-
Booth, P.F.: Indexing : the manual of good practice (2001)
0.01
0.008992517 = product of:
0.0539551 = sum of:
0.0539551 = weight(_text_:wortschatz in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0539551 = score(doc=1968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30395 = queryWeight, product of:
8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.17751308 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Zwar ist das Register zu diesem Buch ein Vorbild, und dem Verlag sei gedankt, dass dem Register neun Prozent vom Buchumfang zugestanden worden sind. Aber auch hier vermisst man noch immer Schlagwörter wie z.B. "Interpretation" oder "Cutter's Rule" (für die Notwendigkeit, die jeweils besttreffenden Schlagwörter aus dem Indexsprachenwortschatz beim Indexieren zu benutzen), alles Themen, die im Buch abgehandelt sind. Wohltuend ist auch die undogmatische Art, in welcher verschiedene formale Indexierungsvarianten als zulässige Alternativen nebeneinander gestellt werden. Unkonventionell ist es beispielsweise im Register zu diesem Buch, dass ein Schlagwort dort auch schon dann durch Untereinträge aufgegliedert wird, wenn es weniger als fünf bis sechs Fundstellenangaben hat. Wohltuend auch die Unvoreingenommenheit, in welcher die Stärken von nicht interpretierter Volltextverarbeitung dort hervorgehoben werden, wo sie zum Zug kommen können, wie z.B. bei simplen Erinnerungs- und Namenrecherchen. Ein wenig ins Auge springender Ratschlag an jeden, der beruflichen oder privaten Schriftwechsel führt oder Fachliteratur liest, verdient hervorgehoben zu werden. Es ist ratsam, frühzeitig mit einer wenigstens rudimentären Indexierung seines Schrifttums zu beginnen, nicht erst dann, wenn einem seine private Sammlung über den Kopf gewachsen ist und wenn sich die Suchfehlschläge häufen und an den Nerven zu zehren beginnen. Die Erinnerung an den Wortlaut der gesuchten Dokumente, worauf man sich anfänglich noch stützen kann, ist nämlich bald verblasst und steht dann nicht mehr als Suchhilfe zur Verfügung. Allerdings wird man für den Eigenbedarf keine derartig ausführliche Einführung in die Theorie und Praxis des Indexierens benötigen, wie sie in diesem Buch geboten wird. Hierfür gibt es andernorts gute Kurzfassungen. Wer dieses Buch als Indexierungsneuling gelesen hat, wird die Indexierungsarbeit und ein Buchregister fortan mit anderen Augen ansehen, nämlich als einen wesentlichen Teil eines Buchs, besonders wenn es sich um ein Nachschlagewerk handelt. Schon eine kurze Einblicknahme in das Buch könnte das Management, einen Verleger oder einen Buchautor davor warnen, all denjenigen Glauben zu schenken, welche behaupten, den Indexer durch ihr vollautomatisches Computerprogramm ersetzen zu können. Das Indexieren umfasst das Übersetzen als einen Teilschritt, nämlich das Übersetzen der Essenz eines Textes oder eines Bildes in eine Indexsprache mit ihrem geregelten Wortschatz. Was man in der Praxis von vollautomatischen Übersetzungen her kennt, selbst von den bisher am weitesten entwickelten Programmen, sollte hier zur Warnung dienen."
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.01
0.006835033 = product of:
0.041010197 = sum of:
0.041010197 = product of:
0.082020395 = sum of:
0.082020395 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082020395 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.01
0.006835033 = product of:
0.041010197 = sum of:
0.041010197 = product of:
0.082020395 = sum of:
0.082020395 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082020395 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.01
0.006835033 = product of:
0.041010197 = sum of:
0.041010197 = product of:
0.082020395 = sum of:
0.082020395 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082020395 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.01
0.006835033 = product of:
0.041010197 = sum of:
0.041010197 = product of:
0.082020395 = sum of:
0.082020395 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082020395 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.01
0.0059806537 = product of:
0.035883922 = sum of:
0.035883922 = product of:
0.071767844 = sum of:
0.071767844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071767844 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.01
0.0059806537 = product of:
0.035883922 = sum of:
0.035883922 = product of:
0.071767844 = sum of:
0.071767844 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071767844 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.01
0.0059806537 = product of:
0.035883922 = sum of:
0.035883922 = product of:
0.071767844 = sum of:
0.071767844 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071767844 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.01
0.0059806537 = product of:
0.035883922 = sum of:
0.035883922 = product of:
0.071767844 = sum of:
0.071767844 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071767844 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.01
0.0059806537 = product of:
0.035883922 = sum of:
0.035883922 = product of:
0.071767844 = sum of:
0.071767844 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071767844 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.01
0.0059806537 = product of:
0.035883922 = sum of:
0.035883922 = product of:
0.071767844 = sum of:
0.071767844 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071767844 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.01
0.0059806537 = product of:
0.035883922 = sum of:
0.035883922 = product of:
0.071767844 = sum of:
0.071767844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071767844 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.01
0.0059806537 = product of:
0.035883922 = sum of:
0.035883922 = product of:
0.071767844 = sum of:
0.071767844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071767844 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.01
0.0059806537 = product of:
0.035883922 = sum of:
0.035883922 = product of:
0.071767844 = sum of:
0.071767844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071767844 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992)
0.01
0.0051262747 = product of:
0.030757647 = sum of:
0.030757647 = product of:
0.061515294 = sum of:
0.061515294 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061515294 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.01
0.0051262747 = product of:
0.030757647 = sum of:
0.030757647 = product of:
0.061515294 = sum of:
0.061515294 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061515294 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.00
0.0048330985 = product of:
0.02899859 = sum of:
0.02899859 = product of:
0.05799718 = sum of:
0.05799718 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05799718 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.00
0.0048330985 = product of:
0.02899859 = sum of:
0.02899859 = product of:
0.05799718 = sum of:
0.05799718 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05799718 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.00
0.0042718956 = product of:
0.025631374 = sum of:
0.025631374 = product of:
0.051262747 = sum of:
0.051262747 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051262747 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.00
0.0034175166 = product of:
0.020505099 = sum of:
0.020505099 = product of:
0.041010197 = sum of:
0.041010197 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041010197 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13249572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03783614 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
