Search (381 results, page 1 of 20)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008) 0.03 
    0.028841147 = product of:
  0.09613715 = sum of:
    0.008884916 = weight(_text_:information in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008884916 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
    0.026380861 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026380861 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
    0.06087137 = sum of:
      0.035871506 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035871506 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
            0.030753274 = queryNorm
          0.278072 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.024999864 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024999864 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.030753274 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003) 0.03 
    0.025742413 = product of:
  0.08580804 = sum of:
    0.0062825847 = weight(_text_:information in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062825847 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
    0.018654086 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018654086 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
    0.06087137 = sum of:
      0.035871506 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035871506 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
            0.030753274 = queryNorm
          0.278072 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
      0.024999864 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024999864 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.030753274 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    First generation scholarly research on the Web lacked a firm system of authority control. Second generation Web research is beginning to model subject access with library science principles of bibliographic control and cataloguing. Harnessing the Web and organising the intellectual content with standards and controlled vocabulary provides precise search and retrieval capability, increasing relevance and efficient use of technology. Dublin Core metadata standards permit a full evaluation and cataloguing of Web resources appropriate to highly specific research needs and discovery. Current research points to a type of structure based on a system of faceted classification. This system allows the semantic and syntactic relationships to be defined. Controlled vocabulary, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, can be assigned, not in a hierarchical structure, but rather as descriptive facets of relating concepts. Web design features such as this are adding value to discovery and filtering out data that lack authority. The system design allows for scalability and extensibility, two technical features that are integral to future development of the digital library and resource discovery.
    Date
    30.12.2008 18:22:46
    Source
    Online information review. 27(2003) no.2, S.94-101
  3. Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017) 0.02 
    0.022102593 = product of:
  0.073675305 = sum of:
    0.007404097 = weight(_text_:information in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007404097 = score(doc=3524,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
    0.015545071 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015545071 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
    0.050726138 = sum of:
      0.02989292 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02989292 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
            0.030753274 = queryNorm
          0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
      0.02083322 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02083322 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.030753274 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    Tags (keywords freely assigned by users to describe web content) have become highly popular on Web 2.0 applications, because of the strong stimuli and easiness for users to create and describe their own content. This increase in tag popularity has led to a vast literature on tag recommendation methods. These methods aim at assisting users in the tagging process, possibly increasing the quality of the generated tags and, consequently, improving the quality of the information retrieval (IR) services that rely on tags as data sources. Regardless of the numerous and diversified previous studies on tag recommendation, to our knowledge, no previous work has summarized and organized them into a single survey article. In this article, we propose a taxonomy for tag recommendation methods, classifying them according to the target of the recommendations, their objectives, exploited data sources, and underlying techniques. Moreover, we provide a critical overview of these methods, pointing out their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we describe the main open challenges related to the field, such as tag ambiguity, cold start, and evaluation issues.
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:30:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.4, S.830-844
  4. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.02 
    0.01990502 = product of:
  0.066350065 = sum of:
    0.014509009 = weight(_text_:information in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014509009 = score(doc=4869,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
    0.03517448 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03517448 = score(doc=4869,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
    0.016666576 = product of:
      0.033333153 = sum of:
        0.033333153 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033333153 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.46-48
    Theme
    Information Gateway
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  5. Khoo, M.J.; Ahn, J.-w.; Binding, C.; Jones, H.J.; Lin, X.; Massam, D.; Tudhope, D.: Augmenting Dublin Core digital library metadata with Dewey Decimal Classification (2015) 0.02 
    0.019398976 = product of:
  0.06466325 = sum of:
    0.00418839 = weight(_text_:information in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00418839 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
    0.03976444 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03976444 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.23904754 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
    0.020710424 = product of:
      0.041420847 = sum of:
        0.041420847 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041420847 = score(doc=2320,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.3210899 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe a new approach to a well-known problem for digital libraries, how to search across multiple unrelated libraries with a single query. Design/methodology/approach - The approach involves creating new Dewey Decimal Classification terms and numbers from existing Dublin Core records. In total, 263,550 records were harvested from three digital libraries. Weighted key terms were extracted from the title, description and subject fields of each record. Ranked DDC classes were automatically generated from these key terms by considering DDC hierarchies via a series of filtering and aggregation stages. A mean reciprocal ranking evaluation compared a sample of 49 generated classes against DDC classes created by a trained librarian for the same records. Findings - The best results combined weighted key terms from the title, description and subject fields. Performance declines with increased specificity of DDC level. The results compare favorably with similar studies. Research limitations/implications - The metadata harvest required manual intervention and the evaluation was resource intensive. Future research will look at evaluation methodologies that take account of issues of consistency and ecological validity. Practical implications - The method does not require training data and is easily scalable. The pipeline can be customized for individual use cases, for example, recall or precision enhancing. Social implications - The approach can provide centralized access to information from multiple domains currently provided by individual digital libraries. Originality/value - The approach addresses metadata normalization in the context of web resources. The automatic classification approach accounts for matches within hierarchies, aggregating lower level matches to broader parents and thus approximates the practices of a human cataloger.
  6. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Power tags in information retrieval (2010) 0.02 
    0.019048478 = product of:
  0.06349493 = sum of:
    0.010470974 = weight(_text_:information in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010470974 = score(doc=865,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
    0.038077492 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038077492 = score(doc=865,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.40932083 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
    0.01494646 = product of:
      0.02989292 = sum of:
        0.02989292 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02989292 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Many Web 2.0 services (including Library 2.0 catalogs) make use of folksonomies. The purpose of this paper is to cut off all tags in the long tail of a document-specific tag distribution. The remaining tags at the beginning of a tag distribution are considered power tags and form a new, additional search option in information retrieval systems. Design/methodology/approach - In a theoretical approach the paper discusses document-specific tag distributions (power law and inverse-logistic shape), the development of such distributions (Yule-Simon process and shuffling theory) and introduces search tags (besides the well-known index tags) as a possibility for generating tag distributions. Findings - Search tags are compatible with broad and narrow folksonomies and with all knowledge organization systems (e.g. classification systems and thesauri), while index tags are only applicable in broad folksonomies. Based on these findings, the paper presents a sketch of an algorithm for mining and processing power tags in information retrieval systems. Research limitations/implications - This conceptual approach is in need of empirical evaluation in a concrete retrieval system. Practical implications - Power tags are a new search option for retrieval systems to limit the amount of hits. Originality/value - The paper introduces power tags as a means for enhancing the precision of search results in information retrieval systems that apply folksonomies, e.g. catalogs in Library 2.0environments.
  7. Rusch-Feja, D.: Subject oriented collection of information resources from the Internet (1997) 0.02 
    0.018949311 = product of:
  0.06316437 = sum of:
    0.018847754 = weight(_text_:information in 528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018847754 = score(doc=528,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.34911853 = fieldWeight in 528, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=528)
    0.026380861 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026380861 = score(doc=528,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 528, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=528)
    0.017935753 = product of:
      0.035871506 = sum of:
        0.035871506 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035871506 = score(doc=528,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.278072 = fieldWeight in 528, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=528)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    Subject oriented information sources on the Internet remain relativley unstructured despite attempts at indexing them and despite the use of search engines to index sources in a collective database and to retrieve relevant information sources. Describes the rationale for developing a means to capture and structure Internet resources for scientific research use in a clearinghouse, and methods for retrieval, information filtering, and structuring subject orientated information sources from the Internet for specific user groups. Discusses the issues of design, maintenance, implementation of metadata, and obtaining use feedback. Cooperation among several institutions involved in the German national subject special collections (SSG) library support programme of the DFG have led to recommendations to expand this programme to include coordination of collective Internet subject information sites. In addition to the compilation of subject oriented information sites on the Internet by library and information staff, connection to other value added services serve to make processes of information searching, retrieval, acquisition, and evaluation more effective for researchers
  8. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.02 
    0.018718302 = product of:
  0.062394336 = sum of:
    0.010470974 = weight(_text_:information in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010470974 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
    0.031090142 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031090142 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
    0.02083322 = product of:
      0.04166644 = sum of:
        0.04166644 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04166644 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  9. Strötgen, R.: Treatment of semantic heterogeneity using meta-data extraction and query translation (2002) 0.02 
    0.018620536 = product of:
  0.06206845 = sum of:
    0.010365736 = weight(_text_:information in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010365736 = score(doc=3595,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
    0.03077767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03077767 = score(doc=3595,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
    0.020925045 = product of:
      0.04185009 = sum of:
        0.04185009 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04185009 = score(doc=3595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.32441732 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    The project CARMEN ("Content Analysis, Retrieval and Metadata: Effective Networking") aimed - among other goals - at improving the expansion of searches in bibliographic databases into Internet searches. We pursued a set of different approaches to the treatment of semantic heterogeneity (meta-data extraction, query translation using statistic relations and Cross-concordances). This paper describes the concepts and implementation of these approaches and the evaluation of the impact for the retrieval result.
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  10. Christel, M.G.: Automated metadata in multimedia information systems : creation, refinement, use in surrogates, and evaluation (2009) 0.02 
    0.017092 = product of:
  0.056973334 = sum of:
    0.013851797 = weight(_text_:information in 3086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013851797 = score(doc=3086,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.256578 = fieldWeight in 3086, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3086)
    0.02198405 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02198405 = score(doc=3086,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 3086, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3086)
    0.021137487 = product of:
      0.042274974 = sum of:
        0.042274974 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 3086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042274974 = score(doc=3086,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.327711 = fieldWeight in 3086, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3086)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    Improvements in network bandwidth along with dramatic drops in digital storage and processing costs have resulted in the explosive growth of multimedia (combinations of text, image, audio, and video) resources on the Internet and in digital repositories. A suite of computer technologies delivering speech, image, and natural language understanding can automatically derive descriptive metadata for such resources. Difficulties for end users ensue, however, with the tremendous volume and varying quality of automated metadata for multimedia information systems. This lecture surveys automatic metadata creation methods for dealing with multimedia information resources, using broadcast news, documentaries, and oral histories as examples. Strategies for improving the utility of such metadata are discussed, including computationally intensive approaches, leveraging multimodal redundancy, folding in context, and leaving precision-recall tradeoffs under user control. Interfaces building from automatically generated metadata are presented, illustrating the use of video surrogates in multimedia information systems. Traditional information retrieval evaluation is discussed through the annual National Institute of Standards and Technology TRECVID forum, with experiments on exploratory search extending the discussion beyond fact-finding to broader, longer term search activities of learning, analysis, synthesis, and discovery.
    Content
    Table of Contents: Evolution of Multimedia Information Systems: 1990-2008 / Survey of Automatic Metadata Creation Methods / Refinement of Automatic Metadata / Multimedia Surrogates / End-User Utility for Metadata and Surrogates: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Satisfaction
    Series
    Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval & services
  11. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.02 
    0.01681431 = product of:
  0.0560477 = sum of:
    0.014509009 = weight(_text_:information in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014509009 = score(doc=4867,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
    0.024872115 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024872115 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
    0.016666576 = product of:
      0.033333153 = sum of:
        0.033333153 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033333153 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.35-39
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  12. Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998) 0.02 
    0.015820807 = product of:
  0.05273602 = sum of:
    0.016389668 = weight(_text_:information in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016389668 = score(doc=5165,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
    0.0217631 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0217631 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
    0.014583254 = product of:
      0.029166508 = sum of:
        0.029166508 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029166508 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    States that heterogeneous project groups today may be expected to use the mechanisms of the Web for sharing information. Metadata has been proposed as a mechanism for expressing the semantics of information and, hence, facilitate information retrieval, understanding and use. Presents an approach to sharing information which aims to use a semantic modeling language as the basis for expressing the semantics of information and designing metadata schemes. Functioning on the borderline between human and computer understandability, the modeling language would be able to express the semantics of published Web documents. Reporting on work in progress, presents the overall framework and ideas
    Date
    9. 9.2000 17:22:23
  13. Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998) 0.02 
    0.015807183 = product of:
  0.05269061 = sum of:
    0.0073296824 = weight(_text_:information in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073296824 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
    0.03077767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03077767 = score(doc=57,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
    0.014583254 = product of:
      0.029166508 = sum of:
        0.029166508 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029166508 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    Conceptual Knowledge Markup Language (CKML), an application of XML, is a new standard being promoted for the specification of online conceptual knowledge (Kent and Shrivastava, 1998). CKML follows the philosophy of Conceptual Knowledge Processing (Wille, 1982), a principled approach to knowledge representation and data analysis, which advocates the development of methodologies and techniques to support people in their rational thinking, judgement and actions. CKML was developed and is being used in the WAVE networked information discovery and retrieval system (Kent and Neuss, 1994) as a standard for the specification of conceptual knowledge
    Date
    30.12.2001 16:22:41
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  14. Craven, T.C.: Variations in use of meta tag descriptions by Web pages in different languages (2004) 0.02 
    0.015383491 = product of:
  0.076917455 = sum of:
    0.0073296824 = weight(_text_:information in 2569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073296824 = score(doc=2569,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2569, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2569)
    0.069587775 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069587775 = score(doc=2569,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16634533 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 2569, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2569)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    Sets of top-ranking pages in 20 languages returned by the Google search engine were downloaded and analyzed for presence of meta tag descriptions and lengths of descriptions. Results showed significant differences in proportion of pages with descriptions and in lengths of descriptions depending on language; specifically, pages in major Western European languages showed higher proportions with descriptions, while pages in Chinese showed the lowest proportions. Descriptions were mostly in the languages of the pages, though English descriptions were provided on some non-English pages. With few exceptions, coding schemes adopted for diacritics and non-Roman characters were standard.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.3, S.479-493
  15. Grün, S.; Poley, C: Statistische Analysen von Semantic Entities aus Metadaten- und Volltextbeständen von German Medical Science (2017) 0.02 
    0.015191438 = product of:
  0.050638124 = sum of:
    0.014048288 = weight(_text_:information in 5032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014048288 = score(doc=5032,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 5032, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5032)
    0.018654086 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018654086 = score(doc=5032,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5032, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5032)
    0.017935753 = product of:
      0.035871506 = sum of:
        0.035871506 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 5032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035871506 = score(doc=5032,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12900078 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.278072 = fieldWeight in 5032, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5032)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    This paper analyzes the information content of metadata and full texts in German Medical Science (GMS) articles in English language. The object of the study is to compare semantic entities that are used to enrich GMS metadata (titles and abstracts) and GMS full texts. The aim of the study is to test whether using full texts increases the value added information. The comparison and evaluation of semantic entities was done statistically. Measures of descriptive statistics were gathered for this purpose. In addition to the ratio of central tendencies and scatterings, we computed the overlaps and complements of the values. The results show a distinct increase of information when full texts are added. On average, metadata contain 25 different entities and full texts 215. 89% of the concepts in the metadata are also represented in the full texts. Hence, 11% of the metadata concepts are found in the metadata only. In summary, the results show that the addition of full texts increases the informational value, e.g. for information retrieval processes.
    Source
    GMS Medizin-Bibliothek-Information. 17(2017) no.3, S.1-5
  16. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.01 
    0.014712521 = product of:
  0.049041733 = sum of:
    0.012695382 = weight(_text_:information in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012695382 = score(doc=3283,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
    0.0217631 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0217631 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
    0.014583254 = product of:
      0.029166508 = sum of:
        0.029166508 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029166508 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 10th Metadata and Semantics Research Conference, MTSR 2016, held in Göttingen, Germany, in November 2016. The 26 full papers and 6 short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 67 submissions. The papers are organized in several sessions and tracks: Digital Libraries, Information Retrieval, Linked and Social Data, Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures, Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment, Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications, European and National Projects.
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
  17. NISO seeking comments : metadata for still images (2001) 0.01 
    0.013299557 = product of:
  0.06649779 = sum of:
    0.01675356 = weight(_text_:information in 3526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01675356 = score(doc=3526,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3526, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3526)
    0.04974423 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04974423 = score(doc=3526,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3526, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3526)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Source
    Information retrieval and library automation. 36(2001) no.10, S.11
  18. Hakala, J.: Dublin core in 1997 : a report from Dublin Core metadata workshops 4 & 5 (1998) 0.01 
    0.013102811 = product of:
  0.043676034 = sum of:
    0.0073296824 = weight(_text_:information in 2220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073296824 = score(doc=2220,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2220, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2220)
    0.0217631 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0217631 = score(doc=2220,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2220, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2220)
    0.014583254 = product of:
      0.029166508 = sum of:
        0.029166508 = weight(_text_:22 in 2220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029166508 = score(doc=2220,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2220, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2220)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    Creation of more and better metadata, or resource descriptions, is the best means to solve the problems of massive recall and lack of precision associated with Internet information retrieval. Dublin Core Metadata workshops aim to develop the resource descriptions. Describes the 4th workshop held in Canberra March 1997 and the 5th held in Oct. 1997 in Helsinki. DC-4 dealt with element structure with qualifiers language, scheme and type; extensibility issues; and element refinement. DC-5 dealt with element refinement and stability; definition of sub-elements and resource types; and sharing of Dublin Core implementation experiences, one of which is the Nordic Metadata project. The Nordic countries are now well prepared to implement useful new tools built by the Internet metadata community
    Source
    Nordinfo Nytt. 1997, nos.3/4, S.10-22
  19. Haynes, D.: Metadata for information management and retrieval : understanding metadata and its use (2018) 0.01 
    0.012692565 = product of:
  0.06346282 = sum of:
    0.017769832 = weight(_text_:information in 4096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017769832 = score(doc=4096,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 4096, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4096)
    0.04569299 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04569299 = score(doc=4096,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 4096, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4096)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    This new and updated second edition of a classic text provides a thought-provoking introduction to metadata for all library and information students and professionals. Metadata for Information Management and Retrieval has been fully revised by David Haynes to bring it up to date with new technology and standards. The new edition, containing new chapters on Metadata Standards and Encoding Schemes, assesses the current theory and practice of metadata and examines key developments in terms of both policy and technology. Coverage includes: an introduction to the concept of metadata a description of the main components of metadata systems and standards an overview of the scope of metadata and its applications a description of typical information retrieval issues in corporate and research environments a demonstration of ways in which metadata is used to improve retrieval a look at ways in which metadata is used to manage information consideration of the role of metadata in information governance.
    RSWK
    Informationsmanagement / Information Retrieval / Metadatenmodell
    Subject
    Informationsmanagement / Information Retrieval / Metadatenmodell
  20. Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018) 0.01 
    0.011941427 = product of:
  0.039804757 = sum of:
    0.007404097 = weight(_text_:information in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007404097 = score(doc=4218,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05398669 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
    0.02198405 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02198405 = score(doc=4218,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030753274 = queryNorm
        0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
    0.01041661 = product of:
      0.02083322 = sum of:
        0.02083322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02083322 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107692726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030753274 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(3/10)
    Abstract
    The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.5, S.633-646

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 332
  • el 41
  • m 24
  • s 16
  • n 4
  • b 2
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications