Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Indexierungsstudien"
  1. Ladewig, C.; Rieger, M.: Ähnlichkeitsmessung mit und ohne aspektische Indexierung (1998) 0.00
    0.0033255802 = product of:
      0.026604641 = sum of:
        0.016790302 = weight(_text_:der in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016790302 = score(doc=2526,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
        0.009814339 = product of:
          0.029443016 = sum of:
            0.029443016 = weight(_text_:29 in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029443016 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09469566 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Für eine fiktive Dokumentmenge wird eine Dokument-Wort-Matrix erstellt und mittels zweier Suchanfragen, ebenfalls als Matrix dargestellt, die Retrievalergebnisse ermittelt. Den Wörtern der Dokumentmenge werden in einem zweiten Schritt Aspekte zugeordnet und die Untersuchung erneut durchgeführt. Ein Vergleich bestätigt die schon früher gefundenen Vorteile des aspektischen Indexierung gegenüber anderen Methoden der Retrievalverbesserung, wie Trunkierung und Controlled Terms
    Date
    4. 1.1999 19:31:29
  2. Iivonen, M.; Kivimäki, K.: Common entities and missing properties : similarities and differences in the indexing of concepts (1998) 0.00
    0.0018676403 = product of:
      0.014941122 = sum of:
        0.007580368 = product of:
          0.022741104 = sum of:
            0.022741104 = weight(_text_:k in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022741104 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.007360754 = product of:
          0.022082262 = sum of:
            0.022082262 = weight(_text_:29 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022082262 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09469566 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    24. 2.1999 21:29:51
  3. Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.00
    0.0018593634 = product of:
      0.014874907 = sum of:
        0.007580368 = product of:
          0.022741104 = sum of:
            0.022741104 = weight(_text_:k in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022741104 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.007294539 = product of:
          0.021883616 = sum of:
            0.021883616 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021883616 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09426877 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  4. Connell, T.H.: Use of the LCSH system : realities (1996) 0.00
    0.0016038885 = product of:
      0.025662215 = sum of:
        0.025662215 = weight(_text_:internet in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025662215 = score(doc=6941,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07947389 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.32290122 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the question of whether academic libraries keep up with the changes in the LCSH system. Analysis of the handling of 15 subject headings in 50 academic library catalogues available via the Internet found that libraries are not consistently maintaining subject authority control, or making syndetic references and scope notes in their catalogues. Discusses the results from the perspective of the libraries' performance, performance on the headings overall, performance on references, performance on the type of change made to the headings,a nd performance within 3 widely used onlien catalogue systems (DRA, INNOPAC and NOTIS). Discusses the implications of the findings in relationship to expressions of dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of subject cataloguing expressed by discussion groups on the Internet
  5. Chen, X.: Indexing consistency between online catalogues (2008) 0.00
    0.0013117424 = product of:
      0.020987878 = sum of:
        0.020987878 = weight(_text_:der in 2209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020987878 = score(doc=2209,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 2209, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2209)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    In der globalen Online-Umgebung stellen viele bibliographische Dienstleistungen integrierten Zugang zu unterschiedlichen internetbasierten OPACs zur Verfügung. In solch einer Umgebung erwarten Benutzer mehr Übereinstimmungen innerhalb und zwischen den Systemen zu sehen. Zweck dieser Studie ist, die Indexierungskonsistenz zwischen Systemen zu untersuchen. Währenddessen werden einige Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen können, untersucht. Wichtigstes Ziel dieser Studie ist, die Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen herauszufinden, damit sinnvolle Vorschläge gemacht werden können, um die Indexierungskonsistenz zu verbessern. Eine Auswahl von 3307 Monographien wurde aus zwei chinesischen bibliographischen Katalogen gewählt. Nach Hooper's Formel war die durchschnittliche Indexierungskonsistenz für Indexterme 64,2% und für Klassennummern 61,6%. Nach Rolling's Formel war sie für Indexterme 70,7% und für Klassennummern 63,4%. Mehrere Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen, wurden untersucht: (1) Indexierungsbereite; (2) Indexierungsspezifizität; (3) Länge der Monographien; (4) Kategorie der Indexierungssprache; (5) Sachgebiet der Monographien; (6) Entwicklung von Disziplinen; (7) Struktur des Thesaurus oder der Klassifikation; (8) Erscheinungsjahr. Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen wurden ebenfalls analysiert. Die Analyse ergab: (1) den Indexieren mangelt es an Fachwissen, Vertrautheit mit den Indexierungssprachen und den Indexierungsregeln, so dass viele Inkonsistenzen verursacht wurden; (2) der Mangel an vereinheitlichten oder präzisen Regeln brachte ebenfalls Inkonsistenzen hervor; (3) verzögerte Überarbeitungen der Indexierungssprachen, Mangel an terminologischer Kontrolle, zu wenige Erläuterungen und "siehe auch" Referenzen, sowie die hohe semantische Freiheit bei der Auswahl von Deskriptoren oder Klassen, verursachten Inkonsistenzen.
  6. Gretz, M.; Thomas, M.: Indexierungen in biomedizinischen Literaturdatenbanken : eine vergleichende Analyse (1991) 0.00
    0.0011245848 = product of:
      0.017993357 = sum of:
        0.017993357 = weight(_text_:der in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017993357 = score(doc=5104,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.060132693 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026919862 = queryNorm
            0.29922754 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    Auf der Grundlage von vier Originaldokumenten, d.h. dokumentarischen Bezugseinheiten (DBEs), wird die Indexierung in vier biomedizinischen Online-Datenbanken (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS PREVIEWS, SCISEARCH) analysiert. Anhand von Beispielen werden inahltliche Erschließung, Indexierungstiefe, Indexierungsbreite, Indexierungskonsistenz, Präzision (durch syntaktisches Indexieren, Gewichtung, Proximity Operatoren) und Wiederauffindbarkeit (Recall) der in den Datenbanken gespeicherten Dokumentationseinheien (DBEs) untersucht. Die zeitaufwendigere intellektuelle Indexierung bei MEDLINE und EMBASE erweist sich als wesentlich präziser als die schneller verfügbare maschinelle Zuteilung von Deskriptoren in BIOSIS PREVIEWS und SCISEARCH. In Teil 1 der Untersuchung werden die Indexierungen in MEDLINE und EMBASE, in Teil 2 die Deskriptorenzuteilungen in BIOSIS PREVIEWS und SCISEARCH verglichen
  7. Cleverdon, C.W.: ¬The Cranfield tests on index language devices (1967) 0.00
    9.47546E-4 = product of:
      0.015160736 = sum of:
        0.015160736 = product of:
          0.045482207 = sum of:
            0.045482207 = weight(_text_:k in 1957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045482207 = score(doc=1957,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 1957, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1957)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.47-58.
  8. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.00
    9.1181736E-4 = product of:
      0.014589078 = sum of:
        0.014589078 = product of:
          0.043767232 = sum of:
            0.043767232 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043767232 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09426877 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
  9. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    6.1063725E-4 = product of:
      0.009770196 = sum of:
        0.009770196 = product of:
          0.014655294 = sum of:
            0.007360754 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007360754 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09469566 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
            0.0072945394 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0072945394 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09426877 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Arguing that catalogers need to work both quickly and accurately, Bade maintains that employing specialists is the most efficient and effective way to achieve this outcome. Far less compelling than these arguments are Bade's concluding remarks, in which he offers meager suggestions for correcting the problems as he sees them. Overall, this essay is little more than a curmudgeon's diatribe. Addressed primarily to catalogers and library administrators, the analysis presented is too superficial to assist practicing catalogers or cataloging managers in developing solutions to any systemic problems in current cataloging practice, and it presents too little evidence of pervasive problems to convince budget-conscious library administrators of a need to alter practice or to increase their investment in local cataloging operations. Indeed, the reliance upon anecdotal evidence and the apparent nit-picking that dominate the essay might tend to reinforce a negative image of catalogers in the minds of some. To his credit, Bade does provide an important reminder that it is the intellectual contributions made by thousands of erudite catalogers that have made shared cataloging a successful strategy for improving cataloging efficiency. This is an important point that often seems to be forgotten in academic libraries when focus centers an cutting costs. Had Bade focused more narrowly upon the issue of deintellectualization of cataloging and written a carefully structured essay to advance this argument, this essay might have been much more effective." - KO 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.236-237 (A. Sauperl)
  10. Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996) 0.00
    6.078783E-4 = product of:
      0.009726053 = sum of:
        0.009726053 = product of:
          0.029178157 = sum of:
            0.029178157 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029178157 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09426877 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
  11. Taghva, K.; Borsack, J.; Nartker, T.; Condit, A.: ¬The role of manually-assigned keywords in query expansion (2004) 0.00
    5.527352E-4 = product of:
      0.008843763 = sum of:
        0.008843763 = product of:
          0.026531288 = sum of:
            0.026531288 = weight(_text_:k in 2567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026531288 = score(doc=2567,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2567, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2567)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
  12. Biagetti, M.T.: Indexing and scientific research needs (2006) 0.00
    5.527352E-4 = product of:
      0.008843763 = sum of:
        0.008843763 = product of:
          0.026531288 = sum of:
            0.026531288 = weight(_text_:k in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026531288 = score(doc=235,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  13. Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990) 0.00
    5.318935E-4 = product of:
      0.008510296 = sum of:
        0.008510296 = product of:
          0.025530888 = sum of:
            0.025530888 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025530888 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09426877 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
  14. Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006) 0.00
    5.318935E-4 = product of:
      0.008510296 = sum of:
        0.008510296 = product of:
          0.025530888 = sum of:
            0.025530888 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025530888 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09426877 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    4. 1.2007 10:22:26
  15. Rodriguez Bravo, B.: ¬The visibility of women in indexing languages (2006) 0.00
    4.73773E-4 = product of:
      0.007580368 = sum of:
        0.007580368 = product of:
          0.022741104 = sum of:
            0.022741104 = weight(_text_:k in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022741104 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  16. Hudon, M.: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections (2004) 0.00
    4.6004713E-4 = product of:
      0.007360754 = sum of:
        0.007360754 = product of:
          0.022082262 = sum of:
            0.022082262 = weight(_text_:29 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022082262 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09469566 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 16:17:19
  17. Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005) 0.00
    4.5590868E-4 = product of:
      0.007294539 = sum of:
        0.007294539 = product of:
          0.021883616 = sum of:
            0.021883616 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021883616 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09426877 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    18. 6.2005 13:16:22
  18. Lu, K.; Mao, J.: ¬An automatic approach to weighted subject indexing : an empirical study in the biomedical domain (2015) 0.00
    3.948108E-4 = product of:
      0.006316973 = sum of:
        0.006316973 = product of:
          0.018950919 = sum of:
            0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 4005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018950919 = score(doc=4005,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4005, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4005)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
  19. Lu, K.; Mao, J.; Li, G.: Toward effective automated weighted subject indexing : a comparison of different approaches in different environments (2018) 0.00
    3.948108E-4 = product of:
      0.006316973 = sum of:
        0.006316973 = product of:
          0.018950919 = sum of:
            0.018950919 = weight(_text_:k in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018950919 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09609793 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
  20. Huffman, G.D.; Vital, D.A.; Bivins, R.G.: Generating indices with lexical association methods : term uniqueness (1990) 0.00
    3.8337262E-4 = product of:
      0.006133962 = sum of:
        0.006133962 = product of:
          0.018401885 = sum of:
            0.018401885 = weight(_text_:29 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018401885 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09469566 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026919862 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    23.11.1995 11:29:46