und der Standardisierung der Mapping-Verfahren. Die Grundlagen sollen anhand der Erkenntnisse aus Doerrs zentraler Publikation aus dem Jahre 2001 (Doerr 2001) dargestellt werden. Darauf folgt ein Blick in den Bereich der Standardisierung, der gerade in den letzten Jahren eine starke Entwicklung durchlaufen hat, was dazu führt, dass immer mehr aktualisierte nationale und internationale Standards herausgegeben werden, die Terminologie Mapping in verschiedener Weise als Mittel zur Erlangung von Interoperabilität empfehlen. Ebenso soll das "Simple Knowledge Organization System" (SKOS), ein Standard des W3Cs zur Repräsentation von kontrollierten Vokabularen, thematisiert werden. Dieser hat das Ziel, kontrollierte Vokabulare im Semantic Web darzustellen. Obwohl sich bei der Modellierung von klassischen kontrollierten Vokabularen (überwiegend Thesauri) in SKOS noch einige Probleme abzeichnen, stellt dieser Standard einen wichtigen Schritt für kontrollierte Vokabulare aus der Fachinformation in das Semantic Web dar. Abschließend soll ein Fazit zur Standardisierung gezogen werden sowie ein Ausblick auf die Möglichkeiten der Einbindung von Terminologie Mapping im Semantic Web via SKOS geben werden.
  15. Krause, J.: Semantic heterogeneity : comparing new semantic web approaches with those of digital libraries (2008) 0.01 
    0.009385394 = product of:
  0.07508315 = sum of:
    0.07508315 = weight(_text_:supported in 1908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07508315 = score(doc=1908,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22949564 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.3271659 = fieldWeight in 1908, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9223356 = idf(docFreq=321, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1908)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Purpose - To demonstrate that newer developments in the semantic web community, particularly those based on ontologies (simple knowledge organization system and others) mitigate common arguments from the digital library (DL) community against participation in the Semantic web. Design/methodology/approach - The approach is a semantic web discussion focusing on the weak structure of the Web and the lack of consideration given to the semantic content during indexing. Findings - The points criticised by the semantic web and ontology approaches are the same as those of the DL "Shell model approach" from the mid-1990s, with emphasis on the centrality of its heterogeneity components (used, for example, in vascoda). The Shell model argument began with the "invisible web", necessitating the restructuring of DL approaches. The conclusion is that both approaches fit well together and that the Shell model, with its semantic heterogeneity components, can be reformulated on the semantic web basis. Practical implications - A reinterpretation of the DL approaches of semantic heterogeneity and adapting to standards and tools supported by the W3C should be the best solution. It is therefore recommended that - although most of the semantic web standards are not technologically refined for commercial applications at present - all individual DL developments should be checked for their adaptability to the W3C standards of the semantic web. Originality/value - A unique conceptual analysis of the parallel developments emanating from the digital library and semantic web communities.
  16. Smith, D.A.: Exploratory and faceted browsing over heterogeneous and cross-domain data sources. (2011) 0.01 
    0.008651716 = product of:
  0.069213726 = sum of:
    0.069213726 = weight(_text_:work in 4839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069213726 = score(doc=4839,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.4866296 = fieldWeight in 4839, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4839)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Exploration of heterogeneous data sources increases the value of information by allowing users to answer questions through exploration across multiple sources; Users can use information that has been posted across the Web to answer questions and learn about new domains. We have conducted research that lowers the interrogation time of faceted data, by combining related information from different sources. The work contributes methodologies in combining heterogenous sources, and how to deliver that data to a user interface scalably, with enough performance to support rapid interrogation of the knowledge by the user. The work also contributes how to combine linked data sources so that users can create faceted browsers that target the information facets of their needs. The work is grounded and proven in a number of experiments and test cases that study the contributions in domain research work.
  17. Gracy, K.F.; Zeng, M.L.; Skirvin, L.: Exploring methods to improve access to Music resources by aligning library Data with Linked Data : a report of methodologies and preliminary findings (2013) 0.01 
    0.008392914 = product of:
  0.033571657 = sum of:
    0.02307124 = weight(_text_:work in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02307124 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.16220987 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
    0.010500416 = product of:
      0.021000832 = sum of:
        0.021000832 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021000832 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13569894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    As a part of a research project aiming to connect library data to the unfamiliar data sets available in the Linked Data (LD) community's CKAN Data Hub (thedatahub.org), this project collected, analyzed, and mapped properties used in describing and accessing music recordings, scores, and music-related information used by selected music LD data sets, library catalogs, and various digital collections created by libraries and other cultural institutions. This article reviews current efforts to connect music data through the Semantic Web, with an emphasis on the Music Ontology (MO) and ontology alignment approaches; it also presents a framework for understanding the life cycle of a musical work, focusing on the central activities of composition, performance, and use. The project studied metadata structures and properties of 11 music-related LD data sets and mapped them to the descriptions commonly used in the library cataloging records for sound recordings and musical scores (including MARC records and their extended schema.org markup), and records from 20 collections of digitized music recordings and scores (featuring a variety of metadata structures). The analysis resulted in a set of crosswalks and a unified crosswalk that aligns these properties. The paper reports on detailed methodologies used and discusses research findings and issues. Topics of particular concern include (a) the challenges of mapping between the overgeneralized descriptions found in library data and the specialized, music-oriented properties present in the LD data sets; (b) the hidden information and access points in library data; and (c) the potential benefits of enriching library data through the mapping of properties found in library catalogs to similar properties used by LD data sets.
    Date
    28.10.2013 17:22:17
  18. Linked data and user interaction : the road ahead (2015) 0.01 
    0.008145229 = product of:
  0.06516183 = sum of:
    0.06516183 = product of:
      0.13032366 = sum of:
        0.13032366 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13032366 = score(doc=2552,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25424787 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03875087 = queryNorm
            0.51258504 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    RSWK
    Bibliothek / Linked Data / Benutzer / Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation / Recherche / Suchverfahren / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Bibliothek / Linked Data / Benutzer / Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation / Recherche / Suchverfahren / Aufsatzsammlung
  19. Dunsire, G.: Interoperability and semantics in RDF representations of FRBR, FRAD and FRSAD (2011) 0.01 
    0.007209763 = product of:
  0.057678103 = sum of:
    0.057678103 = weight(_text_:work in 651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057678103 = score(doc=651,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.40552467 = fieldWeight in 651, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=651)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    This paper describes recent work on registering Resource Description Framework (RDF) versions of the entities and relationships from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) models developed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). FRBR was developed several years before FRAD, and is under-developed in areas which FRAD was expected to cover; FRAD therefore makes significance reference to FRBR. Similarly, FRAD leaves a full treatment of subject authority data to the ongoing development of Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) which was finalised during 2010. Although the FRBR Review Group is charged with consolidating all three models in due course, the RDF versions of FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD are being created in separate namespaces, with a separate Web Ontology Language (OWL) ontology to connect the three models. The paper discusses interoperability issues arising from this work. Such issues include class definitions and sub-classes, reciprocal properties, and disjoint classes and properties. The paper discusses similar work on the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), also maintained by IFLA, and related issues arising from the RDF representation of the metadata element set of RDA: resource description and access, which is based on the FRBR and FRAD models. The work is ongoing, and the paper updates the original conference presentation to the end of October 2010.
  20. Landry, P.: ¬The evolution of subject heading languages in Europe and their impact on subject access interoperability (2008) 0.01 
    0.0061176866 = product of:
  0.048941493 = sum of:
    0.048941493 = weight(_text_:work in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048941493 = score(doc=2192,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14223081 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03875087 = queryNorm
        0.3440991 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Work in establishing interoperability between Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) in Europe is fairly recent and much work is still needed before users can successfully conduct subject searches across information resources in European libraries. Over the last 25 years many subject heading lists were created or developed from existing ones. Obstacles for effective interoperability have been progressively lifted which has paved the way for interoperability projects to achieve some encouraging results. This paper will look at interoperability approaches in the area of subject indexing tools and will present a short overview of the development of European SHLs. It will then look at the conditions necessary for effective and comprehensive interoperability using the method of linking subject headings, as used by the »Multilingual Access to Subject Headings project« (MACS).

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 81
  • d 14

Types

  • a 59
  • el 32
  • x 7
  • m 6
  • s 3
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications