Search (78 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Ackermann, J.: Knuth-Morris-Pratt (2005) 0.01
    0.010524531 = product of:
      0.07367171 = sum of:
        0.07093332 = weight(_text_:donald in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07093332 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849665 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.3573527 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
        0.0027383962 = product of:
          0.010953585 = sum of:
            0.010953585 = weight(_text_:j in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010953585 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des Seminars Suchmaschinen und Suchalgorithmen beschäftigt sich diese Arbeit mit dem Auffinden bestimmter Wörter oder Muster in Texten. Der Begriff "Text" wird hier in einem sehr allgemeinen Sinne als strukturierte Folge beliebiger Länge von Zeichen aus einem endlichen Alphabet verstanden. Somit fällt unter diesen Bereich ganz allgemein die Suche nach einem Muster in einer Sequenz von Zeichen. Beispiele hierfür sind neben der Suche von Wörtern in "literarischen" Texten, z.B. das Finden von Pixelfolgen in Bildern oder gar das Finden von Mustern in DNS-Strängen. Das Anwendungsgebiet für eine solche Suche ist weit gefächert. Man denke hier allein an Texteditoren, Literaturdatenbanken, digitale Lexika oder die besagte DNADatenbank. Betrachtet man allein das 1989 publizierte Oxford English Dictionary mit seinen etwa 616500 definierten Stichworten auf gedruckten 21728 Seiten, so gilt es, einen möglichst effizienten Algorithmus für die Suche in Texten zu nutzen. Der in der Arbeit zugrunde liegende Datentyp ist vom Typ String (Zeichenkette), wobei hier offen gelassen wird, wie der Datentyp programmtechnisch realisiert wird. Algorithmen zur Verarbeitung von Zeichenketten (string processing) umfassen ein bestimmtes Spektrum an Anwendungsgebieten [Ot96, S.617 f.], wie z.B. das Komprimieren, das Verschlüssen, das Analysieren (parsen), das Übersetzen von Texten sowie das Suchen in Texten, welches Thema dieses Seminars ist. Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit wird der Knuth-Morris-Pratt Algorithmus vorgestellt, der wie der ebenfalls in diesem Seminar vorgestellte Boyer-Moore Algorithmus einen effizienten Suchalgorithmus darstellt. Dabei soll ein gegebenes Suchwort oder Muster (pattern) in einer gegeben Zeichenkette erkannt werden (pattern matching). Gesucht werden dabei ein oder mehrere Vorkommen eines bestimmten Suchwortes (exact pattern matching). Der Knuth-Morris-Pratt Algorithmus wurde erstmals 1974 als Institutbericht der Stanford University beschrieben und erschien 1977 in der Fachzeitschrift Journal of Computing unter dem Titel "Fast Pattern Matching in Strings" [Kn77]. Der Algorithmus beschreibt eine Suche in Zeichenketten mit linearer Laufzeit. Der Name des Algorithmus setzt sich aus den Entwicklern des Algorithmus Donald E. Knuth, James H. Morris und Vaughan R. Pratt zusammen.
  2. Nagelschmidt, M.: Verfahren zur Anfragemodifikation im Information Retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.0052601947 = product of:
      0.07364272 = sum of:
        0.07364272 = weight(_text_:semantik in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07364272 = score(doc=2774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16513813 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.44594622 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Für das Modifizieren von Suchanfragen kennt das Information Retrieval vielfältige Möglichkeiten. Nach einer einleitenden Darstellung der Wechselwirkung zwischen Informationsbedarf und Suchanfrage wird eine konzeptuelle und typologische Annäherung an Verfahren zur Anfragemodifikation gegeben. Im Anschluss an eine kurze Charakterisierung des Fakten- und des Information Retrieval, sowie des Vektorraum- und des probabilistischen Modells, werden intellektuelle, automatische und interaktive Modifikationsverfahren vorgestellt. Neben klassischen intellektuellen Verfahren, wie der Blockstrategie und der "Citation Pearl Growing"-Strategie, umfasst die Darstellung der automatischen und interaktiven Verfahren Modifikationsmöglichkeiten auf den Ebenen der Morphologie, der Syntax und der Semantik von Suchtermen. Darüber hinaus werden das Relevance Feedback, der Nutzen informetrischer Analysen und die Idee eines assoziativen Retrievals auf der Basis von Clustering- und terminologischen Techniken, sowie zitationsanalytischen Verfahren verfolgt. Ein Eindruck für die praktischen Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten der behandelten Verfahren soll abschließend durch fünf Anwendungsbeispiele vermittelt werden.
  3. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.00
    0.0030321751 = product of:
      0.04245045 = sum of:
        0.04245045 = product of:
          0.0849009 = sum of:
            0.038337547 = weight(_text_:j in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038337547 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
            0.04656335 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04656335 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  4. Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003) 0.00
    0.0012995036 = product of:
      0.01819305 = sum of:
        0.01819305 = product of:
          0.0363861 = sum of:
            0.016430378 = weight(_text_:j in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016430378 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
            0.01995572 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01995572 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:32:22
  5. Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis : ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005 (2006) 0.00
    9.802845E-4 = product of:
      0.0137239825 = sum of:
        0.0137239825 = weight(_text_:bedeutung in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0137239825 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12347616 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0299306 = idf(docFreq=785, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024548283 = queryNorm
            0.111146815 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0299306 = idf(docFreq=785, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Information Retrieval hat sich zu einer Schlüsseltechnologie in der Wissensgesellschaft entwickelt. Die Anzahl der täglichen Anfragen an Internet-Suchmaschinen bildet nur einen Indikator für die große Bedeutung dieses Themas. Der Sammelbandband informiert über Themen wie Information Retrieval-Grundlagen, Retrieval Systeme, Digitale Bibliotheken, Evaluierung und Multilinguale Systeme, beschreibt Anwendungsszenarien und setzt sich mit neuen Herausforderungen an das Information Retrieval auseinander. Die Beiträge behandeln aktuelle Themen und neue Herausforderungen an das Information Retrieval. Die intensive Beteiligung der Informationswissenschaft der Universität Hildesheim am Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF), einer europäischen Evaluierungsinitiative zur Erforschung mehrsprachiger Retrieval Systeme, berührt mehrere der Beiträge. Ebenso spielen Anwendungsszenarien und die Auseinandersetzung mit aktuellen und praktischen Fragestellungen eine große Rolle.
  6. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.00
    9.502724E-4 = product of:
      0.0133038135 = sum of:
        0.0133038135 = product of:
          0.053215254 = sum of:
            0.053215254 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053215254 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  7. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.00
    8.314884E-4 = product of:
      0.011640837 = sum of:
        0.011640837 = product of:
          0.04656335 = sum of:
            0.04656335 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04656335 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  8. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.00
    7.127043E-4 = product of:
      0.00997786 = sum of:
        0.00997786 = product of:
          0.03991144 = sum of:
            0.03991144 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03991144 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  9. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.00
    7.127043E-4 = product of:
      0.00997786 = sum of:
        0.00997786 = product of:
          0.03991144 = sum of:
            0.03991144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03991144 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  10. Daniowicz, C.; Baliski, J.: Document ranking based upon Markov chains (2001) 0.00
    6.845991E-4 = product of:
      0.009584387 = sum of:
        0.009584387 = product of:
          0.038337547 = sum of:
            0.038337547 = weight(_text_:j in 5388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038337547 = score(doc=5388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 5388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5388)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  11. Savoy, J.; Ndarugendamwo, M.; Vrajitoru, D.: Report on the TREC-4 experiment : combining probabilistic and vector-space schemes (1996) 0.00
    5.8679923E-4 = product of:
      0.008215189 = sum of:
        0.008215189 = product of:
          0.032860756 = sum of:
            0.032860756 = weight(_text_:j in 7574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032860756 = score(doc=7574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 7574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7574)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  12. Belkin, N.J.; Cool, C.; Koenemann, J.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.: Using relevance feedback and ranking in interactive searching (1996) 0.00
    5.8679923E-4 = product of:
      0.008215189 = sum of:
        0.008215189 = product of:
          0.032860756 = sum of:
            0.032860756 = weight(_text_:j in 7588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032860756 = score(doc=7588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 7588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7588)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  13. Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.: ¬The hw-rank : an h-index variant for ranking web pages (2015) 0.00
    4.889993E-4 = product of:
      0.00684599 = sum of:
        0.00684599 = product of:
          0.02738396 = sum of:
            0.02738396 = weight(_text_:j in 1694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02738396 = score(doc=1694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1694)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  14. Karlsson, A.; Hammarfelt, B.; Steinhauer, H.J.; Falkman, G.; Olson, N.; Nelhans, G.; Nolin, J.: Modeling uncertainty in bibliometrics and information retrieval : an information fusion approach (2015) 0.00
    4.889993E-4 = product of:
      0.00684599 = sum of:
        0.00684599 = product of:
          0.02738396 = sum of:
            0.02738396 = weight(_text_:j in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02738396 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  15. Na, S.-H.; Kang, I.-S.; Roh, J.-E.; Lee, J.-H.: ¬An empirical study of query expansion and cluster-based retrieval in language modeling approach (2007) 0.00
    4.8408465E-4 = product of:
      0.006777185 = sum of:
        0.006777185 = product of:
          0.02710874 = sum of:
            0.02710874 = weight(_text_:j in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02710874 = score(doc=906,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.07800208 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  16. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.00
    4.751362E-4 = product of:
      0.0066519068 = sum of:
        0.0066519068 = product of:
          0.026607627 = sum of:
            0.026607627 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026607627 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  17. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.00
    4.751362E-4 = product of:
      0.0066519068 = sum of:
        0.0066519068 = product of:
          0.026607627 = sum of:
            0.026607627 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026607627 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  18. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.00
    4.751362E-4 = product of:
      0.0066519068 = sum of:
        0.0066519068 = product of:
          0.026607627 = sum of:
            0.026607627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026607627 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  19. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.00
    4.751362E-4 = product of:
      0.0066519068 = sum of:
        0.0066519068 = product of:
          0.026607627 = sum of:
            0.026607627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026607627 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  20. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.00
    4.751362E-4 = product of:
      0.0066519068 = sum of:
        0.0066519068 = product of:
          0.026607627 = sum of:
            0.026607627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026607627 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085963905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024548283 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22

Years

Languages

  • e 69
  • d 8
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 72
  • x 3
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…