Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.02
    0.017483998 = product of:
      0.034967996 = sum of:
        0.01870013 = product of:
          0.07480052 = sum of:
            0.07480052 = weight(_text_:learning in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07480052 = score(doc=2889,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15317118 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.48834592 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.016267868 = product of:
          0.032535736 = sum of:
            0.032535736 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032535736 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Als dynamische und einfache Form der Auszeichnung von Ressourcen kann sich Tagging im E-Learning positiv auf Partizipation, soziale Navigation und das Verständnis der Lernenden auswirken. Dieser Beitrag beleuchtet verschiedene Möglichkeiten des Einsatzes von Social Tagging in Lehrportalen und E-LearningKursen. Hierzu werden zunächst drei konkrete Anwendungsfälle dargestellt. Anschließend werden aus den Anwendungsfällen gewonnene Erkenntnisse für Lehr-/Lernszenarien zusammengefasst.
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  2. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.01
    0.012488572 = product of:
      0.024977144 = sum of:
        0.013357237 = product of:
          0.053428948 = sum of:
            0.053428948 = weight(_text_:learning in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053428948 = score(doc=2648,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15317118 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.34881854 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.011619906 = product of:
          0.023239812 = sum of:
            0.023239812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023239812 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The growing predominance of social semantics in the form of tagging presents the metadata community with both opportunities and challenges as for leveraging this new form of information content representation and for retrieval. One key challenge is the absence of contextual information associated with these tags. This paper presents an experiment working with Flickr tags as an example of utilizing social semantics sources for enriching subject metadata. The procedure included four steps: 1) Collecting a sample of Flickr tags, 2) Calculating cooccurrences between tags through mutual information, 3) Tracing contextual information of tag pairs via Google search results, 4) Applying natural language processing and machine learning techniques to extract semantic relations between tags. The experiment helped us to build a context sentence collection from the Google search results, which was then processed by natural language processing and machine learning algorithms. This new approach achieved a reasonably good rate of accuracy in assigning semantic relations to tag pairs. This paper also explores the implications of this approach for using social semantics to enrich subject metadata.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  3. Komus, A.; Wauch, F.: Wikimanagement : was Unternehmen von Social-Software und Web 2.0 lernen können (2008) 0.01
    0.010306083 = product of:
      0.04122433 = sum of:
        0.04122433 = product of:
          0.08244866 = sum of:
            0.08244866 = weight(_text_:lernen in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08244866 = score(doc=508,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19222628 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6033173 = idf(docFreq=442, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.42891464 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.6033173 = idf(docFreq=442, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Wie schaffen es hunderttausende Menschen in ihrer Freizeit eine Enzyklopädie zu erstellen, die in der Qualität der seit Jahrhunderten renommierten Brockhaus-Enzyklopädie in nichts nachsteht und in der Quantität weit übertrifft? Warum veröffentlichen Millionen von Internetnutzern ihre Urlaubsbilder und Videos aus dem privaten Leben im Netz? Wieso funktioniert die Informationsversorgung durch Touristen und Privatleute oftmals besser als die Berichterstattung der großen Agenturen? Und warum versprechen sich Unternehmen wie Google oder die Holtzbrinck Gruppe so viel von derartigen Plattformen, dass deren Gründer über Nacht zu Millionären werden? Wie schaffte es eine australische Brauerei, vom Business Plan bis zur Produktionsplanung alle Prozesse von einer Internet-Community entwickeln zu lassen? Wie passt die lose Kollaboration im Netz zu mühsam ausgearbeiteten und über viele Jahrzehnte untersuchten Organisationsmodellen in Unternehmen? Was können Unternehmen von Wikipedia & Co lernen? Wikimanagement gibt nicht nur einen ausführlichen Überblick über die aktuelle Welt des Web 2.0, sondern stellt auch die Funktionsweise der Wikipedia und anderer Social Software-Systeme den wichtigsten organisationstheoretischen Ansätzen gegenüber. In Anwendungsfeldern wie Innovation, Projektmanagement, Marketing und vielen anderen wird deutlich gemacht, wie Unternehmen von Social Software-Technologie und -Philosophie lernen und profitieren können.
  4. Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008) 0.01
    0.008425959 = product of:
      0.016851919 = sum of:
        0.0075559937 = product of:
          0.030223975 = sum of:
            0.030223975 = weight(_text_:learning in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030223975 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15317118 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.19732155 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.009295925 = product of:
          0.01859185 = sum of:
            0.01859185 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01859185 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Social tagging empowers users to categorize content in a personally meaningful way while harnessing their potential to contribute to a collaborative construction of knowledge (Vander Wal, 2007). In addition, social tagging systems offer innovative filtering mechanisms that facilitate resource discovery and browsing (Mathes, 2004). As a result, social tags may support online communication, informal or intended learning as well as the development of online communities. The purpose of this mixed methods study is to examine how undergraduate students participate in social tagging activities in order to learn about their motivations, behaviours and practices. A better understanding of their knowledge, habits and interactions with such systems will help practitioners and developers identify important factors when designing enhancements. In the first phase of the study, students enrolled at a Canadian university completed 103 questionnaires. Quantitative results focusing on general familiarity with social tagging, frequently used Web 2.0 sites, and the purpose for engaging in social tagging activities were compiled. Eight questionnaire respondents participated in follow-up semi-structured interviews that further explored tagging practices by situating questionnaire responses within concrete experiences using popular websites such as YouTube, Facebook, Del.icio.us, and Flickr. Preliminary results of this study echo findings found in the growing literature concerning social tagging from the fields of computer science (Sen et al., 2006) and information science (Golder & Huberman, 2006; Macgregor & McCulloch, 2006). Generally, two classes of social taggers emerge: those who focus on tagging for individual purposes, and those who view tagging as a way to share or communicate meaning to others. Heavy del.icio.us users, for example, were often focused on simply organizing their own content, and seemed to be conscientiously maintaining their own personally relevant categorizations while, in many cases, placing little importance on the tags of others. Conversely, users tagging items primarily to share content preferred to use specific terms to optimize retrieval and discovery by others. Our findings should inform practitioners of how interaction design can be tailored for different tagging systems applications, and how these findings are positioned within the current debate surrounding social tagging among the resource discovery community. We also hope to direct future research in the field to place a greater importance on exploring the benefits of tagging as a socially-driven endeavour rather than uniquely as a means of managing information.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  5. Vander Wal, T.: Welcome to the Matrix! (2008) 0.01
    0.008425959 = product of:
      0.016851919 = sum of:
        0.0075559937 = product of:
          0.030223975 = sum of:
            0.030223975 = weight(_text_:learning in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030223975 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15317118 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.19732155 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.009295925 = product of:
          0.01859185 = sum of:
            0.01859185 = weight(_text_:22 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01859185 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    My keynote at the workshop "Social Tagging in Knowledge Organization" was a great opportunity to make and share new experiences. For the first time ever, I sat in my office at home and gave a live web video presentation to a conference audience elsewhere on the globe. At the same time, it was also an opportunity to premier my conceptual model "Matrix of Perception" to an interdisciplinary audience of researchers and practitioners with a variety of backgrounds - reaching from philosophy, psychology, pedagogy and computation to library science and economics. The interdisciplinary approach of the conference is also mirrored in the structure of this volume, with articles on the theoretical background, the empirical analysis and the potential applications of tagging, for instance in university libraries, e-learning, or e-commerce. As an introduction to the topic of "social tagging" I would like to draw your attention to some foundation concepts of the phenomenon I have racked my brain with for the last few month. One thing I have seen missing in recent research and system development is a focus on the variety of user perspectives in social tagging. Different people perceive tagging in complex variegated ways and use this form of knowledge organization for a variety of purposes. My analytical interest lies in understanding the personas and patterns in tagging systems and in being able to label their different perceptions. To come up with a concise picture of user expectations, needs and activities, I have broken down the perspectives on tagging into two different categories, namely "faces" and "depth". When put together, they form the "Matrix of Perception" - a nuanced view of stakeholders and their respective levels of participation.
    Date
    22. 6.2009 9:15:45
  6. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.00
    0.0046479623 = product of:
      0.01859185 = sum of:
        0.01859185 = product of:
          0.0371837 = sum of:
            0.0371837 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0371837 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.15-22
  7. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.00
    0.004108257 = product of:
      0.016433029 = sum of:
        0.016433029 = product of:
          0.032866057 = sum of:
            0.032866057 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032866057 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  8. Kuchler, T.; Pawlowski, J.M.; Zimmermann, V.: Social Tagging and Open Content : a concept for the future of e-learning and knowledge management? (2008) 0.00
    0.004007171 = product of:
      0.016028684 = sum of:
        0.016028684 = product of:
          0.064114735 = sum of:
            0.064114735 = weight(_text_:learning in 2892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064114735 = score(doc=2892,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15317118 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.41858223 = fieldWeight in 2892, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2892)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Open Content is a promising concept for e-learning and knowledge management. It can improve sharing and re-using educational resources and create new business opportunities. However, in contrast to open source software, these opportunities have not yet been adopted by a wide community. This article discusses barriers and opportunities. The Content Explosion Model shows how content can be re-used and adapted to increase sharing and distributing Open Content. Social tagging is discussed, on the basis of an implementation example (SLIDESTAR), as a means of fostering content exchange on a content community platform.
  9. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.00
    0.0034859716 = product of:
      0.013943886 = sum of:
        0.013943886 = product of:
          0.027887773 = sum of:
            0.027887773 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027887773 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  10. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.00
    0.0034859716 = product of:
      0.013943886 = sum of:
        0.013943886 = product of:
          0.027887773 = sum of:
            0.027887773 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027887773 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.00
    0.0034859716 = product of:
      0.013943886 = sum of:
        0.013943886 = product of:
          0.027887773 = sum of:
            0.027887773 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027887773 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.00
    0.0034859716 = product of:
      0.013943886 = sum of:
        0.013943886 = product of:
          0.027887773 = sum of:
            0.027887773 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027887773 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  13. Hidderley, R.; Rafferty, P.: Flickr and democratic indexing : disciplining desire lines (2006) 0.00
    0.0033057472 = product of:
      0.013222989 = sum of:
        0.013222989 = product of:
          0.052891955 = sum of:
            0.052891955 = weight(_text_:learning in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052891955 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15317118 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.3453127 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  14. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.00
    0.0029049765 = product of:
      0.011619906 = sum of:
        0.011619906 = product of:
          0.023239812 = sum of:
            0.023239812 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023239812 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  15. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.00
    0.0029049765 = product of:
      0.011619906 = sum of:
        0.011619906 = product of:
          0.023239812 = sum of:
            0.023239812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023239812 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  16. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.00
    0.0029049765 = product of:
      0.011619906 = sum of:
        0.011619906 = product of:
          0.023239812 = sum of:
            0.023239812 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023239812 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  17. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.00
    0.0029049765 = product of:
      0.011619906 = sum of:
        0.011619906 = product of:
          0.023239812 = sum of:
            0.023239812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023239812 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
  18. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.00
    0.0029049765 = product of:
      0.011619906 = sum of:
        0.011619906 = product of:
          0.023239812 = sum of:
            0.023239812 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023239812 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  19. Simon, J.: Interdisciplinary knowledge creation : using wikis in science (2006) 0.00
    0.002361248 = product of:
      0.009444992 = sum of:
        0.009444992 = product of:
          0.03777997 = sum of:
            0.03777997 = weight(_text_:learning in 2516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03777997 = score(doc=2516,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15317118 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.24665193 = fieldWeight in 2516, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2516)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  20. DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008) 0.00
    0.0023239811 = product of:
      0.009295925 = sum of:
        0.009295925 = product of:
          0.01859185 = sum of:
            0.01859185 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01859185 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120133065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0343058 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

Languages

  • e 16
  • d 5

Types